“It’s not rape in Islam”: ISIS Muslima says of jihadis’ rape of non-Muslim women

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Far more examples of slaughter in the name of religion. If genocidal religious leaders throughout histoey had had modern weaponry, missiles, guns, nukes, the human race would not exist anymore.

On the other hand we wouldn't have your idiotic posts anymore, so there is an upside to everything.

Just kidding, bro.

 

[bodecea]

Dear President Trump,

These people do not belong here. Please send them all home.

Thank you,

The women of America.

“It’s not rape in Islam”: ISIS Muslima says jihadis’ rape of non-Muslim women is “allowed in the Quran”

The Daily Mail, the worst paper in the Western world, undertakes here to defend Islam and the Qur’an from charges that they condone the sexual enslavement of Infidel women, citing Qur’an 24:33, “Force not your slave-girls to whoredom.” However, this refers to forcing slave girls to become prostitutes. The Qur’an is quite clear that slave girls, “the captives of the right hand,” can be used sexually: “Prohibited to you are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your father’s sisters, your mother’s sisters, your brother’s daughters, your sister’s daughters, your mothers who nursed you, your sisters through nursing, your wives’ mothers, and your step-daughters under your guardianship of your wives unto whom you have gone in….And married women except those your right hands possess.” (4:23-24)

The seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah hath given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond or those whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

So much more

JIHAD WATCH ^

Sounds very similar to what some GOP politicians have said.

 

[The Purge]

Dear President Trump,

These people do not belong here. Please send them all home.

Thank you,

The women of America.

“It’s not rape in Islam”: ISIS Muslima says jihadis’ rape of non-Muslim women is “allowed in the Quran”

The Daily Mail, the worst paper in the Western world, undertakes here to defend Islam and the Qur’an from charges that they condone the sexual enslavement of Infidel women, citing Qur’an 24:33, “Force not your slave-girls to whoredom.” However, this refers to forcing slave girls to become prostitutes. The Qur’an is quite clear that slave girls, “the captives of the right hand,” can be used sexually: “Prohibited to you are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your father’s sisters, your mother’s sisters, your brother’s daughters, your sister’s daughters, your mothers who nursed you, your sisters through nursing, your wives’ mothers, and your step-daughters under your guardianship of your wives unto whom you have gone in….And married women except those your right hands possess.” (4:23-24)

The seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah hath given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond or those whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

So much more

JIHAD WATCH ^

Sounds very similar to what some GOP politicians have said.

You are full of bullshit and hate....and not necessarily in that order

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Sounds very similar to what some GOP politicians have said.

Nope. Don't be such a prick, please.

 

[Faun]

View attachment 249957

Damn!!! So all I have to do is convert to Islam and I can...

*****CHUCKLE*****





...and it's fine with progressives..... Sounds very progressive to me.

LOL

A 1400 year old edict sounds “progressive” to you?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

View attachment 249957

Damn!!! So all I have to do is convert to Islam and I can...

*****CHUCKLE*****





...and it's fine with progressives..... Sounds very progressive to me.

LOL

A 1400 year old edict sounds “progressive” to you?

No..... But then when progressives believe in excluding white women from feminist rallies and Jews from Democratic conventions it doesn't sound very progressive to me either. I guess the progressive meaning of inclusion and non divisiveness has taken on a new meaning of those not worthy should sit at the back of the bus, whites not served here, or dogs and sailors keep off the grass.

I'm sorry but I'll stick with those you wish to look down at with your condescending non inclusive nose.

*****SMILE******

 

[Nia88]

Sure. Though you’ll struggle to find more examples than the countless religion driven slaughters throughout human history.

Russia/Soviet union/Saddam Hussein’s Iraq/etc… Any sort of socialism. Secularism cannot be trusted.

Secularism has been trusted for decades and has led to the greatest age of human prosperity in history. The zealots and extremists have never had less power. And remember, it wasn’t just Christians and Muslims that suffered under the soviet union, but everybody, including secularists.

Something I’ve learned from USMB is that a lot of religious people would be serial murderers and rapists if not for the fear of eternal damnation. So I definitely believe there’s a place for religion in the world; but that place should not be in the way of the people trying to move civilization forward.

Secularism has been the greatest Serial killer in the history of civilization’s… Soviet union, China, nazi Germany, Saddam Hussain’s Iraq, etc... And will continue to be

America is a secular nation. Our laws aren’t based on religion.

Iraq’s flag literally had Allah’s name on the flag. A secular nation doesn’t point a God’s name on their flag.

I love how your conservatives love point out non religious societies like China and Soviet Union. But never point out the successful irreligious nations like Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands.

There you can find good and bad examples of religious and irreligious countries.