John Kerry To Resign as Democratic Nominee

[ajwps]

John Kerry has a long and well-documented history of providing "aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of war -- particularly in the case of North Vietnam. Kerry. By his own account, Kerry violated the UCMJ, the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer, and he further stands in violation of Article three, Section three of the U.S. Constitution which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare.

Thus, in accordance with the Constitution's Fourteenth
Amendment, Section 3, which states,

"No person shall be a
Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President
and Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged
in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
comfort to the enemies thereof,"

We, the People of the United States, demand that Kerry resign his seat in the Senate.

Please join fellow Democrats and Republicans then sign the petition demanding John Kerry's resignation.

Link to --

http://PatriotPetitions.US/Kerry

 

[acludem]

This was written to keep former Confederate officers out of political offices by the Radical Republicans in the 1860s. Come on...is Bush really that scared?

acludem

 

[DKSuddeth]

other than protesting after his tour, you'll have to point out the specific instances where he engaged in insurrection, rebellion, or gave 'aid and comfort'.

 

[nycflasher]

I smell cowpucky.

 

[Annie]

Originally posted by acludem
This was written to keep former Confederate officers out of political offices by the Radical Republicans in the 1860s. Come on...is Bush really that scared?

acludem

Admitted, there are loons on our side too, just not enough of them to make a whole new party! :

 

[ajwps]

Originally posted by acludem
This was written to keep former Confederate officers out of political offices by the Radical Republicans in the 1860s. Come on...is Bush really that scared?

acludem

I'm sorry but I must have missed that part of the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3 limitingthis article to only former Confederate officers out of political office by the northern Union in 1860. Come on do you really want a traitor who gave comfort to those engaged in a POLICE ACTION which resulted in more than 60,000 American soldiers!

Could you please point out this very significant reference

 

[ajwps]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
other than protesting after his tour, you'll have to point out the specific instances where he engaged in insurrection, rebellion, or gave 'aid and comfort'.

So done. Other than giving aid and comfort to those who killed more than 60,000 American servicemen the following gives voice to why John Kerry fits into the US Constitution's stating that traitors or those who give aid and comfort to America cannot serve as Congressman, Senator, Vice President or President.

http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=6576

Kerry’s post-Vietnam service has proven that he will side with America’s enemies and betray our troops. Not only did the VietCong credit Kerry’s ''Vietnam Veteran’s Against the War'' with enabling the communists to win, but Kerry accused American soldiers of war crimes before the United States Congress. More recently, Kerry voted against funding our soldiers in Iraq. Kerry explained, ''I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.'' Kerry’s arrogance is such that he believes the voters too stupid to understand that a vote against funding our troops is actually a vote against funding our troops!

Kerry’s aid and comfort to the VietCong shows that he will side with our enemies, so who are those foreign leaders?

Kim Jong Il, the communist dictator of North Korea, broadcasts Kerry’s speeches on Radio Pyongyang along with his glowing commentary.

Jean Bertrand-Aristide, Haiti's ousted dictator. Kerry told the New York Times he would have intervened to keep Aristide in power.

Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, Spain’s new anti-war socialist prime minister, has endorsed John Kerry for president.

Mahathir Mohamad, former prime minister of Malaysia, said, ''I think Kerry would be much more willing to listen to the voices of people and of the rest of the world.'' Mahathir is a renowned anti-Semite.

Yasser Arafat, whom John Kerry described as a ''statesman'' and a ''role model'' in his 1997 book, ''The New War.''

Presumably Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan dictator, who opposes President Bush, and Fidel Castro, whom Kerry has openly praised are Kerry boosters--Kerry won’t say.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38535

"More than any other person, John Kerry is responsible for the false image of Vietnam veterans as dysfunctional misfits," Bailey said in a statement. "Kerry betrayed all of us when he returned from Vietnam.

"A lot of good people opposed the war, but some, like John Kerry, went too far. He joined the radical left wing of the anti-war movement and shared the microphone with Jane Fonda and other radicals. He promoted himself by telling unforgivable lies about Vietnam servicemen and women, and he did this under oath."

Kerry testified before U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee 1971, making horrific claims about alleged atrocities committed by American service members.

What about Kerry's claim he helped end the war?

Responded Bailey: "What unmitigated chutzpah! The truth is that the actions he took gave aid and comfort to those who were killing America's sons and daughters. He encouraged our enemies to rebuild and hang on when they were near defeat, as they were after the Tet Offensive in 1968. Did you know our POWs had John Kerry's words quoted to them by their interrogators?"

Bailey says Kerry helped to spread a "negative stereotype" of Vietnam veterans that was exploited in movies and on TV.

"The truth long ago was that we fought with honor and courage, and we won every significant battle," Bailey said. "The truth now is that we are doctors, lawyers, factory workers, nurses, small-business owners, corporate executives, carpenters and pretty much your neighbor or your friend at church, and very patriotic. We are not and never have been the crazed killers we have been portrayed to be for so many years in movies and on TV, in part, because of Kerry's lies."

Bailey says the event is not partisan and that all Vietnam vets are welcome: "We just want the country to know that America's sons and daughters served honorably and well in Vietnam, and the bad things John Kerry said about them have never been true."

As WorldNetDaily reported, earlier this month a group of Kerry's colleagues from the war gathered to denounce his fitness for the land's highest office, saying that during the war he was a "loose cannon." The group represented the organization Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

"The Swift Boat guys are challenging Kerry's fitness for office based on his lies and his Vietnam service," commented Garlock, "and they are qualified to do that since they served with him. Our new VVT organization is not challenging Kerry's Vietnam service. We are going to tell the good news stories about Vietnam vets at our rally and how America should have welcomed them home with pride and gratitude. We will contrast that truth with the lies told about them by John Kerry."

In an open letter to Kerry, the new group tells the candidate: "You should have been our brother, Sen. Kerry, but when you returned from Vietnam you betrayed us. America does not yet understand the depth of that betrayal. We believe that before voters in this country have the opportunity to elect you to the office of commander in chief, they deserve to know the truth, and they deserve to hear some answers from you."

The letter poses 16 specific questions to Kerry that challenge him to explain the statements he has made about those who fought for the U.S. in Vietnam.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=8328

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by ajwps
So done. Other than giving aid and comfort to those who killed more than 60,000 American servicemen the following gives voice to why John Kerry fits into the US Constitution's stating that traitors or those who give aid and comfort to America cannot serve as Congressman, Senator, Vice President or President.

Out of all this crap you posted, I saw nowhere that kerry gave 'aid and comfort'. Now, if you wish to redefine 'aid and comfort' as protesting a war effort, give it a try. You'll most likely fail.

Nowhere did kerry give the enemy weapons, ammo, armor, or shelter and refuge from enemy forces.

 

[ajwps]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
Out of all this crap you posted, I saw nowhere that kerry gave 'aid and comfort'. Now, if you wish to redefine 'aid and comfort' as protesting a war effort, give it a try. You'll most likely fail.

Nowhere did kerry give the enemy weapons, ammo, armor, or shelter and refuge from enemy forces.

If you mean that Kerry 'aid and comfort' also included shooting his own American comrades or poisoned American troops, then I can't prove he abetted the enemie combatants of America men and women.

Your redefintion of 'aid and comfort to the enemy's of America' are well enumerated and documented. If the enemy that kills our own soldiers take solace in his actions and words which increases their willingness to press on even when they are losing the war must have a definition. Kerry's serious 'paperclip' scratches did not leave him physically handicapped nor is there any evidence that his actions saved lives. His rather short stay in Vietnam and later as an assistant to some naval officer is evidence of his brave and honorable service in Vietnam.

I suggest you read my prior post for his feelings toward American interests and now his wife's charitable contributions to terrorist organizations and anti-American groups are telling of one who wants the post of leader of the free world and commander in chief of the American armed services.

He is no joke, he is a traitor whose judgement is directed to those who would destroy this free land.

What do you call it?

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by ajwps
If you mean that Kerry 'aid and comfort' also included shooting his own American comrades or poisoned American troops, then I can't prove he abetted the enemie combatants of America men and women.

Your redefintion of 'aid and comfort to the enemy's of America' are well enumerated and documented. If the enemy that kills our own soldiers take solace in his actions and words which increases their willingness to press on even when they are losing the war must have a definition. Kerry's serious 'paperclip' scratches did not leave him physically handicapped nor is there any evidence that his actions saved lives. His rather short stay in Vietnam and later as an assistant to some naval officer is evidence of his brave and honorable service in Vietnam.

I suggest you read my prior post for his feelings toward American interests and now his wife's charitable contributions to terrorist organizations and anti-American groups are telling of one who wants the post of leader of the free world and commander in chief of the American armed services.

He is no joke, he is a traitor whose judgement is directed to those who would destroy this free land.

What do you call it?

you've given the very long winded version of something I will give an equally matched short version of.

kerry was a lousy naval officer and is a ridiculous joke as a senator, much less even being president.

 

[insein]

Originally posted by ajwps
John Kerry has a long and well-documented history of providing "aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of war -- particularly in the case of North Vietnam. Kerry. By his own account, Kerry violated the UCMJ, the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer, and he further stands in violation of Article three, Section three of the U.S. Constitution which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare.

Thus, in accordance with the Constitution's Fourteenth
Amendment, Section 3, which states,

We, the People of the United States, demand that Kerry resign his seat in the Senate.

Please join fellow Democrats and Republicans then sign the petition demanding John Kerry's resignation.

Link to --

http://PatriotPetitions.US/Kerry

I want Kerry to run. when it comes time for the debates, he's going to be exposed. They keep trying to hide him now by showing Clinton or honoring Teddy at the DNC, but sooner or later the people will see first hand what an arrogant ass this guy is. Thats when it'll be a landslide for Bush.

 

[nycflasher]

Originally posted by insein
I want Kerry to run. when it comes time for the debates, he's going to be exposed. They keep trying to hide him now by showing Clinton or honoring Teddy at the DNC, but sooner or later the people will see first hand what an arrogant ass this guy is. Thats when it'll be a landslide for Bush.

Bush is going to be killed in a landslide? huh?

 

[Annie]

Originally posted by nycflasher
Bush is going to be killed in a landslide? huh?

Ya know Flasher, I think and hope that this election will be decisive. I hope it goes for Bush, I think his stake in history is sealed, for the good, but either way, I do hope it's a landslide.

Doesn't matter which side, let the people be heard. I'm hoping it's not a repeat of a version of chads, seriously.

 

[ajwps]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
you've given the very long winded version of something I will give an equally matched short version of.

kerry was a lousy naval officer and is a ridiculous joke as a senator, much less even being president.

Great shortened version of the obvious.

 

[Annie]

Originally posted by ajwps
Great shortened version of the obvious.

Dam, I have to agree with this. Dk, dam!

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Kerry gave false testimony to congress, swaying public opinion and demoralizing troops. Propaganda is part of war. I agree he should go.

 

[pegwinn]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
other than protesting after his tour, you'll have to point out the specific instances where he engaged in insurrection, rebellion, or gave 'aid and comfort'.

Why did you say "other than"?
He was still a naval officer at that time. His actions do in fact and in spirit constitute sedition at a minimum and could be easily construed as giving aid and comfort.

http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2004/04/john_kerrys_dat.html