JFK: Inside the target car

What I don't understand is that if it was the government like many conspiracy theorists believe, why didn't they have him killed in a private place or something other than a bullet wound (i.e. fake heart attack) instead of in front of a large group of people with many cameras? Seems like that would be a much easier way to cover everything up.

Not as dramatic, and Johnson doesn't get the whole country's support that way. Plus, people would be much more likely to suspect what with conspiracy theorists the way they are.

and also because they wanted the whole world to know that Oswald was the lone assassin and wanted everybody to see it.its a known fact that the CIA was behind it is why over 80% of the population dont accept the fairy tale warren commission report.
 
What I don't understand is that if it was the government like many conspiracy theorists believe, why didn't they have him killed in a private place or something other than a bullet wound (i.e. fake heart attack) instead of in front of a large group of people with many cameras? Seems like that would be a much easier way to cover everything up.

Not as dramatic, and Johnson doesn't get the whole country's support that way. Plus, people would be much more likely to suspect what with conspiracy theorists the way they are.

and also because they wanted the whole world to know that Oswald was the lone assassin and wanted everybody to see it.its a known fact that the CIA was behind it is why over 80% of the population dont accept the fairy tale warren commission report.
bullshit
where is your source to back up the 80% claim
 
Dale Myers

* Lies for the Eyes: The Visual Tricks of Dale Myers
Dale Myers' animated version of the Zapruder film allows viewers to study the JFK assassination "with an incredible degree of accuracy." Or so its creator says. The reports below reveal how Myers --- with an incredible degree of blatancy --- dispensed with realities on the Zapruder film that challenge the lone assassin theory.

o What You Need to Know about Dale Myers introduces the analyses below.

o Delaying JFK's First Reaction to Coincide with Connally's by Falsifying Z-224. A sleight of hands --- JFK's hands --- makes all the difference.

o Accelerating Connally's Reaction to Coincide with JFK's. Myers makes a mountain out of a molehill, turning minutiae into a Big Moment.

o Making a Separate Shot Disappear Here, Myers makes a molehill out of a mountain.
* "I Don't Think Oswald Pulled the Trigger" Back in 1982, Dale Myers was selling conspiracy, and he granted the following interview to John Kelin.

Return to Main Page
 
I watched "The Men who Killed Kennedy" and there was one short clip on there that I think proves beyond a doubt that Oswald couldn't have killed Kennedy. Seconds after the shots were fired, a policeman rushed into the school book depository where he found Oswald in the basement where people claimed they had seen him all morning waiting for a phone call. There were 7 people on the stairs, none of which saw Oswald come down and the elevator took several minutes, so unless you can think of how Oswald could get down 6, or is it 7 stories in a few seconds without being seen, he couldn't possibly have done it, well, unless the cop was lying and I don't see the reasoning for that.

I also talked to some people who think that it was actually one of the motorcaid cops that killed JFK. Hearing the shots, he pulled his gun out and it went off, shooting the president.

All I'm certain of is that the Warren report is a bunch of lies made up to make the American people feel better.
 
It's important to understand that from the very beginning, officials of our government did not want a true investigation and made every attempt to "make the public satisfied that Oswald was the assassin."

There may be no other document that makes it more clear that there was no interest in a true investigation by the highest federal authorities and it was issued just days after the assassination. A memo prepared by Walter Jenkins reflects his conversation with J. Edgar Hoover where Hoover makes this telling statement:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that they can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."

This conversation occured on November 24, 1963, one day prior to Katzenbach's memo below. Meanwhile, Hoover himself wrote a glaring similar memo on the same day that reads:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and SO IS Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that WE can convince the pubic that Oswald is the real assassin." (HSCA, vol 3, pp 471-473. This memo was apparently prepared by Hoover at 4 pm.)

A third memo written by the FBI's Courtney Evans on November 26th mentions that Hoover himself drafted the Katzenbach memo. (North, "Act of Treason")


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo from Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General

November 25, 1963

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. MOYERS

It is important that all of the facts surrounding President Kennedy's Assassination be made public in a way which will satisfy people in the United States and abroad that all the facts have been told and that a statement to this effect be made now.

1. The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.

2. Speculation about Oswald's motivation ought to be cut off, and we should have some basis for rebutting thought that this was a Communist conspiracy or (as the Iron Curtain press is saying) a right-wing conspiracy to blame it on the Communists. Unfortunately the facts on Oswald seem about too pat-- too obvious (Marxist, Cuba, Russian wife, etc.). The Dallas police have put out statements on the Communist conspiracy theory, and it was they who were in charge when he was shot and thus silenced.

3. The matter has been handled thus far with neither dignity nor conviction. Facts have been mixed with rumour and speculation. We can scarcely let the world see us totally in the image of the Dallas police when our President is murdered.

I think this objective may be satisfied by making public as soon as possible a complete and thorough FBI report on Oswald and the assassination. This may run into the difficulty of pointing to in- consistencies between this report and statements by Dallas police officials. But the reputation of the Bureau is such that it may do the whole job. The only other step would be the appointment of a Presidential Commission of unimpeachable personnel to review and examine the evidence and announce its conclusions. This has both advantages and disadvantages. It think it can await publication of the FBI report and public reaction to it here and abroad.

I think, however, that a statement that all the facts will be made public property in an orderly and responsible way should be made now. We need something to head off public speculation or Congressional hearings of the wrong sort.

Nicholas deB. Katzenbach

Deputy Attorney General
 
It's important to understand that from the very beginning, officials of our government did not want a true investigation and made every attempt to "make the public satisfied that Oswald was the assassin."

There may be no other document that makes it more clear that there was no interest in a true investigation by the highest federal authorities and it was issued just days after the assassination. A memo prepared by Walter Jenkins reflects his conversation with J. Edgar Hoover where Hoover makes this telling statement:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that they can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."

This conversation occured on November 24, 1963, one day prior to Katzenbach's memo below. Meanwhile, Hoover himself wrote a glaring similar memo on the same day that reads:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and SO IS Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that WE can convince the pubic that Oswald is the real assassin." (HSCA, vol 3, pp 471-473. This memo was apparently prepared by Hoover at 4 pm.)

A third memo written by the FBI's Courtney Evans on November 26th mentions that Hoover himself drafted the Katzenbach memo. (North, "Act of Treason")


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo from Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General

November 25, 1963

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. MOYERS

It is important that all of the facts surrounding President Kennedy's Assassination be made public in a way which will satisfy people in the United States and abroad that all the facts have been told and that a statement to this effect be made now.

1. The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.

2. Speculation about Oswald's motivation ought to be cut off, and we should have some basis for rebutting thought that this was a Communist conspiracy or (as the Iron Curtain press is saying) a right-wing conspiracy to blame it on the Communists. Unfortunately the facts on Oswald seem about too pat-- too obvious (Marxist, Cuba, Russian wife, etc.). The Dallas police have put out statements on the Communist conspiracy theory, and it was they who were in charge when he was shot and thus silenced.

3. The matter has been handled thus far with neither dignity nor conviction. Facts have been mixed with rumour and speculation. We can scarcely let the world see us totally in the image of the Dallas police when our President is murdered.

I think this objective may be satisfied by making public as soon as possible a complete and thorough FBI report on Oswald and the assassination. This may run into the difficulty of pointing to in- consistencies between this report and statements by Dallas police officials. But the reputation of the Bureau is such that it may do the whole job. The only other step would be the appointment of a Presidential Commission of unimpeachable personnel to review and examine the evidence and announce its conclusions. This has both advantages and disadvantages. It think it can await publication of the FBI report and public reaction to it here and abroad.

I think, however, that a statement that all the facts will be made public property in an orderly and responsible way should be made now. We need something to head off public speculation or Congressional hearings of the wrong sort.

Nicholas deB. Katzenbach

Deputy Attorney General

well done.yeah thats just one of many examples of proof that proves oswald did not pull the trigger.Again Sheila's previous post before yours also proves it as well.The warren commission also forgot to mention that the the police report reported that the first rifle they found on the scene was a Mauser and not the carcano rifle they later showed the public as the rifle that fired the shot and that the alleged rifle they found was apiece of crap.the scope was badly misaligned,the trees were in full bloom,all the doctors at parkland hospital said he had a small entrance wound to the front and the photographs prove that as well.Not to mention the fact that anybody who knows anything about firearms knows that your head goes forward when you shoot a person from the back of the head,not backwards,and the police escort driver on kennedys side had blood splattered on him which is impossible if the shot had come from the back.

But despite all this evidence and facts,logic and common sense doesnt work with some of these people like the thread starter of this thread though.Thats okay though because the warren commissions fairy tale has come apart over the years and the majority of the country no longer believes in it anymore.Just this past november,they had a special on PBS propagating the lone gunman theory that oswald did it defending the warren commission and even THEY had to come out and admit it that people dont accept the warren commission report anymore cause at the end of the show,they had the words printed out on the screen-80% of the country believes there was a conspiracy to kill kennedy.will duh,thats because the facts prove it.
 
Last edited:
I shot JFK from the Parkway with a high powered hunting rifle.
 
It's important to understand that from the very beginning, officials of our government did not want a true investigation and made every attempt to "make the public satisfied that Oswald was the assassin."

There may be no other document that makes it more clear that there was no interest in a true investigation by the highest federal authorities and it was issued just days after the assassination. A memo prepared by Walter Jenkins reflects his conversation with J. Edgar Hoover where Hoover makes this telling statement:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that they can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."

This conversation occured on November 24, 1963, one day prior to Katzenbach's memo below. Meanwhile, Hoover himself wrote a glaring similar memo on the same day that reads:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and SO IS Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that WE can convince the pubic that Oswald is the real assassin." (HSCA, vol 3, pp 471-473. This memo was apparently prepared by Hoover at 4 pm.)

A third memo written by the FBI's Courtney Evans on November 26th mentions that Hoover himself drafted the Katzenbach memo. (North, "Act of Treason")


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo from Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General

November 25, 1963

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. MOYERS

It is important that all of the facts surrounding President Kennedy's Assassination be made public in a way which will satisfy people in the United States and abroad that all the facts have been told and that a statement to this effect be made now.

1. The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.

2. Speculation about Oswald's motivation ought to be cut off, and we should have some basis for rebutting thought that this was a Communist conspiracy or (as the Iron Curtain press is saying) a right-wing conspiracy to blame it on the Communists. Unfortunately the facts on Oswald seem about too pat-- too obvious (Marxist, Cuba, Russian wife, etc.). The Dallas police have put out statements on the Communist conspiracy theory, and it was they who were in charge when he was shot and thus silenced.

3. The matter has been handled thus far with neither dignity nor conviction. Facts have been mixed with rumour and speculation. We can scarcely let the world see us totally in the image of the Dallas police when our President is murdered.

I think this objective may be satisfied by making public as soon as possible a complete and thorough FBI report on Oswald and the assassination. This may run into the difficulty of pointing to in- consistencies between this report and statements by Dallas police officials. But the reputation of the Bureau is such that it may do the whole job. The only other step would be the appointment of a Presidential Commission of unimpeachable personnel to review and examine the evidence and announce its conclusions. This has both advantages and disadvantages. It think it can await publication of the FBI report and public reaction to it here and abroad.

I think, however, that a statement that all the facts will be made public property in an orderly and responsible way should be made now. We need something to head off public speculation or Congressional hearings of the wrong sort.

Nicholas deB. Katzenbach

Deputy Attorney General

well done.yeah thats just one of many examples of proof that proves oswald did not pull the trigger.Again Sheila's previous post before yours also proves it as well.The warren commission also forgot to mention that the the police report reported that the first rifle they found on the scene was a Mauser and not the carcano rifle they later showed the public as the rifle that fired the shot and that the alleged rifle they found was apiece of crap.the scope was badly misaligned,the trees were in full bloom,all the doctors at parkland hospital said he had a small entrance wound to the front and the photographs prove that as well.Not to mention the fact that anybody who knows anything about firearms knows that your head goes forward when you shoot a person from the back of the head,not backwards,and the police escort driver on kennedys side had blood splattered on him which is impossible if the shot had come from the front.

But despite all this evidence and facts,logic and common sense doesnt work with some of these people like the thread starter of this thread though.Thats okay though because the warren commissions fairy tale has come apart over the years and the majority of the country no longer believes in it anymore.Just this past november,they had a special on PBS propagating the lone gunman theory that oswald did it defending the warren commission and even THEY had to come out and admit it that people dont accept the warren commission report anymore cause at the end of the show,they had the words printed out on the screen-80% of the country believes there was a conspiracy to kill kennedy.will duh,thats because the facts prove it.

I saw a show on the Kennedy assassination years and years ago and they were talking about the number of people who were on the grassy knoll that died mysteriously within a few years after the assassination. Japan, apparently did the math and said the odds of all those people dying in such mysterious circumstances after witnessing the same event were something like 4 in a million. Can't remember exactly, it's been more than 30 years since I saw that particular show.
 
It's important to understand that from the very beginning, officials of our government did not want a true investigation and made every attempt to "make the public satisfied that Oswald was the assassin."

There may be no other document that makes it more clear that there was no interest in a true investigation by the highest federal authorities and it was issued just days after the assassination. A memo prepared by Walter Jenkins reflects his conversation with J. Edgar Hoover where Hoover makes this telling statement:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that they can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."

This conversation occured on November 24, 1963, one day prior to Katzenbach's memo below. Meanwhile, Hoover himself wrote a glaring similar memo on the same day that reads:

"The thing I am most concerned about, and SO IS Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so that WE can convince the pubic that Oswald is the real assassin." (HSCA, vol 3, pp 471-473. This memo was apparently prepared by Hoover at 4 pm.)

A third memo written by the FBI's Courtney Evans on November 26th mentions that Hoover himself drafted the Katzenbach memo. (North, "Act of Treason")


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo from Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General

November 25, 1963

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. MOYERS

It is important that all of the facts surrounding President Kennedy's Assassination be made public in a way which will satisfy people in the United States and abroad that all the facts have been told and that a statement to this effect be made now.

1. The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.

2. Speculation about Oswald's motivation ought to be cut off, and we should have some basis for rebutting thought that this was a Communist conspiracy or (as the Iron Curtain press is saying) a right-wing conspiracy to blame it on the Communists. Unfortunately the facts on Oswald seem about too pat-- too obvious (Marxist, Cuba, Russian wife, etc.). The Dallas police have put out statements on the Communist conspiracy theory, and it was they who were in charge when he was shot and thus silenced.

3. The matter has been handled thus far with neither dignity nor conviction. Facts have been mixed with rumour and speculation. We can scarcely let the world see us totally in the image of the Dallas police when our President is murdered.

I think this objective may be satisfied by making public as soon as possible a complete and thorough FBI report on Oswald and the assassination. This may run into the difficulty of pointing to in- consistencies between this report and statements by Dallas police officials. But the reputation of the Bureau is such that it may do the whole job. The only other step would be the appointment of a Presidential Commission of unimpeachable personnel to review and examine the evidence and announce its conclusions. This has both advantages and disadvantages. It think it can await publication of the FBI report and public reaction to it here and abroad.

I think, however, that a statement that all the facts will be made public property in an orderly and responsible way should be made now. We need something to head off public speculation or Congressional hearings of the wrong sort.

Nicholas deB. Katzenbach

Deputy Attorney General

well done.yeah thats just one of many examples of proof that proves oswald did not pull the trigger.Again Sheila's previous post before yours also proves it as well.The warren commission also forgot to mention that the the police report reported that the first rifle they found on the scene was a Mauser and not the carcano rifle they later showed the public as the rifle that fired the shot and that the alleged rifle they found was apiece of crap.the scope was badly misaligned,the trees were in full bloom,all the doctors at parkland hospital said he had a small entrance wound to the front and the photographs prove that as well.Not to mention the fact that anybody who knows anything about firearms knows that your head goes forward when you shoot a person from the back of the head,not backwards,and the police escort driver on kennedys side had blood splattered on him which is impossible if the shot had come from the front.

But despite all this evidence and facts,logic and common sense doesnt work with some of these people like the thread starter of this thread though.Thats okay though because the warren commissions fairy tale has come apart over the years and the majority of the country no longer believes in it anymore.Just this past november,they had a special on PBS propagating the lone gunman theory that oswald did it defending the warren commission and even THEY had to come out and admit it that people dont accept the warren commission report anymore cause at the end of the show,they had the words printed out on the screen-80% of the country believes there was a conspiracy to kill kennedy.will duh,thats because the facts prove it.

I saw a show on the Kennedy assassination years and years ago and they were talking about the number of people who were on the grassy knoll that died mysteriously within a few years after the assassination. Japan, apparently did the math and said the odds of all those people dying in such mysterious circumstances after witnessing the same event were something like 4 in a million. Can't remember exactly, it's been more than 30 years since I saw that particular show.

Thanks for bringing that up.That fact is mentioned in Jim Marrs excellent book- CROSSFIRE-The Plot To Kill Kennedy.yeah thats just one more reason we know the official version is a fairy tale.anybody who came forward saying they saw a gunman behind the picket fence and heard shots from the grassy knoll,they ended up dying in myserious deaths,sometimes violently.One example is that mexican who testified that he saw several men firing gunshots at patrolmen J.D.Tippet and running off in different directions,after he testified to that,his brother who looks very much like him died from getting a bullet to the head.,so after his brother ended up dying mysteriously after he testified about that,he later changed his story to the warren commission that he only saw one gunman and said that it was Lee Harvey Oswald. Mrs Clemons,oswalds landlady who also testified that she saw several men firing at tippet and running off in different directions, ALSO died mysteriously after that.people here ignore that fact,that if they had a story that did not fit the warren commissions version,they ignored it or they ended up dying in mysterious deaths.as I said earlier,Marina Oswald testified to the warren commission that oswald hated kennedy and that she thought he did it and that was only because they put pressure on her and threatend to deport her children back to russia if she did not testify to that.

So her being the young frightened girl she was,told them what they wanted to hear.NOW she is much older and no longer afraid of the government anymore and she tells the truth about that.How they threatened and harrassed her to say that.Also other witnesses who were there that day who saw a gunman behind the picket fence firing a rifle at kennedy,they kept quiet for many decades because they were afraid of dying in mysterious deaths as well if they came forward because they saw how people were dying off in mysterious deaths for saying they saw a gunman behind the picket fence.Now they are so much older and no longer afraid of dying since they wont be around much longer anyways,so more and more people have come forward over the years.who can blame them for staying quiet? if they can kill the president of the united states and get away with it,then their lives sure wouldnt be missed if they killed them as well like they did those other witnesses. there is also the fact that Doctor Crenshaw the leading physician,back in the 90's finally broke his silence and said that he got a phone call from LBJ at the hospital and that LBJ told him that he wanted a death bed confession from oswald that he did it.
 
A lone, disaffected nut killed the President. A tragedy, to be sure, but not a conspiracy.

I watched "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" on the History channel. They have witnesses that place Oswald in the basement breakroom minutes before the shooting. A cop testified that seconds after the shooting, he ran into the building and found Oswald in the basement, the same place he had been all morning, saying he was waiting for a phone call. The elevator in that particular building took a lot more than a few seconds to get from the 6th floor to the basement and there were many people on the stairs, NONE of whom had seen Oswald running down.

Now, unless you can think of a way he got from the 6th floor to the basement in less than a minute....there is no way Oswald could have done the shooting.

So he gets shot from the building and the cop runs into the basement to look for the gunman. Ahh I see.
 
To me, the conspiracy isn't who shot JFK but why and if there was anyone behind it.

Even if Oswald was the lone shooter, it doesn't mean someone wasn't controlling him.

I wonder why THIS hasn't been shown throughout the media.

Carlos Marcello Had JFK Killed

“Yeah, I had the son of a bitch killed. I’m glad I did. I’m sorry I couldn’t have done it myself!”

These were the words of Carlos Marcello, the Mafia godfather of Louisiana and Texas. And he was talking about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Marcello’s startling admission is in uncensored FBI files at the National Archives, detailed for the first time in a new encyclopedic book “Legacy of Secrecy” by Lamar Waldron.
The Mafia easily had the most to gain by killing JFK and essentially getting JFK and RFK out of the way.

And of course, I'm willing to bet 2-1 that the CIA was involved also to at least a certain extent.

And the FBI wasn't gonna do shit. J. Edgar Hoover at the helm hated the Kennedy Brothers. The same POS who sent letters to MLK. Jr telling him to kill himself or he'd reveal the fact that MLK.Jr had a mistress.
I wonder why THIS hasn't been shown throughout the media.?

credibility.

---

I have no idea how somebody controls another individual in the way people propose Oswald was supposed to be controlled. It sounds like science fiction -- the laughable kind.

The Mafia like everyone else only had to wait for an election or two. This is where the theories break down. Mafia Dons and other powerful people know how to bide their time. hello? :lol:

Lone gunmen have assassinated leaders throughout history, most times with no one 'controlling' them.
 
for anyone that is really interested in the truth, it is on the Discovery channel now

if you really believe all the conspiracy stuff you REALLY should watch and see if you can find errors in what they do

i challenge you to

Naturally YOU a guy who is afraid of conspiracys

Gee, who do we listen to? The guy who merely wants us to watch a TV show about conspiracies or a fucked up idiot like you who can't even spell the fucking word. Go away and perhaps you'll stop embarrassing yourself. Congratulations on at lest capitalizing the first word of your post. You're making progress.
 
I saw a show on the Kennedy assassination years and years ago and they were talking about the number of people who were on the grassy knoll that died mysteriously within a few years after the assassination. Japan, apparently did the math and said the odds of all those people dying in such mysterious circumstances after witnessing the same event were something like 4 in a million. Can't remember exactly, it's been more than 30 years since I saw that particular show.

London Sunday Times came up with something like 1,000,000 trillion to one. Then they did another actuary about the number of persons who were witnesses to another crime (I can't remember which one) who were material witnesses and died within 7 years. I think it was Sadat's murder. Anyway, the same gigantic odds presented themselves. There is a movie called "Executive Action". Right before the credits roll they present the JFK data. Since it was made in 73, the Sadat data isn't there. But if you want the exact odds of these material witnesses being dead you'll find it there.

Its of little matter; nobody will ever buy that Oswald didn't act alone. Just way too many things that make zero sense.
 
for anyone that is really interested in the truth, it is on the Discovery channel now

if you really believe all the conspiracy stuff you REALLY should watch and see if you can find errors in what they do

i challenge you to
Go hunt for the documentary " The men who killed JFK".
You'll find it a real eye opener when you find out what a certain "person" was up to that day..........when America became murkastan, the dictatorship/corporatocracy..
 
for anyone that is really interested in the truth, it is on the Discovery channel now

if you really believe all the conspiracy stuff you REALLY should watch and see if you can find errors in what they do

i challenge you to
Go hunt for the documentary " The men who killed JFK".
You'll find it a real eye opener when you find out what a certain "person" was up to that day..........when America became murkastan, the dictatorship/corporatocracy..
ROFLMAO

you MUST be referring to the nutter claims of GHW Bush being there
 
The part I find the most interesting is how reality has been usurped by a desperate academia and progressive 'intellectuals' so they could introduce a smoke screen to cover for the fact that one of their own, a Marxist- Leninist, assassinated JFK....they simply cannot reconcile their decades of belief in and their love affair with Communism with that fact, there-fore they do their best to obfuscate.

So they ( ala the hilarious Oliveer Stone-JFK) created a plethora of bogeymen; the mafia, Castro, military-industrial complex, Texas oilmen, LBJ, Marilyn Monroe's dentist......
 
for anyone that is really interested in the truth, it is on the Discovery channel now

if you really believe all the conspiracy stuff you REALLY should watch and see if you can find errors in what they do

i challenge you to


I'll look for this to dvr....thx.

this to-

Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy-
Vincent Bugliosi

he leaves no stone unturned.
 
for anyone that is really interested in the truth, it is on the Discovery channel now

if you really believe all the conspiracy stuff you REALLY should watch and see if you can find errors in what they do

i challenge you to


I'll look for this to dvr....thx.

this to-

Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy-
Vincent Bugliosi

he leaves no stone unturned.
this was posted months ago
but i'm sure they have it available on dvd


actually, looks like they have at least parts of it available to watch online

http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/jfk-inside-the-target-car-jfks-final-hours.html
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top