Jenner - Theory on Sex Change......

[Skylar]

A florist isn't getting married by selling a wedding bouquet. Nixing that theory.

He's being compelled by law, to support with his labor, talents, and other resources, that which is overtly immoral. Any excuses notwithstanding, this is absolutely not an acceptable or justifiable use if government power.

Cake doesn't have moral implications. Its just cake. If your religion makes doing your job impossible, find a job that's more conducive to your religion.

The First Amendment is supposed to protect us from this sort of abuse.

The first amendment doesn't grant you immunity from any law you find 'immoral'. You're offering us a religious sovereign citizen argument, where the only laws that apply to you are the ones you agree do.

That's not our system of law nor ever has been.

Nor does anything you've raised have the slightest relevance to gays and lesbians being allowed to marry. No one is being forced to enter into a same sex marriage.

 

[aris2chat]

If Jenner still has a pekker, and he's guilty of manslaughter, then he should suffer the consequences.

If they cut off his pekker, and he's guilty of manslaughter, then he should still suffer the consequences.

In any case, he-she-it is one screwed-up, confused bastard... as are all-such head-cases.

The family in the hummer are suing the estate of the dead woman for over 18 million. She was driving without a license.
Jenner was the third car in the accident, not the cause.

At thirty some mph, for Jenner to push the car into oncoming traffic, her wheels must have been turned in that direction. Was she perhaps trying to get away before a cop showed up and arrest her for Dw/oL?
Considering the Prius stopped short, Jenner towing a trailer needed more room to stop after the lexus hit the prious.

What does his penis have to do with the accident? Jenner is just one of several cars in the accident, not the cause or the one that killed the Lexus driver. It is tragic, but the woman had no business being behind the wheel or driving on the PCH.

 

[aris2chat]

A florist isn't getting married by selling a wedding bouquet. Nixing that theory.

He's being compelled by law, to support with his labor, talents, and other resources, that which is overtly immoral. Any excuses notwithstanding, this is absolutely not an acceptable or justifiable use if government power.

Cake doesn't have moral implications. Its just cake. If your religion makes doing your job impossible, find a job that's more conducive to your religion.

The First Amendment is supposed to protect us from this sort of abuse.

The first amendment doesn't grant you immunity from any law you find 'immoral'. You're offering us a religious sovereign citizen argument, where the only laws that apply to you are the ones you agree do.

That's not our system of law nor ever has been.

Nor does anything you've raised have the slightest relevance to gays and lesbians being allowed to marry. No one is being forced to enter into a same sex marriage.

Many whites used to believe that serving blacks was immoral, black and white should not mix, or they had to use the back entrance. Used to be that those of a mixed marriage could not buy a home or rent an apartment.
No, you cannot treat others different or refuse to serve them. All people are equal under the law.

Gays can't refuse to serve bigots in their place of business. If you enter and cause a scene you can be removed by police, at that point they can refuse. As the consumer you can choose which business to buy from. As the provider, you must serve all as if they are the same.

 

[Kondor3]

...What does his penis have to do with the accident?...

Mine was an opinion on the idea - advanced by some of our colleagues earlier - that he had undergone sex-conversation 'therapy', to escape the Manslaughter charge.

So I came back with... whether he's got a Schwanz or not... if he's guilty of Manslaughter, his present state is no defense.

Perhaps that's a bit clearer, now...

 

[Derideo_Te]

A florist isn't getting married by selling a wedding bouquet. Nixing that theory.

He's being compelled by law, to support with his labor, talents, and other resources, that which is overtly immoral. Any excuses notwithstanding, this is absolutely not an acceptable or justifiable use if government power.

The First Amendment is supposed to protect us from this sort of abuse.

Your grasp of the 1st Amendment leave a lot to be desired.

No business person is denied their right to their free speech, religious beliefs, etc, etc.

They simply cannot discriminate as far as who they are serving based upon their own opinions, beliefs, etc.

 

[aris2chat]

...What does his penis have to do with the accident?...

Mine was an opinion on the idea - advanced by some of our colleagues earlier - that he had undergone sex-conversation 'therapy', to escape the Manslaughter charge.

So I came back with... whether he's got a Schwanz or not... if he's guilty of Manslaughter, his present state is no defense.

Perhaps that's a bit clearer, now...

He started his conversion before the accident. The actually gender identification was just after the accident, but it had nothing to do with it either way. The only difference was the sensation the media made of both.

He had first tried to transition back in the 80's. He has been struggling with identity since he was a child.

The people in the car that actually killed the woman is suing her estate for more than $18 million for driving without a license. She should never have been behind the wheel or on the road.

 

[ninja007]

hey Bonzi- I said this last month. I think it is likely tbh. Its an Obama move ala Saul Alinsky- distract.

 

[Ame®icano]

Caitlyn Jenner Claims She No Longer Feels Like A Woman And Asks Everyone To Call Her Bruce Again