Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
The only source you have presented are Jewish sources as stated
This was one of the first documented massacres against Jews by Palestinians, proving they started the aggression.1929 Hebron massacre - Conservapedia
During the summer of 1929, however, the Islamic Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and head of the Supreme Muslim Council, Haj Amin al-Husseini, began to agitate the Arabs to riot against the Jewish community, distributing leaflets and stirring up anti-Jewish sentiment. Among these were leaflets stating that the Jews were planning to take over the al-Aqsa Mosque.[7] Another stated: "Hearts are in tumult because of these barbaric deeds, and the people began to break out in shouts of 'war, Jihad... rebellion.'... O Arab nation, the eyes of your brothers in Palestine are upon you... and they awaken your religious feelings and national zealotry to rise up against the enemy who violated the honor of Islam and raped the women and murdered widows and babies."
Conservapedia? LOL How about something Zionipedia?
Firstly, people being colonized cannot, by definition, start the aggression. The aggression begins when people intent on colonizing land upon which others live go to that land. But, Ottoman archives show that the colonists killed Arabs prior to 1929.
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side. At times, one could find another narrative – the official account of events as recorded by the local Ottoman administration. Still, a new document referring to the Zarnuka incident was discovered recently by researcher Yuval Ben Bassat, in the Istanbul Archives, a petition written to Sultan Mehmet V by heads of families in the area.
The petitioners present themselves as, "We, the residents of villages neighboring with the Jewish colonies of Daran [Rehovot] and Lun Kara (Rishon Leztion)," and complain that the Jews "wanted to strip the camel owner of their clothes, money and camels, but these men refused to give their camels and escaped from Lun Kara with their camels, protecting each other [to seek refuge with] men of the law… The above mentioned Jews attacked our villages, robbed and looted our property, killed and even damaged the family honor, all this in a manner we find hard to put in words."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Just as Ottoman histories also show that muslims massacred Jews before Zionism was invented. And where is your corroborative evidence to support the islamonazi claims ?
Bullshit.
Ahh, so you judge the site based on its name, without even looking into it. Good job Monti!ontiWhat's wrong with the site ??
What political leanings would a site called Conservopedia have? Maybe you would consider a site called Nazipedia reliable, or Liberalpedia.
No I judge sites by their editors and content:
"Conservapedia is an English-language wiki encyclopedia project written from a hard American conservative and fundamentalist Christian point of view.[3] The website was started in 2006 by American homeschool teacher and attorney Andrew Schlafly, son of conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly,[4][5] to counter what he perceived as a liberal bias present in Wikipedia.[6][7] It uses editorials and a wiki-based system to generate content."
Conservapedia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
So a Christian site, should be right up your street, and fully acceptable seeing as you say you are a Christian.
Not a fundamentalist Christian Zionist site.
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
You define documented as coming from a Zionist sources. As stated in the article:
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
The only source you have presented are Jewish sources as stated
This was one of the first documented massacres against Jews by Palestinians, proving they started the aggression.Conservapedia? LOL How about something Zionipedia?
Firstly, people being colonized cannot, by definition, start the aggression. The aggression begins when people intent on colonizing land upon which others live go to that land. But, Ottoman archives show that the colonists killed Arabs prior to 1929.
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side. At times, one could find another narrative – the official account of events as recorded by the local Ottoman administration. Still, a new document referring to the Zarnuka incident was discovered recently by researcher Yuval Ben Bassat, in the Istanbul Archives, a petition written to Sultan Mehmet V by heads of families in the area.
The petitioners present themselves as, "We, the residents of villages neighboring with the Jewish colonies of Daran [Rehovot] and Lun Kara (Rishon Leztion)," and complain that the Jews "wanted to strip the camel owner of their clothes, money and camels, but these men refused to give their camels and escaped from Lun Kara with their camels, protecting each other [to seek refuge with] men of the law… The above mentioned Jews attacked our villages, robbed and looted our property, killed and even damaged the family honor, all this in a manner we find hard to put in words."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Just as Ottoman histories also show that muslims massacred Jews before Zionism was invented. And where is your corroborative evidence to support the islamonazi claims ?
Bullshit.
Do you want them posting again then Abdul, so you will have to eat crow ?
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
You define documented as coming from a Zionist sources. As stated in the article:
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Read again unsubstantiated one source documents are propaganda, the same report fro a multitude of sources is not propaganda. When you learn that you will have been banned again for spamming a board.
What's wrong with the site ??
What political leanings would a site called Conservopedia have? Maybe you would consider a site called Nazipedia reliable, or Liberalpedia.
As in conservative or conserving for future generations, and not a political movement. But even if it was it would be more reliable than islamopedia
"As in conservative or conserving for future generations..." The truth:
Christian fundamentalists in the US have launched two online encyclopedias modelled on the Wikipedia format. Conservapedia and CreationWiki aim to explain the world from a creationist perspective. They make entertaining reading. Wikipedia for Christian Fundamentalists The Lord s Encyclopedia - SPIEGEL ONLINE
Another Phoney Phantasy debunked! Next.
TROLLING again
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
The only source you have presented are Jewish sources as stated
This was one of the first documented massacres against Jews by Palestinians, proving they started the aggression.
Firstly, people being colonized cannot, by definition, start the aggression. The aggression begins when people intent on colonizing land upon which others live go to that land. But, Ottoman archives show that the colonists killed Arabs prior to 1929.
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side. At times, one could find another narrative – the official account of events as recorded by the local Ottoman administration. Still, a new document referring to the Zarnuka incident was discovered recently by researcher Yuval Ben Bassat, in the Istanbul Archives, a petition written to Sultan Mehmet V by heads of families in the area.
The petitioners present themselves as, "We, the residents of villages neighboring with the Jewish colonies of Daran [Rehovot] and Lun Kara (Rishon Leztion)," and complain that the Jews "wanted to strip the camel owner of their clothes, money and camels, but these men refused to give their camels and escaped from Lun Kara with their camels, protecting each other [to seek refuge with] men of the law… The above mentioned Jews attacked our villages, robbed and looted our property, killed and even damaged the family honor, all this in a manner we find hard to put in words."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Just as Ottoman histories also show that muslims massacred Jews before Zionism was invented. And where is your corroborative evidence to support the islamonazi claims ?
Bullshit.
Do you want them posting again then Abdul, so you will have to eat crow ?
Yes, please do. LOL
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
You define documented as coming from a Zionist sources. As stated in the article:
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Read again unsubstantiated one source documents are propaganda, the same report fro a multitude of sources is not propaganda. When you learn that you will have been banned again for spamming a board.
Is that English? But, the documents are substantiated by Jewish researchers, the source is an Israeli newspaper and Phoney thinks it is anti_Israel propaganda. You can't make this stuff up.
Ahh, so you judge the site based on its name, without even looking into it. Good job Monti!onti
What political leanings would a site called Conservopedia have? Maybe you would consider a site called Nazipedia reliable, or Liberalpedia.
No I judge sites by their editors and content:
"Conservapedia is an English-language wiki encyclopedia project written from a hard American conservative and fundamentalist Christian point of view.[3] The website was started in 2006 by American homeschool teacher and attorney Andrew Schlafly, son of conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly,[4][5] to counter what he perceived as a liberal bias present in Wikipedia.[6][7] It uses editorials and a wiki-based system to generate content."
Conservapedia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
So a Christian site, should be right up your street, and fully acceptable seeing as you say you are a Christian.
Not a fundamentalist Christian Zionist site.
Why not the Ctholics to many are fundementalists aren't they ?
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
You define documented as coming from a Zionist sources. As stated in the article:
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Read again unsubstantiated one source documents are propaganda, the same report fro a multitude of sources is not propaganda. When you learn that you will have been banned again for spamming a board.
Is that English? But, the documents are substantiated by Jewish researchers, the source is an Israeli newspaper and Phoney thinks it is anti_Israel propaganda. You can't make this stuff up.
What political leanings would a site called Conservopedia have? Maybe you would consider a site called Nazipedia reliable, or Liberalpedia.
As in conservative or conserving for future generations, and not a political movement. But even if it was it would be more reliable than islamopedia
"As in conservative or conserving for future generations..." The truth:
Christian fundamentalists in the US have launched two online encyclopedias modelled on the Wikipedia format. Conservapedia and CreationWiki aim to explain the world from a creationist perspective. They make entertaining reading. Wikipedia for Christian Fundamentalists The Lord s Encyclopedia - SPIEGEL ONLINE
Another Phoney Phantasy debunked! Next.
TROLLING again
Laugh all you want when too many complaints are received we will see who laughs then
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
You define documented as coming from a Zionist sources. As stated in the article:
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Read again unsubstantiated one source documents are propaganda, the same report fro a multitude of sources is not propaganda. When you learn that you will have been banned again for spamming a board.
Is that English? But, the documents are substantiated by Jewish researchers, the source is an Israeli newspaper and Phoney thinks it is anti_Israel propaganda. You can't make this stuff up.
Yes it is, but you not being English wont be able to read it
Means nothing at all if you only have one source. By the way the source is the author and not the medium used to portray the report. So the medium might be a Jewish newspaper while the author could well be an islamonazi terrorist LIAR
Ahh, so you judge the site based on its name, without even looking into it. Good job Monti!
No I judge sites by their editors and content:
"Conservapedia is an English-language wiki encyclopedia project written from a hard American conservative and fundamentalist Christian point of view.[3] The website was started in 2006 by American homeschool teacher and attorney Andrew Schlafly, son of conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly,[4][5] to counter what he perceived as a liberal bias present in Wikipedia.[6][7] It uses editorials and a wiki-based system to generate content."
Conservapedia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
So a Christian site, should be right up your street, and fully acceptable seeing as you say you are a Christian.
Not a fundamentalist Christian Zionist site.
Why not the Ctholics to many are fundementalists aren't they ?
No, Catholics are not Christian Fundamentalists. We are quite different. Just some difference. Supporting the death penalty is a sin for us. We also cannot discriminate against (or hate) homosexuals. We believe in evolution.
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
You define documented as coming from a Zionist sources. As stated in the article:
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Read again unsubstantiated one source documents are propaganda, the same report fro a multitude of sources is not propaganda. When you learn that you will have been banned again for spamming a board.
Is that English? But, the documents are substantiated by Jewish researchers, the source is an Israeli newspaper and Phoney thinks it is anti_Israel propaganda. You can't make this stuff up.As in conservative or conserving for future generations, and not a political movement. But even if it was it would be more reliable than islamopedia
"As in conservative or conserving for future generations..." The truth:
Christian fundamentalists in the US have launched two online encyclopedias modelled on the Wikipedia format. Conservapedia and CreationWiki aim to explain the world from a creationist perspective. They make entertaining reading. Wikipedia for Christian Fundamentalists The Lord s Encyclopedia - SPIEGEL ONLINE
Another Phoney Phantasy debunked! Next.
TROLLING again
Laugh all you want when too many complaints are received we will see who laughs then
What complaints Phoney, and complaints about what. You are the one abusing other posters left and right.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
You define documented as coming from a Zionist sources. As stated in the article:
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Read again unsubstantiated one source documents are propaganda, the same report fro a multitude of sources is not propaganda. When you learn that you will have been banned again for spamming a board.
Is that English? But, the documents are substantiated by Jewish researchers, the source is an Israeli newspaper and Phoney thinks it is anti_Israel propaganda. You can't make this stuff up.
Yes it is, but you not being English wont be able to read it
Means nothing at all if you only have one source. By the way the source is the author and not the medium used to portray the report. So the medium might be a Jewish newspaper while the author could well be an islamonazi terrorist LIAR
But the author is Jewish. Are Jews that disagree with you islamonazis too.
It is documented in the Ottoman archives. If you define "documented" as being in article in Wiki, I can write an article on the massacre tonight and it would be in Wiki.
No we define documented as coming from more than just one partisan source
The only source you have presented are Jewish sources as stated
Firstly, people being colonized cannot, by definition, start the aggression. The aggression begins when people intent on colonizing land upon which others live go to that land. But, Ottoman archives show that the colonists killed Arabs prior to 1929.
"As in so many incidents that enfolded in the early years of Zionism, often researchers have only had access to the version of events written by the Jewish side. At times, one could find another narrative – the official account of events as recorded by the local Ottoman administration. Still, a new document referring to the Zarnuka incident was discovered recently by researcher Yuval Ben Bassat, in the Istanbul Archives, a petition written to Sultan Mehmet V by heads of families in the area.
The petitioners present themselves as, "We, the residents of villages neighboring with the Jewish colonies of Daran [Rehovot] and Lun Kara (Rishon Leztion)," and complain that the Jews "wanted to strip the camel owner of their clothes, money and camels, but these men refused to give their camels and escaped from Lun Kara with their camels, protecting each other [to seek refuge with] men of the law… The above mentioned Jews attacked our villages, robbed and looted our property, killed and even damaged the family honor, all this in a manner we find hard to put in words."
New documents reveal early Palestinian attitudes toward Zionist settlements - Israel News Haaretz
Just as Ottoman histories also show that muslims massacred Jews before Zionism was invented. And where is your corroborative evidence to support the islamonazi claims ?
Bullshit.
Do you want them posting again then Abdul, so you will have to eat crow ?
Yes, please do. LOL
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Aleppo_(1850)
Start with that one before Zionists arrived in palestine
Just for starters, maybe you should read the rules and take in what they say
The exact amount of land and who owned it is a well known fact. The survey commissioned by the U.S. and the U.K. for the UN prior to, and to facilitate the partition provides details of land ownership taken from the land tax registries.
View attachment 39410
The exact amount of land and who owned it is a well known fact. The survey commissioned by the U.S. and the U.K. for the UN prior to, and to facilitate the partition provides details of land ownership taken from the land tax registries.
View attachment 39410
http://www.bjpa.org/Publications/downloadFile.cfm?FileID=17185
Page 556
