Jan 24th will mark 1000 days that the senate has not passed a budget

In your previous post you stated that the Senate voted on the House budget.
The entire Senate or just a budget committee?

If it was voted on by the entire Senate and killed, the House would then have to re-submit a budget wouldn't they? Or would it fall on the Senate to take up the task?

Because, right now, the House can pass just about any Budget they want to with a (R) majority.
With whom would they 'compromise'?

The Dems proposed a Budget and it was literally death-by-suicide. Their own party voted against it. :lol:


Isn't the President supposed to come up with some sort of a recommendation? Where is that at?
:eusa_eh:

Wasn't the presidents plan rejected 97-0?
If the president proposed a budget giving 2 trillion to Disney to make new rides and the senate went 97-0 against would this be a bad thing?

Just because the president proposed it does not make it competent OR a good idea economically.

From what I have observed the republicans are doing the country a favor by blocking Obama and the dems. What little growth and progress has been made only started after the republicans took control of the house.
 
In your previous post you stated that the Senate voted on the House budget.
The entire Senate or just a budget committee?

If it was voted on by the entire Senate and killed, the House would then have to re-submit a budget wouldn't they? Or would it fall on the Senate to take up the task?

Because, right now, the House can pass just about any Budget they want to with a (R) majority.
With whom would they 'compromise'?

The Dems proposed a Budget and it was literally death-by-suicide. Their own party voted against it. :lol:


Isn't the President supposed to come up with some sort of a recommendation? Where is that at?
:eusa_eh:

Wasn't the presidents plan rejected 97-0?


Aww, man....

You spoiled the surprise!!!
:lol:

Sorry, but it looks like the libs have fled from the truth anyhow.
 
Wasn't the presidents plan rejected 97-0?
If the president proposed a budget giving 2 trillion to Disney to make new rides and the senate went 97-0 against would this be a bad thing?

Just because the president proposed it does not make it competent OR a good idea economically.

From what I have observed the republicans are doing the country a favor by blocking Obama and the dems. What little growth and progress has been made only started after the republicans took control of the house.
We've only had 80 bills passed since 2010. I consider this a good thing compared to the several hundred normally pass.

Gridlock is evidence your government is prevented from fucking up your life.
 
If the president proposed a budget giving 2 trillion to Disney to make new rides and the senate went 97-0 against would this be a bad thing?

Just because the president proposed it does not make it competent OR a good idea economically.

From what I have observed the republicans are doing the country a favor by blocking Obama and the dems. What little growth and progress has been made only started after the republicans took control of the house.
We've only had 80 bills passed since 2010. I consider this a good thing compared to the several hundred normally pass.

Gridlock is evidence your government is prevented from fucking up your life.

You got that right.
And most of those be were just done to make it look like they were actually woring. All they are really doing is screwing the country while raking in big bucks. Time to go back to the being paid per diem and only doing what the constitution gave them power to do.
 
House Republicans are too busy reading the Constitution out loud and passing anti abortion measures to do anything useful.

They will lose seats in November.

It is not your decision who gets what seats in November. Our current system has no place for dictatorships. And even your Messiah cannot change that.
 
Bah! Who needs a budget when we're off in the trillion column?

Reagan ran the entire government for less that an Obama Deficit
 
Say what you will about Newt but he passed a few of these in his days with Pres. Clinton.
 
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.

In your previous post you stated that the Senate voted on the House budget.
The entire Senate or just a budget committee?

If it was voted on by the entire Senate and killed, the House would then have to re-submit a budget wouldn't they? Or would it fall on the Senate to take up the task?

Because, right now, the House can pass just about any Budget they want to with a (R) majority.
With whom would they 'compromise'?

The Dems proposed a Budget and it was literally death-by-suicide. Their own party voted against it. :lol:


Isn't the President supposed to come up with some sort of a recommendation? Where is that at?
:eusa_eh:

Did you ever get an answer to your questions???? Hmmmm....didn't see any. Wonder where Occupied went???
 

Forum List

Back
Top