"IT'S GOING TO TAKE 'WE THE PEOPLE'" DC out of Control

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Robodoon, Feb 8, 2012.

  1. Robodoon
    Offline

    Robodoon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,034
    Thanks Received:
    113
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +113
    America’s Founding Fathers clearly understood that the states are the ultimate guardians of the peoples’ liberties. James Madison (and even Alexander Hamilton) spoke to this eloquently in the Federalist Papers.

    In Federalist #46, Madison said, “Were it admitted, however, that the Federal government may fell an equal disposition with the State governments to extend its power beyond the due limits, the [states] would still have the advantage in the means of DEFEATING SUCH ENCROACHMENTS” (emphasis added). By “defeating such encroachments,” Madison included “opposition,” “refusal to cooperate,” “frowns of the [State] executive,” “obstructions,” and “plans of resistance.”

    Did you see that? America’s third President and Father of the Constitution said that it was the duty of the states to obstruct, oppose, resist, and otherwise refuse to cooperate with any federal policy or mandate that runs counter to the principles of liberty. And, remember, this is from the man who authored the so-called “supremacy clause” of the US Constitution!

    In Federalist #45, Madison said, “Thus, each of the principal branches of the federal government will owe its existence more or less to the favor of the State governments, and must consequently feel a dependence, which is much more likely to beget a disposition too obsequious than too overbearing towards them. On the other side, the component parts of the State governments will in no instance be indebted for their appointment to the direct agency of the federal government, and very little, if at all, to the local influence of its members.”

    Did you get that? In the mind of America’s founders, the federal government would be dependent upon the State governments, not the other way around! But what do we hear today? Even these so-called “conservative” politicos and talking heads say just the opposite. They keep insisting that the states are dependent upon, and subservient to, the federal government.

    Even the colonists’ biggest proponent of central government, Alexander Hamilton, had it right on the power of the states to resist federal encroachment. In Federalist #26, Hamilton said, “Independent of … the national legislature itself … the State legislatures, who will always be not only vigilant but suspicious and jealous guardians of the rights of the citizens against encroachments from the federal government, will constantly have their attention awake to the conduct of the national rulers, and will be ready enough, if any thing improper appears, to sound the alarm to the people, and not only to be the voice, but, if necessary, the arm of their discontent.”

    Wow! Did you catch that? Hamilton said that the states held the right and duty to resist federal encroachment with their “voice” and with their “arm.”

    Does any of this sound like America’s Founding Fathers expected the states to be lap dogs for federal usurpation of power? They fully recognized that it would take the individual states standing against any potential federal overreach to protect and secure the rights and liberties of the American people.

    Article

    Comment: Sure would be nice if the drooling elected would pay attention to the Constitution. The Criminals in DC are out of control.
     
  2. B. Kidd
    Offline

    B. Kidd Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    12,258
    Thanks Received:
    1,916
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Western Lands
    Ratings:
    +6,938
    You ain't telling Arizona nothing that they don't already know. Also all the states that are against Obie care, too!
     
  3. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    56,171
    Thanks Received:
    9,360
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +24,621
    I will buy into this 10th Amendment shit the day I hear people like Chuck Baldwin getting all hopping mad about "activist judges" and "states rights" when the Supreme Court strikes down a state gun control law.

    Until then...yawn.
     
  4. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    56,171
    Thanks Received:
    9,360
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +24,621
    Sorry, this post was in the wrong topic.
     
  5. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,549
    Thanks Received:
    19,880
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,540
    The original colonies needed state centered government because of the challenges of transportation and communication. It would take weeks to communicate between Washington and the states. As we grew, it became evident that state centered government was inefficient and counterproductive

    We actually had a war that settled the excesses of State controlled government and since moving to a centralized federal controlled government, we have emerged as the most powerful nation in the history of mankind

    We are not going back
     

Share This Page