Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Persecution complex.
Persecution complex.
It is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
Persecution complex.
It is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
That's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
Persecution complex.
It is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
That's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
If your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
Snowflakes love to flake‘It’s Okay to Be White’ Trends on Twitter
Awesome! I have this on my profile picture on FB and man does it trigger the anti white racists!
Persecution complex.
It is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
That's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
If your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
I didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
Hate to tell you but blacks are attacking whites at almost 100% blacks are stabbing our woman, jumping us, shooting us. It’s beyond a epidemic, we should demand unrestricted rights to carry a gun near blacks and stand your ground laws should be Sanctuary! . The guarantee of no persecutionPersecution complex.
It is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
That's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
If your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
I didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
Persecution complex.
It is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
That's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
If your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
I didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
THat you cannot let it pass, some one saying it is ok to be white, without attacking them,
invalidates your implication that saying that, is a manifestation of a persecution complex.
This is the brilliance of the meme, I was trying to explain to you. That you cannot allow yourself to see.
THe only answer that does not support it, ironically, is easily acceptance.
How do you identify? Tell me that what it is, is "ok" and see how I respond.
Hate to tell you but blacks are attacking whites at almost 100% blacks are stabbing our woman, jumping us, shooting us. It’s beyond a epidemic, we should demand unrestricted rights to carry a gun near blacks and stand your ground laws should be Sanctuary! . The guarantee of no persecutionPersecution complex.
It is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
That's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
If your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
I didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
Www.fbi.comHate to tell you but blacks are attacking whites at almost 100% blacks are stabbing our woman, jumping us, shooting us. It’s beyond a epidemic, we should demand unrestricted rights to carry a gun near blacks and stand your ground laws should be Sanctuary! . The guarantee of no persecutionIt is a brilliant meme. Any attempt to marginalize it, demonstrates it's validity.
That's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
If your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
I didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
Show me your "almost 100%" statistics.
You and I both know you won't.
Www.fbi.comHate to tell you but blacks are attacking whites at almost 100% blacks are stabbing our woman, jumping us, shooting us. It’s beyond a epidemic, we should demand unrestricted rights to carry a gun near blacks and stand your ground laws should be Sanctuary! . The guarantee of no persecutionThat's interesting reasoning. Let me try.
You attempted to marginalize my statement. Therefore you have demonstrated that my statement is valid.
QED.
If your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
I didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
Show me your "almost 100%" statistics.
You and I both know you won't.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan InstituteWww.fbi.comHate to tell you but blacks are attacking whites at almost 100% blacks are stabbing our woman, jumping us, shooting us. It’s beyond a epidemic, we should demand unrestricted rights to carry a gun near blacks and stand your ground laws should be Sanctuary! . The guarantee of no persecutionIf your statement was that it was ok for you to make a statement then yes, that would fit.
But your statement was an attack on the statement that "it is ok to be white".
That something as harmless as stating, "it is ok to be white" motivated an attack from you,
demonstrates the validity of making that statement.
YOur understanding of QED, is zero.
I didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
Show me your "almost 100%" statistics.
You and I both know you won't.
Big surprise. Nothing there.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan InstituteWww.fbi.comHate to tell you but blacks are attacking whites at almost 100% blacks are stabbing our woman, jumping us, shooting us. It’s beyond a epidemic, we should demand unrestricted rights to carry a gun near blacks and stand your ground laws should be Sanctuary! . The guarantee of no persecutionI didn't attack him for being white.
I attacked him for having a persecution complex.
Thus, I did not demonstrate the validity in his statement.
QED.
Show me your "almost 100%" statistics.
You and I both know you won't.
Big surprise. Nothing there.
Hope I get Sanctuary to Eliminate any black threatThe Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan InstituteWww.fbi.comHate to tell you but blacks are attacking whites at almost 100% blacks are stabbing our woman, jumping us, shooting us. It’s beyond a epidemic, we should demand unrestricted rights to carry a gun near blacks and stand your ground laws should be Sanctuary! . The guarantee of no persecution
Show me your "almost 100%" statistics.
You and I both know you won't.
Big surprise. Nothing there.
Neat. What do you plan to do about that?
Hope I get Sanctuary to Eliminate any black threadThe Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan InstituteWww.fbi.comShow me your "almost 100%" statistics.
You and I both know you won't.
Big surprise. Nothing there.
Neat. What do you plan to do about that?
