Chips Rafferty
Active Member
No Chips, the preceeding passage in Luke is a parable that hadn't happened but obviously takes place after Jesus returns. The bible is pretty clear that a war takes place after he returns. You didn't expect the final battle between good and evil to follow the Geneva Conventions did you?
Again, you take passages out of context. I don't deny the bible is full of contradictions and is open to interpretation. I personally don't believe in the literal translation, but as a whole, I think we're better off with Christianity today than without. If people can conform to society through religion and do some charity because of their beliefs, why do you have such a problem with it?
Dirt, earlier:
That link debunks one of your earlier posts:
If I recall correctly, I was asked here to cite one instance where Jesus was as big a \!/ as His Trinitarian alter-ego, His Father. Your interpretation of the "Parable of the Pounds" confirms just that.
According to you, Jesus intends to have all those, billions of people, who didn’t accept him as King of the Castle killed. What an uber petulant, genocidal, little ego trip!
Especially seeing as He deliberately makes His words gobble-de-gook to those who have been condemned to Hell since before the beginning of time!
Although how, in your admittedly semi-divine interpretation, He manages to kill them after they have already died, but still manages to keep them alive to torture them throughout eternity, is gonna be a real neat trick.
Perhaps He only means to symbolically kill them?
Funny that, how He wants the blackest of sinners to “come to him” but He does a Tower of Babel on their brain so His words are utter gibberish when they try to read His pesher parables.
I wonder why He spoke in indecipherable gibberish to beetle-browed bucolic Hebrew Bubbas when proselytising for **** converts? I can just see the bewildered look on the inbred faces of the sister-fucking Bubbas up in the Blue Ridge Mountains if He tried it on them!
How wonderfully serendipitous this impasse proves for you proselytising "Grand Commission" Proddies to be the sole decoders of His words, eh?
What makes me wonder though is WHY you Christians, knowing Jesus (or one of His other imaginary playmates) has fucked up my thinking, would want to argue the point with me?
Knowing God's mind as you do and how little I know, isn't that like shooting fish in a rain barrel?
Obviously Salivation doesn't fix low self-esteem.
Don’t bother, McGirt, I already know. “Yet again you have taken everything out of context/You can’t interpret parables because Jebus has confounded your satanic thinking/The ways of the Lords are beyond our puny minds..." etc, etc, etc.