- Thread starter
- #21
Joey, you're lying again.
No one told W 'straight up' we might be attacked by airplanes.
The brief mentioned airplanes and that hijacking might be a real possibility.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Joey, you're lying again.
No one told W 'straight up' we might be attacked by airplanes.
You are truly dumber than owlshit! You are totally wrong on most everything!
I was not in favor of the Iraq War as it was conducted, but Bush had valid reasons for it, and had bipartisan support.
Does any one elses skin crawl when you read that GW's daughters call them Uncle Bill and Auntie Hillary?
Does any one elses skin crawl when you read that GW's daughters call them Uncle Bill and Auntie Hillary?
No, I've never heard that before. I do know the Clintons and Bushes are close on a personal level.
You are truly dumber than owlshit! You are totally wrong on most everything!
I was not in favor of the Iraq War as it was conducted, but Bush had valid reasons for it, and had bipartisan support.
Fear and lies are not valid reasons. Saddam was not working with Bin Laden and he did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction. Sorry, expired canisters of mustard gas that were buried ten years before don't count.
I can support Jeb if he makes solid statements that reject the Iraqi invasion of his brother.
What about the ones that was hauled out to Syria?
Saddam was harboring terrorists of Bin Laden's.
That said, I was not in favor of putting large numbers of ground troops into Iraq. However, most of what Dubya did will eventually rank in the top ten among Presidents.
What about the ones that was hauled out to Syria?
You mean the ones that Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster moved. Next.
Saddam was harboring terrorists of Bin Laden's.
Uh, no, he wasn't.
Hussein s Iraq and al Qaeda not linked Pentagon says - CNN.com
The U.S. military's first and only study looking into ties between Saddam Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda showed no connection between the two, according to a military report released by the Pentagon.
The report released by the Joint Forces Command five years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq said it found no "smoking gun" after reviewing about 600,000 Iraqi documents captured in the invasion and looking at interviews of key Iraqi leadership held by the United States, Pentagon officials said.
That said, I was not in favor of putting large numbers of ground troops into Iraq. However, most of what Dubya did will eventually rank in the top ten among Presidents.
Actually, Dubya will be remembered as one of the worst presidents in our history.
Yes sir, I was correct. You ARE dumber than owlshit! There's no hope for your brand of ignorance! The end.
Joey, you're lying again.
No one told W 'straight up' we might be attacked by airplanes.
The brief mentioned airplanes and that hijacking might be a real possibility.
Joey, you're such a lying idiot you can't even keep you own made-up bullshit story straight. And it's not part of your well-known reading comprehension problem either. Rather, it's your penchant for inventing facts to support your argument.
Recall what you invented in post #15: Then your boy Bush was told by the CIA, straight up - bin Laden is going to attack us and he might use airplanes. What the August 6 PDB did say was that bin Laden had wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the US since 1997, 3-plus years earlier. The report further stated: We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from (redacted) Service in 1998 saying bin Laden wanted to hijack a US aircraft to gain release of blind Shaykh al-Rahman.
Read that over a few times slowly, Joey. There was nothing said that conflated hijacked airplanes with an attack on the US, no "might" use them to attack us at all in that now famous PDB. The heads-up (uncorroborated) was the possibility of a hijacked US aircraft, passengers, and crew as bargaining chips to negotiate the release of the blind creep.
Once again, nice try Joey. As usual I'm sure your fellow low information idiots believe everything you've made up in this thread.
If I had to bet on one person being our next President, it would be Jeb Bush. Dubya was a good President considering what Clinton left him, and will not hurt Jeb's chances.
I cant vote for Jeb....
I don't and wont vote Democrat.
.
This piece says Bush probably won't run: A.B. Stoddard Jeb stalling in neutral TheHill
And if the reasoning of the article is true - that the main reason Bush doesn't want to run is that American politics have become too shitty, ugly and nasty - I'd imagine that should worry some people.
So our politics are driving decent people away. Not a surprise at all, and not good.
.