Jewish Right of Return...

[P F Tinmore]

66th anniversary just passed of another UN resolution that Israel never complied with and Germany the role model for the Jewish return...

The Jewish right of return - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

They also haver the right of return to land they owned in the west bank and gaza, or is that just for arab muslims with rusty keys and no title...............

Absolutely right Phoney...

As do the Palestinians right of return to Israel and Jerusalem.

Of course the Jews, like everyone else, have the right to return.

I don't see any Jewish organizations pushing for that right though.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What "right" is that, dipshit? The one you just dreamed of in your mentally clueless state?

It's the same right the Jews have.

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

 

[Phoenall]

66th anniversary just passed of another UN resolution that Israel never complied with and Germany the role model for the Jewish return...

The Jewish right of return - Opinion - Al Jazeera English

They also haver the right of return to land they owned in the west bank and gaza, or is that just for arab muslims with rusty keys and no title...............

Absolutely right Phoney...

As do the Palestinians right of return to Israel and Jerusalem.

Of course the Jews, like everyone else, have the right to return.

I don't see any Jewish organizations pushing for that right though.

It is part of the peace talks that the P.A. refuse to negotiate, while demanding the right of return for Iranian muslims who have never even seen Tel Aviv

 

[Phoenall]

What "right" is that, dipshit? The one you just dreamed of in your mentally clueless state?

It's the same right the Jews have.

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

Then this means that I have the right of return to your home and you cant do a thing about it can you. Because that is how stupid your remark is. The right of return hinges on property ownership or legal habitation. BUT the right of return is not embodied in International Law and it is up to every nation to decide how it is implemented.

Right of return - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


The right of return is a principle which is drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, intended to enable people to return to, and re-enter, their country of origin.
The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (read together with its 1967 Protocol) does not give refugees a right to return, but rather prohibits return (refoulment) to a country where he or she faces serious threats to his or her life or freedom:.[1] The Convention binds the many countries which have ratified it. A list of those countries can be found at:[2]
By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship:

So the Palestinians have no actual legal right of return


Palestine[edit]
Main article: Palestinian right of return
Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories (formerly part of the British Mandate of Palestine) as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[29]
As a rebuttal to UNGA resolution 194 being used in support, opponents note that General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and usually have no force as international law.[

 

[P F Tinmore]

What "right" is that, dipshit? The one you just dreamed of in your mentally clueless state?

It's the same right the Jews have.

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

Then this means that I have the right of return to your home and you cant do a thing about it can you. Because that is how stupid your remark is. The right of return hinges on property ownership or legal habitation. BUT the right of return is not embodied in International Law and it is up to every nation to decide how it is implemented.

Right of return - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


The right of return is a principle which is drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, intended to enable people to return to, and re-enter, their country of origin.
The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (read together with its 1967 Protocol) does not give refugees a right to return, but rather prohibits return (refoulment) to a country where he or she faces serious threats to his or her life or freedom:.[1] The Convention binds the many countries which have ratified it. A list of those countries can be found at:[2]
By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship:

So the Palestinians have no actual legal right of return


Palestine[edit]
Main article: Palestinian right of return
Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories (formerly part of the British Mandate of Palestine) as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[29]
As a rebuttal to UNGA resolution 194 being used in support, opponents note that General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and usually have no force as international law.[

The UN does not create law. However, it does reference existing law.

2. Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return;

A RES 3236 XXIX of 22 November 1974​

Notice that they said homes not houses. A home is a home whether it is owned or rented. Ownership is not a requirement.

 

[Hossfly]

What "right" is that, dipshit? The one you just dreamed of in your mentally clueless state?

It's the same right the Jews have.

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

Then this means that I have the right of return to your home and you cant do a thing about it can you. Because that is how stupid your remark is. The right of return hinges on property ownership or legal habitation. BUT the right of return is not embodied in International Law and it is up to every nation to decide how it is implemented.

Right of return - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


The right of return is a principle which is drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, intended to enable people to return to, and re-enter, their country of origin.
The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (read together with its 1967 Protocol) does not give refugees a right to return, but rather prohibits return (refoulment) to a country where he or she faces serious threats to his or her life or freedom:.[1] The Convention binds the many countries which have ratified it. A list of those countries can be found at:[2]
By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship:

So the Palestinians have no actual legal right of return


Palestine[edit]
Main article: Palestinian right of return
Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories (formerly part of the British Mandate of Palestine) as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[29]
As a rebuttal to UNGA resolution 194 being used in support, opponents note that General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and usually have no force as international law.[

The UN does not create law. However, it does reference existing law.

2. Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return;

A RES 3236 XXIX of 22 November 1974​

Notice that they said homes not houses. A home is a home whether it is owned or rented. Ownership is not a requirement.

I agree that displaced persons have a right of return. However, they are all in their late eighties or nineties and are too old to travel. Sorry 'bout that Tinhorn.

 

[Phoenall]

What "right" is that, dipshit? The one you just dreamed of in your mentally clueless state?

It's the same right the Jews have.

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

Then this means that I have the right of return to your home and you cant do a thing about it can you. Because that is how stupid your remark is. The right of return hinges on property ownership or legal habitation. BUT the right of return is not embodied in International Law and it is up to every nation to decide how it is implemented.

Right of return - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


The right of return is a principle which is drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, intended to enable people to return to, and re-enter, their country of origin.
The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (read together with its 1967 Protocol) does not give refugees a right to return, but rather prohibits return (refoulment) to a country where he or she faces serious threats to his or her life or freedom:.[1] The Convention binds the many countries which have ratified it. A list of those countries can be found at:[2]
By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship:

So the Palestinians have no actual legal right of return


Palestine[edit]
Main article: Palestinian right of return
Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories (formerly part of the British Mandate of Palestine) as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[29]
As a rebuttal to UNGA resolution 194 being used in support, opponents note that General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and usually have no force as international law.[

The UN does not create law. However, it does reference existing law.

2. Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return;

A RES 3236 XXIX of 22 November 1974​

Notice that they said homes not houses. A home is a home whether it is owned or rented. Ownership is not a requirement.

And the section they use is actually part of a UN resolution so not International law, so cant be an existing law to reference. They said homes and property, and that means rented or owned. In either case they should have legal documentation on file showing their right of return under the existing rules. Seeing as there are no rules then they don't have any rights until the whole of the world accepts everyones same right of return and passes it into INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Try again and this time read what the actual law says before showing you are grasping at straws

 

[Phoenall]

It's the same right the Jews have.

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

Then this means that I have the right of return to your home and you cant do a thing about it can you. Because that is how stupid your remark is. The right of return hinges on property ownership or legal habitation. BUT the right of return is not embodied in International Law and it is up to every nation to decide how it is implemented.

Right of return - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


The right of return is a principle which is drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, intended to enable people to return to, and re-enter, their country of origin.
The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (read together with its 1967 Protocol) does not give refugees a right to return, but rather prohibits return (refoulment) to a country where he or she faces serious threats to his or her life or freedom:.[1] The Convention binds the many countries which have ratified it. A list of those countries can be found at:[2]
By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship:

So the Palestinians have no actual legal right of return


Palestine[edit]
Main article: Palestinian right of return
Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories (formerly part of the British Mandate of Palestine) as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[29]
As a rebuttal to UNGA resolution 194 being used in support, opponents note that General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and usually have no force as international law.[

The UN does not create law. However, it does reference existing law.

2. Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return;

A RES 3236 XXIX of 22 November 1974​

Notice that they said homes not houses. A home is a home whether it is owned or rented. Ownership is not a requirement.

I agree that displaced persons have a right of return. However, they are all in their late eighties or nineties and are too old to travel. Sorry 'bout that Tinhorn.

And that is exactly the Palestinians position on Jews in Palestine. Only those Jews born before the Zionist invasion of Palestine in 1875 are to be given Palestinian citizenship. Any arab muslim who has lived in any part of Palestine for two years is automatically granted Palestinian citizenship

 

[P F Tinmore]

It's the same right the Jews have.

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

Then this means that I have the right of return to your home and you cant do a thing about it can you. Because that is how stupid your remark is. The right of return hinges on property ownership or legal habitation. BUT the right of return is not embodied in International Law and it is up to every nation to decide how it is implemented.

Right of return - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


The right of return is a principle which is drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, intended to enable people to return to, and re-enter, their country of origin.
The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (read together with its 1967 Protocol) does not give refugees a right to return, but rather prohibits return (refoulment) to a country where he or she faces serious threats to his or her life or freedom:.[1] The Convention binds the many countries which have ratified it. A list of those countries can be found at:[2]
By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship:

So the Palestinians have no actual legal right of return


Palestine[edit]
Main article: Palestinian right of return
Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories (formerly part of the British Mandate of Palestine) as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[29]
As a rebuttal to UNGA resolution 194 being used in support, opponents note that General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and usually have no force as international law.[

The UN does not create law. However, it does reference existing law.

2. Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return;

A RES 3236 XXIX of 22 November 1974​

Notice that they said homes not houses. A home is a home whether it is owned or rented. Ownership is not a requirement.

And the section they use is actually part of a UN resolution so not International law, so cant be an existing law to reference. They said homes and property, and that means rented or owned. In either case they should have legal documentation on file showing their right of return under the existing rules. Seeing as there are no rules then they don't have any rights until the whole of the world accepts everyones same right of return and passes it into INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Try again and this time read what the actual law says before showing you are grasping at straws

Nevertheless it is normal residence and citizenship that matter. Property ownership does not.

 

[Phoenall]

Correct, but the problem they have is proving that they owned the property in the first place. The rusty key they carry is not proof so they need land title or evidence of residency. That is why they have never managed right of return in the last 66 years, because they never ever lived there.

The right to return has nothing to do with the ownership of property.

Then this means that I have the right of return to your home and you cant do a thing about it can you. Because that is how stupid your remark is. The right of return hinges on property ownership or legal habitation. BUT the right of return is not embodied in International Law and it is up to every nation to decide how it is implemented.

Right of return - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


The right of return is a principle which is drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, intended to enable people to return to, and re-enter, their country of origin.
The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (read together with its 1967 Protocol) does not give refugees a right to return, but rather prohibits return (refoulment) to a country where he or she faces serious threats to his or her life or freedom:.[1] The Convention binds the many countries which have ratified it. A list of those countries can be found at:[2]
By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship:

So the Palestinians have no actual legal right of return


Palestine[edit]
Main article: Palestinian right of return
Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in what is now Israel and the Palestinian territories (formerly part of the British Mandate of Palestine) as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[29]
As a rebuttal to UNGA resolution 194 being used in support, opponents note that General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding and usually have no force as international law.[

The UN does not create law. However, it does reference existing law.

2. Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return;

A RES 3236 XXIX of 22 November 1974​

Notice that they said homes not houses. A home is a home whether it is owned or rented. Ownership is not a requirement.

And the section they use is actually part of a UN resolution so not International law, so cant be an existing law to reference. They said homes and property, and that means rented or owned. In either case they should have legal documentation on file showing their right of return under the existing rules. Seeing as there are no rules then they don't have any rights until the whole of the world accepts everyones same right of return and passes it into INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Try again and this time read what the actual law says before showing you are grasping at straws

Nevertheless it is normal residence and citizenship that matter. Property ownership does not.

Wrong as their is no law granting a right of return, so the Palestinians will fail on this every time