John Boehner - yay or nay?

John Boehner - yay or nay?

Gay.
After high school, John worked several jobs to pay his way through Xavier University. While working as a night janitor he met Debbie - now his wife of 37 years - and in 1977 earned his bachelor's degree in business. John and Debbie raised two daughters, Lindsay and Tricia, in the northern Cincinnati suburb of West Chester where they still live today. Speaker Boehner's biographical notes
No, that is not his history, EdtheCynic.
Oh, almost forgot this one Freedom. I just wanted to say, I would NOT worry too much about someone who quotes a person in their signature who's plan to practice eugenics and execute 10's of MILLIONS of Americans because they were retarded, or sick AND who's plan WAS the inspiration for Hitler's labor camps and the gassing of MILLIONS of Jews too seriously.

Cause that IS who George Bernard Shaw was. ANYONE who holds him up as anything other than and INSANE piece of shit is too foolish to take seriously!
 
John Boehner - yay or nay?

Gay.
After high school, John worked several jobs to pay his way through Xavier University. While working as a night janitor he met Debbie - now his wife of 37 years - and in 1977 earned his bachelor's degree in business. John and Debbie raised two daughters, Lindsay and Tricia, in the northern Cincinnati suburb of West Chester where they still live today. Speaker Boehner's biographical notes
No, that is not his history, EdtheCynic.
Oh, almost forgot this one Freedom. I just wanted to say, I would NOT worry too much about someone who quotes a person in their signature who's plan to practice eugenics and execute 10's of MILLIONS of Americans because they were retarded, or sick AND who's plan WAS the inspiration for Hitler's labor camps and the gassing of MILLIONS of Jews too seriously.

Cause that IS who George Bernard Shaw was. ANYONE who holds him up as anything other than and INSANE piece of shit is too foolish to take seriously!
You obviously know nothing about Shaw except what you have been brainwashed with. Try googling "Shavian Eugenics" and learn something, you mindless moronic drooling :asshole:
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I thought Boehner would have been in rehab by now. In that regard, he has surpassed my expectations.
 
You obviously know nothing about Shaw except what you have been brainwashed with. Try googling "Shavian Eugenics" and learn something, you mindless moronic drooling :asshole:
Oh my...did I strike a nerve with the habitually ignorant?

Why don't you try NOT googling up something and see what you find.

Here, I'll save you a little trouble with your Fabien Society (socialist) hero's own words, "Extermination must be put on a scientific basis if it is ever to be carried out humanely and apologetically as well as thoroughly," he wrote.

And followed that with, "...if we desire a certain type of civilization and culture we must exterminate the sort of people who do not fit into it."

Who were those "sort of people" you ask. The old, the infirm, the mentally deficient.

And here are his thoughts on the gas chamber he designated as the proper tool and that the Nazi's actually adopted FROM HIM to use on the Jews, "We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living... A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people's time to look after them."

But you know what...if you do a little looking...you can find old footage of him SAYING IT IN PERSON!

The man was a FREAKIN' MONSTER!

I'll tell ya a little secret edthecynic, you pseudo intellectual liberals are just to easy. You're so damn busy trying to prove how enlightened and intellectual you are that you don't actually take the time to BECOME SO!
 
Boehner is a hardworking Congressman who is holding the line on the push by socialists to swamp America in the doom and gloom of failed socialist models.

I'm going to support John Boehner through this planned barrage of false and malicious calumny aimed at destroying the Republican Party, the party of Anti-slavery, and the party that pushed through every major civil rights law since it elected Abraham Lincoln POTUS.

You want Boehner out to weaken current laws against everything I know to be good propriety.

Boehner is disliked by his loyal opposition because he knows when to hold 'em, and he's not gonna fold 'em. He's not gonna walk away, and he's not gonna run.

You may be counting your early votes as based on your surly throats, but you can count on this time we'll check to see voting is done fairly.

And when the counting is done, there'll be a man standing proud whose only flaw is too much love for his fellow man... and that's Speaker John Boehner.

:woohoo:

A fine post. If you believe that sort of thing. Boehner is one of the biggest wimps in washington and has folded continuously. The only hope the GOP has at my vote is if they hold the line on spending. Currently he is O for 2
 
You obviously know nothing about Shaw except what you have been brainwashed with. Try googling "Shavian Eugenics" and learn something, you mindless moronic drooling :asshole:
Oh my...did I strike a nerve with the habitually ignorant?

Why don't you try NOT googling up something and see what you find.

Here, I'll save you a little trouble with your Fabien Society (socialist) hero's own words, "Extermination must be put on a scientific basis if it is ever to be carried out humanely and apologetically as well as thoroughly," he wrote.

And followed that with, "...if we desire a certain type of civilization and culture we must exterminate the sort of people who do not fit into it."

Who were those "sort of people" you ask. The old, the infirm, the mentally deficient.

And here are his thoughts on the gas chamber he designated as the proper tool and that the Nazi's actually adopted FROM HIM to use on the Jews, "We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living... A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people's time to look after them."

But you know what...if you do a little looking...you can find old footage of him SAYING IT IN PERSON!

The man was a FREAKIN' MONSTER!

I'll tell ya a little secret edthecynic, you pseudo intellectual liberals are just to easy. You're so damn busy trying to prove how enlightened and intellectual you are that you don't actually take the time to BECOME SO!
These out of context misquotes are a perfect example of why CON$ are the lowest scum to ever crawl out of a sewer. When CON$ sink their teeth into a lie they never let go. Even after telling this worthless liar he is wrong and telling him what to look up to find the truth, the POS chooses to remain ignorant so he can continue to willfully lie with a clear conscious.

Shaw, a SATIRIST, was mocking eugenicists with the out of context quotes you dishonestly used to slander an honest man you hate for his honesty. Shavian eugenics is known as ELECTIVE breeding, is based on women CHOOSING who they mate with!!!!! It has nothing to do with killing anyone, as you and the lying scum you parrot know.

I'm an atheist and I thank God for it.
-George Bernard Shaw

BTW, Shaw is not an Atheist, he's a SATIRIST!!!

George Bernard Shaw - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As with many of the topics which Shaw addressed, but particularly so in his examination of the "social purity" movement, he used irony, misdirection and satire to make his point.[73][82][83] At a meeting of the Eugenics Education Society of 3 March 1910 he suggested the need to use a "lethal chamber" to solve their problem. Shaw said: "We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment ..." Shaw also called for the development of a "deadly" but "humane" gas for the purpose of killing, many at a time, those unfit to live.[84]
In a newsreel interview released on 5 March 1931, dealing with alternatives to the imprisonment of criminals, Shaw says
You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth. Just put them there and say Sir, or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? If you can’t justify your existence, if you’re not pulling your weight in the social boat, if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more, then, clearly, we cannot use the organizations of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.[85][86]
Shaw, however, often used satiric irony in order to mock those who took eugenics to inhumane extremes and commentators have sometimes failed to take this into account.[77][87] Some noticed that this was an example of Shaw satirically employing the reductio ad absurdum argument against the eugenicists' wilder aspirations: The Globe and The Evening News recognised it as a skit on the dreams of the eugenicists, though many others in the press took his words out of their satirical context. Dan Stone of Liverpool University writes: "Either the press believed Shaw to be serious, and vilified him, or recognised the tongue-in-cheek nature of his lecture".[87][88]
 
I'm an atheist and I thank God for it.
-George Bernard Shaw

BTW, Shaw is not an Atheist, he's a SATIRIST!!!
Yeah, and then he said he became an atheist, "before I could think."

So which version are you going with?

I...AM an atheist, and I think George Bernard Shaw was a MONSTER and YOU are just gullible enough to be "useful" to the cause.

Revisionist history does NOT change the facts of history. He WAS a Fabien socialist! He attended rallies and RAILED about the virtues of socialism and Karl Marx. He wrote MILES of material justifying the MURDEROUS actions of Joesph Stalin.

He DID write a letter calling the editor of a British news paper a liar and the article slanderous because they printed a FACT FILL expose on the MILLIONS Joe Stalin was oppressing and murdering. Of course...since he had toured Russia as Joe Stalin's guest...I'm sure he would know. Oh and what was his last words as he left the Soviet Union to return to London? "Tomorrow I leave this land of hope and return to our Western countries of despair." Yeah, guy was a sweet heart!

He DID say...with NO hint of sarcasm that EVERYONE should be made to go before a panel to "justify" their continued existence in society.

You want to know who this monster is...read the preference to On The Rocks. Then get back to me!

Malevolence in any other guise is STILL malevolent!
 
I'm an atheist and I thank God for it.
-George Bernard Shaw

BTW, Shaw is not an Atheist, he's a SATIRIST!!!
Yeah, and then he said he became an atheist, "before I could think."

So which version are you going with?

I...AM an atheist, and I think George Bernard Shaw was a MONSTER and YOU are just gullible enough to be "useful" to the cause.

Revisionist history does NOT change the facts of history. He WAS a Fabien socialist! He attended rallies and RAILED about the virtues of socialism and Karl Marx. He wrote MILES of material justifying the MURDEROUS actions of Joesph Stalin.

He DID write a letter calling the editor of a British news paper a liar and the article slanderous because they printed a FACT FILL expose on the MILLIONS Joe Stalin was oppressing and murdering. Of course...since he had toured Russia as Joe Stalin's guest...I'm sure he would know. Oh and what was his last words as he left the Soviet Union to return to London? "Tomorrow I leave this land of hope and return to our Western countries of despair." Yeah, guy was a sweet heart!

He DID say...with NO hint of sarcasm that EVERYONE should be made to go before a panel to "justify" their continued existence in society.

You want to know who this monster is...read the preference to On The Rocks. Then get back to me!

Malevolence in any other guise is STILL malevolent!
Well, at least you dropped your lies about Shavian Eugenics/Elective Breeding. That's progress, I suppose.
 
Boehner is a hardworking Congressman who is holding the line on the push by socialists to swamp America in the doom and gloom of failed socialist models.

I'm going to support John Boehner through this planned barrage of false and malicious calumny aimed at destroying the Republican Party, the party of Anti-slavery, and the party that pushed through every major civil rights law since it elected Abraham Lincoln POTUS.

You want Boehner out to weaken current laws against everything I know to be good propriety.

Boehner is disliked by his loyal opposition because he knows when to hold 'em, and he's not gonna fold 'em. He's not gonna walk away, and he's not gonna run.

You may be counting your early votes as based on your surly throats, but you can count on this time we'll check to see voting is done fairly.

And when the counting is done, there'll be a man standing proud whose only flaw is too much love for his fellow man... and that's Speaker John Boehner.

:woohoo:

A fine post. If you believe that sort of thing. Boehner is one of the biggest wimps in washington and has folded continuously. The only hope the GOP has at my vote is if they hold the line on spending. Currently he is O for 2
One of those refusals would have significantly shut the vital areas of government down. That would be bad for the air controllers, fire departments, police, military, national parks, although rather good for criminals, drug lords, rapists, and hospitals. That may not seem important to some Americans, but it could be to those who take these kinds of protections for granted, not knowing what "shutting the government completely down" would actually do.

I am a conservative, but not to the point of anarchy. Neither is Speaker Boehner. I support John Boehner. He is not just a good Speaker, he is a thoroughly good human being. And I rest my case. :)
 
Last edited:
The people want the spending stopped and voted that way. Speaker Boehner has the last election as his first priority, because the people spoke to him and told him to stop the DC spending spree. I do think he's doing his best, Mr. Rightwinger. :)

Even Boehner has been humiliated by the actions of his own party. The Speaker of the House has certain responsibilities that transcend party loyalties. Boehner has not even been able to allow the House to do business. His speakership has devolved to petty bickering not only with Democrats but between Republicans

Worst Speaker of our generation
You insisting he's not a control-freak, hm.

'Kay... :lmao:

Not being able to control doesn't make one not a control freak. Maybe it's that inability to control which has him blubbering so much.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAC2xeT2yOg]Republican Minority Leader John Boehner explains why he handed out bribes on the House floor - YouTube[/ame]
 
I love the guy.

Am I alone?
He'd better sober-up, soon!!!

It's lookin' like Eric Cantor might be taking ol' Boner's Majority-seat....


898.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top