Its called"Earth Cyclical Climate Change,"Global warming is a scam.!

There are a lot of research groups that don't parrot what the left would like to think is peered reviewed. But apparently you just ignore it. So why don't you watch Gore's movie one more time and parrot what he wants you to worship.:cuckoo:

Ya sure, you silly wingnut. Groups like OISM. Real bunch of winners you have quoted there. Others, like Lindzen and Singer that also testify that cigerette smoke is good for you.

Comes back to the same ol' same ol'. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major universities all state that global warming is happening, we are the primary driver of it, and that it is a clear and present danger.

You cannot lie that statement out of existance. It is the truth, and has been for many years now. The people you are parroting are the ones funded by the fossil fuel companies. And you are simply to lazy to do the real research in scientific journals.

Until you find more scientists that are not peer pressured and funded by the government or the companies their findings endorse, you have no way to convince any intelligent person that GW is more than a hoax.

he won't find any.
 
So you have a PhD in atmoshpheric physics or chemistry, and do original peer reviewed research on the topic?

No????


So, are you just parroting then what you heard on Fox News, or from a rightwing think tank that doesn't actually do any of their own research on the topic?

There are a lot of research groups that don't parrot what the left would like to think is peered reviewed. But apparently you just ignore it. So why don't you watch Gore's movie one more time and parrot what he wants you to worship.:cuckoo:

Ya sure, you silly wingnut. Groups like OISM. Real bunch of winners you have quoted there. Others, like Lindzen and Singer that also testify that cigerette smoke is good for you.

Comes back to the same ol' same ol'. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major universities all state that global warming is happening, we are the primary driver of it, and that it is a clear and present danger.

You cannot lie that statement out of existance. It is the truth, and has been for many years now. The people you are parroting are the ones funded by the fossil fuel companies. And you are simply to lazy to do the real research in scientific journals.

Silly wing nut coming from you is just rich old rocks...I have to stop with that because the rest is just blah, blah, blah...the sky is falling, the sky is falling. What a numpskull :cuckoo:
 
It is called "Earth Cyclical Climate change". This "Global Warming" is all a big scam , aimed at
extracting carbon monoxide money from third world nations, and slowing their development.

The Earth has gone through these cycles many times over, during its billions year history.
"Global Warming" is nothing but an elaborate scam , that is being implemented by the industrialized nations of the world.

Volcanoes, and the ocean, all release more CO2, and Methane, than humans have ever produced. These natural emissions , have been affecting the temperature on Earth , weather hot or cold , for many millions of years.

Really! Lordy, lordy. Read some geology. You might start with the P-T event. More recently, the PETM. Now explain to me why, if we start the same cycle going as was started in those events, that the result should in any way be differant? Do you really believe the laws of physics are going to change, just because you think it isn't the Way it Ought to Be.

At present, we put about 130 to 150 times as much greenhouse gases into the atmosphere as all the volcanoes in the world do. Those are USGS figures.
 
There are a lot of research groups that don't parrot what the left would like to think is peered reviewed. But apparently you just ignore it. So why don't you watch Gore's movie one more time and parrot what he wants you to worship.:cuckoo:

Ya sure, you silly wingnut. Groups like OISM. Real bunch of winners you have quoted there. Others, like Lindzen and Singer that also testify that cigerette smoke is good for you.

Comes back to the same ol' same ol'. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major universities all state that global warming is happening, we are the primary driver of it, and that it is a clear and present danger.

You cannot lie that statement out of existance. It is the truth, and has been for many years now. The people you are parroting are the ones funded by the fossil fuel companies. And you are simply to lazy to do the real research in scientific journals.

Until you find more scientists that are not peer pressured and funded by the government or the companies their findings endorse, you have no way to convince any intelligent person that GW is more than a hoax.

Ah yes, but it is quite apparent here that I am not trying to convince intelligent people.
 
Ya sure, you silly wingnut. Groups like OISM. Real bunch of winners you have quoted there. Others, like Lindzen and Singer that also testify that cigerette smoke is good for you.

Comes back to the same ol' same ol'. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major universities all state that global warming is happening, we are the primary driver of it, and that it is a clear and present danger.

You cannot lie that statement out of existance. It is the truth, and has been for many years now. The people you are parroting are the ones funded by the fossil fuel companies. And you are simply to lazy to do the real research in scientific journals.

Until you find more scientists that are not peer pressured and funded by the government or the companies their findings endorse, you have no way to convince any intelligent person that GW is more than a hoax.

he won't find any.

No, just the overwhelming majority of scientists in the world. Those are the people that make up Scientific Societies, after all.
 
Ya sure, you silly wingnut. Groups like OISM. Real bunch of winners you have quoted there. Others, like Lindzen and Singer that also testify that cigerette smoke is good for you.

Comes back to the same ol' same ol'. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major universities all state that global warming is happening, we are the primary driver of it, and that it is a clear and present danger.

You cannot lie that statement out of existance. It is the truth, and has been for many years now. The people you are parroting are the ones funded by the fossil fuel companies. And you are simply to lazy to do the real research in scientific journals.

Until you find more scientists that are not peer pressured and funded by the government or the companies their findings endorse, you have no way to convince any intelligent person that GW is more than a hoax.

Ah yes, but it is quite apparent here that I am not trying to convince intelligent people.

yeah if we were carpenters, then we'd understand, right asshole?:cuckoo:
 
Until you find more scientists that are not peer pressured and funded by the government or the companies their findings endorse, you have no way to convince any intelligent person that GW is more than a hoax.

he won't find any.

No, just the overwhelming majority of scientists in the world. Those are the people that make up Scientific Societies, after all.

The only ones you have used have funding from someone telling them what to find.
 
Policy statements and reports by date
Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change
7 Jun 2005

The national science academies of the G8 nations and Brazil, China and India, three of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases in the developing world, have signed a statement on the global response to climate change.

The statement stresses that the scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action and calls on world leaders, including those meeting at the G8 summit at Gleneagles in July 2005, to do the following.

Acknowledge that the threat of climate change is clear and increasing

Launch an international study to explore scientifically-informed targets for atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, and their associated emissions scenarios, that will enable nations to avoid impacts deemed unacceptable.
Identify cost-effective steps that can be taken now to contribute to substantial and long-term reduction in net global greenhouse gas emissions. Recognise that delayed action will increase the risk of adverse environmental effects and will likely incur a greater cost.
Work with developing nations to build a scientific and technological capacity best suited to their circumstances, enabling them to develop innovative solutions to mitigate and adapt to the adverse effects of climate change, while explicitly recognising their legitimate development rights.
Show leadership in developing and deploying clean energy technologies and approaches to energy efficiency, and share this knowledge with all other nations.
Mobilise the science and technology community to enhance research and development efforts, which can better inform climate change decisions.
The Royal Society issued a press release highlighting this statement on 7 June 2005.

Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change (Adobe PDF File, 392kb)
For more information about Adobe Acrobat and to download a free copy of Acrobat Reader, go to
Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change
 
These tools of the environazis just babble on, undaunted.

Meh, if they just babbled I wouldn't care about them. They are pushing laws into effect though, and dooming us because now we don't have the resources to help when something really bad naturally happens. The environuts simply don't care about life, only money.
 
Scientific Society Speaks Out on Climate.
Article from:World Watch Article date:May 1, 1999 Author: Dunn, Seth | Copyright informationCOPYRIGHT 1999 Worldwatch Institute. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)

More CA wildfires?
Statewide reports on wildfires from KQED's Climate Watch

Climate Watch | KQED Public Media for Northern CA

Help Solve Global Warming
Discover How You Can Take Action & Demand Change From Your Leaders.

We Can Solve It


After months of internal discussion, the American Geophysical Union (AGU), a prominent international scientific body of 35,000 Earth and planetary scientists, made a bold move into the public global warming debate last January by unveiling a strongly worded position statement on climate change and greenhouse gases.

The move signifies a new political role for the high-profile body, which has traditionally distanced itself from any type of advocacy work by its members. It also marks the scientific group's first foray into environmental policy, as prior position statements have focused on research and education issues.

The paper reiterates several generally ...

Read all of this article with a FREE trial

Scientific Society Speaks Out on Climate. | Article from World Watch | HighBeam Research
 
These tools of the environazis just babble on, undaunted.

Meh, if they just babbled I wouldn't care about them. They are pushing laws into effect though, and dooming us because now we don't have the resources to help when something really bad naturally happens. The environuts simply don't care about life, only money.

:eusa_boohoo:
 
:lol:OK, now where are your scientific societies? Oh, I know, you don't need no stinkin' scientific societies, Ol' Limp Rushbo is all you need
 
These tools of the environazis just babble on, undaunted.

Meh, if they just babbled I wouldn't care about them. They are pushing laws into effect though, and dooming us because now we don't have the resources to help when something really bad naturally happens. The environuts simply don't care about life, only money.
Clearly you misunderstood.

You are describing the environazis. I was describing the tools of same. Like oldnut here, chris, some others. They aren't the actual dangerous ones, they are simply the mindless little yapping ankle biter kickme mangy mongrel mutts of the deal. Who continue to yap, undaunted on message boards throughout the web. No matter how thoroughly they get the shit kicked out of them.
 
These tools of the environazis just babble on, undaunted.

Meh, if they just babbled I wouldn't care about them. They are pushing laws into effect though, and dooming us because now we don't have the resources to help when something really bad naturally happens. The environuts simply don't care about life, only money.
Clearly you misunderstood.

You are describing the environazis. I was describing the tools of same. Like oldnut here, chris, some others. They aren't the actual dangerous ones, they are simply the mindless little yapping ankle biter kickme mangy mongrel mutts of the deal. Who continue to yap, undaunted on message boards throughout the web. No matter how thoroughly they get the shit kicked out of them.

Aah ... true. Point taken.
 
These tools of the environazis just babble on, undaunted.

Meh, if they just babbled I wouldn't care about them. They are pushing laws into effect though, and dooming us because now we don't have the resources to help when something really bad naturally happens. The environuts simply don't care about life, only money.
Clearly you misunderstood.

You are describing the environazis. I was describing the tools of same. Like oldnut here, chris, some others. They aren't the actual dangerous ones, they are simply the mindless little yapping ankle biter kickme mangy mongrel mutts of the deal. Who continue to yap, undaunted on message boards throughout the web. No matter how thoroughly they get the shit kicked out of them.

Dream on, old fool. You have yet to post a reasonable response to the fact that the overwhelming scientific consensus states that you are a doddering old ignoramous. See, I can play the game, too.

But back at the ranch, the science still says all you state is nonsense.
 
:lol:OK, now where are your scientific societies? Oh, I know, you don't need no stinkin' scientific societies, Ol' Limp Rushbo is all you need

No ... who's this Rush person again? We posted them, you ignored them because they weren't part of your peer pressured groups, which do no even come close to representing all the scientists, just the ones with government funding. So meh, it's old and now you are just a toy poodle and we are using your arguments as a laser pointer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top