Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Guess what , Sparky......I used to believe that crap and mindlessly spouted those same boilerplate yammering points over and over and over and over again, just like you.
Then something happened....I let an analytical thought into my head.
The sun isn't the only variable.......The magnetosphere is ever-shifting and is weaker than it has been in decades. SOURCE
Also, your holy ice cores have shown that CO2 is a LAGGING statistic viz. temperature spikes, not a leading indicator.
Moreover, you cannot reproduce ANY of the purported "evidence" in the context of a dynamic ecosystem.....If you cannot reproduce it, it ain't science.
Likewise, you cannot falsify AGW junk science...If you cannot disprove ALL other possible explanations, it ain't science.
Science isn't about proving yourself right, it's about disproving ALL possible alternatives.....Which neither you nor any other AGW cultist have come anywhere near doing.
Mmmm-hmmmm...
When the U.N. scaremonger moonbats cherry pick their sources, that's "science". When someone else takes into account those whose opinions were ignored by those alarmists, the well is poisoned.
Nope....Didn't see that one coming!!
Atmospheric CO2 has increased 40% in the last 200 years. We are adding billions of tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year, and the ice cap and the glaciers are melting in spite of the fact that the sun's activity is at its lowest level in 80 years.
You are the moonbat.
So does water vapor, which comprises significantly more of the total atmosphere than CO2.
Want to try and control how many clouds are "allowed" form next??
Guess what , Sparky......I used to believe that crap and mindlessly spouted those same boilerplate yammering points over and over and over and over again, just like you.
Then something happened....I let an analytical thought into my head.
The sun isn't the only variable.......The magnetosphere is ever-shifting and is weaker than it has been in decades. SOURCE
Also, your holy ice cores have shown that CO2 is a LAGGING statistic viz. temperature spikes, not a leading indicator.
Moreover, you cannot reproduce ANY of the purported "evidence" in the context of a dynamic ecosystem.....If you cannot reproduce it, it ain't science.
Likewise, you cannot falsify AGW junk science...If you cannot disprove ALL other possible explanations, it ain't science.
Science isn't about proving yourself right, it's about disproving ALL possible alternatives.....Which neither you nor any other AGW cultist have come anywhere near doing.
Didn't I see you trying to sell cloud seeding services at a cattlemen's convention??Sure, you can easily control the number of clouds allowed to form. Eliminate most of the CO2 from the atmosphere. Water vapor has a residence time of less than 10 days in the atmosphere. Without the CO2 in the atmosphere, the earth would rapidly cool. Soon, thousands of years, the earth would have ice pack nearly to the equator. That has happened before. On a very cold earth, few clouds would form.
CO2, on the other hand, has a residence time of about two centuries. Eliminate the water vapor from the atmosphere, and the retained heat from the CO2 would immediatly cause water vapor to form over water covered areas.
So, eliminate water vapor, and there is only a minor glitch, the water vapor immediatly reforms over the seas. Eliminate CO2, and you have a snowball earth, one that will not warm up until there is enough CO2 in the atmosphere again to warm the ice and water and cause water vapor to enter the atmosphere. That comes from volcanic action, and, unless you are dealing with Trapp Volcanics, it takes many 100s of millenia to get enough CO2 back into the atmosphere to warm the earth again.
Old Rocks, the Un formed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as you well know. The group asked Climatologists, meteorologists, bio-scientists, and Earth scientists from all over the world to submit papers addressing evidence and the effects of global warming. Did you know that over 14,000 papers were submitted, and they only accepted 948? Those 948 had only one theme, and you know the theme is what you worshipped. Roughly 1 out of 14 were accepted. I have to wonder what all those other papers had to say....I bet you don't wonder about it, though.
When these scientists found out how their work was being misrepresented they started pulling away. Did you know that out of the 948 scientists that had been picked, only 191 still remain?
Last month the US Senate released a 255 page "Minority Report On Manmade Global Warming" Over 650 scientists and many from the IPCC researchers debunk the man caused global warming.
Senate Minority Report: MAN-MADE Global Warming Fraud exposed by 650 Scientists - total_truth_sciences | Google Groups
Facts debunk global warming alarmism | The Australian
Guess what , Sparky......I used to believe that crap and mindlessly spouted those same boilerplate yammering points over and over and over and over again, just like you.
Then something happened....I let an analytical thought into my head.
The sun isn't the only variable.......The magnetosphere is ever-shifting and is weaker than it has been in decades. SOURCE
Also, your holy ice cores have shown that CO2 is a LAGGING statistic viz. temperature spikes, not a leading indicator.
Moreover, you cannot reproduce ANY of the purported "evidence" in the context of a dynamic ecosystem.....If you cannot reproduce it, it ain't science.
Likewise, you cannot falsify AGW junk science...If you cannot disprove ALL other possible explanations, it ain't science.
Science isn't about proving yourself right, it's about disproving ALL possible alternatives.....Which neither you nor any other AGW cultist have come anywhere near doing.
Milankovic Cycles mean anything to you?
Why don't you grow up, Elvis.
No...It's not proven.
Repeating that it is over and over and over and over and over again doesn't prove it the 1,000,001st time, any more than it did the previous 1,000,000 repetitions.
No...It's not proven.
Repeating that it is over and over and over and over and over again doesn't prove it the 1,000,001st time, any more than it did the previous 1,000,000 repetitions.
If the sun's activity is at its lowest level in 80 years, why is the ice still melting?
The Earth is one cynical bitch. Forget this Eath Mother loves you shit. She is out to kill you, and she will. She is a mass killer. Mass extinction event.
99% of all life that has ever evolved is gone, and we are talking life before humankind ever started killing. Earth Mother is a raging bitch in post partum despression, do not be fooled by her.
She will not love us in the long run.
Only our reason can fight back, and we will loose if we do not get off our Earth Mother's tit and go off into space.
Besides elvis' astute observation, begging the question isn't proof of anything, other than your lack of analytical thought, either.If the sun's activity is at its lowest level in 80 years, why is the ice still melting?
No...It's not proven.
Repeating that it is over and over and over and over and over again doesn't prove it the 1,000,001st time, any more than it did the previous 1,000,000 repetitions.
Nothing more than just an emotional outburst by boboNo...It's not proven.
Repeating that it is over and over and over and over and over again doesn't prove it the 1,000,001st time, any more than it did the previous 1,000,000 repetitions.
We need to change the topic because you guys LOVE it being about whether or not humans are contributing to global warming.
That's an argument you can debate with us forever.
So lets change it to, "are we as humans polluting the planet and is that harmful to our long term existence"?
Is all the plastic in the ocean bad for us? Hell yea.
Is all the toxic CO2 bad for us to be breathing?
Can we clean up our air? Fuck if its causing global warming. We can't breath!!!! We're getting cancer from it. Fish are dying.
I bet the GOP deregulated this too much, just like they did our economy. I bet we will find that companies can pollute now more than ever. And I bet the GOP have fudged stats that suggest the environment is cleaner after Bush, and I bet that turns out to be a big fat lie.
Corporations and tax payers are going to have to pay for the cleanup. And this is something that we all share blame on. But corporations pollute way more than we do. And they don't want to get better gas milage out of cars. They want the status quo!!!
Right wingers are stupid.
We need to change the topic because you guys LOVE it being about whether or not humans are contributing to global warming.
That's an argument you can debate with us forever.
So lets change it to, "are we as humans polluting the planet and is that harmful to our long term existence"?
Is all the plastic in the ocean bad for us? Hell yea.
Is all the toxic CO2 bad for us to be breathing?
Can we clean up our air? Fuck if its causing global warming. We can't breath!!!! We're getting cancer from it. Fish are dying.
I bet the GOP deregulated this too much, just like they did our economy. I bet we will find that companies can pollute now more than ever. And I bet the GOP have fudged stats that suggest the environment is cleaner after Bush, and I bet that turns out to be a big fat lie.
Corporations and tax payers are going to have to pay for the cleanup. And this is something that we all share blame on. But corporations pollute way more than we do. And they don't want to get better gas milage out of cars. They want the status quo!!!
Right wingers are stupid.
Besides elvis' astute observation, begging the question isn't proof of anything, other than your lack of analytical thought, either.If the sun's activity is at its lowest level in 80 years, why is the ice still melting?
