Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So all the snowflakes have to do to put the NRA out of business is to get the guns out of the hands of all the criminals, who don't give a flying f* about all the legislation they pass.Exactly, the more criminals have guns the easier the NRA can convince the non-criminals that they need guns to protect themselves.
"How many guns are brought in from the Red States?
You people are too fuicking stupid to be alive.
How many guns are brought in from the Red States?
You people are too fuicking stupid to be alive.
It is the NRA who is arming the drug cartels, as you well know.So all the snowflakes have to do to put the NRA out of business is to get the guns out of the hands of all the criminals, who don't give a flying f* about all the legislation they pass.Exactly, the more criminals have guns the easier the NRA can convince the non-criminals that they need guns to protect themselves.
I would suggest starting by NOT illegally arming any more Mexican Drug Cartels or terrorists, like Barry did.
Kimmel is spot on
Liberals still get their talking points from comedians.
that's the point of those opposing gun laws, you can make enough laws so as to make the constitution worthless, but guns will make it from somewhere
See what everyone means about CNN and the other fake news outlets...they falsely claim it is the CIAIt is the NRA who is arming the drug cartels, as you well know.So all the snowflakes have to do to put the NRA out of business is to get the guns out of the hands of all the criminals, who don't give a flying f* about all the legislation they pass.Exactly, the more criminals have guns the easier the NRA can convince the non-criminals that they need guns to protect themselves.
I would suggest starting by NOT illegally arming any more Mexican Drug Cartels or terrorists, like Barry did.
Now why did you go and have to prove yourself to be a deplorable liar who has no credibility?It is the NRA who is arming the drug cartels, as you well know.
)
censor him I change the channel. that's his censor.Fuck Jimmy Kimmel.
He only cries for ratings.
He's a hypocrite.
He has the right to express his opinion, and your desire to censor him is evidence you are not a real American.
The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.
None of which would have stopped Paddock, but let's not allow reality to get in the way of your feelings.
All you have done is show that Right-wing media lie in packs.Now why did you go and have to prove yourself to be a deplorable liar who has no credibility?It is the NRA who is arming the drug cartels, as you well know.
ATF gunwalking scandal - Wikipedia
'Fast And Furious' Just Might Be President Obama's Watergate
El Chapo’s Capture Puts ‘Operation Fast and Furious’ Back in the Headlines
I don't know WHY you did it, but thanks!
(If libs are serious about wanting to ensure the mentally ill can not have guns in their possession, someone might want to report ed to the feds and have them check out his home for firearms he should not have.
/—-/ Hey moron, Rush simply cited the study, he didn’t create it. You can’t refute the data so you attack the messenger and reject the studyout of hand. How liberal of you./----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEIAfter being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.
Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'
"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.
The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.
The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."
Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.
Citing Rush Limbaugh? Just how fucking stupid can you get.
There are lots of factors in the lowering of the crime rate. But hey, Rush knows evertything.....everything to takes to dupe the ignorant.
With fewer guns, the rate might have dropped more.
The average global temperature rose during that period therefore global warming is reducing the crime rate. Autos averaged a higher MPG .... OMG OMG Higher fuel efficiencies reduced the crime rate!
/—-/ How many laws did Paddock violate? How would another 200 laws stop him?The NRA ignores the wishes of it's own members who overwhelmingly support things like detailed background checks and keeping guns out of the hands of mentally ill people.
None of which would have stopped Paddock, but let's not allow reality to get in the way of your feelings.
Feelings rule you. What is it with people that find some anecdotal thing that supports what they believe and they immediately extrapolate it out into infinity. "Well if this one thing happened then all things happen". Reality doesn't work like that. "Well we have laws against stealing but one person still stole something so no laws against stealing work".
By this reasoning no laws are of any value so why have them.
An Ad Absurdum argument that is ridiculous. All of human existence is about minimizing damage. Many people that wear seatbelts die in car crashes. We still require seatbelts because they save many lives. People die running red lights and stop signs, nobody then argues red lights and stop signs should be done away with because in one instance or even a thousand people ignored the law or such devices were less than 100% effective.
To argue such a thing is the realm of the lazy, those people that have no real grasp on something but find one instance of an exception and then apply it across the board in all circumstances. Real life is far messier and muddier than that but the lazy look for the easiest path that requires the least amount of thought.
By this reasoning no laws are of any value so why have them.
An Ad Absurdum argument that is ridiculous.
By this reasoning no laws are of any value so why have them.
An Ad Absurdum argument that is ridiculous.
I agree, so why did you make one? Who said laws have no value? I responded specifically to your two aspects of gun control. Paddock passed multiple background checks as and he also had no history of mental illness so that would have not have stopped him either. These are FACTS, so your proposals wouldn't do shit. Like I said, don't let reality get in the way of your feelings
You mean like the FACT that not one new gun law / proposed piece of gun legislation from the Left would have stopped the Vegas shooting or any such shooting in the future? You mean like THOSE FACTS?LOL Yours is a fixed mentality that rejects facts in favor or your feelings on the matter.
/----/ From Rush's website: Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013 - AEIAfter being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.
Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'
"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.
The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.
The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."
Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...
You want to hear another little fact? AEI, American Enterprise Institute, has a chart here that records American gun ownership and the American murder rate with guns since 1994. Since 1994, gun ownership has increased. Privately owned firearms has increased by 56%. The gun homicide rate has declined since 1994 by 49%, meaning more guns does not mean more murder. More guns has meant less murder. Again, since 1994 the number of privately owned firearms has gone up 56%. I don’t have total numbers here, but it doesn’t matter for the purposes of this. In that same period sense 1994, gun homicide rate annually has declined 49%, it’s almost equal.
"Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate..."
After being called out for his disastrously-flawed Late Night Monologue rant about guns / gun legislation, Kimmel doubled down on his ignorance and emotion-fueled rhetoric, telling 'gun nuts' that they are partially to blame for refusing to allow Liberals to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights, which would not have prevented the Vegas attack and would not prevent future attacks.
Jimmy Kimmel Doubles Down on Gun 'Nuts': 'You Bear Some Responsibility'
"Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel continued to attack gun rights advocates during Tuesday night’s monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, defending the deceptive gun control rant he issued in tears one night earlier and mocked gun “nuts” who called him out on it.
The greater criticism for Kimmel rests on the nature of his Monday night comments; his misleading and, in some cases, blatantly false claims about gun laws, certain types of firearms, and Second Amendment legislation pending before Congress.
The comic offered no apology for his deception during his Tuesday night monologue, nor did he rectify his failure to cry over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — nearly 59 people each month — the way he cried over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada. Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it."
Yesterday several media outlets reported that Kimmel had received help writing his monologue from D-Schumer, who provided Kimmel with some gun 'facts' and figures. Well, that explains, in part, why his Monologue rant was so flawed and factually inaccurate...
