*JOBS numbers- LIE-Missing ONE LARGE state*

No he just appoints people that control the reports..... Dont you ever get tired of being a dishonest idiot?

The acting commissioner of the BLS has been there since 1998. That would be Clinton, Bush, Obama presidencies in case you need to be reminded.

Naive

So when the UE jumped up 4 ticks in October of 2008, from 6.1 to 6.5,

you're claiming that the Bush appointees in the BLS did that to get Obama elected instead of McCain?

You're an idiot.
 
The trouble with you dipshits is that you think Obama controls these reports. It just shows how stupid you really are.

No he just appoints people that control the reports..... Dont you ever get tired of being a dishonest idiot?

The acting commissioner of the BLS has been there since 1998. That would be Clinton, Bush, Obama presidencies in case you need to be reminded.

No, Jack has been there since 1979...that's Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Obama.
 
Not many people believed the jobs numbers anyway. obama has just been caught in too many lies to be believed on anything.

The trouble with you dipshits is that you think Obama controls these reports. It just shows how stupid you really are.

No he just appoints people that control the reports..... Dont you ever get tired of being a dishonest idiot?

BLS has one appointed position, which is currently unfilled. The last political appointee, Dr. Keith Hall, was a Bush appointee and retired Jan 2012.

So who are you talking about? Sec Labor has no control over the reports.
 

So when the UE jumped up 4 ticks in October of 2008, from 6.1 to 6.5,

you're claiming that the Bush appointees in the BLS did that to get Obama elected instead of McCain?

You're an idiot.
I am a realist.

How would someone at the BLS alter the numbers? The numbers come from the states. In order to alter the compilation, you would have to alter the states' numbers. The states have the original numbers.

Don't you think a state might notice if the numbers in the federal report didn't match the numbers they sent in?

...mr. realist...
 
So when the UE jumped up 4 ticks in October of 2008, from 6.1 to 6.5,

you're claiming that the Bush appointees in the BLS did that to get Obama elected instead of McCain?

You're an idiot.
I am a realist.

How would someone at the BLS alter the numbers? The numbers come from the states.
No they don't. The Current Population Survey is conducted by Census for BLS and the states aren't involved until after the Employment Situation is released and BLS starts compiling the state and local area numbers.

In order to alter the compilation, you would have to alter the states' numbers. The states have the original numbers.

Don't you think a state might notice if the numbers in the federal report didn't match the numbers they sent in?

You might be talking about UI benefits claims which are not handled by BLS and do come from the states and sent to DOL.

For the UE rate, the states do get later access, for their state, and can see discrepencies.
For UI claims, the states do generate the data and can see discrepencies.
 
It's amazing the UE numbers "somehow" get better after Obamination gets his ass whipped by Romney on TV then a so-called shooting at an Obamination cult office in Denver "somehow" happens after a tough week of Libya questioning......

Democraps will do anything to steer voters to their side.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top