*JOBS numbers- LIE-Missing ONE LARGE state*


A link to a real news source would be helpful. Giving us a link to a blog doesn't prove anything. Until you have real evidence, this belongs in with all the other conspiracy theories.

Said the FAKE republican.. I linked the WSJ.. suck on that.

It's a blog, not a factual story. It starts out addressing conspiracy theorists. God you are dumb.
 
A link to a real news source would be helpful. Giving us a link to a blog doesn't prove anything. Until you have real evidence, this belongs in with all the other conspiracy theories.

Said the FAKE republican.. I linked the WSJ.. suck on that.

It's a blog, not a factual story. It starts out addressing conspiracy theorists. God you are dumb.

The fake republican can't read.. It's on Drudge now :) I guess everyone is a liar and not a real news source but you, right? :lol:
 
This was a obvious manipulation........They have been fucking with these numbers for years....Obama got his ass handed to him in the debate and needed something to prop him up and funny thing is if you look at the heavily sampled dem polls it didnt do him any good LOL
 
Just like Obama's billion dollar re election campaign donations. Somebody over at freerepublic did the math and came to the conclusion that a full one quarter of all Americans would have had to kick in $199'dollah' to amass that amount. Statistically impossible. But then Conservatives catch members of the DNC on tape coaching people how to vote twice in the election and the press does the "Three Monkey's Routine" in reagrds to Obama "Hear No Evil. See No Evil! Do No Evil!"
Maybe its because Liberals believe stuff like this.....

“Star Wars” Actor: Obama A “Cross Between Obi-Wan And Yoda”… | Weasel Zippers
 

Again, an article with a headline suggesting that they didn't include one large state, but nothing in the article to support that. It may be true, but so far, you have not shown any evidence of that. The second issue is that even if it is true, it doesn't guarantee a change in the numbers in the opposite direction. Just more silliness; I prefer to stick to clear facts over hyperbole.
 
This is just getting stupid. After expectations of a rebound in initial claims from 367K last week (naturally revised higher to 369K), to 370K (with the lowest of all sellside expectations at 355K), the past week mysteriously, yet so very unsurprisingly in the aftermath of the fudged BLS unemployment number, saw claims tumble to a number that is so ridiculous not even CNBC's Steve Liesman bothered defending it, or 339K. Ironically, not even the Labor Department is defending it: it said that "one large state didn't report some quarterly figures." Great, but what was reported was a headline grabbing number that is just stunning for reelection purposes. This was the lowest number since 2008. The only point to have this print? For 2-3 bulletin talking points at the Vice Presidential debate tonight. Everything else is now noise. It is also sad that the US "economy" has devolved to such trivial data fudging on a week by week basis, which makes even the Chinese Department of Truth appear amateurish by comparison. Needless to say, Not Seasonally Adjusted initial claims jumped by 26K to 327K in the past week but who's counting. Finally, what is the reason for ongoing QEternity if the employment situation is now back to normal. Finally, in completely ignored news, because who needs global trade when you have toner cartridge, and generally ink, the US trade deficit in August rose by 4.1% to $44.2 billion, on expectations of a deterioration to $44.0 billion. Then again nobody talks about the US trade deficit during presidential debates so all good here.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-...-tumble-339k-lowest-2008-far-below-lowest-exp


Even more financial news organziations are starting to report this..
 
Oh noesssss.. A VIDEO now... The Fake republican as usual making a big fat azz of himself! LOL

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRI84yEqPcw]Propaganda? -- US Weekly Jobless Claim 339,000 Down 30,000 From Last Week - 1 Large State Missing! - YouTube[/ame]
 
Just like Obama's billion dollar re election campaign donations. Somebody over at freerepublic did the math and came to the conclusion that a full one quarter of all Americans would have had to kick in $199'dollah' to amass that amount. Statistically impossible. But then Conservatives catch members of the DNC on tape coaching people how to vote twice in the election and the press does the "Three Monkey's Routine" in reagrds to Obama "Hear No Evil. See No Evil! Do No Evil!"
Maybe its because Liberals believe stuff like this.....

“Star Wars” Actor: Obama A “Cross Between Obi-Wan And Yoda”… | Weasel Zippers

Imagine that. Dimwits can't claim the truth because they do not know what a truth is.
 
The man-child in the White House is a Chicago thug. Why are we surprised at anything that comes out of this administration or the subsequent departments staffed with his cronies? Let them do it. Most voters who are still undecided are on to them.


They're :dig: a deeper hole.
 
Last edited:
Initial Jobless Claims Drop When ‘One Large State’ Does Not Report Numbers | The Lonely Conservative

Why release an INCOMPLETE Jobless report????? If you don't have the complete report, why in the world do you release it but for POLITICAL reasons!


Should we reallybe surprised by that, when this administration and the media only looks to the unemployment numbers, as if that's really the best and ONLY way to tell a how bad of an economy we actually have? When was the last time you heard the media report "misery index" or part-time ("UNDERemployment")? We seem to be only delt a sliver of this hope and change, and denied a more accurate picture of how bad it really is out there.

Misery index: Jan '09 was at 7.83% ..... for august 2012 it's 9.79%



U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force:

Sept 2011 was at 15.7%, July 2012 it's 15.0% august 2012 it's 14.7%
and for Sept 2012 it's 14.7%

NOTE: Persons marginally attached to the labor force are those who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the past 12 months. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule.

Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
 
Last edited:
ummm it happens all the time. Which is why there are two revisions. Missing or incomplete data is imputed from past trends, and then the report is revised the next week or two as the data comes in.

I mean, come on...today's release was for the week ending October 6. That means, since Monday was a holiday, there were 2 days to submit all claims to the state and DOL. It's a surprise that not every state got it in on time? Next week it will be added.
 
ummm it happens all the time. Which is why there are two revisions. Missing or incomplete data is imputed from past trends, and then the report is revised the next week or two as the data comes in.

I mean, come on...today's release was for the week ending October 6. That means, since Monday was a holiday, there were 2 days to submit all claims to the state and DOL. It's a surprise that not every state got it in on time? Next week it will be added.

You're the typical HACK IDIOT.. It's never done.. You don't release a Jobs number with an incomplete report you.. PERIOD.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top