it's the pundits v. the people

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Silence, Sep 28, 2008.

?

Whose opinion matters most regarding who won the debate

  1. the political pundits who most of the time talk to hear themselves talk

    5 vote(s)
    38.5%
  2. the people who watched trying to learn more about the candidates positions

    8 vote(s)
    61.5%
  1. Silence
    Offline

    Silence wanna lick?

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,820
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    in deciding who won the debate which group is more important? the political pundits or the people who watched the debate?

    It seems the pundits either think McCain won or it was a tie but the people seem to overwhelmingly think Obama won.

    So, in your opinion, whose view of the debate is more important?
     
  2. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    mine. ;)
     
  3. Silence
    Offline

    Silence wanna lick?

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,820
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    :clap2: well then you should vote for the people del...
     
  4. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    i almost always vote for people, although in '04 i voted for Foghorn Leghorne.
    ;)
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Shattered
    Online

    Shattered Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Well, Ah say!
     
  6. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    the weasel was his running mate, that's what put him over the top, IMO.
    truth in advertising and all that.
     
  7. Shattered
    Online

    Shattered Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    As it should be. ;)
     
  8. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    well to be honest, he would've had my vote with the chicken hawk or the dog, too.

    in fact, domestically, i thought the dog had a better grip on the issues.

    the weasel was frosting on the cake.
     
  9. Silence
    Offline

    Silence wanna lick?

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,820
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    The dog would've won Friday's debate!
     
  10. rayboyusmc
    Offline

    rayboyusmc Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    4,015
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +338
    The pundits live in their own world just like the politicians. Listen to Chris Matthews and you see he has no idea of what is happening in the real world that we have to work and live in.

    Plus, they have too much time on their hands with 24 hour cable fake news these daze.
     

Share This Page