Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are you OK with Palestinians killing Israelis? Because if Palestinians quit killing Israelis they wouldn't have anything to worry about.
I ain't against self-defense, but killing civilians is never justified.
"Whatcha gonna do, Rastus?"
Oh yeah, and I'm the racist...
9-11 wasn't killing civilians
daily car bombings and restaurant bombings of innocent civilians
rockets fired at civilan towns
That aint killing civilians?
You've got to stop thinking of it like sports. See, I always support the Packers, cause I like them. But you don't always support Isreal just because they're Jewish. If the Muslims had did what Isreal did in invading palestine, I'd be pissed at them too.
Palestine is a made up name and never existed. It aint' sports that is history.
Brief history of Palestine - Palestine - Home of history
You need to do some reasearch...
Yeah... I'm a racist because I don't think Isreal should be killing Palestinians. Sometimes I wonder about this world...
no...perhaps you're an anti-semite because you're ok with palestinians killing israelis.
Palestine is a made up name and never existed. It aint' sports that is history.
Brief history of Palestine - Palestine - Home of history
You need to do some reasearch...
You should do some unbiased research.
Yeah... I'm a racist because I don't think Isreal should be killing Palestinians. Sometimes I wonder about this world...
no...perhaps you're an anti-semite because you're ok with palestinians killing israelis.
I never said I was. I'm an advocate of non-violence thank you very much... taking people's words out of context is the first sign of a weak argument.
no...perhaps you're an anti-semite because you're ok with palestinians killing israelis.
I never said I was. I'm an advocate of non-violence thank you very much... taking people's words out of context is the first sign of a weak argument.
So do you think that violence everywhere and at every time is wrong? I can respect a position like that. It is consistent. I happen to disagree. I'll point out that slavery, Nazism, Communism, and a whole bunch of unsavory things were ended with violence.
But I can respect the position.
I ain't against self-defense, but killing civilians is never justified.
"Whatcha gonna do, Rastus?"
Oh yeah, and I'm the racist...
9-11 wasn't killing civilians
daily car bombings and restaurant bombings of innocent civilians
rockets fired at civilan towns
That aint killing civilians?
It is killing civilians... but you got to look to the root of the problem. You ain't going to stop terrorism if you keep doing the same thing yourself. It's like the Hatfeild and McCoys.
9-11 wasn't killing civilians
daily car bombings and restaurant bombings of innocent civilians
rockets fired at civilan towns
That aint killing civilians?
It is killing civilians... but you got to look to the root of the problem. You ain't going to stop terrorism if you keep doing the same thing yourself. It's like the Hatfeild and McCoys.
What has Israel done to Iran?
Yeah... I'm a racist because I don't think Isreal should be killing Palestinians. Sometimes I wonder about this world...
no...perhaps you're an anti-semite because you're ok with palestinians killing israelis.
I never said I was. I'm an advocate of non-violence thank you very much... taking people's words out of context is the first sign of a weak argument.
no...perhaps you're an anti-semite because you're ok with palestinians killing israelis.
I never said I was. I'm an advocate of non-violence thank you very much... taking people's words out of context is the first sign of a weak argument.
I took nothing out of context. "nonviolence" is lovely when you're not under attack.
How many missile attacks does Israel have to take before retaliating? It took 3,000....
how many would you let your wife and children live through before you'd want your government to respond?
It is killing civilians... but you got to look to the root of the problem. You ain't going to stop terrorism if you keep doing the same thing yourself. It's like the Hatfeild and McCoys.
What has Israel done to Iran?
What has Iran done to Isreal?
They've been up front about their activities, yet Isreal hasn't signed the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty and refuses UN inspections. What are they hiding?
Israel, as a non-signatory state, has zero obligations under the NPT, and thus zero obligations for any IAEA inspections.
What has Israel done to Iran?
What has Iran done to Isreal?
They've been up front about their activities, yet Isreal hasn't signed the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty and refuses UN inspections. What are they hiding?
BTW, Israel had nukes before the NPT even came on line.
How many missile attacks does Israel have to take before retaliating?
I never said I was. I'm an advocate of non-violence thank you very much... taking people's words out of context is the first sign of a weak argument.
I took nothing out of context. "nonviolence" is lovely when you're not under attack.
How many missile attacks does Israel have to take before retaliating? It took 3,000....
how many would you let your wife and children live through before you'd want your government to respond?
Isreal hit first... which, if you follow basketball... they're the offense, Palestine is the defense. And you ain't against defending oneself are you?
I took nothing out of context. "nonviolence" is lovely when you're not under attack.
How many missile attacks does Israel have to take before retaliating? It took 3,000....
how many would you let your wife and children live through before you'd want your government to respond?
Isreal hit first... which, if you follow basketball... they're the offense, Palestine is the defense. And you ain't against defending oneself are you?
prime example of lying revisionist history.
thanks for playing.
I took nothing out of context. "nonviolence" is lovely when you're not under attack.
How many missile attacks does Israel have to take before retaliating? It took 3,000....
how many would you let your wife and children live through before you'd want your government to respond?
Isreal hit first... which, if you follow basketball... they're the offense, Palestine is the defense. And you ain't against defending oneself are you?
prime example of lying revisionist history.
thanks for playing.
You don't put a nation with a thousand nuclear war-heads next to a bunch of third-world countries and expect them to accept that as legitimate.
What would you do if China decided that the Tibetans, after years of discrimination, could set up camp in California. So they pleaded to the United Nations, and they gave in. Everyone had to leave California to make room for the Tibetans.
But it don't stop there... then China arms the New Tibetan Republic with a bunch of nuclear weapons right on our doorstep.
I bet you'd be just fine with that idea.
Isreal hit first... which, if you follow basketball... they're the offense, Palestine is the defense. And you ain't against defending oneself are you?
prime example of lying revisionist history.
thanks for playing.
The man is a fucking shitstain on the carpet of life. He cannot lift his finger on the keyboard without lying. This we know from way back.
How many missile attacks does Israel have to take before retaliating?
LOL!! there were NO missles fired at IsraHell
There were some home made rockets fired.
And they wern't much more than bottle rockets
prime example of lying revisionist history.
thanks for playing.
The man is a fucking shitstain on the carpet of life. He cannot lift his finger on the keyboard without lying. This we know from way back.
Who are you talking about?
