Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I pitied the man who is Jesse Venture until I meet the man who believed his conspiracy theories.
When does a 'conspiracy theory' cross the line and become a 'conspiracy fact'?
No idea my best guess would be when enough people start to believe it despite the absence of any real facts to support it the second gunman on the grassy knoll comes to mind.
Time for another refresher course:
Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About The 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 5 Minutes - YouTube
To produce the effect we saw would require the most elaborate controlled demolition project in the history of the craft and there are only one or two demolition gangs in the entire world which are capable of bringing it off.Not even sure Bin Laden did it. If he did Mossad and the Bush admin knew about it and planted explosives to make sure the buildings came down.
A project of that size would require no less than a dozen experienced, expert sappers running wire in the service corridors of both buildings, attaching measured charges to exposed beams, all of which would be visible to dozens of tradesmen, including carpenters, electricians, HVAC mechanics, tinsmiths, painters, and plumbers, all of whom would be moving about in those corridors 24 hours a day -- all of whom would be curious and have questions. Add to this the fact that access to those corridors is rigidly monitored by armed security personnel who need to identify all contractors and approve their presence and activities.
Also consider the fact that every one of the sappers involved in that project must be okay with knowing he is doing something which will result in the deaths of thousands of innocent people, including children.
If you were a government official would you be willing to risk being involved in such a massively nefarious conspiracy, knowing all it would take to expose you is for one participant to be caught and interrogated? For a Mossad agent to be involved in such a plot would mean the end of America/Israel relations, or worse.
To produce the effect we saw would require the most elaborate controlled demolition project in the history of the craft and there are only one or two demolition gangs in the entire world which are capable of bringing it off.Not even sure Bin Laden did it. If he did Mossad and the Bush admin knew about it and planted explosives to make sure the buildings came down.
A project of that size would require no less than a dozen experienced, expert sappers running wire in the service corridors of both buildings, attaching measured charges to exposed beams, all of which would be visible to dozens of tradesmen, including carpenters, electricians, HVAC mechanics, tinsmiths, painters, and plumbers, all of whom would be moving about in those corridors 24 hours a day -- all of whom would be curious and have questions. Add to this the fact that access to those corridors is rigidly monitored by armed security personnel who need to identify all contractors and approve their presence and activities.
Also consider the fact that every one of the sappers involved in that project must be okay with knowing he is doing something which will result in the deaths of thousands of innocent people, including children.
If you were a government official would you be willing to risk being involved in such a massively nefarious conspiracy, knowing all it would take to expose you is for one participant to be caught and interrogated? For a Mossad agent to be involved in such a plot would mean the end of America/Israel relations, or worse.
Don't bother, just do what I do, point and laugh.
Very, very hard!So Mike, you say there is no way for the buildings to be wired for demolition yet for 6 months prior to the collapse there were hundreds of workmen in the towers rewiring the offices with broadband and data cables. These guys, according to employees interviewed after the fact, were granted access to the towers 24/7. How hard could it be for a crew to go unnoticed amongst the hundreds of workers doing the legitimate work?
Begin with the fact that it would be virtually impossible to find the necessary craftsmen who would be willing to participate in such a monumentally nefarious and incredibly risky project. And don't you think at least one of the technicians who were wiring the cable equipment might wonder why beams were being cut and explosive charges were being attached? How could something like that be concealed or disguised from the curious eyes of dozens of other types of tradesmen -- and security personnel?
Can you really imagine anyone at any level of government being stupidly self-destructive enough to engage in such a conspiratory effort? Even Tom Clancy wouldn't consider putting forth such an absurd plot. The odds against bringing it off are a billion to one.
One element of common sense logic escapes the reasoning behind these paranoid conspiracy theories and it is the simple fact that implementing a controlled demolition capable of producing the "pancake" effect seen in the collapses would be counterproductive to the very purpose of the attack, which was destruction. The purpose of a controlled demolition, and all the intricate work involved in producing it, is to minimize destruction of the surrounding area. So given the fact that an un-controlled demolition, such as that attempted by Ramseh Yousef in 1993, would require significantly less than one percent of the effort and risk involved in a controlled demolition and, most importantly, would topple the building causing infinitely more damage to the surrounding areas, why would the conspirators go through all the extra trouble and risk to avoid the additional damage?
It should be mentioned it was determined that Yousef's attempt would successfully have toppled Tower One if the truck with the explosives had been parked closer to a support column in the basement garage -- a fact which the supposed 9/11 conspirators would have known and taken advantage of.
So the 9/11 conspiracy theory hinges on answering the question posed above. If the question cannot be satisfactorily answered the conspiracy theories must be intelligently regarded as ignorant, paranoid nonsense.
The fact that the government's investigation inot the attacks is full of holes and inconsistancies makes me sure it's the truth. The reason is because they DON"T know what happened and they are giving us their best guess. If they had planned it all along, they would have had a theory all ready and air tight. Had their version of the events been precise and exact, I would be suspicious of it.
I know I know, I'm doing what I told mike not to. I'm going back to pointing and laughing at truthers now.
So you and your Flat-Earth Society colleagues believe that someone managed to assemble a crew of highly-skilled demolition experts to enter the World Trade Center after hours and wire both Towers for controlled demolition because they didn't want to just topple them and cause a lot of surrounding damage.One element of common sense logic escapes the reasoning behind these paranoid conspiracy theories and it is the simple fact that implementing a controlled demolition capable of producing the "pancake" effect seen in the collapses would be counterproductive to the very purpose of the attack, which was destruction. The purpose of a controlled demolition, and all the intricate work involved in producing it, is to minimize destruction of the surrounding area. So given the fact that an un-controlled demolition, such as that attempted by Ramseh Yousef in 1993, would require significantly less than one percent of the effort and risk involved in a controlled demolition and, most importantly, would topple the building causing infinitely more damage to the surrounding areas, why would the conspirators go through all the extra trouble and risk to avoid the additional damage?
It should be mentioned it was determined that Yousef's attempt would successfully have toppled Tower One if the truck with the explosives had been parked closer to a support column in the basement garage -- a fact which the supposed 9/11 conspirators would have known and taken advantage of.
So the 9/11 conspiracy theory hinges on answering the question posed above. If the question cannot be satisfactorily answered the conspiracy theories must be intelligently regarded as ignorant, paranoid nonsense.
Just because you are in denial and afraid of the truth doesnt mean we are paranoid.You obviously only see what you want to see.you are evading the facts not addressing the evidence in these videos posted before your post on this page.the only conspiracy theory is the governments that the plans and the fires caused the collapse without a shread of evidence to back it up.
to keep defending the governments version just shows you are ignorant and can only post nonsense. you clearly slept through junior high school science classes the fact that you are so ignorant about the laws of physics.
You just got your ass handed to you on a platter by Again Sheila,Eots,Mr Jones and now myself.Here is the proof of the mossads involvement.I know you will run off and not try and debunk it.you cant.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4]9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie ) - YouTube[/ame]
Nobody ever has been able to.they dont even try just as you havent with any of the information in these videos.you remind me of racist pale retard.You must be a die hard republican like him as well.Just like Pale Retard,your objecive and open minded about the truth that Obama is not a us citizen,but when it comes to 9/11, your as close minded and ignorant as he is and just like him,you run off away from the facts when asked to disprove them.
So you and your Flat-Earth Society colleagues believe that someone managed to assemble a crew of highly-skilled demolition experts to enter the World Trade Center after hours and wire both Towers for controlled demolition because they didn't want to just topple them and cause a lot of surrounding damage.One element of common sense logic escapes the reasoning behind these paranoid conspiracy theories and it is the simple fact that implementing a controlled demolition capable of producing the "pancake" effect seen in the collapses would be counterproductive to the very purpose of the attack, which was destruction. The purpose of a controlled demolition, and all the intricate work involved in producing it, is to minimize destruction of the surrounding area. So given the fact that an un-controlled demolition, such as that attempted by Ramseh Yousef in 1993, would require significantly less than one percent of the effort and risk involved in a controlled demolition and, most importantly, would topple the building causing infinitely more damage to the surrounding areas, why would the conspirators go through all the extra trouble and risk to avoid the additional damage?
It should be mentioned it was determined that Yousef's attempt would successfully have toppled Tower One if the truck with the explosives had been parked closer to a support column in the basement garage -- a fact which the supposed 9/11 conspirators would have known and taken advantage of.
So the 9/11 conspiracy theory hinges on answering the question posed above. If the question cannot be satisfactorily answered the conspiracy theories must be intelligently regarded as ignorant, paranoid nonsense.
Just because you are in denial and afraid of the truth doesnt mean we are paranoid.You obviously only see what you want to see.you are evading the facts not addressing the evidence in these videos posted before your post on this page.the only conspiracy theory is the governments that the plans and the fires caused the collapse without a shread of evidence to back it up.
to keep defending the governments version just shows you are ignorant and can only post nonsense. you clearly slept through junior high school science classes the fact that you are so ignorant about the laws of physics.
You just got your ass handed to you on a platter by Again Sheila,Eots,Mr Jones and now myself.Here is the proof of the mossads involvement.I know you will run off and not try and debunk it.you cant.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4]9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie ) - YouTube[/ame]
Nobody ever has been able to.they dont even try just as you havent with any of the information in these videos.you remind me of racist pale retard.You must be a die hard republican like him as well.Just like Pale Retard,your objecive and open minded about the truth that Obama is not a us citizen,but when it comes to 9/11, your as close minded and ignorant as he is and just like him,you run off away from the facts when asked to disprove them.
I'm curious to know if you also believe the controlled demolition was intentionally coordinated with the two hijacked airliners that crashed into the buildings, or if the two events were coincidental, or if the planes were really some sort of sophisticated optical illusions?
I eagerly await your response. (So does Tom Clancy.)
One element of common sense logic escapes the reasoning behind these paranoid conspiracy theories and it is the simple fact that implementing a controlled demolition capable of producing the "pancake" effect seen in the collapses would be counterproductive to the very purpose of the attack, which was destruction. The purpose of a controlled demolition, and all the intricate work involved in producing it, is to minimize destruction of the surrounding area. So given the fact that an un-controlled demolition, such as that attempted by Ramseh Yousef in 1993, would require significantly less than one percent of the effort and risk involved in a controlled demolition and, most importantly, would topple the building causing infinitely more damage to the surrounding areas, why would the conspirators go through all the extra trouble and risk to avoid the additional damage?
It should be mentioned it was determined that Yousef's attempt would successfully have toppled Tower One if the truck with the explosives had been parked closer to a support column in the basement garage -- a fact which the supposed 9/11 conspirators would have known and taken advantage of.
So the 9/11 conspiracy theory hinges on answering the question posed above. If the question cannot be satisfactorily answered the conspiracy theories must be intelligently regarded as ignorant, paranoid nonsense.
One element of common sense logic escapes the reasoning behind these paranoid conspiracy theories and it is the simple fact that implementing a controlled demolition capable of producing the "pancake" effect seen in the collapses would be counterproductive to the very purpose of the attack, which was destruction. The purpose of a controlled demolition, and all the intricate work involved in producing it, is to minimize destruction of the surrounding area. So given the fact that an un-controlled demolition, such as that attempted by Ramseh Yousef in 1993, would require significantly less than one percent of the effort and risk involved in a controlled demolition and, most importantly, would topple the building causing infinitely more damage to the surrounding areas, why would the conspirators go through all the extra trouble and risk to avoid the additional damage?
It should be mentioned it was determined that Yousef's attempt would successfully have toppled Tower One if the truck with the explosives had been parked closer to a support column in the basement garage -- a fact which the supposed 9/11 conspirators would have known and taken advantage of.
So the 9/11 conspiracy theory hinges on answering the question posed above. If the question cannot be satisfactorily answered the conspiracy theories must be intelligently regarded as ignorant, paranoid nonsense.
You seem to be making an assumption that since it is unlikely this could have been a controlled demolition event, the operation must have been entirely conceived and carried out--without assistance--by Middle Eastern terrorists.
My personal opinion is that CD is not obvious, but the sophistication and timing of the event strongly implies the cooperation of networked intelligence operatives.
As I see it, the "controlled demolition" debate is being used to discredit the evidence of a wider conspiracy of interests that saw an opportunity to greatly advance their agendas throught this "act of terrorism." The "controlled demolition" debate is not important at all.
So you and your Flat-Earth Society colleagues believe that someone managed to assemble a crew of highly-skilled demolition experts to enter the World Trade Center after hours and wire both Towers for controlled demolition because they didn't want to just topple them and cause a lot of surrounding damage.One element of common sense logic escapes the reasoning behind these paranoid conspiracy theories and it is the simple fact that implementing a controlled demolition capable of producing the "pancake" effect seen in the collapses would be counterproductive to the very purpose of the attack, which was destruction. The purpose of a controlled demolition, and all the intricate work involved in producing it, is to minimize destruction of the surrounding area. So given the fact that an un-controlled demolition, such as that attempted by Ramseh Yousef in 1993, would require significantly less than one percent of the effort and risk involved in a controlled demolition and, most importantly, would topple the building causing infinitely more damage to the surrounding areas, why would the conspirators go through all the extra trouble and risk to avoid the additional damage?
It should be mentioned it was determined that Yousef's attempt would successfully have toppled Tower One if the truck with the explosives had been parked closer to a support column in the basement garage -- a fact which the supposed 9/11 conspirators would have known and taken advantage of.
So the 9/11 conspiracy theory hinges on answering the question posed above. If the question cannot be satisfactorily answered the conspiracy theories must be intelligently regarded as ignorant, paranoid nonsense.
Just because you are in denial and afraid of the truth doesnt mean we are paranoid.You obviously only see what you want to see.you are evading the facts not addressing the evidence in these videos posted before your post on this page.the only conspiracy theory is the governments that the plans and the fires caused the collapse without a shread of evidence to back it up.
to keep defending the governments version just shows you are ignorant and can only post nonsense. you clearly slept through junior high school science classes the fact that you are so ignorant about the laws of physics.
You just got your ass handed to you on a platter by Again Sheila,Eots,Mr Jones and now myself.Here is the proof of the mossads involvement.I know you will run off and not try and debunk it.you cant.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4]9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie ) - YouTube[/ame]
Nobody ever has been able to.they dont even try just as you havent with any of the information in these videos.you remind me of racist pale retard.You must be a die hard republican like him as well.Just like Pale Retard,your objecive and open minded about the truth that Obama is not a us citizen,but when it comes to 9/11, your as close minded and ignorant as he is and just like him,you run off away from the facts when asked to disprove them.
I'm curious to know if you also believe the controlled demolition was intentionally coordinated with the two hijacked airliners that crashed into the buildings, or if the two events were coincidental, or if the planes were really some sort of sophisticated optical illusions?
I eagerly await your response. (So does Tom Clancy.)
Ron Paul knows the Fed Reserve is a conspiracy, and that there is something wrong about the 9-11 "investigations" and thanks to him more people know about it now as well. Batshit crazy is clinging to batshit crazy beliefs that are batshit crazy lies, told to you by batshit crazy psychopaths that think you are batshit crazy for still believing them, because they know they are telling you BS and you actually fucking believe them because the lies have been passed down to you for decades from your elders who were the original believers of the lies and convinced to think it was all legit.I'd be more inclined to support Ron Paul if so many batshit crazy nutters didn't support him also.
And jerk off assholes such as yourself are "smart" enough to see through all of those lies?Ron Paul knows the Fed Reserve is a conspiracy, and that there is something wrong about the 9-11 "investigations" and thanks to him more people know about it now as well. Batshit crazy is clinging to batshit crazy beliefs that are batshit crazy lies, told to you by batshit crazy psychopaths that think you are batshit crazy for still believing them, because they know they are telling you BS and you actually fucking believe them because the lies have been passed down to you for decades from your elders who were the original believers of the lies and convinced to think it was all legit.I'd be more inclined to support Ron Paul if so many batshit crazy nutters didn't support him also.
Just how many lies must you be aware of before you just suck it up and realize you and the rest of us were bamboozled?
Ron Paul is not wrong, we are for going along with the obvious lies we were fed and not having the balls to admit it, and doing something about it.
Anyone should be able to see them once the subject matter has been brought to their attention and they then are paying attention to them with objectivity and the goal of getting to the truth or as close to it as the evidence or proof available allows.And jerk off assholes such as yourself are "smart" enough to see through all of those lies?Ron Paul knows the Fed Reserve is a conspiracy, and that there is something wrong about the 9-11 "investigations" and thanks to him more people know about it now as well. Batshit crazy is clinging to batshit crazy beliefs that are batshit crazy lies, told to you by batshit crazy psychopaths that think you are batshit crazy for still believing them, because they know they are telling you BS and you actually fucking believe them because the lies have been passed down to you for decades from your elders who were the original believers of the lies and convinced to think it was all legit.I'd be more inclined to support Ron Paul if so many batshit crazy nutters didn't support him also.
Just how many lies must you be aware of before you just suck it up and realize you and the rest of us were bamboozled?
Ron Paul is not wrong, we are for going along with the obvious lies we were fed and not having the balls to admit it, and doing something about it.
Ron Paul knows the Fed Reserve is a conspiracy, and that there is something wrong about the 9-11 "investigations" and thanks to him more people know about it now as well. Batshit crazy is clinging to batshit crazy beliefs that are batshit crazy lies, told to you by batshit crazy psychopaths that think you are batshit crazy for still believing them, because they know they are telling you BS and you actually fucking believe them because the lies have been passed down to you for decades from your elders who were the original believers of the lies and convinced to think it was all legit.I'd be more inclined to support Ron Paul if so many batshit crazy nutters didn't support him also.
Just how many lies must you be aware of before you just suck it up and realize you and the rest of us were bamboozled?
Ron Paul is not wrong, we are for going along with the obvious lies we were fed and not having the balls to admit it, and doing something about it.
I was wondering how long it would be before agent candyass's handlers would send him here.He posted immediately after you did.Anyone should be able to see them once the subject matter has been brought to their attention and they then are paying attention to them with objectivity and the goal of getting to the truth or as close to it as the evidence or proof available allows.And jerk off assholes such as yourself are "smart" enough to see through all of those lies?Ron Paul knows the Fed Reserve is a conspiracy, and that there is something wrong about the 9-11 "investigations" and thanks to him more people know about it now as well. Batshit crazy is clinging to batshit crazy beliefs that are batshit crazy lies, told to you by batshit crazy psychopaths that think you are batshit crazy for still believing them, because they know they are telling you BS and you actually fucking believe them because the lies have been passed down to you for decades from your elders who were the original believers of the lies and convinced to think it was all legit.
Just how many lies must you be aware of before you just suck it up and realize you and the rest of us were bamboozled?
Ron Paul is not wrong, we are for going along with the obvious lies we were fed and not having the balls to admit it, and doing something about it.
Ron Paul has been shining lights on the BS for years, and his predictions have come to pass on many things. It doesn't you to ignore the information that can help one really see the shit for what it is, or to place ones trust in proven liars whose goals are to keep you in the dark and stupid. Doing these 2 things makes one stupid, and being will fully ignorant to the point of obnoxiousness like you are
will eventually label you an "asshole", you have done a fine job and succeeded at both.
Toto ignores his warped logic he has that because our corrupt government institutions who have a looooooonnnnnnngggggggggg history of corruption,and the zionist controlled media say its true,then its automatically true.what high credential architects,engineers and demolition experts say,mean nothing to him.He really should start a comedy club.He obviously never reads what he posts.
