Does politics influence peoples position on this ?
It certainly shouldn't, but one has to wonder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Does politics influence peoples position on this ?
If you can smell a rat there must be a rat in the mix....you just said one or two,you did not include the MANY reliable ones he used
Oliver Stone's JFK: a basket case for conspiracyIts a stupid movie made a decade or two after the event....you can't be serious...Oliver Stone used one or two unreliable witnesses, and he dramatized episodes which probably did not happen. Other claims of factual inaccuracies were less solid, and can be explained merely as dramatic licence....I dare you to try and counter the facts and evidence he gave in his movie,you would end up with shit on your face same as the reaganut
Are There Factual Errors in Oliver Stone's Movie JFK? : 22 November 1963
you just said one or two,you did not include the MANY reliable ones he used. you cant be serious saying the movie doesnt prove how the warren commission lied about almost everything and OMITTED several key details oh and i said from the very get go,that not all of it was true,but that it was sure of a hell a lot more accurate and closer to the truth to what actually DID happen than what the warren commission said. and that is a miserable fail on my challenge i gave that his film does not debunk the warren commission,that was my challenge,you failed.
Oliver Stone's JFK: a basket case for conspiracyIts a stupid movie made a decade or two after the event....you can't be serious...Oliver Stone used one or two unreliable witnesses, and he dramatized episodes which probably did not happen. Other claims of factual inaccuracies were less solid, and can be explained merely as dramatic licence....I dare you to try and counter the facts and evidence he gave in his movie,you would end up with shit on your face same as the reaganut
Are There Factual Errors in Oliver Stone's Movie JFK? : 22 November 1963
you just said one or two,you did not include the MANY reliable ones he used. you cant be serious saying the movie doesnt prove how the warren commission lied about almost everything and OMITTED several key details oh and i said from the very get go,that not all of it was true,but that it was sure of a hell a lot more accurate and closer to the truth to what actually DID happen than what the warren commission said. and that is a miserable fail on my challenge i gave that his film does not debunk the warren commission,that was my challenge,you failed.
What is that, Pogo?I never followed all the theories but I often wondered if someone put him up to it, at least. Especially when that mob guy killed him. The mob was everywhere back then.So do you see it as close to the truth ?I had the same reaction.In my opinion this is a great movie. Without knowing much about the kennedy assassination it totally convinced me that he was not killed by Oswald alone.
In fact I would say that it is the ultimate conspiracy theory movie. I bought it on vhs when it came out and I also bought it for my Dad.
You guys know a lot more about it than me. Did it ring true ? Is Stone just a skilled story teller ?
Oswalds back up story.
The magic bullet.
Were these just made up ?
Anyway , its a film that wouldnt get made in Russia or China.
JFK (1991) - IMDb
It would indeed appear so.
Oliver Stone's JFK: a basket case for conspiracyIts a stupid movie made a decade or two after the event....you can't be serious...Oliver Stone used one or two unreliable witnesses, and he dramatized episodes which probably did not happen. Other claims of factual inaccuracies were less solid, and can be explained merely as dramatic licence....I dare you to try and counter the facts and evidence he gave in his movie,you would end up with shit on your face same as the reaganut
Are There Factual Errors in Oliver Stone's Movie JFK? : 22 November 1963
you just said one or two,you did not include the MANY reliable ones he used. you cant be serious saying the movie doesnt prove how the warren commission lied about almost everything and OMITTED several key details oh and i said from the very get go,that not all of it was true,but that it was sure of a hell a lot more accurate and closer to the truth to what actually DID happen than what the warren commission said. and that is a miserable fail on my challenge i gave that his film does not debunk the warren commission,that was my challenge,you failed.
What is that, Pogo?I never followed all the theories but I often wondered if someone put him up to it, at least. Especially when that mob guy killed him. The mob was everywhere back then.So do you see it as close to the truth ?I had the same reaction.In my opinion this is a great movie. Without knowing much about the kennedy assassination it totally convinced me that he was not killed by Oswald alone.
In fact I would say that it is the ultimate conspiracy theory movie. I bought it on vhs when it came out and I also bought it for my Dad.
You guys know a lot more about it than me. Did it ring true ? Is Stone just a skilled story teller ?
Oswalds back up story.
The magic bullet.
Were these just made up ?
Anyway , its a film that wouldnt get made in Russia or China.
JFK (1991) - IMDb
It would indeed appear so.
Like pogo said so well earlier and I did as well.the thing more important than anything stone was able to prove the wC bullshit was how he made a point of it with back and to the left.only someone on drugs who skipped junior high school science classes would think oswald did it after THAT point stone drove home. you hit a golf ball,the ball goes FORWARD,not backward.proof of conspiracy since that proves a shot was fired from the front as all doctors said.
What is that, Pogo?I never followed all the theories but I often wondered if someone put him up to it, at least. Especially when that mob guy killed him. The mob was everywhere back then.So do you see it as close to the truth ?I had the same reaction.In my opinion this is a great movie. Without knowing much about the kennedy assassination it totally convinced me that he was not killed by Oswald alone.
In fact I would say that it is the ultimate conspiracy theory movie. I bought it on vhs when it came out and I also bought it for my Dad.
You guys know a lot more about it than me. Did it ring true ? Is Stone just a skilled story teller ?
Oswalds back up story.
The magic bullet.
Were these just made up ?
Anyway , its a film that wouldnt get made in Russia or China.
JFK (1991) - IMDb
It would indeed appear so.
You are SUCH a party pooper. First, Oak Island oaks, now no JFK conspiracy? C'mon Rightwinger--live a little!Warren Comission was rightI never followed all the theories but I often wondered if someone put him up to it, at least. Especially when that mob guy killed him. The mob was everywhere back then.So do you see it as close to the truth ?I had the same reaction.
It would indeed appear so.
what NONE of these trolls that keep coming on here saying
Stone is certifiable....a complete nut job....Dude...a movie?...seriously?....Dude that post would be appropriate for that idiot nutcase deannelw ,but did you even read what he said? he said that the movie convinced him oswald did not act alone
obviously you have never watched it,a huge mistake you are making because had you done research on the movie, you would know stone exhaustively researched the case YEARS before making the film. people make the ignorant assumption that because its a MOVIE,its all made up which seems to be what you're doing ,but that could not be any further from the truth.The majority of the film is all documented and accurate down to the tee.
Now I am not saying that just watch the movie alone and assume that is the truth,however that movie is far too easy to prove the warren commission totally lied about almost everything,only getting a few things right like how old oswald was and irrelevent stuff like that.LOL
there is also a book called JFK the book of the film where the book explains in detail,where stone got his sources and how he backed them up,so yes a movie dude.
Just my opinion....
and the warren commission people were NOT complete nutjobs?
you are sounding more and more like WRONGwinger all the time who kisses the warren commissions ass everyday.
try and debunk the evidence that he gave in that film oswald was innocent and there were multiple shooters,you cant.
Oswald acted alone
You mean Howard Hunt the spook/plumber of Watergate?What is that, Pogo?I never followed all the theories but I often wondered if someone put him up to it, at least. Especially when that mob guy killed him. The mob was everywhere back then.So do you see it as close to the truth ?I had the same reaction.
It would indeed appear so.
Letter from LHO to Howard Hunt, two weeks before what Hunt called "the Big Event". It's what I thought of when you wondered if someone put him up to it. Very vague here but it would appear that Hunt was setting Oswald up to --- do something, or be somewhere --- and he (Oswald) had been told little about it.
What is that, Pogo?I never followed all the theories but I often wondered if someone put him up to it, at least. Especially when that mob guy killed him. The mob was everywhere back then.So do you see it as close to the truth ?I had the same reaction.
It would indeed appear so.
Letter from LHO to Howard Hunt, two weeks before what Hunt called "the Big Event". It's what I thought of when you wondered if someone put him up to it. Very vague here but it would appear that Hunt was setting Oswald up to --- do something, or be somewhere --- and he (Oswald) had been told little about it.
Since USMB's resident troll WRONGwinger liked this post,everybody knows thats bullshit.LOL
Whatever. When it comes to talking about movies, food, music and other non-political topics, I try to not make it a Left vs. Right issue. If RW likes the mini-series, it's fine with me.
It hurts your case though HAVING him like your post , the troll cant stand toe to toe in a debate on this subject as HUNDREDS here beside me can testify and has to LIE when he is backed up with nowhere to run that there was a conspiracy and oswald was innocent,the patsy just as he said he was,as they can all testify to as well.
omg...so did I, lol. Got it from Fingerhut!Holy fuck. You are old!I have never heard of betamax lol
I told you I was old!
I remember owning one in the 1970's before VHS whipped it butt...
All of you assholes are!
I also owned a Tandy Computer!
How many copies of Al Gores POS do you own?You morons probably own 20 copies of every Michael Moore DVD too.Shows why you’re a leftist. Easily fooled by bullshit.In my opinion this is a great movie. Without knowing much about the kennedy assassination it totally convinced me that he was not killed by Oswald alone.
In fact I would say that it is the ultimate conspiracy theory movie. I bought it on vhs when it came out and I also bought it for my Dad.
You guys know a lot more about it than me. Did it ring true ? Is Stone just a skilled story teller ?
Oswalds back up story.
The magic bullet.
Were these just made up ?
Anyway , its a film that wouldnt get made in Russia or China.
JFK (1991) - IMDb
Ironic post for a wag who just got busted twice in two days for posting bullshit threads.
So --- you're buying the WC too eh? Because I have multiple Magic Bridges for sale.
Why yes, I do take PayPal. How many Magic Bridges would you like?
You really should consider buying the Magic Bridge. It goes straight to Great Neck, then comes out, stands around in mid-air, checks its email, makes a complete turn and then goes to Connellyville where it runs over bones (rough ride there), plunges through Wristville and then plops you out on the other side, clean as a whistle.
In other words it goes straight to Coverupistan.
Like pogo said so well earlier and I did as well.the thing more important than anything stone was able to prove the wC bullshit was how he made a point of it with back and to the left.only someone on drugs who skipped junior high school science classes would think oswald did it after THAT point stone drove home. you hit a golf ball,the ball goes FORWARD,not backward.proof of conspiracy since that proves a shot was fired from the front as all doctors said.
Clearly Oswald had not only "magic bullets" but "boomerang bullets".
This has Australia's fingerprints all over it.
How many copies of Al Gores POS do you own?You morons probably own 20 copies of every Michael Moore DVD too.Shows why you’re a leftist. Easily fooled by bullshit.
Ironic post for a wag who just got busted twice in two days for posting bullshit threads.
So --- you're buying the WC too eh? Because I have multiple Magic Bridges for sale.
Why yes, I do take PayPal. How many Magic Bridges would you like?
You really should consider buying the Magic Bridge. It goes straight to Great Neck, then comes out, stands around in mid-air, checks its email, makes a complete turn and then goes to Connellyville where it runs over bones (rough ride there), plunges through Wristville and then plops you out on the other side, clean as a whistle.
In other words it goes straight to Coverupistan.
Where does it say Howard Hunt?What is that, Pogo?I never followed all the theories but I often wondered if someone put him up to it, at least. Especially when that mob guy killed him. The mob was everywhere back then.So do you see it as close to the truth ?I had the same reaction.
It would indeed appear so.
Letter from LHO to Howard Hunt, two weeks before what Hunt called "the Big Event". It's what I thought of when you wondered if someone put him up to it. Very vague here but it would appear that Hunt was setting Oswald up to --- do something, or be somewhere --- and he (Oswald) had been told little about it.