It's Become Clear the Left Is Controlling the Dems

Maineman, here is a tip when talking to people like RedStateRules. PARROTS cannot be trained to learn. They can be trained to REPEAT LINES but that's it. They will never understand what they are saying.
 
A Non-Binding Beacon of Hope for Iraqi Freedom Fighters
Much like the Living, Breathing Constitution and the Clinton marriage, Friday's House vote to denounce Bush’s illegal and immoral troop surge was non-binding and largely symbolic. At the very worse, it will serve to give Iraqi freedom fighters a glimmer of hope that victory is finally at hand. Is that really so bad – giving hope to the hopeless? The Senate repugs obviously think so, for they refused to even allow the measure to be debated. So much for democracy. So much for supporting our troops.

Righteously outraged democrats won't be silenced, however, and vow to take new, more “drastic” steps to end the war and bring our troops home - steps that even the Iraqi freedom fighters haven't thought of yet. They may include showboating, bloviation and, if the Republicans refuse to play ball, Senator Kennedy vomitting a gallon of gin and shrimp scampi all over the floor of Congress in the name of Peace
http://blamebush.typepad.com/
 
For the Useless Nations, oh, now I understand

The same outfit in Duefler Report where it is obvious that high ranking officials in the United Nations had engaged in criminal activity by taking bribes from Saddam Hussein. More recently, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan was implicated in Iraq's oil-for-food scandal [Washington Times]. This is probably the reason Annan used his position to block a United States Senate subcommittee investigation of fraud in the oil-for-food program

No wonder you are the liberal nut you are

I still seemed to miss any posts from you that detail the source of your knowledge and experience concerning arabs, islam and the middle east. Will that be forthcoming anytime soon?

And I think it is great how republicans can bitch about democrats not supporting our troops yet they themselves denigrate veterans and the missions that they've performed. hypocrites.
 
I still seemed to miss any posts from you that detail the source of your knowledge and experience concerning arabs, islam and the middle east. Will that be forthcoming anytime soon?

And I think it is great how republicans can bitch about democrats not supporting our troops yet they themselves denigrate veterans and the missions that they've performed. hypocrites.

It has been proven the mass corruption and waste the UN has given the world

UN "peace keepers" have been proven to have raped women and children and have WALKED away

The Useless Nations is the biggest watse of taxpayer money and anyone who thinks they have any useful purpose is a liberal nut
 
It has been proven the mass corruption and waste the UN has given the world

UN "peace keepers" have been proven to have raped women and children and have WALKED away

The Useless Nations is the biggest watse of taxpayer money and anyone who thinks they have any useful purpose is a liberal nut


You will not find any such claims made about officers who serve in the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization. Why do you feel it is OK for you to denigrate the honorable service of US military officers spreading back nearly 60 years?

Do you call General George Casey, the new Army Chief of Staff a "liberal nut"?
 
Just a few examples of the contributons of the UN


In a new report referring to the widespread sex scandal as "the U.N.'s Abu Ghraib," the London Times provides some specific examples, including:


A French U.N. logistics expert in the Congo shot pornographic videos in his home, in which he had converted his bedroom into a photo studio for videotaping his sexual abuse of young girls. When police raided his home, the man was allegedly about to rape a 12-year-old girl sent to him in a law enforcement sting operation. As the Times reported, a senior Congolese police officer confirmed the bed was surrounded by large mirrors on three sides, with a remote control camera on the fourth side.

U.N. officials are worried that the scandal, which already has netted 150 allegations of sex crimes by U.N. staffers, will explode if the pornographic videos and photos, now on sale in Congo, becoming public
"It would be a pretty big problem for the U.N. if these pictures come out," one senior official told the Times.


Two Russian pilots paid young girls with jars of mayonnaise and jam to have sex with them, the report adds.

U.N. "peacekeepers" from Morocco based in Kisangani – a secluded town on the Congo River – are notorious for impregnating local women and girls. In March, an international group probing the scandal found 82 women and girls had been made pregnant by Moroccan U.N. staffers and 59 others by Uruguayan staffers. One U.N. soldier accused of rape was apparently hidden in the barracks for a year.
Congo's Minister of Defense Maj.-Gen. Jean Pierre Ondekane told a top U.N. official that all U.N. "peacekeepers" in Kisangani would be remember for would be "for running after little girls," the Times reported.


And at least two U.N. officials – a Ukrainian and a Canadian – have been forced to leave the African nation after getting local women pregnant.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42088
 
typical cut and pasting off topic. why do you refuse to engage me in a discussion? why do you refuse to address my questions? what ARE you so afraid of?
 
typical cut and pasting off topic. why do you refuse to engage me in a discussion? why do you refuse to address my questions? what ARE you so afraid of?

Translation : I am not interested in facts about the crimes and corruption of the UN
 
Translation : I am not interested in facts about the crimes and corruption of the UN


no: translation: we were talking about the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization. You want to suggest that that organization is synonymous with UN peacekeepers - it is not. You want to suggest that I am a liberal nut for having served my country as a UN crisis mediator.... yet you won't go so far as to call General George Casey a liberal nut for having served along side me.
 
no: translation: we were talking about the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization. You want to suggest that that organization is synonymous with UN peacekeepers - it is not. You want to suggest that I am a liberal nut for having served my country as a UN crisis mediator.... yet you won't go so far as to call General George Casey a liberal nut for having served along side me.

Is this the same outfit that consistantly bashes Israel and sides with the terrorists that want to wipe Israel off the map?
 
Is this the same outfit that consistantly bashes Israel and sides with the terrorists that want to wipe Israel off the map?

no...it is not.

but the mere fact that you are having to ask questions about this should give you pause before you continue to bash me and my service - and the service of many other American military officers.
 
no...it is not.

but the mere fact that you are having to ask questions about this should give you pause before you continue to bash me and my service - and the service of many other American military officers.

It is and you know it

This is the same outfit that sttod by while Palestinians were firing rockets into Israel and when terrorists crossed into Israel and kidnapped their soldiers
 
It is and you know it

This is the same outfit that sttod by while Palestinians were firing rockets into Israel and when terrorists crossed into Israel and kidnapped their soldiers


you clearly have no idea of the mission of the organization. I do. For your information, UNTSO members are always "unarmed". They get involved, only at the request of one of the parties to any dispute and mediate it.... or, they observe and report violations of treaties and truces to the UNSC.

You should realize that when you keep your piehole shut, your intellectual deficit is in doubt...when you open it, you confirm it.
 
how would you like me to do that? Do I need to scan a copy of my DD214 and upload it for you? Sorry... that ain't gonna happen.

I can back up my record of service with the knowledge that I gained during that service. Anything else, too fucking bad. As IF I would post anything on the internet that would give a freakin' wacko like you any idea where I lived or where my children were.

1. So you have no facts then. Figgered as much.
2. Actually, you were the one who brought my child into our discourse. Who's the wacko, wacko? More irony.
 
1. So you have no facts then. Figgered as much.
2. Actually, you were the one who brought my child into our discourse. Who's the wacko, wacko? More irony.

I have no facts to confirm my identity? no...none that I would care to share with you. Do YOU have any facts that confirm you are something other than a teenaged dork living with your parents and playacting on the internet? I didn't think so.
 
Post 94, item #2.

I really don't enjoy being quoted out of context. If you want to post photographs of two little boys in snow suits, don't bitch when folks comment.

I personally would never post any information about my children on here.... there are way too many weirdos..... people who actually claim to "OWN" their spouses and their children - real wackos - and I have absolutely no desire to put my children in the line of fire.
 
I really don't enjoy being quoted out of context. If you want to post photographs of two little boys in snow suits, don't bitch when folks comment.

I personally would never post any information about my children on here.... there are way too many weirdos..... people who actually claim to "OWN" their spouses and their children - real wackos - and I have absolutely no desire to put my children in the line of fire.
Not out of context at all. You were the one that went into the gutter by bringing my child into our discourse. Anyone who is not a has-been old drunk can see that.
 
Not out of context at all. You were the one that went into the gutter by bringing my child into our discourse. Anyone who is not a has-been old drunk can see that.

"I have no facts....." and then following that with a discussion that the initial statement was not connected to is, in fact, quoting me out of context.

I'm curious: do you know what the phrase "out of context" even means?
 

Forum List

Back
Top