It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian

[Denechek]

Bet that won't stop the crooked biased media from their attempts to spread their "fake news."

They are complicit in the DNC scandal, teaming up with them to blame the Russians is their only option. To acknowledge their role in the deception is to invite liability and serious criminal and civil lawsuits. They think President Trump is bad now, wait until CNN and MSBC are replaced by Briebart and InfoWars in the White House Press Corps.

Wow. What a conspiracy. It involves all of the US intelligence agencies, all of the mainstream media...how in the hell did they get them all to agree

Not exactly ALL the intelligence agencies. The NSA is conspicuously quiet on the issue, the one agency that could provide proof if there was any. Even Obama is not willing to say anything stronger than "alleged" actions and it's no surprise that Clinton News Network has been invested in a shell game with the truth since the DNC scandal. Maybe "all" the mainstream media you are referring to are the few that spoon feed you what you want to hear. Obama Bombshell: Russia Did Not Hack Our Elections

 

[Coyote]

Bet that won't stop the crooked biased media from their attempts to spread their "fake news."

They are complicit in the DNC scandal, teaming up with them to blame the Russians is their only option. To acknowledge their role in the deception is to invite liability and serious criminal and civil lawsuits. They think President Trump is bad now, wait until CNN and MSBC are replaced by Briebart and InfoWars in the White House Press Corps.

Wow. What a conspiracy. It involves all of the US intelligence agencies, all of the mainstream media...how in the hell did they get them all to agree

Not exactly ALL the intelligence agencies. The NSA is conspicuously quiet on the issue, the one agency that could provide proof if there was any. Even Obama is not willing to say anything stronger than "alleged" actions and it's no surprise that Clinton News Network has been invested in a shell game with the truth since the DNC scandal. Maybe "all" the mainstream media you are referring to are the few that spoon feed you what you want to hear. Obama Bombshell: Russia Did Not Hack Our Elections

Video: NSA Chief Confirms DNC Hack Was 'Conscious Effort' By Russia To Achieve 'A Specific Effect'

Michael Rogers is the current head of the NSA's Cybersecurity Division. During an interview with the Wall Street Journal today, he was asked to comment on the Wikileaks release of DNC emails in the lead up to last week's election.


His answer was withering.


"There shouldn't be any doubt in anybody's mind. This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily. This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect."​

 

[Denechek]

The FBI is solely in charge of counter-intelligence, CIA confirmation is fake news.

And the NSA hasn't said a word...

NSA Chief speaks candidly of Russia and U.S. election

Wow, don't you look stupid.

Not as stupid as someone who joins the piss parade to sell everyone that it's raining. "Rogers is most likely referencing Russia" Still waiting for the proof, Slappy. Why can't any name names or come up with proof? Until they do, my statement stands unopposed and uncontested.

 

[Coyote]

The FBI is solely in charge of counter-intelligence, CIA confirmation is fake news.

And the NSA hasn't said a word...

NSA Chief speaks candidly of Russia and U.S. election

Wow, don't you look stupid.

Not as stupid as someone who joins the piss parade to sell everyone that it's raining. "Rogers is most likely referencing Russia" Still waiting for the proof, Slappy. Why can't any name names or come up with proof? Until they do, my statement stands unopposed and uncontested.

This was your statement: "And the NSA hasn't said a word"

It's been debunked.

 

[Denechek]

The FBI is solely in charge of counter-intelligence, CIA confirmation is fake news.

And the NSA hasn't said a word...

NSA Chief speaks candidly of Russia and U.S. election

Wow, don't you look stupid.

Not as stupid as someone who joins the piss parade to sell everyone that it's raining. "Rogers is most likely referencing Russia" Still waiting for the proof, Slappy. Why can't any name names or come up with proof? Until they do, my statement stands unopposed and uncontested.

This was your statement: "And the NSA hasn't said a word"

It's been debunked.

I've implied that "a word" in the context of the statement is synonymous with "a word of proof". Or do we also need to help you with the big words too?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Wow. What a conspiracy. It involves all of the US intelligence agencies, all of the mainstream media...how in the hell did they get them all to agree

Lol, it is hardly worthy of a conspiracy theory.

It is called "Political Appointees Sucking their Bosses Cock", nothing more than that.

 

[JimBowie1958]

This was your statement: "And the NSA hasn't said a word"
It's been debunked.

Lol, standard liberal counter-claim sans any evidence.

IF 'it's been debunked' that the NSA has not commented, then what did they say and what specific evidence did they give for their speculation regarding Russia?

 

[Coyote]

Wow. What a conspiracy. It involves all of the US intelligence agencies, all of the mainstream media...how in the hell did they get them all to agree

Lol, it is hardly worthy of a conspiracy theory.

It is called "Political Appointees Sucking their Bosses Cock", nothing more than that.

The "boss" didn't say anything until the intelligence agencies did.

Now, how on earth did they manage to get the Trumpists and president elect to suck Putin's cock?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Now, how on earth did they manage to get the Trumpists and president elect to suck Putin's cock?

I know that with this inactive President we now have and the energetic ball of fire that we have as President elect, it might SEEM like Trump is in charge already, but actually, no, he is not.

So that would be Obammy doing the royal favors right now, not Trump, as if.

 

[Denechek]

This was your statement: "And the NSA hasn't said a word"
It's been debunked.

Lol, standard liberal counter-claim sans any evidence.

IF 'it's been debunked' that the NSA has not commented, then what did they say and what specific evidence did they give for their speculation regarding Russia?

An avalanche of comments does not produce evidence. They want us to believe that the FBI, the CIA or the NSA cannot come up with a credible name with all the assets at their disposal. The only reason to withhold evidence would be that it would prove to be embarrassing. I'm sure everyone invested in the lie will use any tactic they can to cover up the fact that it was a DNC leak from someone who was sick of their tactics. Not really a problem. The truth is a stubborn thing. Let them spin their wheels and finally validate their own opposition. The only sad thing is that they will spend countless millions of tax payer dollars in committees and the end result will still be no evidence. As long as the focus is on the Russians, there will be no evidence. Focus on the leak and the rats will jump ship.

 

[Coyote]

Funny how you didn't demand all this proof of evidence when NK hacked Sony. Now that it's Russia....you demand details.

 

[Denechek]

Funny how you didn't demand all this proof of evidence when NK hacked Sony. Now that it's Russia....you demand details.

 

[Denechek]

Funny how you didn't demand all this proof of evidence when NK hacked Sony. Now that it's Russia....you demand details.

Here, I got you a more appropriate icon:

 

[Ame®icano]

The Hillary favoring media wants us to believe that purpose of the "Russian hacks" were to help Donald Trump.

But if we follow the timeline, that's actually plain lie, since timing of the hacks can be connected to helping Sanders, not Trump, against Hillary.

The early hacked/leaked emails from the DNC showed those at the DNC were favoring Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders. How does this directly help Donald Trump? They made and proved the case that Bernie Sanders was being mistreated by the DNC.

The later hacked/leaked emails show more of team Hillary doing things they should have never committed to an email. Was this an attempt to help Trump or an attempt to punish Hillary Clinton for messing with their candidate Bernie Sanders?

Nobody at the DNC or team Hillary would confirm or deny any of these emails, so who is to say that there was any hacking? It could have been all made up to help Bernie Sanders.

Finally, the "report" given to Congress indicated that has Trump as the beneficiary was the "consensus belief". There was no direct information.

How do we know that this campaign wasn't to help Bernie Sanders, and worse, why did the Obama Administration do nothing to stop it during the primaries or before the general election?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Funny how you didn't demand all this proof of evidence when NK hacked Sony. Now that it's Russia....you demand details.

Funny how you still provide no evidence.

And with this highly politicized Obama regime, evidence is required.

 

[Denechek]

Funny how you didn't demand all this proof of evidence when NK hacked Sony. Now that it's Russia....you demand details.

Funny how you still provide no evidence.

And with this highly politicized Obama regime, evidence is required.

smoke & mirrors...

 

[Ame®icano]

Funny how you didn't demand all this proof of evidence when NK hacked Sony. Now that it's Russia....you demand details.

Funny how you still provide no evidence.

And with this highly politicized Obama regime, evidence is required.

Remember, there was "no evidence" that Hillary did anything wrong.

However, all the "evidence" pinpoint to Russian hacking.

 

[Baron]

Who cares?
Officially it was the Putin hack.
Anything other is fake news.

 

[theHawk]

Why do progressives think that Russia wanting Hillary defeated somehow invalidates the election? We also know China and Saudi Arabia wanted Hillary to win. She was openly hostile to Russia and was pushing for war with them. Everyone knows Trump isn't out to start a war with Russia, which is why a lot of us supported him. We don't want war with Russia, and we don't want to be in a proxy war with them by means of the Syria quagmire that Hillary and the Hussein want us in.

I could care less if Russia "helped" Trump by means of exposing the Democrats for the corrupt pieces of shit they are. Hillary and the Dems were "helped" by the Saudis and China. Should we call Obama's election invalid because of all the overseas money from China he got? Were was the progressive outrage over another government "influencing" then?

 

[Roudy]

​

Julian Assange has claimed since the leaks from the DNC started coming out that they were not from Russia hacking the DNC despite Hillary Clinton and the DNC blaming Russia for the hacks.

The CIA director recently came out saying that Russia could be indirectly involved which is not proof at all. Either they are involved or they are not.

Let’s not forget that the CIA also said that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and we all know that was a lie now.

Now former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan has come out saying that he knows who the person leaker is and they are not from Russia but rather from inside the DNC!

According to Craig Murray.org:

A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they “know the individuals” involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of “We know who it was, it was the Russians” are beneath contempt.

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.

There is no direct evidence pointing to Russian involvement. Only those that have had their dirty secrets and lies exposed are the ones claiming that. Hard to imaging why?

It appears as if someone from the DNC is releasing the files. Destroyed from inside is the perfect way for these corrupt politicians to go down.

There is no direct evidence pointing to Russian involvement. Only those that have had their dirty secrets and lies exposed are the ones claiming that. Hard to imaging why?

It appears as if someone from the DNC is releasing the files. Destroyed from inside is the perfect way for these corrupt politicians to go down.

WikiLeaks Operative Exposes Democrat Insiders as Source for Hacked DNC Docs -- NOT RUSSIA

Oh, but we keep hearing 17 federal agencies all claim it was Russian hackers.

What I want to know is what are 17 different agencies doing looking into this? Don't they have other assigned duties?

Well, it appears they were sitting on their asses picking boogers doing absolutely nothing throughout the last year and half of all the so called "hacking" that "undermined our democracy" that Hussien Obama assured us won't happen, can't be done, and in fact he, media and the entire Democrapic party exhibited an amazing amount of fake outrage when Trump said won't accept the results of the election until he sees what actually happens. Ya gotta laugh at the pathetic desperation, these spineless liberals have no self respect or shame.