It was NOT me...

[Mr. P]

Bringing my kids into a discussion is borderline personal - calling me a candidate for 'ways stupid people die' is a candidate.

Sorry..YOU brought your kids into it when you had your mishap and made the post about it, not me.
Let's see you said something like "I picked them/her up an hugged them/her". Right?
(the link is deleted). As far as "calling me a candidate for 'ways stupid people die' is a candidate".
You said something in that same tread that puts ya in or near that (DARWIN) group pal, Lets see..wasn't it something like.."Next time I may die", with a (SHRUG)? Something like that.

My 40mph low side, thru curves and gravel does not relate in the least to a high-speed run.

True...but your acceptance of a high-speed run does relate to recklessness and responsibility, or lack of.

 

[dmp]

Sorry..YOU brought your kids into it when you had your mishap and made the post about it, not me.
Let's see you said something like "I picked them/her up an hugged them/her". Right?
(the link is deleted). As far as "calling me a candidate for 'ways stupid people die' is a candidate".
You said something in that same tread that puts ya in or near that (DARWIN) group pal, Lets see..wasn't it something like.."Next time I may die", with a (SHRUG)? Something like that.


True...but your acceptance of a high-speed run does relate to recklessness and responsibility, or lack of.

Here you go, written as if to a retarded kid:


'You are confusing your topics again. I mentioned my kids in ANOTHER (another means 'like this one, but different') thread; written in the context of "I was glad I didn't hurt myself to the point where it'd be impossible to hug them, etc".

PLEASE tell me what the FUCK that has to do with a guy allegedly running at 200mph? Please? Anyone? Draw SOME logic to comparing the two topics/instances.

Now - I've got Mr. P saying "Speed and Recklessness aren't married is the SAME THING as accepting High-Speed driving".

You sir...have comprehension issues. I mean that in the best possible way. Welcome to my ignore list.

 

[JOKER96BRAVO]

I gotta go with P on this. IMHO most laws are set to PREVENT things that COULD
happen. I can only compare with DUI, I would much rather have an officer pull
the drunk over and give him/her a ticket rather than wait till they kill my family.
Saying that he didn't reck and he shouldn't have gotten a ticket is like trusting
everyone who has had a few drinks to get home safe.

 

[dmp]

I gotta go with P on this. IMHO most laws are set to PREVENT things that COULD
happen..

...but most TRAFFIC laws are in place to generate revenue.

12 seconds of WOT on a motorcycle - along a HIGH visibility road, with little/no traffic is NOT like DUI because with DUI there's deminished ability. There's no evidence the rider would have done such a thing with ANY traffic in the area; until we know what the traffic was doing, or OTHER environmental factors, I'm soundly in the camp of "It may not be reckless...dangerous? sure."

 

[JOKER96BRAVO]

205 miles an hour doesn't deminish ANY ability???
I tried to find the statute for RD in MN but I can't open it.