PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
11. Bloody fingerprints that leave no doubt.
āThanks to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, we now know that high-level FBI officials were involvedā¦.text messages between FBI Deputy Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page that suggest an illegal plan to utilize law enforcement to frame Trump. The most revealing exchange we know of took place on August 15, 2016. Concerned about the outcome of the election, Strzok wrote:
I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [Andrew McCabeās] officeāthat thereās no way [Trump] gets electedābut Iām afraid we canāt take that risk. Itās like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before youāre 40.
No amount of sugar coating or post hoc explanation of this and other texts can conceal the coupleās animus against Trump and support for Clinton.
Strzokās messages illustrate his commitment to Clintonās victory and Trumpās defeat or, if Trump won, to an āinsurance policy.ā
The term āinsurance policyā obviously refers to the Trump-Russia collusion investigationā¦ā The Politicization of the FBI
And, for the Democrat boot-lickers, their motto:
'We donn need no stinkin' evidence!!'
We learned that that is their view long ago:
What was new with the Clarence Thomas nomination was the accusation of criminal wrongdoing on his part, namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill.
Even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter. Thus, a new mantra for the Left was born:
āThe nature of the evidence is irrelevant; itās the seriousness of the charge that matters.ā Tom Foley, Democrat, Former Speaker of the House.
āThanks to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, we now know that high-level FBI officials were involvedā¦.text messages between FBI Deputy Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page that suggest an illegal plan to utilize law enforcement to frame Trump. The most revealing exchange we know of took place on August 15, 2016. Concerned about the outcome of the election, Strzok wrote:
I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [Andrew McCabeās] officeāthat thereās no way [Trump] gets electedābut Iām afraid we canāt take that risk. Itās like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before youāre 40.
No amount of sugar coating or post hoc explanation of this and other texts can conceal the coupleās animus against Trump and support for Clinton.
Strzokās messages illustrate his commitment to Clintonās victory and Trumpās defeat or, if Trump won, to an āinsurance policy.ā
The term āinsurance policyā obviously refers to the Trump-Russia collusion investigationā¦ā The Politicization of the FBI
And, for the Democrat boot-lickers, their motto:
'We donn need no stinkin' evidence!!'
We learned that that is their view long ago:
What was new with the Clarence Thomas nomination was the accusation of criminal wrongdoing on his part, namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill.
Even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter. Thus, a new mantra for the Left was born:
āThe nature of the evidence is irrelevant; itās the seriousness of the charge that matters.ā Tom Foley, Democrat, Former Speaker of the House.