It’s Russia, Russia, Russia

Russia is central to the events screaming out of today's headlines....
.and it is all about Russia- the country, their aim for world domination, who they bribed and why Trump is an obstacle to this.

I’ll tell who and why.

Are Steel, McCain and all Democrat leaders Russian citizens? Why everybody keeps blaming Russia? You should blame your own crooks who have been running your country for quite a while and your own corrupt system.

"Don't blame a mirror if your face is ugly," Russian saying.



Here's the quote that should not be overlooked:
Christopher Steele told [the DoJ] he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”




Here is the question that has never been asked:
Steele is not even an American citizen…..what is behind this hatred of Trump, and his passion to end his chances of becoming President?
Steel belonged to British intelligence, so may be it's time for "Brits interfered in our elections!" slogan?

I can describe what's going on in USA like that: Good uncle Soros gave you guys a sweet candy with the name "Russia" which appeared to be so delicious that almost all the country has been sucking it for years. You guys have only two options now: to spit that candy out and to move on or to keep sucking that sweet candy and to keep marching in place and to please good uncle Soros and his Deep State buddies. It's all up to you guys.

Is it possible you understand less than zero about history since our 32nd President??????

Say the word and I'll recommend some books that will fill in your lacunae.


And....

Stay connected to this thread and I'll be teaching a bit about British intelligence agencies.
Ok, I see, your choice is to keep sucking that "Russia" candy and to keep pleasing uncle Soros. Good luck!



Sooo.....you'd rather remain ignorant, pretending that communism isn't the source of the majority of the world's problems....and murders.....than educate yourself.

There's appears to be a lot of that going around....
 
Christopher Steele told [the DoJ] he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”



5. Why did Steele, a citizen of another country, harbor this hatred?


Could it be less hatred for Donald Trump, and more a love of socialist ideology, one that Democrats bring to every policy decision?

Because Russia, under a Hillary presidency, would be even closer to a communist-controlled America than they were when Roosevelt’s Vice-President was communist Henry Wallace.




Christopher Steele was as much a socialist/communist as Henry Wallace, and both served the interests of the Kremlin.
That's the reason he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”


“[Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions."
The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



It wouldn't have mattered who was running against Hillary....Steele, and Russia, would have been right there in her corner.
 
I find it so strange that very few are outraged over the UK interfering in our Election. There's ample evidence proving it did. All Americans should be outraged.
 
Are Steel, McCain and all Democrat leaders Russian citizens? Why everybody keeps blaming Russia? You should blame your own crooks who have been running your country for quite a while and your own corrupt system.

"Don't blame a mirror if your face is ugly," Russian saying.



Here's the quote that should not be overlooked:
Christopher Steele told [the DoJ] he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”




Here is the question that has never been asked:
Steele is not even an American citizen…..what is behind this hatred of Trump, and his passion to end his chances of becoming President?
Steel belonged to British intelligence, so may be it's time for "Brits interfered in our elections!" slogan?

I can describe what's going on in USA like that: Good uncle Soros gave you guys a sweet candy with the name "Russia" which appeared to be so delicious that almost all the country has been sucking it for years. You guys have only two options now: to spit that candy out and to move on or to keep sucking that sweet candy and to keep marching in place and to please good uncle Soros and his Deep State buddies. It's all up to you guys.

Is it possible you understand less than zero about history since our 32nd President??????

Say the word and I'll recommend some books that will fill in your lacunae.


And....

Stay connected to this thread and I'll be teaching a bit about British intelligence agencies.
Ok, I see, your choice is to keep sucking that "Russia" candy and to keep pleasing uncle Soros. Good luck!



Sooo.....you'd rather remain ignorant, pretending that communism isn't the source of the majority of the world's problems....and murders.....than educate yourself.

There's appears to be a lot of that going around....
So are we still fighting the spread of communism in the Middle East or are we importing shitloads of manufactured goods from communist nations?
 
Christopher Steele told [the DoJ] he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”



5. Why did Steele, a citizen of another country, harbor this hatred?


Could it be less hatred for Donald Trump, and more a love of socialist ideology, one that Democrats bring to every policy decision?

Because Russia, under a Hillary presidency, would be even closer to a communist-controlled America than they were when Roosevelt’s Vice-President was communist Henry Wallace.




Christopher Steele was as much a socialist/communist as Henry Wallace, and both served the interests of the Kremlin.
That's the reason he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”


“[Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions."
The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



It wouldn't have mattered who was running against Hillary....Steele, and Russia, would have been right there in her corner.

:21:
 
I find it so strange that very few are outraged over the UK interfering in our Election. There's ample evidence proving it did. All Americans should be outraged.
Not many Anglophiles in the thread...

Yeah, most don't care. It's being overlooked. But there's ample evidence showing that the Anti-Trump Brits did collude with Clinton to oust Trump. That collusion has been proven.
 
I find it so strange that very few are outraged over the UK interfering in our Election. There's ample evidence proving it did. All Americans should be outraged.
Not many Anglophiles in the thread...

Yeah, most don't care. It's being overlooked.
You think they would since the majority is Germans...

The evidence proves that elements within the UK did collude with Clinton to tamper with our Election. When will arrests be made?
 
I find it so strange that very few are outraged over the UK interfering in our Election. There's ample evidence proving it did. All Americans should be outraged.
Not many Anglophiles in the thread...

Yeah, most don't care. It's being overlooked.
You think they would since the majority is Germans...

The evidence proves that elements within the UK did collude with Clinton to tamper with our Election. When will arrests be made?
As soon as we can get Sessions to do something other than chase a weed....
 
I find it so strange that very few are outraged over the UK interfering in our Election. There's ample evidence proving it did. All Americans should be outraged.
Not many Anglophiles in the thread...

Yeah, most don't care. It's being overlooked.
You think they would since the majority is Germans...

The evidence proves that elements within the UK did collude with Clinton to tamper with our Election. When will arrests be made?
As soon as we can get Sessions to do something other than chase a weed....

He's been neutered. The Deep State likely has a whole lotta dirt on him. Trump made a Yuge mistake choosing him for AG.
 
Russia is central to the events screaming out of today's headlines....
'Russia' is the explanation for Franklin Roosevelt, up to the events surrounding Hillary Clinton and Christopher Steele.
It’s all about a belief in Marxism.






1.Franklin Roosevelt had an inordinate fondness to Joseph Stalin, and, to engender his affection, actually promoted individuals when they became known as Stalin’s agents, in the Roosevelt administration.
Roosevelt made certain that Stalin survived the war, and then, set in motion the attitudes that culminated in the cultural Marxism evident today.



2. Jump to today’s headlines: Trump, the dossier, and Mueller’s pretend investigation. British spy Christopher Steele is paid by Hillary Clinton’s campaign to produce the dossier, meant to sink the Trump presidential campaign.

Here's the quote that should not be overlooked:
Christopher Steele told [the DoJ] he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”




3. Here is the question that has never been asked:
Steele is not even an American citizen…..what is behind this hatred of Trump, and his passion to end his chances of becoming President?


To understand Steele’s hatred of Trump, and, alternatively, his love of Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, one need understand who this man is, and his worldview......and it is all about Russia- the country, their aim for world domination, who they bribed and why Trump is an obstacle to this.

I’ll tell who and why.

Interesting synopsis and I would give pretty good odds that you are probably more correct here than not if there is any fault at all to be found with it.

One of the most absurd memes of this whole current bruhaha is that Putin wanted Donald Trump to be President. Even the most cursory logic would suggest that his preference would have been Hillary and the Democrats who would likely agree to anything he insisted on to avoid any problems.

So why then would Russia hack Hillary's e-mails? The fact is there is no proof whatsoever that it was the Russians who did. And Julian Assange, the one person who probably does know who did it, is quite persistent and definite that it was not the Russians who did.

Of course back in July I think it was, Assange also expected his release of the e-mails he had from Hillary's server would result in her indictment. What he hadn't counted on though was how deep the deep state went, and that the 7th floor of the FBI and the Obama Justice Dept. would go to any lengths to protect her. Which they did.

A Navy seaman was recently tried, convicted, sentenced to a year in prison plus six months of house arrest because he had six classified photos of a submarine on his phone. The classification was 'confidential', the lowest classification. And Comey said 'no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against Hillary?

In any other world, Hillary would have been charged and tried if she didn't plea bargain out.
 
Russia is central to the events screaming out of today's headlines....
'Russia' is the explanation for Franklin Roosevelt, up to the events surrounding Hillary Clinton and Christopher Steele.
It’s all about a belief in Marxism.






1.Franklin Roosevelt had an inordinate fondness to Joseph Stalin, and, to engender his affection, actually promoted individuals when they became known as Stalin’s agents, in the Roosevelt administration.
Roosevelt made certain that Stalin survived the war, and then, set in motion the attitudes that culminated in the cultural Marxism evident today.



2. Jump to today’s headlines: Trump, the dossier, and Mueller’s pretend investigation. British spy Christopher Steele is paid by Hillary Clinton’s campaign to produce the dossier, meant to sink the Trump presidential campaign.

Here's the quote that should not be overlooked:
Christopher Steele told [the DoJ] he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”




3. Here is the question that has never been asked:
Steele is not even an American citizen…..what is behind this hatred of Trump, and his passion to end his chances of becoming President?


To understand Steele’s hatred of Trump, and, alternatively, his love of Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, one need understand who this man is, and his worldview......and it is all about Russia- the country, their aim for world domination, who they bribed and why Trump is an obstacle to this.

I’ll tell who and why.

Interesting synopsis and I would give pretty good odds that you are probably more correct here than not if there is any fault at all to be found with it.

One of the most absurd memes of this whole current bruhaha is that Putin wanted Donald Trump to be President. Even the most cursory logic would suggest that his preference would have been Hillary and the Democrats who would likely agree to anything he insisted on to avoid any problems.

So why then would Russia hack Hillary's e-mails? The fact is there is no proof whatsoever that it was the Russians who did. And Julian Assange, the one person who probably does know who did it, is quite persistent and definite that it was not the Russians who did.

Of course back in July I think it was, Assange also expected his release of the e-mails he had from Hillary's server would result in her indictment. What he hadn't counted on though was how deep the deep state went, and that the 7th floor of the FBI and the Obama Justice Dept. would go to any lengths to protect her. Which they did.

A Navy seaman was recently tried, convicted, sentenced to a year in prison plus six months of house arrest because he had six classified photos of a submarine on his phone. The classification was 'confidential', the lowest classification. And Comey said 'no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against Hillary?

In any other world, Hillary would have been charged and tried if she didn't plea bargain out.


"One of the most absurd memes of this whole current bruhaha is that Putin wanted Donald Trump to be President. Even the most cursory logic would suggest that his preference would have been Hillary and the Democrats who would likely agree to anything he insisted on to avoid any problems."


Nothing short of brilliant!


The Democrat narrative appears to be a misapplication of logic....but, in reality.....

.....it's nothing but lies.
 
6. Steele’s bone fides come via his service with MI6. The British MI6 is the equivalent of our CIA.

Unfortunately, there has always been a heavy overlay of socialism/communism throughout the British intelligence community….where Steele worked.


a.“In 1940, journalist and Soviet agent Kim Philby applied for a vacancy in Section D of SIS, and was vetted by his friend and fellow Soviet agent Guy Burgess. When Section D was absorbed by Special Operations Executive (SOE) in summer of 1940, Philby was appointed as an instructor in the arts of "black propaganda" at the SOE's training establishment…

…In August 1945 Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Volkov tried to defect to the UK, offering the names of all Soviet agents working inside British intelligence.” Secret Intelligence Service - Wikipedia


.b“…Philby's father, St John Philby, was the most powerful influence in Kim's life. The Arabist, explorer, colonial intelligence officer and eccentric kept his friends in MI6 though he was far from loyal to Britain and British interests in the Middle East.

Yet in the end Philby was probably not as valuable to Moscow as other members of the Ring of Five, including Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross who were also offered immunity from prosecution in return for confessing. (The other two members of the ring were Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess).” How Kim Philby infiltrated MI6, with a lot of help from his friends


Russia, communists, socialists, internationalists......who would be their choice for US President....a Democrat, or a Republican?
 
6. Steele’s bone fides come via his service with MI6. The British MI6 is the equivalent of our CIA.

Unfortunately, there has always been a heavy overlay of socialism/communism throughout the British intelligence community….where Steele worked.


a.“In 1940, journalist and Soviet agent Kim Philby applied for a vacancy in Section D of SIS, and was vetted by his friend and fellow Soviet agent Guy Burgess. When Section D was absorbed by Special Operations Executive (SOE) in summer of 1940, Philby was appointed as an instructor in the arts of "black propaganda" at the SOE's training establishment…

…In August 1945 Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Volkov tried to defect to the UK, offering the names of all Soviet agents working inside British intelligence.” Secret Intelligence Service - Wikipedia


.b“…Philby's father, St John Philby, was the most powerful influence in Kim's life. The Arabist, explorer, colonial intelligence officer and eccentric kept his friends in MI6 though he was far from loyal to Britain and British interests in the Middle East.

Yet in the end Philby was probably not as valuable to Moscow as other members of the Ring of Five, including Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross who were also offered immunity from prosecution in return for confessing. (The other two members of the ring were Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess).” How Kim Philby infiltrated MI6, with a lot of help from his friends


Russia, communists, socialists, internationalists......who would be their choice for US President....a Democrat, or a Republican?

In answer to your closing question, consider that Hillary brokered a deal to funnel a good deal of U.S. uranium to Russia. A deal I don't think any Republican would have made except for a John McCain, Jeff Flake, Lindsay Graham maybe.

Consider that President Obama was caught on open mic telling Prime Minister Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the (2012) election. Medvedev clearly said he understood and would relay that information to Putin.

Consider that President Obama did absolutely nothing to prevent the Iranians from completing a nuclear weapon but on the pretense that he did, funneled billions in cash to Iran and unilaterally lifted all sanctions on them.

Consider that President Obama criticized and blustered about the North Korean nuclear ambitions but did absolutely nothing to interfere with it other than continue sanctions that were already there.

Consider that President Obama refused to assist the Ukraine when Russia started taking back territory controlled by the USSR.

Consider that Hillary was on the record to continue Obama policies pretty much across the board. Trump was on the record as opposing them.

If you were Putin, would you think a Hillary Clinton would be more of a problem for you? Or a Donald Trump?
 
6. Steele’s bone fides come via his service with MI6. The British MI6 is the equivalent of our CIA.

Unfortunately, there has always been a heavy overlay of socialism/communism throughout the British intelligence community….where Steele worked.


a.“In 1940, journalist and Soviet agent Kim Philby applied for a vacancy in Section D of SIS, and was vetted by his friend and fellow Soviet agent Guy Burgess. When Section D was absorbed by Special Operations Executive (SOE) in summer of 1940, Philby was appointed as an instructor in the arts of "black propaganda" at the SOE's training establishment…

…In August 1945 Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Volkov tried to defect to the UK, offering the names of all Soviet agents working inside British intelligence.” Secret Intelligence Service - Wikipedia


.b“…Philby's father, St John Philby, was the most powerful influence in Kim's life. The Arabist, explorer, colonial intelligence officer and eccentric kept his friends in MI6 though he was far from loyal to Britain and British interests in the Middle East.

Yet in the end Philby was probably not as valuable to Moscow as other members of the Ring of Five, including Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross who were also offered immunity from prosecution in return for confessing. (The other two members of the ring were Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess).” How Kim Philby infiltrated MI6, with a lot of help from his friends


Russia, communists, socialists, internationalists......who would be their choice for US President....a Democrat, or a Republican?

In answer to your closing question, consider that Hillary brokered a deal to funnel a good deal of U.S. uranium to Russia. A deal I don't think any Republican would have made except for a John McCain, Jeff Flake, Lindsay Graham maybe.

Consider that President Obama was caught on open mic telling Prime Minister Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the (2012) election. Medvedev clearly said he understood and would relay that information to Putin.

Consider that President Obama did absolutely nothing to prevent the Iranians from completing a nuclear weapon but on the pretense that he did, funneled billions in cash to Iran and unilaterally lifted all sanctions on them.

Consider that President Obama criticized and blustered about the North Korean nuclear ambitions but did absolutely nothing to interfere with it other than continue sanctions that were already there.

Consider that President Obama refused to assist the Ukraine when Russia started taking back territory controlled by the USSR.

Consider that Hillary was on the record to continue Obama policies pretty much across the board. Trump was on the record as opposing them.

If you were Putin, would you think a Hillary Clinton would be more of a problem for you? Or a Donald Trump?


I like the analysis...

...but before we paint the Republicans et al as of a different ilk than many of those Democrats, remember how many were never-Trumpers.

Republicans who were ready to turn the nation over to the congenital liar and career criminal, Hillary Clinton.


I believe that many of the corrupt on both sides saw Trump as a threat to their future prosperity......because of regulations....


Here's the reason the establishment of both parties is anti-Trump: he is a threat to their wealth.


"Trump Attack on Regulation
Starts To Win Admiration
Both At Home and Abroad"

Trump Attack on Regulation Starts To Win Admiration Both At Home and Abroad - The New York Sun



Most important to the tyrants...er, Congressmen....is that by producing regulations that stymie businesses....said businesses have to bribe....er, lobby....the Representative to put in loopholes.



Ending regulation is an existential danger to their sinecures: they go to Washington to do good, and end up doing well.


Every notice how many Congressmen leave government far richer than when they went in?





...here is the explanation:
"Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal"
Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal

Most regulations are, in terms of what they are alleged to do, are actually there to be bribed away by the industries that they inhibit.
The pols write them, the corporations pay lobbyists to bribe the pols to insert loopholes....
 
Here's the quote that should not be overlooked:
Christopher Steele told [the DoJ] he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”

Here is the question that has never been asked:
Steele is not even an American citizen…..what is behind this hatred of Trump, and his passion to end his chances of becoming President?



7. The fact that Steele was not an American was beside the point; he served and wished for, international socialism, i.e., communism.


And Hillary had already been shown to be bribable, a tool for Russia.

$145 million for America’s uranium.

Bill Clinton sold missile technology to China, and when our servicemen were killed in Khobar Towers, he went to the Saudis to ask that the FBI be allowed in:

"Bill Clinton raised the subject only to tell the crown prince that he understood the Saudi's reluctance to cooperate, and then he hit Abdullah up for a contribution to the Clinton Presidential Library."
Louis Freeh, former Director of the FBI



The Clinton Crime Family has no heartfelt interest in any ideology…..only greed.
 
6. Steele’s bone fides come via his service with MI6. The British MI6 is the equivalent of our CIA.

Unfortunately, there has always been a heavy overlay of socialism/communism throughout the British intelligence community….where Steele worked.


a.“In 1940, journalist and Soviet agent Kim Philby applied for a vacancy in Section D of SIS, and was vetted by his friend and fellow Soviet agent Guy Burgess. When Section D was absorbed by Special Operations Executive (SOE) in summer of 1940, Philby was appointed as an instructor in the arts of "black propaganda" at the SOE's training establishment…

…In August 1945 Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Volkov tried to defect to the UK, offering the names of all Soviet agents working inside British intelligence.” Secret Intelligence Service - Wikipedia


.b“…Philby's father, St John Philby, was the most powerful influence in Kim's life. The Arabist, explorer, colonial intelligence officer and eccentric kept his friends in MI6 though he was far from loyal to Britain and British interests in the Middle East.

Yet in the end Philby was probably not as valuable to Moscow as other members of the Ring of Five, including Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross who were also offered immunity from prosecution in return for confessing. (The other two members of the ring were Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess).” How Kim Philby infiltrated MI6, with a lot of help from his friends


Russia, communists, socialists, internationalists......who would be their choice for US President....a Democrat, or a Republican?

In answer to your closing question, consider that Hillary brokered a deal to funnel a good deal of U.S. uranium to Russia. A deal I don't think any Republican would have made except for a John McCain, Jeff Flake, Lindsay Graham maybe.

Consider that President Obama was caught on open mic telling Prime Minister Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the (2012) election. Medvedev clearly said he understood and would relay that information to Putin.

Consider that President Obama did absolutely nothing to prevent the Iranians from completing a nuclear weapon but on the pretense that he did, funneled billions in cash to Iran and unilaterally lifted all sanctions on them.

Consider that President Obama criticized and blustered about the North Korean nuclear ambitions but did absolutely nothing to interfere with it other than continue sanctions that were already there.

Consider that President Obama refused to assist the Ukraine when Russia started taking back territory controlled by the USSR.

Consider that Hillary was on the record to continue Obama policies pretty much across the board. Trump was on the record as opposing them.

If you were Putin, would you think a Hillary Clinton would be more of a problem for you? Or a Donald Trump?


I like the analysis...

...but before we paint the Republicans et al as of a different ilk than many of those Democrats, remember how many were never-Trumpers.

Republicans who were ready to turn the nation over to the congenital liar and career criminal, Hillary Clinton.


I believe that many of the corrupt on both sides saw Trump as a threat to their future prosperity......because of regulations....


Here's the reason the establishment of both parties is anti-Trump: he is a threat to their wealth.


"Trump Attack on Regulation
Starts To Win Admiration
Both At Home and Abroad"
Trump Attack on Regulation Starts To Win Admiration Both At Home and Abroad - The New York Sun



Most important to the tyrants...er, Congressmen....is that by producing regulations that stymie businesses....said businesses have to bribe....er, lobby....the Representative to put in loopholes.



Ending regulation is an existential danger to their sinecures: they go to Washington to do good, and end up doing well.


Every notice how many Congressmen leave government far richer than when they went in?





...here is the explanation:
"Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal"
Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal


Most regulations are, in terms of what they are alleged to do, are actually there to be bribed away by the industries that they inhibit.
The pols write them, the corporations pay lobbyists to bribe the pols to insert loopholes....

I am not discounting that many members of the GOP in Congress and high level bureaucracy are members of the deep state, the professional permanent political class that exists to increase its own power, prestige, influence, and personal wealth. The only difference between the two parties in that respect are the kinds of bones they throw at their different constituencies to keep them quiet, complacent, and accommodating.

I don't think most of the congressional GOP gave a flying fig whether the President is Republican or Democrat so long as they can retain their majority and therefore the lucrative committee chairmanships. It is actually easier for them when a Democratic President is in the White House (and vice versa) because then they can blame him for not getting anything done. The Democrats certainly didn't fare well when they had the power and a Democratic President. But with a few noble exceptions, neither side wants a great deal of change. They're all making out like bandits as it is. Most were not millionaires when they got there but if they manage to stay for awhile, they will be multi millionaires when they leave.

It is because of that permanent political class and the status quo (that advantages them) that enough of us finally got fed up with it and elected a Donald Trump who was not a partisan, not an ideologue, not a member of the permanent political class, but who had a vision and the skill sets to actually change things for the better. And that is why he is a threat to the permanent political class in both the GOP and among the Democrats.

Unfortunately, we didn't elect enough people who support the President's vision and goals to give him help to achieve them.
 
6. Steele’s bone fides come via his service with MI6. The British MI6 is the equivalent of our CIA.

Unfortunately, there has always been a heavy overlay of socialism/communism throughout the British intelligence community….where Steele worked.


a.“In 1940, journalist and Soviet agent Kim Philby applied for a vacancy in Section D of SIS, and was vetted by his friend and fellow Soviet agent Guy Burgess. When Section D was absorbed by Special Operations Executive (SOE) in summer of 1940, Philby was appointed as an instructor in the arts of "black propaganda" at the SOE's training establishment…

…In August 1945 Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Volkov tried to defect to the UK, offering the names of all Soviet agents working inside British intelligence.” Secret Intelligence Service - Wikipedia


.b“…Philby's father, St John Philby, was the most powerful influence in Kim's life. The Arabist, explorer, colonial intelligence officer and eccentric kept his friends in MI6 though he was far from loyal to Britain and British interests in the Middle East.

Yet in the end Philby was probably not as valuable to Moscow as other members of the Ring of Five, including Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross who were also offered immunity from prosecution in return for confessing. (The other two members of the ring were Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess).” How Kim Philby infiltrated MI6, with a lot of help from his friends


Russia, communists, socialists, internationalists......who would be their choice for US President....a Democrat, or a Republican?

In answer to your closing question, consider that Hillary brokered a deal to funnel a good deal of U.S. uranium to Russia. A deal I don't think any Republican would have made except for a John McCain, Jeff Flake, Lindsay Graham maybe.

Consider that President Obama was caught on open mic telling Prime Minister Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the (2012) election. Medvedev clearly said he understood and would relay that information to Putin.

Consider that President Obama did absolutely nothing to prevent the Iranians from completing a nuclear weapon but on the pretense that he did, funneled billions in cash to Iran and unilaterally lifted all sanctions on them.

Consider that President Obama criticized and blustered about the North Korean nuclear ambitions but did absolutely nothing to interfere with it other than continue sanctions that were already there.

Consider that President Obama refused to assist the Ukraine when Russia started taking back territory controlled by the USSR.

Consider that Hillary was on the record to continue Obama policies pretty much across the board. Trump was on the record as opposing them.

If you were Putin, would you think a Hillary Clinton would be more of a problem for you? Or a Donald Trump?


I like the analysis...

...but before we paint the Republicans et al as of a different ilk than many of those Democrats, remember how many were never-Trumpers.

Republicans who were ready to turn the nation over to the congenital liar and career criminal, Hillary Clinton.


I believe that many of the corrupt on both sides saw Trump as a threat to their future prosperity......because of regulations....


Here's the reason the establishment of both parties is anti-Trump: he is a threat to their wealth.


"Trump Attack on Regulation
Starts To Win Admiration
Both At Home and Abroad"
Trump Attack on Regulation Starts To Win Admiration Both At Home and Abroad - The New York Sun



Most important to the tyrants...er, Congressmen....is that by producing regulations that stymie businesses....said businesses have to bribe....er, lobby....the Representative to put in loopholes.



Ending regulation is an existential danger to their sinecures: they go to Washington to do good, and end up doing well.


Every notice how many Congressmen leave government far richer than when they went in?





...here is the explanation:
"Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal"
Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal


Most regulations are, in terms of what they are alleged to do, are actually there to be bribed away by the industries that they inhibit.
The pols write them, the corporations pay lobbyists to bribe the pols to insert loopholes....

I am not discounting that many members of the GOP in Congress and high level bureaucracy are members of the deep state, the professional permanent political class that exists to increase its own power, prestige, influence, and personal wealth. The only difference between the two parties in that respect are the kinds of bones they throw at their different constituencies to keep them quiet, complacent, and accommodating.

I don't think most of the congressional GOP gave a flying fig whether the President is Republican or Democrat so long as they can retain their majority and therefore the lucrative committee chairmanships. It is actually easier for them when a Democratic President is in the White House (and vice versa) because then they can blame him for not getting anything done. The Democrats certainly didn't fare well when they had the power and a Democratic President. But with a few noble exceptions, neither side wants a great deal of change. They're all making out like bandits as it is. Most were not millionaires when they got there but if they manage to stay for awhile, they will be multi millionaires when they leave.

It is because of that permanent political class and the status quo (that advantages them) that enough of us finally got fed up with it and elected a Donald Trump who was not a partisan, not an ideologue, not a member of the permanent political class, but who had a vision and the skill sets to actually change things for the better. And that is why he is a threat to the permanent political class in both the GOP and among the Democrats.

Unfortunately, we didn't elect enough people who support the President's vision and goals to give him help to achieve them.


Perhaps there aren't enough of us.....that's government schooling's mission....and it is largely successful.
 
6. Steele’s bone fides come via his service with MI6. The British MI6 is the equivalent of our CIA.

Unfortunately, there has always been a heavy overlay of socialism/communism throughout the British intelligence community….where Steele worked.


a.“In 1940, journalist and Soviet agent Kim Philby applied for a vacancy in Section D of SIS, and was vetted by his friend and fellow Soviet agent Guy Burgess. When Section D was absorbed by Special Operations Executive (SOE) in summer of 1940, Philby was appointed as an instructor in the arts of "black propaganda" at the SOE's training establishment…

…In August 1945 Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Volkov tried to defect to the UK, offering the names of all Soviet agents working inside British intelligence.” Secret Intelligence Service - Wikipedia


.b“…Philby's father, St John Philby, was the most powerful influence in Kim's life. The Arabist, explorer, colonial intelligence officer and eccentric kept his friends in MI6 though he was far from loyal to Britain and British interests in the Middle East.

Yet in the end Philby was probably not as valuable to Moscow as other members of the Ring of Five, including Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross who were also offered immunity from prosecution in return for confessing. (The other two members of the ring were Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess).” How Kim Philby infiltrated MI6, with a lot of help from his friends


Russia, communists, socialists, internationalists......who would be their choice for US President....a Democrat, or a Republican?

In answer to your closing question, consider that Hillary brokered a deal to funnel a good deal of U.S. uranium to Russia. A deal I don't think any Republican would have made except for a John McCain, Jeff Flake, Lindsay Graham maybe.

Consider that President Obama was caught on open mic telling Prime Minister Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the (2012) election. Medvedev clearly said he understood and would relay that information to Putin.

Consider that President Obama did absolutely nothing to prevent the Iranians from completing a nuclear weapon but on the pretense that he did, funneled billions in cash to Iran and unilaterally lifted all sanctions on them.

Consider that President Obama criticized and blustered about the North Korean nuclear ambitions but did absolutely nothing to interfere with it other than continue sanctions that were already there.

Consider that President Obama refused to assist the Ukraine when Russia started taking back territory controlled by the USSR.

Consider that Hillary was on the record to continue Obama policies pretty much across the board. Trump was on the record as opposing them.

If you were Putin, would you think a Hillary Clinton would be more of a problem for you? Or a Donald Trump?


I like the analysis...

...but before we paint the Republicans et al as of a different ilk than many of those Democrats, remember how many were never-Trumpers.

Republicans who were ready to turn the nation over to the congenital liar and career criminal, Hillary Clinton.


I believe that many of the corrupt on both sides saw Trump as a threat to their future prosperity......because of regulations....


Here's the reason the establishment of both parties is anti-Trump: he is a threat to their wealth.


"Trump Attack on Regulation
Starts To Win Admiration
Both At Home and Abroad"
Trump Attack on Regulation Starts To Win Admiration Both At Home and Abroad - The New York Sun



Most important to the tyrants...er, Congressmen....is that by producing regulations that stymie businesses....said businesses have to bribe....er, lobby....the Representative to put in loopholes.



Ending regulation is an existential danger to their sinecures: they go to Washington to do good, and end up doing well.


Every notice how many Congressmen leave government far richer than when they went in?





...here is the explanation:
"Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal"
Trump kills 16 regulations for every new one, crushing 2-for-1 goal


Most regulations are, in terms of what they are alleged to do, are actually there to be bribed away by the industries that they inhibit.
The pols write them, the corporations pay lobbyists to bribe the pols to insert loopholes....

I am not discounting that many members of the GOP in Congress and high level bureaucracy are members of the deep state, the professional permanent political class that exists to increase its own power, prestige, influence, and personal wealth. The only difference between the two parties in that respect are the kinds of bones they throw at their different constituencies to keep them quiet, complacent, and accommodating.

I don't think most of the congressional GOP gave a flying fig whether the President is Republican or Democrat so long as they can retain their majority and therefore the lucrative committee chairmanships. It is actually easier for them when a Democratic President is in the White House (and vice versa) because then they can blame him for not getting anything done. The Democrats certainly didn't fare well when they had the power and a Democratic President. But with a few noble exceptions, neither side wants a great deal of change. They're all making out like bandits as it is. Most were not millionaires when they got there but if they manage to stay for awhile, they will be multi millionaires when they leave.

It is because of that permanent political class and the status quo (that advantages them) that enough of us finally got fed up with it and elected a Donald Trump who was not a partisan, not an ideologue, not a member of the permanent political class, but who had a vision and the skill sets to actually change things for the better. And that is why he is a threat to the permanent political class in both the GOP and among the Democrats.

Unfortunately, we didn't elect enough people who support the President's vision and goals to give him help to achieve them.

Perhaps there aren't enough of us.....that's government schooling's mission....and it is largely successful.

I hope that there are. It is just that when the deep state includes most of the media and the "I hate anything Trump" crowd troll and deflect every message board or social media effort to explain things, it is so very difficult to educate people.

My husband, for instance, smart, competent, considered an esteemed professional and expert in his profession, has not been closely following the whole Steele dossier thing and the subplots surround it. So even when a conservative media outlet tries to condense it into a news article or into a few minutes on television, I can see his eyes glaze over with all the various facts, sidebars, and unfamiliar names being throw around.

It is even more difficult when most of the MSM put their own anti-Trump spin on it and refuse to even report or gloss over most of the more important facts.

It is easier for me, being an active message boarder, and also a news junkie, who has been following it from the beginning and the various terms, names, facts have become familiar over time.

But we need to keep up the effort to inform and educate here, because I honestly believe this is the last generation that will have sufficient numbers to prevent total domination by the leftist deep state agenda and powers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top