‘I’ve seen America’s future — and it’s not Republican’

[guno]

In national elections the white christianist party is finished, they will win local elections only




The shift marked by these polls reflects the new American majority and explains why next year’s election will prove shattering and divisive for the Republican party, even if it retains its strongholds in the House of Representatives and states .

It also explains why, since 2004, Republicans have been engaged in a ferocious counter-revolution to stop these new and expanding demographic groups from coalescing to form a politically coherent bloc capable of governing successfully. The tactic adopted by Karl Rove, George W Bush’s election strategist, and other social conservatives was to forsake “big tent Republicanism” and the swing voter. Instead of an earlier emphasis on “compassion” or the “Latino vote”, they made politics a battle for social and cultural values – “American values” – that would raise the stakes and engage those who leaned furthest to the right, particularly evangelicals and the religiously observant. Rove’s ambition was to create a permanent Republican majority, and he saw “moral” issues such as opposition to gay marriage as the most powerful force in politics. Indeed, he used them to galvanise enough support to get Bush re-elected in November 2004.

But the culture war ignited by Rove is a fire that requires ever more toxic fuel – it only works by raising fears of the moral and social Armageddon that would follow a Democratic victory.


‘I’ve seen America’s future — and it’s not Republican’: How demographic change gives Democrats the advantage

 

[my2¢]

Don't count your chickens .....

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rubio and Kasich can beat HRC.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That must explain why Republican have done so poorly since the Obama Preisdency

 

[Delta4Embassy]

In national elections the white christianist party is finished, they will win local elections only




The shift marked by these polls reflects the new American majority and explains why next year’s election will prove shattering and divisive for the Republican party, even if it retains its strongholds in the House of Representatives and states .

It also explains why, since 2004, Republicans have been engaged in a ferocious counter-revolution to stop these new and expanding demographic groups from coalescing to form a politically coherent bloc capable of governing successfully. The tactic adopted by Karl Rove, George W Bush’s election strategist, and other social conservatives was to forsake “big tent Republicanism” and the swing voter. Instead of an earlier emphasis on “compassion” or the “Latino vote”, they made politics a battle for social and cultural values – “American values” – that would raise the stakes and engage those who leaned furthest to the right, particularly evangelicals and the religiously observant. Rove’s ambition was to create a permanent Republican majority, and he saw “moral” issues such as opposition to gay marriage as the most powerful force in politics. Indeed, he used them to galvanise enough support to get Bush re-elected in November 2004.

But the culture war ignited by Rove is a fire that requires ever more toxic fuel – it only works by raising fears of the moral and social Armageddon that would follow a Democratic victory.


‘I’ve seen America’s future — and it’s not Republican’: How demographic change gives Democrats the advantage

America's future is either complete government disintegration following terrorist or national nuclear attack, or 2nd civil war, or going the way the USSR did with states forming micro-alliances after the USA proper ceases to exist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

In national elections the white christianist party is finished, they will win local elections only




The shift marked by these polls reflects the new American majority and explains why next year’s election will prove shattering and divisive for the Republican party, even if it retains its strongholds in the House of Representatives and states .

It also explains why, since 2004, Republicans have been engaged in a ferocious counter-revolution to stop these new and expanding demographic groups from coalescing to form a politically coherent bloc capable of governing successfully. The tactic adopted by Karl Rove, George W Bush’s election strategist, and other social conservatives was to forsake “big tent Republicanism” and the swing voter. Instead of an earlier emphasis on “compassion” or the “Latino vote”, they made politics a battle for social and cultural values – “American values” – that would raise the stakes and engage those who leaned furthest to the right, particularly evangelicals and the religiously observant. Rove’s ambition was to create a permanent Republican majority, and he saw “moral” issues such as opposition to gay marriage as the most powerful force in politics. Indeed, he used them to galvanise enough support to get Bush re-elected in November 2004.

But the culture war ignited by Rove is a fire that requires ever more toxic fuel – it only works by raising fears of the moral and social Armageddon that would follow a Democratic victory.


‘I’ve seen America’s future — and it’s not Republican’: How demographic change gives Democrats the advantage

America's future is either complete government disintegration following terrorist or national nuclear attack, or 2nd civil war, or going the way the USSR did with states forming micro-alliances after the USA proper ceases to exist.

Silly person.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

In national elections the white christianist party is finished, they will win local elections only




The shift marked by these polls reflects the new American majority and explains why next year’s election will prove shattering and divisive for the Republican party, even if it retains its strongholds in the House of Representatives and states .

It also explains why, since 2004, Republicans have been engaged in a ferocious counter-revolution to stop these new and expanding demographic groups from coalescing to form a politically coherent bloc capable of governing successfully. The tactic adopted by Karl Rove, George W Bush’s election strategist, and other social conservatives was to forsake “big tent Republicanism” and the swing voter. Instead of an earlier emphasis on “compassion” or the “Latino vote”, they made politics a battle for social and cultural values – “American values” – that would raise the stakes and engage those who leaned furthest to the right, particularly evangelicals and the religiously observant. Rove’s ambition was to create a permanent Republican majority, and he saw “moral” issues such as opposition to gay marriage as the most powerful force in politics. Indeed, he used them to galvanise enough support to get Bush re-elected in November 2004.

But the culture war ignited by Rove is a fire that requires ever more toxic fuel – it only works by raising fears of the moral and social Armageddon that would follow a Democratic victory.


‘I’ve seen America’s future — and it’s not Republican’: How demographic change gives Democrats the advantage

America's future is either complete government disintegration following terrorist or national nuclear attack, or 2nd civil war, or going the way the USSR did with states forming micro-alliances after the USA proper ceases to exist.

Silly person.

Wanna bet a dollar?

 

[JakeStarkey]

In national elections the white christianist party is finished, they will win local elections only




The shift marked by these polls reflects the new American majority and explains why next year’s election will prove shattering and divisive for the Republican party, even if it retains its strongholds in the House of Representatives and states .

It also explains why, since 2004, Republicans have been engaged in a ferocious counter-revolution to stop these new and expanding demographic groups from coalescing to form a politically coherent bloc capable of governing successfully. The tactic adopted by Karl Rove, George W Bush’s election strategist, and other social conservatives was to forsake “big tent Republicanism” and the swing voter. Instead of an earlier emphasis on “compassion” or the “Latino vote”, they made politics a battle for social and cultural values – “American values” – that would raise the stakes and engage those who leaned furthest to the right, particularly evangelicals and the religiously observant. Rove’s ambition was to create a permanent Republican majority, and he saw “moral” issues such as opposition to gay marriage as the most powerful force in politics. Indeed, he used them to galvanise enough support to get Bush re-elected in November 2004.

But the culture war ignited by Rove is a fire that requires ever more toxic fuel – it only works by raising fears of the moral and social Armageddon that would follow a Democratic victory.


‘I’ve seen America’s future — and it’s not Republican’: How demographic change gives Democrats the advantage

America's future is either complete government disintegration following terrorist or national nuclear attack, or 2nd civil war, or going the way the USSR did with states forming micro-alliances after the USA proper ceases to exist.

Silly person.

Wanna bet a dollar?

I have a couple of million bet on it already.

 

[AVG-JOE]

In lay-mans terms it's called The Browning of America.

Speaking of bets... I'll bet a dollar that the modern American Redneck wishes that his ancestors hadn't been so dependent on African Slaves for the maintenance of their life-style.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

In lay-mans terms it's called The Browning of America.

Speaking of bets... I'll bet a dollar that the modern American Redneck wishes that his ancestors hadn't been so dependent on African Slaves for the maintenance of their life-style.

Have read there wasn't an actual critical need for slave labor. Was basicly, other countries were doing it, and white people being inordinately lazy figured why the hell not.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Industrialized slavery in America was the result of the corporate big-wigs of the era deciding on what to do to enhance their bottom line for next quarter with absolutely no regard to what they might be doing to the world that their grandchildren would inherit.



The more things change, eh?

​

 

[AVG-JOE]

Sugar in the Caribbean started it all and the profits flowed white in Europe.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Industrialized slavery in America was the result of the corporate big-wigs of the era deciding on what to do to enhance their bottom line for next quarter with absolutely no regard to what they might be doing to the world that their grandchildren would inherit.



The more things change, eh?

​

Was no labor shortage of poor white trash not paid much. Blacks were redundant. The savings insignificant given the consequences.

 

[the_human_being]

In national elections the white christianist party is finished, they will win local elections only




The shift marked by these polls reflects the new American majority and explains why next year’s election will prove shattering and divisive for the Republican party, even if it retains its strongholds in the House of Representatives and states .

It also explains why, since 2004, Republicans have been engaged in a ferocious counter-revolution to stop these new and expanding demographic groups from coalescing to form a politically coherent bloc capable of governing successfully. The tactic adopted by Karl Rove, George W Bush’s election strategist, and other social conservatives was to forsake “big tent Republicanism” and the swing voter. Instead of an earlier emphasis on “compassion” or the “Latino vote”, they made politics a battle for social and cultural values – “American values” – that would raise the stakes and engage those who leaned furthest to the right, particularly evangelicals and the religiously observant. Rove’s ambition was to create a permanent Republican majority, and he saw “moral” issues such as opposition to gay marriage as the most powerful force in politics. Indeed, he used them to galvanise enough support to get Bush re-elected in November 2004.

But the culture war ignited by Rove is a fire that requires ever more toxic fuel – it only works by raising fears of the moral and social Armageddon that would follow a Democratic victory.


‘I’ve seen America’s future — and it’s not Republican’: How demographic change gives Democrats the advantage

You totally discount the informed voter? You seriously feel that no one at all actually votes on policy issues rather than along party lines?
I don't think so.