Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More importantly that the economic crisis was allowed to bloom under the Bush admin.
They did nothing to avert it when it could have been done.
They instead called anyone who was saying there was a problem in the making a "whiner" or "doom and gloom" patisan.
You really need a civics lesson.
Who was controlling congress the last two years of the Bush Administration?
Democrats. Blame them...it's their baby.....and Obama was a part of it. Voting *present* every time doesn't exclude him from responsibility. However he did vote for TARP and he did sign the Stimulus Bill.
Bush just signs the checks. He doesn't make the laws and oversee commerce. Read the constitution for once.
When exactly did the economy tank?
Maybe you have forgotten some parts.
You really need a civics lesson.
Who was controlling congress the last two years of the Bush Administration?
Democrats. Blame them...it's their baby.....and Obama was a part of it. Voting *present* every time doesn't exclude him from responsibility. However he did vote for TARP and he did sign the Stimulus Bill.
Bush just signs the checks. He doesn't make the laws and oversee commerce. Read the constitution for once.
When exactly did the economy tank?
Maybe you have forgotten some parts.
The economy started to tank within months after the Dems took control of congress in 07'. They tightened lending guidelines and started tweaking rules and regulations.
All it takes is a few irresponsible people in key positions and they can ruin the economy in a matter of months.
You really need a civics lesson.
Who was controlling congress the last two years of the Bush Administration?
Democrats. Blame them...it's their baby.....and Obama was a part of it. Voting *present* every time doesn't exclude him from responsibility. However he did vote for TARP and he did sign the Stimulus Bill.
Bush just signs the checks. He doesn't make the laws and oversee commerce. Read the constitution for once.
When exactly did the economy tank?
Maybe you have forgotten some parts.
The economy started to tank within months after the Dems took control of congress in 07'. They tightened lending guidelines and started tweaking rules and regulations.
All it takes is a few irresponsible people in key positions and they can ruin the economy in a matter of months.
When exactly did the economy tank?
Maybe you have forgotten some parts.
The economy started to tank within months after the Dems took control of congress in 07'. They tightened lending guidelines and started tweaking rules and regulations.
All it takes is a few irresponsible people in key positions and they can ruin the economy in a matter of months.
How many vetoes did bush hand out? I think that had a lot to do with it as well you partisan hack..
"in March 2006 Bush set a 200-year veto record"
1. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005
2. US Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability
3. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007
4. Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007
5. Water Resources Development Act of 2007
6. Appropriations: Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, 2008
7. Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007
8. National Defense Authorization Act for FY2008
9. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
10. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
11. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2)
12. Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008
Presidential Vetos - Bills Vetoed by President George W. Bush (2001-2008)
The economy started to tank within months after the Dems took control of congress in 07'. They tightened lending guidelines and started tweaking rules and regulations.
All it takes is a few irresponsible people in key positions and they can ruin the economy in a matter of months.
How many vetoes did bush hand out? I think that had a lot to do with it as well you partisan hack..
"in March 2006 Bush set a 200-year veto record"
1. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005
2. US Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability
3. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007
4. Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007
5. Water Resources Development Act of 2007
6. Appropriations: Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, 2008
7. Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007
8. National Defense Authorization Act for FY2008
9. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
10. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
11. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2)
12. Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008
Presidential Vetos - Bills Vetoed by President George W. Bush (2001-2008)
All of these acts were from 07' and 08' yet the heading says he set the record in 2006 for vetos. Get your fucken facts straight dip-shit.
The Dems had no intention of sending him any decent bills. They put poison pill legislation in everything they sent him turning them into PROTEST BILLS rather then useful legislation. They attached shit like Universal Health Care in defense omnibus bills. They inserted abortion funding in anything that was needed to run the government. Is it any wonder he vetoed there shit..
They are going to be real hard pressed to defend the Bush record and beat on the Obama record in about a year.
No, get your talking points straight. The comeback for this one is "Who controlled the Congress for the last 2 years of Bush presidency???"
According to Stuttering LimpTard and Charles Krautnazi the CON$ervaTards won in 2006 and congress moved to the RIGHT. They said Liberal and moderate Republicans were replaced by CON$ervative Democrats. So blame CON$ervatism, not GOP or Dem, for what happened the last 2 years of the Bush debacle.More importantly that the economic crisis was allowed to bloom under the Bush admin.
They did nothing to avert it when it could have been done.
They instead called anyone who was saying there was a problem in the making a "whiner" or "doom and gloom" patisan.
You really need a civics lesson.
Who was controlling congress the last two years of the Bush Administration?
Democrats. Blame them...it's their baby .....and Obama was a part of it. Voting *present* every time doesn't exclude him from responsibility. However he did vote for TARP and he did sign the Stimulus Bill.
Bush just signs the checks. He doesn't make the laws and oversee commerce. Read the constitution for once.
They are going to be real hard pressed to defend the Bush record and beat on the Obama record in about a year.
No, get your talking points straight. The comeback for this one is "Who controlled the Congress for the last 2 years of Bush presidency???"
According to Stuttering LimpTard and Charles Krautnazi the CON$ervaTards won in 2006 and congress moved to the RIGHT. They said Liberal and moderate Republicans were replaced by CON$ervative Democrats. So blame CON$ervatism, not GOP or Dem, for what happened the last 2 years of the Bush debacle.More importantly that the economic crisis was allowed to bloom under the Bush admin.
They did nothing to avert it when it could have been done.
They instead called anyone who was saying there was a problem in the making a "whiner" or "doom and gloom" patisan.
You really need a civics lesson.
Who was controlling congress the last two years of the Bush Administration?
Democrats. Blame them...it's their baby .....and Obama was a part of it. Voting *present* every time doesn't exclude him from responsibility. However he did vote for TARP and he did sign the Stimulus Bill.
Bush just signs the checks. He doesn't make the laws and oversee commerce. Read the constitution for once.
What happened after 2006 proves that CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried no matter which Party tries it!!!!!
Republicans lost but conservatism did not
November 8, 2006
RUSH: Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night. In fact, Republicanism, being a political party first rather than an ideological movement, is what lost.
There was conservatism yesterday in the election, and it was to be found on the Democratic side of the aisle.
But conservatism won when it was tried yesterday. Conservatism won fairly big when it was tried
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
They are going to be real hard pressed to defend the Bush record and beat on the Obama record in about a year.
No, get your talking points straight. The comeback for this one is "Who controlled the Congress for the last 2 years of Bush presidency???"
According to Stuttering LimpTard and Charles Krautnazi the CON$ervaTards won in 2006 and congress moved to the RIGHT. They said Liberal and moderate Republicans were replaced by CON$ervative Democrats. So blame CON$ervatism, not GOP or Dem, for what happened the last 2 years of the Bush debacle.More importantly that the economic crisis was allowed to bloom under the Bush admin.
They did nothing to avert it when it could have been done.
They instead called anyone who was saying there was a problem in the making a "whiner" or "doom and gloom" patisan.
You really need a civics lesson.
Who was controlling congress the last two years of the Bush Administration?
Democrats. Blame them...it's their baby .....and Obama was a part of it. Voting *present* every time doesn't exclude him from responsibility. However he did vote for TARP and he did sign the Stimulus Bill.
Bush just signs the checks. He doesn't make the laws and oversee commerce. Read the constitution for once.
What happened after 2006 proves that CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried no matter which Party tries it!!!!!
Republicans lost but conservatism did not
November 8, 2006
RUSH: Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night. In fact, Republicanism, being a political party first rather than an ideological movement, is what lost.
There was conservatism yesterday in the election, and it was to be found on the Democratic side of the aisle.
But conservatism won when it was tried yesterday. Conservatism won fairly big when it was tried
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
Hey Quit picking on Barry the Boob!! He has been working hard at creating jobs!!! He has created millions of jobs!!! that is jobs that millions of people go to the unemployment office, fill out forms, wait in lines, drive home, wait to walk out to post box to get a check and go to cash, then repeat every two weeks!!! thats called jobs creation in the Obama administration!!!!
I love it!No, get your talking points straight. The comeback for this one is "Who controlled the Congress for the last 2 years of Bush presidency???"
According to Stuttering LimpTard and Charles Krautnazi the CON$ervaTards won in 2006 and congress moved to the RIGHT. They said Liberal and moderate Republicans were replaced by CON$ervative Democrats. So blame CON$ervatism, not GOP or Dem, for what happened the last 2 years of the Bush debacle.You really need a civics lesson.
Who was controlling congress the last two years of the Bush Administration?
Democrats. Blame them...it's their baby .....and Obama was a part of it. Voting *present* every time doesn't exclude him from responsibility. However he did vote for TARP and he did sign the Stimulus Bill.
Bush just signs the checks. He doesn't make the laws and oversee commerce. Read the constitution for once.
What happened after 2006 proves that CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried no matter which Party tries it!!!!!
Republicans lost but conservatism did not
November 8, 2006
RUSH: Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night. In fact, Republicanism, being a political party first rather than an ideological movement, is what lost.
There was conservatism yesterday in the election, and it was to be found on the Democratic side of the aisle.
But conservatism won when it was tried yesterday. Conservatism won fairly big when it was tried
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
Utterly delusional.....pathetic.
When someone is so far left that everything else looks conservative they're living in la la land.
They are going to be real hard pressed to defend the Bush record and beat on the Obama record in about a year.
Except, thanks to the GOP's delaying tactics, unemployment was already OVER 8% BEFORE the stimulus package was even passed in the middle of February. So you can thank the GOP for UE going over 8% if you want to be honest.They are going to be real hard pressed to defend the Bush record and beat on the Obama record in about a year.
I am not at all hard pressed. Obama passed a 787 billion dollar stimulus bill before anyone read it last feburary and he promised that unemployment would not go above 8% it's now at 9.7% only because people have given up looking and the real number of unemployed is around 15 million. THERE HAVE BEEN NO JOBS CREATED IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, even he knows it's been a failure that's why the talk about stimulus 2. BTW Obama has lost another 4 million jobs since he took office.
They are going to be real hard pressed to defend the Bush record and beat on the Obama record in about a year.
Statement by AFL-CIO President John Sweeney on September ...
The nation has lost 2.6 million jobs under President Bush's watch
I love it!According to Stuttering LimpTard and Charles Krautnazi the CON$ervaTards won in 2006 and congress moved to the RIGHT. They said Liberal and moderate Republicans were replaced by CON$ervative Democrats. So blame CON$ervatism, not GOP or Dem, for what happened the last 2 years of the Bush debacle.
What happened after 2006 proves that CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried no matter which Party tries it!!!!!
Republicans lost but conservatism did not
November 8, 2006
RUSH: Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night. In fact, Republicanism, being a political party first rather than an ideological movement, is what lost.
There was conservatism yesterday in the election, and it was to be found on the Democratic side of the aisle.
But conservatism won when it was tried yesterday. Conservatism won fairly big when it was tried
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
Utterly delusional.....pathetic.
When someone is so far left that everything else looks conservative they're living in la la land.
The "delusional" LimpTard and KrautHammer&Sickle from "la la land" are so far LEFT that everything else looks CON$ervoFascist.
PRICELESS!
Thank you for admitting that the major voices of CON$ervoFascism are "mind-numb dip-shits."I love it!Utterly delusional.....pathetic.
When someone is so far left that everything else looks conservative they're living in la la land.
The "delusional" LimpTard and KrautHammer&Sickle from "la la land" are so far LEFT that everything else looks CON$ervoFascist.
PRICELESS!
In your case it fits.
Only a mind-numb dip-shit thinks that Congress has gone right.
It's too friggen stupid to even discuss.
