It's not that we (right wing) support the rich; We just oppose something-for-nothing.

But TECHNICALLY, it's true, GE did not "get" anything "from us".

The gov't simply did not TAKE that money from them. Thats a huge difference.

Tax breaks for the rich are not "giving" them anything from the rest of us. It's simply the people we elected into office not "taking by force" that from those people. Big difference.

So the road that their trucks drove on were totally funded by GE? Wow...I take it back.

Those trucks ran on air, rather than on fuel, which is subject to a hefty federal tax to support those roads? Hello? If you want to be taken seriously you need to have some knowledge base.

Ran on air? Gotcha.

Bottom line; GE used goods and services paid for by the US Government and didn't pay a dime for it.

Now back to Rabbi's Liefest 2011.
 
So the road that their trucks drove on were totally funded by GE? Wow...I take it back.

Those trucks ran on air, rather than on fuel, which is subject to a hefty federal tax to support those roads? Hello? If you want to be taken seriously you need to have some knowledge base.

Ran on air? Gotcha.

Bottom line; GE used goods and services paid for by the US Government and didn't pay a dime for it.

Now back to Rabbi's Liefest 2011.

So do welfare queens when they drive their Escalade from gov't housing to the grocery store to use their food stamps on food and cash on lottery tickets and beer and cigarettes.

Fair enough?
 
Those trucks ran on air, rather than on fuel, which is subject to a hefty federal tax to support those roads? Hello? If you want to be taken seriously you need to have some knowledge base.

Ran on air? Gotcha.

Bottom line; GE used goods and services paid for by the US Government and didn't pay a dime for it.

Now back to Rabbi's Liefest 2011.

So do welfare queens when they drive their Escalade from gov't housing to the grocery store to use their food stamps on food and cash on lottery tickets and beer and cigarettes.

Fair enough?

If they have Escalades; sure they do. I was just pointing out that the $3.2 Billion GE got from US largely dwarfs, at least, the much celebrated welfare abuses like you referenced above.
 
So the road that their trucks drove on were totally funded by GE? Wow...I take it back.

Those trucks ran on air, rather than on fuel, which is subject to a hefty federal tax to support those roads? Hello? If you want to be taken seriously you need to have some knowledge base.

Ran on air? Gotcha.

Bottom line; GE used goods and services paid for by the US Government and didn't pay a dime for it.

Now back to Rabbi's Liefest 2011.

Bottom line: You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about. And you cannot defend your views because they are based on nothing but bigotry and misinformation.
 
Ran on air? Gotcha.

Bottom line; GE used goods and services paid for by the US Government and didn't pay a dime for it.

Now back to Rabbi's Liefest 2011.

So do welfare queens when they drive their Escalade from gov't housing to the grocery store to use their food stamps on food and cash on lottery tickets and beer and cigarettes.

Fair enough?

If they have Escalades; sure they do. I was just pointing out that the $3.2 Billion GE got from US largely dwarfs, at least, the much celebrated welfare abuses like you referenced above.

In welfare abuse people get money they don't deserve. If they are caught they will be prosecuted. GE broke no laws and paid what they were obligated to pay.
See the difference?
 
Those trucks ran on air, rather than on fuel, which is subject to a hefty federal tax to support those roads? Hello? If you want to be taken seriously you need to have some knowledge base.

Ran on air? Gotcha.

Bottom line; GE used goods and services paid for by the US Government and didn't pay a dime for it.

Now back to Rabbi's Liefest 2011.

Bottom line: You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about. And you cannot defend your views because they are based on nothing but bigotry and misinformation.

Yeah...ABC News got it wrong....and your'e right. Don't make me laugh. GE used goods and services and didn't pay a cent in federal income taxes on $14 B of income. Those are the facts and they are not in disupte.
 
So do welfare queens when they drive their Escalade from gov't housing to the grocery store to use their food stamps on food and cash on lottery tickets and beer and cigarettes.

Fair enough?

If they have Escalades; sure they do. I was just pointing out that the $3.2 Billion GE got from US largely dwarfs, at least, the much celebrated welfare abuses like you referenced above.

In welfare abuse people get money they don't deserve. If they are caught they will be prosecuted. GE broke no laws and paid what they were obligated to pay.
See the difference?

No the abuses are mis-application of funds. If they are getting the money, they have shown need. You really are clueless. GE broke no laws; true. It would seem as though you guys would be more concerned about $3.2 Billion they got from us than the $200 a week a single mom gets.
 
Ran on air? Gotcha.

Bottom line; GE used goods and services paid for by the US Government and didn't pay a dime for it.

Now back to Rabbi's Liefest 2011.

Bottom line: You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about. And you cannot defend your views because they are based on nothing but bigotry and misinformation.

Yeah...ABC News got it wrong....and your'e right. Don't make me laugh. GE used goods and services and didn't pay a cent in federal income taxes on $14 B of income. Those are the facts and they are not in disupte.

What goods and services did GE use they didnt pay for and should have? Be specific here.
 
If they have Escalades; sure they do. I was just pointing out that the $3.2 Billion GE got from US largely dwarfs, at least, the much celebrated welfare abuses like you referenced above.

In welfare abuse people get money they don't deserve. If they are caught they will be prosecuted. GE broke no laws and paid what they were obligated to pay.
See the difference?

No the abuses are mis-application of funds. If they are getting the money, they have shown need. You really are clueless. GE broke no laws; true. It would seem as though you guys would be more concerned about $3.2 Billion they got from us than the $200 a week a single mom gets.

Do you understand what "fraudulent" means? Fraudulent means they did not deserve the money but got it anyway. That's why they get prosecuted.
GE did not get 3.2B from us, or anyone else. You clearly do not understand what a tax credit is.
 
In welfare abuse people get money they don't deserve. If they are caught they will be prosecuted. GE broke no laws and paid what they were obligated to pay.
See the difference?

No the abuses are mis-application of funds. If they are getting the money, they have shown need. You really are clueless. GE broke no laws; true. It would seem as though you guys would be more concerned about $3.2 Billion they got from us than the $200 a week a single mom gets.

Do you understand what "fraudulent" means? Fraudulent means they did not deserve the money but got it anyway. That's why they get prosecuted.
GE did not get 3.2B from us, or anyone else. You clearly do not understand what a tax credit is.

Fraud is on a case by case basis. Still, it's $200 a week or so; not $3.2 Billion that GE got from us.
 
Bottom line: You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about. And you cannot defend your views because they are based on nothing but bigotry and misinformation.

Yeah...ABC News got it wrong....and your'e right. Don't make me laugh. GE used goods and services and didn't pay a cent in federal income taxes on $14 B of income. Those are the facts and they are not in disupte.

What goods and services did GE use they didnt pay for and should have? Be specific here.

Roads, fire, police, our navy that secures the shipping lanes for their importing of goods from their factories overseas, our monetary policy that leads to stable markets in which they operate...
 
No the abuses are mis-application of funds. If they are getting the money, they have shown need. You really are clueless. GE broke no laws; true. It would seem as though you guys would be more concerned about $3.2 Billion they got from us than the $200 a week a single mom gets.

Do you understand what "fraudulent" means? Fraudulent means they did not deserve the money but got it anyway. That's why they get prosecuted.
GE did not get 3.2B from us, or anyone else. You clearly do not understand what a tax credit is.

Fraud is on a case by case basis. Still, it's $200 a week or so; not $3.2 Billion that GE got from us.

GE didnt get 3.2B from us. Do you not understand that?
And no one is accusing GE of acting fraudulently. Except you maybe.
 
Yeah...ABC News got it wrong....and your'e right. Don't make me laugh. GE used goods and services and didn't pay a cent in federal income taxes on $14 B of income. Those are the facts and they are not in disupte.

What goods and services did GE use they didnt pay for and should have? Be specific here.

Roads, fire, police, our navy that secures the shipping lanes for their importing of goods from their factories overseas, our monetary policy that leads to stable markets in which they operate...

Roads fire and police are typically local matters.
Half of tax filers pay no tax. So I guess they are free loaders in your book too. And it's a hell of a lot more than 3.2B.
 
Again, it's true: GE got NOTHING from us. We simply didn't take from them.

In that respect, GE is no different than your local welfare queen. Using our services. Contributing none of their own.
 
Then you support denying public education to those who can't pay for it?

No. Because public education is offered to everyone. The rich and the poor.

But I can't get welfare or food stamps. Because I work too hard and earn too much. Despite the fact I already pay for both.

So you don't oppose something for nothing. Oh wait! You do! You don't!

Which is it?
 
I keep seeing lefties ask why right wingers love the rich, support the rich, vote for the rich, etc, etc, etc.

They are missing the point. It's not that we are pro-rich people. We are as annoyed with our rich bosses as anyone. It's just that we don't believe in the lifetime handout mentality. The something-for-nothing ideals that the left is pushing. We may hate our bosses as much as you.......but we know that he is the reason we have a job, house, car. And if he goes down, so do we. Yeah, it sucks. We wish we were at his wealth status....thats why we play the lottery.

But forcibly taking resources from one group....to hand them out to others who did not earn them? Thats our problem. It's just not really part of our upbringing or beliefs. We see our society. And we see opportunity, not oppression.

It's the idea that someone who hasn't begun to work the entry level jobs, or the jobs that requires one to swallow their pride.........says somehow he is owed an immediate middle class lifestyle without suffering through that learning and growing process, and going through the humility of working odd jobs while knowing you are capable of so much more...and one day actually getting there.........that process has been gone through by millions of Americans for decades and decades.

And now we have a generation that wants to get a free pass to skip that 5-10 year "growing" process. And they want others to pay for that pass. They refuse to work retail. Or fast food. It'll be "too hard". Or "not enough". So instead, they demand others pay their pass to middle class rather than take the path most of us took, where we looked at it and said "theres no way I'll be able to...." and found a way to do it anyway.

It sucks. Thats why people strive to more.

But you dont get a free pass. Thats our stance. Not pro-rich. But anti-free pass. Earn your fucking way. Find a way. Many have before, and many are doing it NOW.

GE should give back the $3.2 Billion they got from us then.

General Electric Paid No Federal Taxes in 2010 - ABC News

Or was that not the type of "something for nothing" you were talking about?

Thats EXACTLY what I mean.

I suppose it helps when GE's CEO, Mark Immelt, is PART OF OBAMAS STAFF as the "Jobs Czar". Really?????????

Exxon paid no income tax in 2009. Whose fault was that?
 
Then you support denying public education to those who can't pay for it?

No. Because public education is offered to everyone. The rich and the poor.

But I can't get welfare or food stamps. Because I work too hard and earn too much. Despite the fact I already pay for both.

So you don't oppose something for nothing. Oh wait! You do! You don't!

Which is it?

Well, most all the school systems I know of are funded by two things:

- Sales tax
- Property tax

And EVERYONE, even welfare queens and trailor park kings, pay those two taxes. So it's not technically something for nothing.

Federal handouts, however, or state handouts funded by federal money, are from income tax. Which 50% of people dont pay. And people who REFUSE to work dont pay. But even those folks pay sales tax when they buy beer, cigs and lottery tickets.

So actually............you dont know WTF you're talking about:tongue:
 
GE should give back the $3.2 Billion they got from us then.

General Electric Paid No Federal Taxes in 2010 - ABC News

Or was that not the type of "something for nothing" you were talking about?

Thats EXACTLY what I mean.

I suppose it helps when GE's CEO, Mark Immelt, is PART OF OBAMAS STAFF as the "Jobs Czar". Really?????????

Exxon paid no income tax in 2009. Whose fault was that?

Well..............Obama was president in 2009. So.........NO MORE TAX BREAKS FOR BIG OIL FROM BARACK OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OBAMA THE OIL PRESIDENT!!!! NO WAR FOR OIL OBAMA!!!!!!!! OBAMA BOMBED 4 MORE COUNTRIES THAN BUSH!!!!! NO BLOOD FOR OIL!!!!!!!


Wait.....things are different now than 06?
 
Again, it's true: GE got NOTHING from us. We simply didn't take from them.

In that respect, GE is no different than your local welfare queen. Using our services. Contributing none of their own.

Except GE wasnt obligated to pay any money.
 

Forum List

Back
Top