John Jesus McCain

[Flanders]

If the election was held next Tuesday Mitt Romney would cruise on in. This is the fear Republicans live with: By the time November rolls around Romney might turn a lock into a loss. Tea Partiers are rightly more concerned over Senate races.

Michael Savage lays out Romney’s road to defeat if he does not change his wicked ways. Click on the link. Then click on “add videos.” Start the videos playing by clicking on Savage’s picture:

Michael Savage: Romney following McCain's losing strategy - Worldnews.com

I especially enjoyed the third video (46 seconds) because liberals go nuts when I say Hussein. Savage points out that liberals would have a diarrhea fit if McCain’s middle name was Jesus. I couldn’t resist using it for my title. It’s a funny bit and right on the money. Check Al Gore’s popping eyeballs.

Savage makes his case by mixing McCain’s disaster with Romney’s campaign. I can only find fault with one thing. Savage puts too much emphasis on Jeremiah Wright:

The political gurus who advised Mitt Romney to condemn a plan by a “super PAC” to use Barack Obama’s influential relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright against him in the 2012 campaign will lead the presumed Republican nominee to the same fate as John McCain four years ago, said talk-radio host Michael Savage.

Everybody knows about Hussein and Wright. It does not make a dent because of this:

Romney said the nation needs “to come together to recognize that even though we have differing views about the country and about where we should go, we all love the country.”

“I’m not going to say outrageous things about the president or about my opponents,” the former governor emphasized.

Romney talks grand themes but he can’t get conservative Tea Partiers to line up behind him. That’s because Romney has no more to offer them than did Hussein and McCain in 2008; so he is falling back on “Let’s all unite behind me.” They all sound like Dumas’ musketeers “One for all and all for one.” Dumas’ musketeers were loyal to their king. One assumes our musketeers are swearing loyalty to the federal government rather than the country.

Note the similarity in campaign strategies. McCain would not attack Hussein, while Hussein was saying collectivism would unite the country under his moral leadership. Following a loser’s lead, Romney will not attack Hussein, but he is preaching patriotism which is not Hussein’s strong suit. The truth: Hussein already portrayed the country; Romney can’t wait to do it.

Every wannabe plays the “come together” card. Should one of them get away with it they will have a mandate to screw the country big time. The people in the federal government have been betraying this country every way from Sunday without passing themselves off as moral leaders; so what do you think a character who “unites the country” can get away with? The possibilities are endless. That is why they all sell themselves as unifiers.

Hussein tried to establish himself as a moral leader. That was his shtick. He failed and his “moral leadership” is not enough to cover the results of his lies. Democrats need not worry —— Romney has Hussein’s back as the saying goes.

Every hustling preacher that ever lived fed off their flocks by convincing them that they, the preachers, are morally superior. Hussein is a piece of work right out of the Preacher’s Guidebook to Sheep Shearing. He convinced millions that he is a morally superior human being. In so doing he was clever enough to manipulate every branch of government and the media into covering for him, but he was not clever enough to fool everyone. Without total acceptance going for him his hustle fell apart.

Now ask yourself why is Romney using the same “come together” rhetoric? Not only the same crap Hussein pulled, Romney speaks in meaningless platitudes as did Hussein:

After the interview, Savage told a caller, however, that Romney says “nothing about so many of the issues that plague us today.”

“Mitt Romney speaks in platitudes,” Savage said. “He speaks in platitudes like a kid running for the presidency of a high school class.”

Michael Savage: Romney following McCain's losing strategy
GOP's 2008 nominee was unwilling to confront Obama on character
Published: 1 day ago

Michael Savage: Romney following McCain’s losing strategy

Everybody knows that Romney will create jobs because he told us he would, but have you ever heard him say how he intends to do it? or if those jobs will be government jobs? or if those jobs will be labeled private sector jobs when they are funded with tax dollars à la Hussein’s green energy jobs?

In any event, Romney’s economic talk is pure crap because he will do exactly what Congress tells him to do; i.e., more of the same.

Forget the economy. Tea Partiers should get answers about Romney’s foreign policy before they even consider voting for him? He’s a New World Order guy; so he will continue selling out the country to the United Nations irrespective of his patriotic double-talk. That’s a forgone conclusion. This is where President Romney might be forced to expose his less than patriotic positions:

As it becomes clearer that the 2012 elections are going to be a landslide victory for the Tea Parties, We, the People and America, and a major defeat for Big Government socialism, the Senate, like Obama The Kenyan, are going into full Damage Creation mode. I have mentioned before that there are several incredibly dangerous, sovereignty-destroying U.N. treaties hidden in the wings, just waiting for the traitors in the Senate to ratify. That great patriot and Swift Boat Hero from his four whole months in Vietnam, John Kerry (R-MA), has vowed to get them onto the Senate floor for votes as soon, he hopes, as this summer. They include:

∙ The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS or LOST, “Law of the Sea), which cedes control of all the world’s oceans and their contents, including our territorial waters, to the U.N.;
∙ The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, aka, Small Arms Treaty, that would virtually outlaw privately owned firearms or ammunition of any sort;
∙ The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which takes away parental rights to raise their children as they choose, and gives them to the U.N.;
∙ The International Criminal Court, which allows foreigners to have Americans arrested and tried in kangaroo “international” courts, using foreign law;
∙.The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which destroys, among many other things, marriage;
∙ And a host of outrageous environmental treaties that would doom most of the world’s people to Third-World level poverty in a world-wide police state.

Sack the Senate
Michael Oberndorf, RPA Friday, May 18, 2012

Sack the Senate

Here’s the question Romney needs to answer in plain English: Where do you stand on those treaties should the Senate remain in Democrat hands? As far as I know he has never said a word about opposing anything the United Nations wants.

Finally, let me point out that John Kerry inherited the title Biggest Traitor in the Senate. Ted Kennedy is dead, Biden is vice president, and Lugar will be gone come January. There are still plenty of Democrat and RINO traitors waiting to ratify UN treaties before or after the Senate changes hands. One thing stands out like a sore thumb. Ratifying UN treaties looks a hell of a lot more patriotic when a Republican does it.

 

[Salt Jones]

Romney will lose and Savage is a self-hating Jew, hence the name change.

 

[whitehall]

Savage is a bit overblown and it's funny that libs never quote him except when they get marching orders from the tax exempt propaganda entity that never sleeps, Media Matters. I don't pay much attention to Savage but I'm beginning to believe he was right when he said "liberalism is a mental illness".