Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thank you for proving my point regarding your poor understanding of economics.
Now how about getting back to the classroom and brainwashing another generation of innocent children into being complacent tools of the state.
You post a personal attack because you're too stupid to explain with examples and evidence how the government getting out of the way benefits jobs creation as well as the economy, environment and the health of our people.
So, lets say government gets out of the way. The oldest profession flourishes, for there are no cops to prosecute prostitutes or their pimps, no prosecutors needed since no arrests are made and no free clinics to diagnose and treat STD's.
Want more examples? I can offer many, but making an argument to a willfully ignorant partisan ^$##@$^* makes no sense.
Have a nice day and thank you so much for sharing your opinion.
Nobody's calling for anarchy which is what you are illustrating, stop being so silly. What is meant by "getting out of the way" is the reduction in the amount of regs, the punitive taxation, the mandates, the reporting. You see, I am a CPA and have served as a CFO of mid-sized company. The reporting requirements, the endless surveys and census' forms, the endless amounts of insurance needed just to operate, the environmental studies required just to build a new plant, the forms, the never ending changes to W2's, 1099's, 940's, 941's, etc., the endless changes in withholding tables, amounts, SOX compliance, it is a nightmare. And you think that;s bad? Try taking a firm public. You have the SEC and various other agencies up your ass with a microscope.
Nobody's advocating eliminating the police... so get real.
what the hell is JOBS BILL?
And the First order of Business the people who voted in the Republicans with this last election has been to take on the TAKEOVER of our health care by this commie administration.
They better stay with it if they want to KEEP THEIR JOBS.
Sorry, hon, it STAYS unless and until it reaches the Supreme Court.
Actually, no, it's already been voided.
Democrats were in the majority in the House for 4 years. Obama has been president for (a long long) 2 years. Where did the jobs go?
Our beloved corporations sent them elsewhere in the never ending search for higher profits.
Sorry, hon, it STAYS unless and until it reaches the Supreme Court.
Actually, no, it's already been voided.
They would have to ask for a stay at this point. Like you said, it's dead meat.
Actually, no, it's already been voided.
They would have to ask for a stay at this point. Like you said, it's dead meat.
The judge doesn't have to issue a stay because voiding the law is the legal equivalent of the stay. The judge is opperating under the legal presumption that the executive branch is going to obey the law.
Now, the administration doesn't want to violate the law does it?
Democrats were in the majority in the House for 4 years. Obama has been president for (a long long) 2 years. Where did the jobs go?
Our beloved corporations sent them elsewhere in the never ending search for higher profits.
Yeah, why is that?
Oh yeah, because liberal Democrats and liberal Republicans have been putting so much unnecessary regulation and taxation on said companies, that they can no longer make a living in the United States.
So what would be the logical way to fix that:
Make more regulation and raise taxes to "punish" those "evil" corporations that actually want to make a living, or
eliminate the unnecessary regulations that are artificially pushing up costs and the over taxation making companies unprofitable and non-competitive in the global market.
The more you squeeze down on businesses, the more wealth our nation is going to lose. Allow freedom to persist, let the businesses create wealth, you will have more jobs and more tax revenue.
Unless, of course, you really dont want our nation creating wealth and our people to be employed.
Jobs bill? Ok, here's your jobs bill:
Repeal Obamacare, lift the stupid moratorium on drilling, get rid of the EPA, Dept. of Energy, etc., lower corporate income taxes and stop attacking private indutry at every turn.
There's your jobs bill.
Jobs bill? Ok, here's your jobs bill:
Repeal Obamacare, lift the stupid moratorium on drilling, get rid of the EPA, Dept. of Energy, etc., lower corporate income taxes and stop attacking private indutry at every turn.
There's your jobs bill.
That's what we need to do. Get rid of the EPA. Brilliant. Change America to look like this:
Yeah, that's it.
China's environment has suffered for years as the country has chased rapid economic growth, with little official attention given until recently to the threats of unfettered growth to the nation's air, water and soil.
In November, soon to be Speaker Boehner and the ambitious Cantor knew they would soon have the power to set the agenda for the House of Representatives and the nation. Nearly 60 days have passed and no job bill has been offered, or to my knowledge discussed and shared with the American people.
So far the social agenda has been the priority, while I understand paying back the social conservatives is important to the RNC, and providing lip service to the TP is necessary, why haven't Messrs. Boehner and Cantor discussed their ideas on job creation?
Why have Cantor and USSC Justice Scalia met privately with the Kock brothers (for those not willfully ignorant I suggest strongly a review of thier business and family political history)?
My guess is dems need something with the title of "Jobs Bill" for them to understand.
Democrats were in the majority in the House for 4 years. Obama has been president for (a long long) 2 years. Where did the jobs go?
As you demonstrate a very poor understanding of economics, a proper explanation will be difficult to achieve. Here's a picture which summarizes the problem:
Post WWII, Federal Spending has trended around 20% of the economy (with receipts trending between 18-19%). Obamanomics has increased that spending to 25% of the economy in less than 2 years, and is headed towards 30%. Receipts are not, and will not grow no matter how high they raise tax rates due to the fact that high taxes suppress economic activity - something DC consistently refuses to acknowledge in its budget models.
This level of government spending retards growth of the private sector due to the very simple concept of Opportunity Costs. Government is not an efficient investor of capital and does not create jobs. It allocates jobs (at a fractional multiplier) from one sector to another. By diverting that capital, the government prevents other, more productive jobs from being creating - the Opportunity Cost which, like the effect of high taxes, is not properly considered when the government scores its bloated programs.
The only way to create jobs is for the government to GET OUT OF THE WAY of the private sector.
Yeah, like that's worked so well before. Fewer jobs, less wages. Trickle down is non-existent, so you guys want to try it again?
http://www.tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.nsf/0971609221721415852572ac0067c130/ed6ea2d2bd49e267852577a80067043b/$FILE/Table_4.pdf
And here's a member of the Economic Illiterates Greek Chorus spewing yet more nonsense.
It wouldn't occur to you to consider how the tax code and regulatory bureaucracy has expanded over the decades to the point where small, entrepreneurial businesses are being suffocated. Net job creation is due to the small business sector. Period. End of story.
Thank you for proving my point regarding your poor understanding of economics.
Now how about getting back to the classroom and brainwashing another generation of innocent children into being complacent tools of the state.
You post a personal attack because you're too stupid to explain with examples and evidence how the government getting out of the way benefits jobs creation as well as the economy, environment and the health of our people.
So, lets say government gets out of the way. The oldest profession flourishes, for there are no cops to prosecute prostitutes or their pimps, no prosecutors needed since no arrests are made and no free clinics to diagnose and treat STD's.
Want more examples? I can offer many, but making an argument to a willfully ignorant partisan ^$##@$^* makes no sense.
Have a nice day and thank you so much for sharing your opinion.
Nobody's calling for anarchy which is what you are illustrating, stop being so silly. What is meant by "getting out of the way" is the reduction in the amount of regs, the punitive taxation, the mandates, the reporting. You see, I am a CPA and have served as a CFO of mid-sized company. The reporting requirements, the endless surveys and census' forms, the endless amounts of insurance needed just to operate, the environmental studies required just to build a new plant, the forms, the never ending changes to W2's, 1099's, 940's, 941's, etc., the endless changes in withholding tables, amounts, SOX compliance, it is a nightmare. And you think that;s bad? Try taking a firm public. You have the SEC and various other agencies up your ass with a microscope.
Nobody's advocating eliminating the police... so get real.
As you demonstrate a very poor understanding of economics, a proper explanation will be difficult to achieve. Here's a picture which summarizes the problem:
Post WWII, Federal Spending has trended around 20% of the economy (with receipts trending between 18-19%). Obamanomics has increased that spending to 25% of the economy in less than 2 years, and is headed towards 30%. Receipts are not, and will not grow no matter how high they raise tax rates due to the fact that high taxes suppress economic activity - something DC consistently refuses to acknowledge in its budget models.
This level of government spending retards growth of the private sector due to the very simple concept of Opportunity Costs. Government is not an efficient investor of capital and does not create jobs. It allocates jobs (at a fractional multiplier) from one sector to another. By diverting that capital, the government prevents other, more productive jobs from being creating - the Opportunity Cost which, like the effect of high taxes, is not properly considered when the government scores its bloated programs.
The only way to create jobs is for the government to GET OUT OF THE WAY of the private sector.
I love simple explanations of extremely complex issues. And using statistics and graphs explains nothing without contex.
What you are saying is taxes and regulations kill business. My answer is that 'burden' can and is mitigted by special interest legislation provided to business and industry by both Democrats and Republicans. Business and industry rely on government for much of its business.
Look at the Miliatry Industrial complex; who is their customer?
Look at Big Farma, without regulations and subsidies food prices would drop from overproduction, soon crops would be left to rot in the fields. Then what, famine and higher prices.
Who built the highways and railroads which move our goods and services? Contractors paid for by taxes by the government.
Small business; restaurants, dry cleaners, hardware stores, ice cream stores, etc. etc. rely on employed Americans to have income sufficient to frequent their business.
In one respect the solution to this complex problem is simple: Jobs. How jobs are created is the object of controversy and should be debated.
Sadly, the New Right has been convinced that there is only one way for jobs to be created in America; there is no proof or evidence that government getting out of the way produces anything but low-paying jobs with few benefits (research the pay and benefits of a Wal-Mart employee).
Plutocracy anyone? Sure, vote for the GOP (Grow our Plutocracy) party.
Thank you for proving my point regarding your poor understanding of economics.
Now how about getting back to the classroom and brainwashing another generation of innocent children into being complacent tools of the state.
BTW, the HIRE act and the recent changes to employee SSI withholding has created an unmitigated nightmare for payroll systems.
what the hell is JOBS BILL?
And the First order of Business the people who voted in the Republicans with this last election has been to take on the TAKEOVER of our health care by this commie administration.
They better stay with it if they want to KEEP THEIR JOBS.
Sorry, hon, it STAYS unless and until it reaches the Supreme Court.
Actually, no, it's already been voided.
One part has been voided, and others probably will too. But the bill itself will stand.
You post a personal attack because you're too stupid to explain with examples and evidence how the government getting out of the way benefits jobs creation as well as the economy, environment and the health of our people.
So, lets say government gets out of the way. The oldest profession flourishes, for there are no cops to prosecute prostitutes or their pimps, no prosecutors needed since no arrests are made and no free clinics to diagnose and treat STD's.
Want more examples? I can offer many, but making an argument to a willfully ignorant partisan ^$##@$^* makes no sense.
Have a nice day and thank you so much for sharing your opinion.
Nobody's calling for anarchy which is what you are illustrating, stop being so silly. What is meant by "getting out of the way" is the reduction in the amount of regs, the punitive taxation, the mandates, the reporting. You see, I am a CPA and have served as a CFO of mid-sized company. The reporting requirements, the endless surveys and census' forms, the endless amounts of insurance needed just to operate, the environmental studies required just to build a new plant, the forms, the never ending changes to W2's, 1099's, 940's, 941's, etc., the endless changes in withholding tables, amounts, SOX compliance, it is a nightmare. And you think that;s bad? Try taking a firm public. You have the SEC and various other agencies up your ass with a microscope.
Nobody's advocating eliminating the police... so get real.
Indeed.
At one of my small companies, we underwent an EEOC audit. The "auditor" harassed us because of the four people in HR, none of them were men.
Why on earth we need the Federal Government to scrutinize the gender of an HR staff consisting of FOUR PEOPLE is inexplicable.
Sorry, hon, it STAYS unless and until it reaches the Supreme Court.
Actually, no, it's already been voided.
They would have to ask for a stay at this point. Like you said, it's dead meat.
