Jackson Doesn't Want Accuser Called 'Victim'

5stringJeff

Senior Member
Sep 15, 2003
9,990
544
48
Puyallup, WA
Because, of course, nothing happened to the child... :rolleyes:

-------------------

Jackson Doesn't Want Accuser Called 'Victim'
Wed Jan 19, 2005 09:03 PM ET
By Steve Gorman and Dan Whitcomb

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Lawyers for Michael Jackson have asked a judge in his child molestation case to bar prosecutors from referring to his young accuser or the boy's family as "victims" in front of a jury, saying that it violates the pop star's right to a fair trial.

Jackson's attorneys also want Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon and his deputies prevented from telling jurors that they represent "the people," for the same reason when trial begins on Jan. 31.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=7375428
 
gop_jeff said:
Because, of course, nothing happened to the child... :rolleyes:

-------------------

Jackson Doesn't Want Accuser Called 'Victim'
Wed Jan 19, 2005 09:03 PM ET
By Steve Gorman and Dan Whitcomb

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Lawyers for Michael Jackson have asked a judge in his child molestation case to bar prosecutors from referring to his young accuser or the boy's family as "victims" in front of a jury, saying that it violates the pop star's right to a fair trial.

Jackson's attorneys also want Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon and his deputies prevented from telling jurors that they represent "the people," for the same reason when trial begins on Jan. 31.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=7375428

By now, I would think the "innocent" plee would be very questionable.
JMO
 

Forum List

Back
Top