James Baker Testimony Proves Comey Lied To The American People And Protected Hillary From Indictment

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,076
2,645
Hillary Clinton:

Operated an illegal, unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured private server that contained classified information above the level of 'TOP SECRET' - information she was no longer legally allowed to have access to, information SO classified Barak Obama himself said it could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.

-- This server was stored in the BATHROOM of a small tech company that did not have the security clearances required to have it in their possession or to maintain it.

-- The US IG revealed that the contents of this server had been access by the Russians, the Chinese, and 3 other foreign entities. (OBAMA: The information / data on this server "could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.")



By the very definition of the word 'Espionage', Hillary Clinton committed this crime, and James Comey's lie about it not being criminal due a lack of intent is debunked in the definition of the crime, stating 'Intent' is not a requirement for being guilty of committing 'Espionage'.

Instead of staging armed raids of Hillary's offices, caught on camera, to seize her server, computers, files, devices, etc... Instead, they ASKED her to turn over all of her 'stuff'...IN DUE TIME. DURING THAT TIME Hillary and her team used hammers to destroy her devices, deleted files, Bleach Bit her server - She lied to the FBI, telling them she was going to turn in everything official they had requested and said everything she had deleted was 'personal'. THE REALITY WAS SHE COMMITTED OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY DELETING / DESTROYING SUBPOENAED EVIDENCE.

Afterwards, the FBI publicly declared they had recovered the documents and e-mails she had attempted to delete...and found more than 15,000 official subpoenaed documents. EACH document represented 1 criminal count of Obstruction, 1 criminal count of violating the FOIA, and 1 criminal count of violating the Federal Records Act....for a grand total of more than 45,000 criminal counts ... and that does not include the Espionage and crimes of Illegally handling classified, illegal destruction of Classified, and lying to the FBI.

James Comey publicly told the American people that Hillary HAD broken Laws...but that she was too stupid to know she was doing it. The 2 most glaring things wrong with his statement and attempted justification for not recommending her for indictment was 1) 'Ignorance' is NOT a legal defense for breaking the law, and 2) as pointed out, the Crime of Espionage, which she committed, does not require 'Intent'.

The REAL LIE Comey told, which is the topic of this thread, is when he said THIS:

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case"
- FBI director says "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict Clinton over emails


Just like when Bill Clinton looked into the camera / faces of the American people and said, "I did not have sex with that woman', Comey looked into the faces of every American citizen watching his BS press conference and LIED HIS ASS OFF.

'NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR'?! REALLY?

James Baker, THE FBI'S TOP LAWYER, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”
-- 'Late in the process', btw, means DAYS before the Presidential election. Baker argued and fought with his own FBI leadership eight up to just DAYS before the election over his belief Hillary Clinton COULD not only be indicted for her crimes but SHOULD be indicted for her crimes.


-- FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it


.
 
Hillary Clinton:

Operated an illegal, unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured private server that contained classified information above the level of 'TOP SECRET' - information she was no longer legally allowed to have access to, information SO classified Barak Obama himself said it could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.

-- This server was stored in the BATHROOM of a small tech company that did not have the security clearances required to have it in their possession or to maintain it.

-- The US IG revealed that the contents of this server had been access by the Russians, the Chinese, and 3 other foreign entities. (OBAMA: The information / data on this server "could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.")



By the very definition of the word 'Espionage', Hillary Clinton committed this crime, and James Comey's lie about it not being criminal due a lack of intent is debunked in the definition of the crime, stating 'Intent' is not a requirement for being guilty of committing 'Espionage'.

Instead of staging armed raids of Hillary's offices, caught on camera, to seize her server, computers, files, devices, etc... Instead, they ASKED her to turn over all of her 'stuff'...IN DUE TIME. DURING THAT TIME Hillary and her team used hammers to destroy her devices, deleted files, Bleach Bit her server - She lied to the FBI, telling them she was going to turn in everything official they had requested and said everything she had deleted was 'personal'. THE REALITY WAS SHE COMMITTED OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY DELETING / DESTROYING SUBPOENAED EVIDENCE.

Afterwards, the FBI publicly declared they had recovered the documents and e-mails she had attempted to delete...and found more than 15,000 official subpoenaed documents. EACH document represented 1 criminal count of Obstruction, 1 criminal count of violating the FOIA, and 1 criminal count of violating the Federal Records Act....for a grand total of more than 45,000 criminal counts ... and that does not include the Espionage and crimes of Illegally handling classified, illegal destruction of Classified, and lying to the FBI.

James Comey publicly told the American people that Hillary HAD broken Laws...but that she was too stupid to know she was doing it. The 2 most glaring things wrong with his statement and attempted justification for not recommending her for indictment was 1) 'Ignorance' is NOT a legal defense for breaking the law, and 2) as pointed out, the Crime of Espionage, which she committed, does not require 'Intent'.

The REAL LIE Comey told, which is the topic of this thread, is when he said THIS:

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case"
- FBI director says "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict Clinton over emails


Just like when Bill Clinton looked into the camera / faces of the American people and said, "I did not have sex with that woman', Comey looked into the faces of every American citizen watching his BS press conference and LIED HIS ASS OFF.

'NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR'?! REALLY?

James Baker, THE FBI'S TOP LAWYER, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”
-- 'Late in the process', btw, means DAYS before the Presidential election. Baker argued and fought with his own FBI leadership eight up to just DAYS before the election over his belief Hillary Clinton COULD not only be indicted for her crimes but SHOULD be indicted for her crimes.


-- FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it


.

Maybe Trump and his DOJ are in Hillary's pocket.

Donald has been the boss of the guys in charge of every alphabet security agency we have for two years now right? There are no more excuses for him bot prosecuting if there is something to prosecute
 
"We now are learning that Comey’s top lawyer, then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”
ADVERTISEMENT


The revelation is contained in testimony Baker gave to House investigators last year. His testimony has not been publicly released, but I was permitted to review a transcript:

“I have reason to believe that you originally believed it was appropriate to charge Hillary Clinton with regard to violations of law — various laws, with regard to mishandling of classified information. Is that accurate?” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, asked Baker.


Baker paused to gain his lawyer’s permission to respond, and then answered, “Yes.”



Baker tried to back-track, to justify why he changed his mind that Hillary should not be indicted by REPEATING COMEY'S LIE:

“And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — she had the intent necessary to violate (the law).”

1. 'BECAME PERSUADED'...just DAYS out from the Presidential Election.
In other words, The FBI's Leadership...and others...pressured Baker into backing down.

Just IMAGINE the firestorm and political / legal hell Baker would have unleashed had he gone public with his professional opinion that Hillary should be charged:


- Evidence shows Comey and US AG Loretta Lynch had already written Hillary's EXONERATION LETTER BEFORE the investigation of Hillary Clinton was complete, before they ever interviewed her. IMAGINE them having to explain THAT after Baker came forward to announce their was DEFINITELY enough on which to indict Clinton.

- AFTER the FBI publicly declared they had found thousands of official subpoenaed documents Hillary had attempted to destroy (Obstruction / FOIA Violations / Fed Records Act Violations), Comey LIED to the American people by declaring although it was OBVIOUS Hillary broke laws she was stupid, had no intention of doing it, and 'NO REASONABLE LAWYER WOULD RECOMMENT INDICTMENT'. IMAGINE Comey trying to explain THAT comment / LIE after Baker then came forward to declare there WAS reasonable cause / evidence on which to indict Hillary!

- Evidence acquired already shows the FBI leadership was already convinced Hillary would win the election and was afraid of Hillary's wrath, holding a grudge against anyone who crossed her.

2. 'INTENT': As pointed out already, 1) Ignorance of the Law is NOT a legal defense for breaking the law, & 2) 'Intent' is NOT required to be guilty of 'Espionage'



*** 'IGNORANCE / LACK OF INTENT TO BREAK THE LAW:
This argument is pure BULLSHIT, as well! The very FACT that Hillary LIED to the FBI, claiming she was only going to turn in official documents (amazing the FBI allowed a possible criminal tell THEM what she would turn in and what she would not - again, the FBI and Mueller made it a point not only to raid and seize everything when it came to Manafort and Cohen but also made sure CNN was there to cover it), and then intentionally illegally destroyed devices, ”stole / withheld sim cards, attempted to delete documents, and attempted to Bleach Bit her hard drive proves she KNEW she had broken the law and that she was willing to intentionally commit the crime of Obstruction to hide it!



 
She should have been prosecuted. Hell many others have been prosecuted for doing much less than that old hag did.

It would be nice if she faced justice just as they did.
 
We can also factor in the exposed evidence that, just DAYS before the election, the FBI found TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED Hillary documents on Huma Abedin's personal UN-classified, UN-encrypted, UN-secured home laptop, which she had illegally e-mailed to herself - the infamous 'Comey Re-opens Hillary Investigation Just Days Before The Election' incident.

(This is the SAME laptop, BTW, that spent a lot of time resting on Anthony Weiner's nake junk as he trolled the internet sexting under-aged girls.)


At this point Baker was still arguing there was enough evidence to indict Hillary, and suddenly FBI Agents report to Comey of Huma's crimes....which we now know, like all the others, Comey sweeps under the rug....




FBI Found "Tens Of Thousands Of Emails" Belonging To Huma Abedin On Weiner's Laptop

Huma Abedin often handled classified data on computer she shared with Anthony Weiner

BREAKING: FBI Finds 2,800 Huma Govt Docs on Weiner Laptop - Most Likely Contains Classified Info


Not only does evidence show the FBI refused to indict Huma for Lying to the FBI earlier, this exposed evidence shows her ass should be sharing a cell will Hillary for mishandling classified!
 
Last edited:
Donald has been the boss of the guys in charge of every alphabet security agency we have for two years now right? There are no more excuses for him bot prosecuting if there is something to prosecute

Are you REALLY trying to suggest that Donald Trump has any control over the proven treasonous, seditious conspiratorial Obama hold-over criminals who were just exposed as having plotted, planned, and attempted to execute a coup d'état against the President?

Bwuhahahahaha.....you can't be THAT stupid....can you? :p
 
Hillary Clinton:

Operated an illegal, unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured private server that contained classified information above the level of 'TOP SECRET' - information she was no longer legally allowed to have access to, information SO classified Barak Obama himself said it could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.

-- This server was stored in the BATHROOM of a small tech company that did not have the security clearances required to have it in their possession or to maintain it.

-- The US IG revealed that the contents of this server had been access by the Russians, the Chinese, and 3 other foreign entities. (OBAMA: The information / data on this server "could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.")



By the very definition of the word 'Espionage', Hillary Clinton committed this crime, and James Comey's lie about it not being criminal due a lack of intent is debunked in the definition of the crime, stating 'Intent' is not a requirement for being guilty of committing 'Espionage'.

Instead of staging armed raids of Hillary's offices, caught on camera, to seize her server, computers, files, devices, etc... Instead, they ASKED her to turn over all of her 'stuff'...IN DUE TIME. DURING THAT TIME Hillary and her team used hammers to destroy her devices, deleted files, Bleach Bit her server - She lied to the FBI, telling them she was going to turn in everything official they had requested and said everything she had deleted was 'personal'. THE REALITY WAS SHE COMMITTED OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY DELETING / DESTROYING SUBPOENAED EVIDENCE.

Afterwards, the FBI publicly declared they had recovered the documents and e-mails she had attempted to delete...and found more than 15,000 official subpoenaed documents. EACH document represented 1 criminal count of Obstruction, 1 criminal count of violating the FOIA, and 1 criminal count of violating the Federal Records Act....for a grand total of more than 45,000 criminal counts ... and that does not include the Espionage and crimes of Illegally handling classified, illegal destruction of Classified, and lying to the FBI.

James Comey publicly told the American people that Hillary HAD broken Laws...but that she was too stupid to know she was doing it. The 2 most glaring things wrong with his statement and attempted justification for not recommending her for indictment was 1) 'Ignorance' is NOT a legal defense for breaking the law, and 2) as pointed out, the Crime of Espionage, which she committed, does not require 'Intent'.

The REAL LIE Comey told, which is the topic of this thread, is when he said THIS:

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case"
- FBI director says "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict Clinton over emails


Just like when Bill Clinton looked into the camera / faces of the American people and said, "I did not have sex with that woman', Comey looked into the faces of every American citizen watching his BS press conference and LIED HIS ASS OFF.

'NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR'?! REALLY?

James Baker, THE FBI'S TOP LAWYER, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”
-- 'Late in the process', btw, means DAYS before the Presidential election. Baker argued and fought with his own FBI leadership eight up to just DAYS before the election over his belief Hillary Clinton COULD not only be indicted for her crimes but SHOULD be indicted for her crimes.


-- FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it


.

When your entire first paragraph is a lie, the entire post must is dismissed as being premised on things that never happened. Hillary's server was not illegal, no matter how many times you say it:

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law

Stupid lying Russians!!
 
Baker wanted Clinton Indicted at first, and from what I read and heard Comey told him to back off, and eventually Baker relented.
 
Hillary Clinton:

Operated an illegal, unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured private server that contained classified information above the level of 'TOP SECRET' - information she was no longer legally allowed to have access to, information SO classified Barak Obama himself said it could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.

-- This server was stored in the BATHROOM of a small tech company that did not have the security clearances required to have it in their possession or to maintain it.

-- The US IG revealed that the contents of this server had been access by the Russians, the Chinese, and 3 other foreign entities. (OBAMA: The information / data on this server "could not be released to the public without causing GRAVE Damage to our National Security.")



By the very definition of the word 'Espionage', Hillary Clinton committed this crime, and James Comey's lie about it not being criminal due a lack of intent is debunked in the definition of the crime, stating 'Intent' is not a requirement for being guilty of committing 'Espionage'.

Instead of staging armed raids of Hillary's offices, caught on camera, to seize her server, computers, files, devices, etc... Instead, they ASKED her to turn over all of her 'stuff'...IN DUE TIME. DURING THAT TIME Hillary and her team used hammers to destroy her devices, deleted files, Bleach Bit her server - She lied to the FBI, telling them she was going to turn in everything official they had requested and said everything she had deleted was 'personal'. THE REALITY WAS SHE COMMITTED OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY DELETING / DESTROYING SUBPOENAED EVIDENCE.

Afterwards, the FBI publicly declared they had recovered the documents and e-mails she had attempted to delete...and found more than 15,000 official subpoenaed documents. EACH document represented 1 criminal count of Obstruction, 1 criminal count of violating the FOIA, and 1 criminal count of violating the Federal Records Act....for a grand total of more than 45,000 criminal counts ... and that does not include the Espionage and crimes of Illegally handling classified, illegal destruction of Classified, and lying to the FBI.

James Comey publicly told the American people that Hillary HAD broken Laws...but that she was too stupid to know she was doing it. The 2 most glaring things wrong with his statement and attempted justification for not recommending her for indictment was 1) 'Ignorance' is NOT a legal defense for breaking the law, and 2) as pointed out, the Crime of Espionage, which she committed, does not require 'Intent'.

The REAL LIE Comey told, which is the topic of this thread, is when he said THIS:

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case"
- FBI director says "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict Clinton over emails


Just like when Bill Clinton looked into the camera / faces of the American people and said, "I did not have sex with that woman', Comey looked into the faces of every American citizen watching his BS press conference and LIED HIS ASS OFF.

'NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR'?! REALLY?

James Baker, THE FBI'S TOP LAWYER, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”
-- 'Late in the process', btw, means DAYS before the Presidential election. Baker argued and fought with his own FBI leadership eight up to just DAYS before the election over his belief Hillary Clinton COULD not only be indicted for her crimes but SHOULD be indicted for her crimes.


-- FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it


.

When your entire first paragraph is a lie, the entire post must is dismissed as being premised on things that never happened. Hillary's server was not illegal, no matter how many times you say it:

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law

Stupid lying Russians!!
It was in violation of The Espionage Act and it's clauses on the protection and handling of classified information. So yes, it was illegal. It was also in violation of State Department Guidelines on computer usage, email policies etc.
Obama himself was in violation of these policies as were many of his staff, simply by emailing Clinton at that server using aliases in attempts to conceal communications, and circumvent Freedom of Information Act Laws.

Again, the mere existence of Clinton's Server was Illegal.
The usage of it was illegal.
The destruction of emails on it was illegal.
In addition to that, two federal court orders to preserve all data on that server were violated, which meant, bleach bitting Clinton's sever was a felony.
 
When your entire first paragraph is a lie, the entire post must is dismissed as being premised on things that never happened. Hillary's server was not illegal, no matter how many times you say it:

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law

Stupid lying Russians!!
You're such a lying, spinning, treasonous c*nt....

1. NPR.....REALLY? Bwuhahahahaha

2. From Your Own Link:

FOIA is intended to "foster democracy by ensuring public access to agency records and information" in a timely manner.

FORGET 'TIMELY MANNER' - IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT HILLARY CLINTON NEVER TURNED IN THESE OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS, IAW THE FOIA AND FEDERAL RECORDS ACT, WHICH IS BREAKING THOSE LAWS....OVER 15,000 TIMES EACH...JUST PRIOR TO HER ATTEMPT TO COMPLETELY DESTROY ALL TRACE OF THEM, PERMANENTLY DENYING THE PUBLIC FROM EVER ACCESSING THEM.



In Clinton's case, she says she turned over some 30,000 relevant emails, totaling 55,000 pages, and wants those all made public.

WHO THE F* CARES HOW MANY SHE TURNED IN - THE POINT / ISSUE IS THAT THE FBI DECLARED THEY RECOVERED OVER 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS THAT 1) HILLARY NEVER TURNED IN IAW THE FOIA AND FEDERAL RECORDS ACT & 2) THE FACT THAT SHE REFUSED TO TURN IN THESE SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS & INSTEAD ATTEMPTED TO DESTROY THEM WHILE LYING TO THE FBI BY TELLING THEM SHE HAD TURNED IN ALL THE SUBPEONAED DOCUMENTS CONSTITUTE THE CRIMES OF LYING TO THE FBI AND OBSTRUCTION!



Clinton was the filter for what was relevant to work and what was not.

:wtf:

Yeah, we saw what kind of FILTER Hillary Clinton was. The FBI exposed the fact that the FILTER was broken, that the FILTER lied to the FBI by declaring she had turned over all official SUBPOENAED documents before attempting to destroy over 15,000 official subpoenaed documents and wipe destroy all devices and Bleach Bit her server to delete evidence.

Barak Obama openly exposed how broken the FILTER was when he declared her server contained (illegally) data so classified it could not be released or it would cause GRAVE DAMAGE to our national security...which it was already doing, as the US IG revealed the Russians, Chinese, and 3 other foreign entities had hacked her ILLEGAL, UNAUTHORIZED, UNENCRYPTED, UNSECURED server. F* HILLARY MIGHT AS WELL HAVE JUST FAXED THEM THE DAMN INFORMATION!
 
When your entire first paragraph is a lie, the entire post must is dismissed as being premised on things that never happened. Hillary's server was not illegal, no matter how many times you say it:

Fact Check: Hillary Clinton, Those Emails And The Law

Stupid lying Russians!!
You're such a lying, spinning, treasonous c*nt....

1. NPR.....REALLY? Bwuhahahahaha

2. From Your Own Link:

FOIA is intended to "foster democracy by ensuring public access to agency records and information" in a timely manner.

FORGET 'TIMELY MANNER' - IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT HILLARY CLINTON NEVER TURNED IN THESE OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS, IAW THE FOIA AND FEDERAL RECORDS ACT, WHICH IS BREAKING THOSE LAWS....OVER 15,000 TIMES EACH...JUST PRIOR TO HER ATTEMPT TO COMPLETELY DESTROY ALL TRACE OF THEM, PERMANENTLY DENYING THE PUBLIC FROM EVER ACCESSING THEM.



In Clinton's case, she says she turned over some 30,000 relevant emails, totaling 55,000 pages, and wants those all made public.

WHO THE F* CARES HOW MANY SHE TURNED IN - THE POINT / ISSUE IS THAT THE FBI DECLARED THEY RECOVERED OVER 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS THAT 1) HILLARY NEVER TURNED IN IAW THE FOIA AND FEDERAL RECORDS ACT & 2) THE FACT THAT SHE REFUSED TO TURN IN THESE SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS & INSTEAD ATTEMPTED TO DESTROY THEM WHILE LYING TO THE FBI BY TELLING THEM SHE HAD TURNED IN ALL THE SUBPEONAED DOCUMENTS CONSTITUTE THE CRIMES OF LYING TO THE FBI AND OBSTRUCTION!



Clinton was the filter for what was relevant to work and what was not.

:wtf:

Yeah, we saw what kind of FILTER Hillary Clinton was. The FBI exposed the fact that the FILTER was broken, that the FILTER lied to the FBI by declaring she had turned over all official SUBPOENAED documents before attempting to destroy over 15,000 official subpoenaed documents and wipe destroy all devices and Bleach Bit her server to delete evidence.

Barak Obama openly exposed how broken the FILTER was when he declared her server contained (illegally) data so classified it could not be released or it would cause GRAVE DAMAGE to our national security...which it was already doing, as the US IG revealed the Russians, Chinese, and 3 other foreign entities had hacked her ILLEGAL, UNAUTHORIZED, UNENCRYPTED, UNSECURED server. F* HILLARY MIGHT AS WELL HAVE JUST FAXED THEM THE DAMN INFORMATION!

I think Clinton was actively selling Classified Information both to The Chinese and Russians.

This is how Russia got our Hypersonic Missile Technology, and how China developed a Chinese Clone of our F-35.

Also on that server was information about the Benghazi Gun Running Operation to Al Queda regarding The Libya COUP, and assassination of Qadaffi, as well as communications regarding The Muslim Brotherhood and COUP Clinton and Obama plotted in Egypt.

I am also fairly confident that there were communications between Clinton, Obama, and people like Rice, Mills, Lynch and Comey regarding Donald Trump, and using The Dirty Dossier to take him down, and I am also confident that there were communications on that server from Russian Intelligence regarding the Dossier, it's preparation, payments, delivery dates etc.

The only reason Clinton is not in prison, and was not put away for LIFE, is because we would have had to Put Obama Bin Lying on trial, and throw him in jail too. The Social Upheaval over doing something like that, was not worth the risk of exacting justice on those two, and the cronies surrounding them.

So what will happen instead is a bunch of others will have to fall on their swords, and get a few slaps on the wrist, and we'll move on and forget about the whole thing, "In The Interest of National Security."

They all will protect former President Obama, and in protecting him, they have to protect Clinton as well.

No one should expect any investigations in to either of these two to EVER GO ANYWHERE.

It's a waste of time, and we shouldn't bother with it.
 
Last edited:
The Original Tree:

The mere existence of Clinton's Server was Illegal.

The usage of it was illegal.

The destruction of emails on it was illegal.

In addition to that, two federal court orders to preserve all data on that server were violated, which meant, bleach bitting Clinton's sever was a felony.


Every Democrat....every Liberal....EVERY Trump-Hating Snowflake...KNOWS these are all true...but continue to publicly refuse to acknowledge the evidence / facts, continue to publicly refuse to admit the truth due to their irrational partisan hatred for the President of the United States and their irrational, treasonous / seditious party-1st mentality.

If they deny this, they are lying....to themselves because no one else believes them.

And if they seriously do not believe these facts then they are so stupid it is a wonder they can walk around and do things, how they can do anything but stay still and focus on forcing themselves to take a breath every few seconds because of being SO stupid their automatic response system in their bodies which usually does it for them without THINKING simply does not work due to their lack of mental ability / brain cells.
 
The Original Tree:

The mere existence of Clinton's Server was Illegal.

The usage of it was illegal.

The destruction of emails on it was illegal.

In addition to that, two federal court orders to preserve all data on that server were violated, which meant, bleach bitting Clinton's sever was a felony.


Every Democrat....every Liberal....EVERY Trump-Hating Snowflake...KNOWS these are all true...but continue to publicly refuse to acknowledge the evidence / facts, continue to publicly refuse to admit the truth due to their irrational partisan hatred for the President of the United States and their irrational, treasonous / seditious party-1st mentality.

If they deny this, they are lying....to themselves because no one else believes them.

And if they seriously do not believe these facts then they are so stupid it is a wonder they can walk around and do things, how they can do anything but stay still and focus on forcing themselves to take a breath every few seconds because of being SO stupid their automatic response system in their bodies which usually does it for them without THINKING simply does not work due to their lack of mental ability / brain cells.

Clinton and Obama will walk... "In The Interest of National Security"

If there are any two people who need to be put on Trial and Bludgeoned with Justice, it's those two. Arguably the two most Corrupt Politicians to ever walk the face of The Earth.

But they will walk unfortunately, and really it's best for America if they do.

And I do not agree at all that they should be left off the hook, but to take Clinton down, you have to take Obama with her.

That is going to cause major Social Upheaval in this country and it's not worth it.

They are guilty...both of them...the entire administration was a quagmire of corruption, but we'll exact a little justice on just the satellite players, the foot soldiers who got caught carrying out Obama's orders, and then sweep the rest under the rug.
 
I think Clinton was actively selling Classified Information both to The Chinese and Russians.

$100+ MILLION from the Russians is a LOT of money...and the snowflakes themselves are adamant that it was not paid to her for uranium...soooooooo it had to be for something else. Considering the evidence / facts, selling classified seems to be the next reasonable explanation.

I mean, evidence shows:
- Barry knew that the Russians were trying to hack senior US officials' servers / e-mail


- Barry knew Hillary was operating an illegal, unauthorized, unencrypted unsecured server - he was e-mailing her using an alias

- Knowing what the Russians were up to and about Hillary's server, he never forced her to shut it down or secure it

- Hillary was operating an illegal, unauthorized, unencrypted unsecured server she knew contained TS SCI data

- The Russians, Chinese, & 3 other foreign entities accessed that data Obama would cause 'Grave Damage' to Natl Sec if exposed

Either Barry and Hillary were 'Brain-Dead' Incompetent & Oblivious to the threat her server and the Russians posed OR......
 
Even if Comey was right...and Baker was eventually pressured / came around on his own....to believe the BS about Hillary being SO stupid she had no clue she was breaking the law:

They can't get around the FACTS that:

1) INTENT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE GUILTY OF ESPIONAGE.

2) IGNORANCE IS NO LEGAL DEFENSE FOR BREAKING THE LAW.



....AND WHY THE HELL WOULD THE DEMOCRATS / SNOWFLAKES WANT A PRESIDENT WHO WAS SO INCOMPETENT AND SO UNWANTED SHE COULD NOT WIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOMINATION ON HER OWN AND A PRESIDENT SO F*ING STUPID THAT SHE DID NOT COMPREHENT LAWS AND HAD NO IDEA SHE WAS BREAKING THEM?
 
Well we certainly have the right wing nutjob opinion.(loudly...in BOLD print...and repeated often)

However two years after the Trump Admin ha had control of the DOJ...and four years of investigations prior to that

And


Nothing
 
Donald has been the boss of the guys in charge of every alphabet security agency we have for two years now right? There are no more excuses for him bot prosecuting if there is something to prosecute

Are you REALLY trying to suggest that Donald Trump has any control over the proven treasonous, seditious conspiratorial Obama hold-over criminals who were just exposed as having plotted, planned, and attempted to execute a coup d'état against the President?

Bwuhahahahaha.....you can't be THAT stupid....can you? :p
Yes, yes he can.
 

Forum List

Back
Top