John Boehner's Surrebuttal of 7/25/11

[Avatar4321]

Did he cry?

Why does it matter?

What exactly is wrong with crying?

It doesn't inspire confidence.

From a person in the leadership position, it's paralyzing.

In the context of a person in a leadership position during a crisis...yeech!

Funny, I think the exactly opposite. After all, Jesus Christ was the greatest leader of all time. And Jesus wept openly.

 

[candycorn]

Why does it matter?

What exactly is wrong with crying?

It doesn't inspire confidence.

From a person in the leadership position, it's paralyzing.

In the context of a person in a leadership position during a crisis...yeech!

Funny, I think the exactly opposite. After all, Jesus Christ was the greatest leader of all time. And Jesus wept openly.

Senator,

I know Jesus Christ,

I have worked with Jesus Christ

Jesus Christ is a friend of mine...

Speaker Boehner is no Jesus Christ

 

[Mr. Shaman]

John Boehner's Surrebuttal of 7/25/2011

What think you?

He did make sure....

....Boss Hog cleared it....

....first.
​

 

[pete]

What was it ... Americans have credit card debt and its manageable, but this is different .. !?
No its not its the same thing and also manageable, but they don't want to give up their own ideas
2.5 years of spending has done NOTHING ... and as a Homer ... DOH !!!!

 

[California Girl]

Funny how that wasn't my perception.

I usually prefer reality to perception.

 

[Sallow]

It's funny yet sad at the same time that our potus can't keep up with current events.

The "grand bargain" has been dead for awhile now Mr prez. He said any deal w/o taxes isn't balanced. Apparently he forgot to tell Harry that cause his senate bill has 0 revenues.

He's so stupid, he talks highly of the speaker in one sentence then insults him in the next. Yet expects him to come back to negotiate with him. Tool, you've been benched. Let the big boys iron out the problems.

It's all Boooooosh and those pesky responsible gopers

Well the Republicans did the same thing with Clinton. They also shut down government.

So when a Democrat is elected President..it's okay for Republicans to ignore him?

But when a Republican is elected President..Democrats have to treat him..um..like a President?

And it was bad..when a foreign leader came to congress, insulted our President..to the cheers of Republicans..and when a foreign leader came to the UN, insulted our President, DEMOCRATS went on the air to defend him.

Gosh.

Republicans..are showing..they have no business in government.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Why does it matter?

What exactly is wrong with crying?

It doesn't inspire confidence.

From a person in the leadership position, it's paralyzing.

In the context of a person in a leadership position during a crisis...yeech!

Funny, I think the exactly opposite. After all, Jesus Christ was the greatest leader of all time.

It must have driven you half-crazy, to find-out He was more-than-likely DARK-SKINNED.

 

[BDBoop]

And Jesus wept openly.

1) Not everywhere

2) Not all the time

3) Not at the wedding of Canaa, when he'd had one too many bottles of Merlot*

*See "John Boehner"

 

[Liability]

I personally find it kind of funny that Boehner is so easily made to show emotions over "touching" personal matters.

Suck it up, man.

On the other hand, the liberal chorus mocks him totally out of proportion to the "offense."

They have nothing else.

When confronted by the stark contrast of the President's deliberate prime time lies versus the Speaker's prime time rebuttal, the libbies know they lose. Ergo, the matter of Mr. Boehner's proclivity to show emotion too easily becomes the necessary deflection.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It's funny yet sad at the same time that our potus can't keep up with current events.

The "grand bargain" has been dead for awhile now Mr prez. He said any deal w/o taxes isn't balanced. Apparently he forgot to tell Harry that cause his senate bill has 0 revenues.

He's so stupid, he talks highly of the speaker in one sentence then insults him in the next. Yet expects him to come back to negotiate with him. Tool, you've been benched. Let the big boys iron out the problems.

It's all Boooooosh and those pesky responsible gopers

You have absolutely no concept of how your posts reflect on your level of 'intelligence'; calling President Obama "stupid" suggests you believe you're smarter than President Obama and that is proven untrue in every post you make.

 

[Liability]

It's funny yet sad at the same time that our potus can't keep up with current events.

The "grand bargain" has been dead for awhile now Mr prez. He said any deal w/o taxes isn't balanced. Apparently he forgot to tell Harry that cause his senate bill has 0 revenues.

He's so stupid, he talks highly of the speaker in one sentence then insults him in the next. Yet expects him to come back to negotiate with him. Tool, you've been benched. Let the big boys iron out the problems.

It's all Boooooosh and those pesky responsible gopers

You have absolutely no concept of how your posts reflect on your level of 'intelligence'; calling President Obama "stupid" suggests you believe you're smarter than President Obama and that is proven untrue in every post you make.

Recognizing that this President is highly OVER-rated in "intelligence" is not the same thing as being stupid.

It's being observant.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It's funny yet sad at the same time that our potus can't keep up with current events.

The "grand bargain" has been dead for awhile now Mr prez. He said any deal w/o taxes isn't balanced. Apparently he forgot to tell Harry that cause his senate bill has 0 revenues.

He's so stupid, he talks highly of the speaker in one sentence then insults him in the next. Yet expects him to come back to negotiate with him. Tool, you've been benched. Let the big boys iron out the problems.

It's all Boooooosh and those pesky responsible gopers

Well the Republicans did the same thing with Clinton. They also shut down government.

So when a Democrat is elected President..it's okay for Republicans to ignore him?

But when a Republican is elected President..Democrats have to treat him..um..like a President?

And it was bad..when a foreign leader came to congress, insulted our President..to the cheers of Republicans..and when a foreign leader came to the UN, insulted our President, DEMOCRATS went on the air to defend him.

Gosh.

Republicans..are showing..they have no business in government.

The speaker didn't cry. And football is back on! When Reagan was prez I think apples were still Obama just doesn't get and that's why dems fail........

 

[blastoff]

Here IMO is how well Boehner's rebuttal was last night.

Chris Matthews was bitching about his style or format, for God's sake! He basically didn't like the fact that Boehner had the gall to make his speech from behind a friggin' podium because it looked too presidential in his tiny little mind. Rather, Boehner should have been sort of slouched in front of a desk with his butt resting on it.

Oh, well. I hope the feeling Chris had going up his leg last night at least gave him a nice stiffy to bring home to the boss.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I personally find it kind of funny taht Boehner is so easily made to show emotions over "touching" personal matters.

Suck it up, man.

on the other hand, the liberal chorus mocks him totally out of proportion to the "offense."

They have nothing else.

When confronted by the stark contrast of the President's deliberate prime time lies versus the Speaker's prime time rebuttal, the libbies know they lose. Ergo, the matter of Mr. Boehner's proclivity to show emotion too easily becomes the necessary deflection.

Boehner has zero credibility as a leader. The Speaker of the House is elected by the majority party to set an agenda ostensively to benefit the people (The People's House); Boehner has no vision, has expressed no mission statement and in fact follows an agenda set by radical Republicans whose goal is simple and singular - defeat Obama at any cost.

Calling President Obama a liar without knowing what went on in private conversations to which you were not included, LIEabilty, is partisan hackery on steroids.

Only a fool believes the Republican Party will be fiscally conservative, the entire debate on the debt ceiling is based on their not so hidden agenda to privatize medicare and social security.

 

[Liability]

I personally find it kind of funny taht Boehner is so easily made to show emotions over "touching" personal matters.

Suck it up, man.

on the other hand, the liberal chorus mocks him totally out of proportion to the "offense."

They have nothing else.

When confronted by the stark contrast of the President's deliberate prime time lies versus the Speaker's prime time rebuttal, the libbies know they lose. Ergo, the matter of Mr. Boehner's proclivity to show emotion too easily becomes the necessary deflection.

Boehner has zero credibility as a leader. The Speaker of the House is elected by the majority party to set an agenda ostensively to benefit the people (The People's House); Boehner has no vision, has expressed no mission statement and in fact follows an agenda set by radical Republicans whose goal is simple and singular - defeat Obama at any cost.

Calling President Obama a liar without knowing what went on in private conversations to which you were not included, LIEabilty, is partisan hackery on steroids.

Only a fool believes the Republican Party will be fiscally conservative, the entire debate on the debt ceiling is based on their not so hidden agenda to privatize medicare and social security.

It is the President who has ZERO credibility. That dimwitted man lies compulsively. He's such a fucking dickhead.

Kinda like the idiot, Fly Catcher, who would blow him given the chance.

<<shlurp, shlurp>> "Thank you, Mr. President," said Fly Catcher, wiping his chin with his sleeve.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It's funny yet sad at the same time that our potus can't keep up with current events.

The "grand bargain" has been dead for awhile now Mr prez. He said any deal w/o taxes isn't balanced. Apparently he forgot to tell Harry that cause his senate bill has 0 revenues.

He's so stupid, he talks highly of the speaker in one sentence then insults him in the next. Yet expects him to come back to negotiate with him. Tool, you've been benched. Let the big boys iron out the problems.

It's all Boooooosh and those pesky responsible gopers

You have absolutely no concept of how your posts reflect on your level of 'intelligence'; calling President Obama "stupid" suggests you believe you're smarter than President Obama and that is proven untrue in every post you make.

I care what you think why? We've done what the big O wanted for the most part for 2 years. He and his mighty (smart) ideas netted us what? Notta, zero, zilch, none. Yea, he's failed.
Congress told him to sit down an stfu so the big kids could do the job he failed at. If Obama were smart he would have moved to the center after the midterms. He is not smart, and you are none the wiser for blindly following like a good lap dog.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Here IMO is how well Boehner's rebuttal was last night.

Chris Matthews was bitching about his style or format, for God's sake! He basically didn't like the fact that Boehner had the gall to make his speech from behind a friggin' podium because it looked too presidential in his tiny little mind. Rather, Boehner should have been sort of slouched in front of a desk with his butt resting on it.

Oh, well. I hope the feeling Chris had going up his leg last night at least gave him a nice stiffy to bring home to the boss.

Mathews has zero credibility as a journalist anymore... he's a joke.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It's funny yet sad at the same time that our potus can't keep up with current events.

The "grand bargain" has been dead for awhile now Mr prez. He said any deal w/o taxes isn't balanced. Apparently he forgot to tell Harry that cause his senate bill has 0 revenues.

He's so stupid, he talks highly of the speaker in one sentence then insults him in the next. Yet expects him to come back to negotiate with him. Tool, you've been benched. Let the big boys iron out the problems.

It's all Boooooosh and those pesky responsible gopers

Well the Republicans did the same thing with Clinton. They also shut down government.

So when a Democrat is elected President..it's okay for Republicans to ignore him?

But when a Republican is elected President..Democrats have to treat him..um..like a President?

And it was bad..when a foreign leader came to congress, insulted our President..to the cheers of Republicans..and when a foreign leader came to the UN, insulted our President, DEMOCRATS went on the air to defend him.

Gosh.

Republicans..are showing..they have no business in government.

The speaker didn't cry. And football is back on! When Reagan was prez I think apples were still Obama just doesn't get and that's why dems fail........

When President Reagan was in office Obama was an apple? Fuji? Pippin? McIntosh?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Well the Republicans did the same thing with Clinton. They also shut down government.

So when a Democrat is elected President..it's okay for Republicans to ignore him?

But when a Republican is elected President..Democrats have to treat him..um..like a President?

And it was bad..when a foreign leader came to congress, insulted our President..to the cheers of Republicans..and when a foreign leader came to the UN, insulted our President, DEMOCRATS went on the air to defend him.

Gosh.

Republicans..are showing..they have no business in government.

The speaker didn't cry. And football is back on! When Reagan was prez I think apples were still Obama just doesn't get and that's why dems fail........

When President Reagan was in office Obama was an apple? Fuji? Pippin? McIntosh?

I'm quite clearly mocking his jibberish post. Sorry you don't possess the reading comprehension to figure that out.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I personally find it kind of funny taht Boehner is so easily made to show emotions over "touching" personal matters.

Suck it up, man.

on the other hand, the liberal chorus mocks him totally out of proportion to the "offense."

They have nothing else.

When confronted by the stark contrast of the President's deliberate prime time lies versus the Speaker's prime time rebuttal, the libbies know they lose. Ergo, the matter of Mr. Boehner's proclivity to show emotion too easily becomes the necessary deflection.

Boehner has zero credibility as a leader. The Speaker of the House is elected by the majority party to set an agenda ostensively to benefit the people (The People's House); Boehner has no vision, has expressed no mission statement and in fact follows an agenda set by radical Republicans whose goal is simple and singular - defeat Obama at any cost.

Calling President Obama a liar without knowing what went on in private conversations to which you were not included, LIEabilty, is partisan hackery on steroids.

Only a fool believes the Republican Party will be fiscally conservative, the entire debate on the debt ceiling is based on their not so hidden agenda to privatize medicare and social security.

It is the President who has ZERO credibility. That dimwitted man lies compulsively. He's such a fucking dickhead.

Kinda like the idiot, Fly Catcher, who would blow him given the chance.

<<shlurp, shlurp>> "Thank you, Mr. President," said Fly Catcher, wiping his chin with his sleeve.

Your propensity for lewdness aside (though not to rule out a serious psyco-sexual problem) your 'argument' is nothing more than an unsupported allegation of mendacity framed in an add hominem attack. You lose LIEability.