Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thank you for exposing yourself.
That was easy.
Thank you for exposing yourself.
That was easy.
thanks for showing your ignorance and intolerance towards other people.
i simply told you to leave your abortion argument on the other thread and you responded with a nice fuck you. well fuck you, no family and everything you stand for. its people like you who this country a worse place to live.
Thank you for exposing yourself.
That was easy.
thanks for showing your ignorance and intolerance towards other people.
i simply told you to leave your abortion argument on the other thread and you responded with a nice fuck you. well fuck you, your family and everything you stand for. its people like you who this country a worse place to live.
Ooh..and that's against the rules.
Reported, douchebag.
You don't see my posts getting edited, do you?
you dont have the capacity to have a legitimate argument, this coming from the i oppose making people pay for health care, and agree with them being able to get it for free.
actually just oppose getting rid of you, as your have shown an inability to contribute anything positive to this society.
1st and foremost the cost to employer's and states.
2nd that a board will be making decisions about who will get what.
And the biggest is the cost in the future ,just like all of the social programs that have been around for over 25 or 30 years or more, it finally gets way to expensive.
there is no board that will be making medical decision, that is a fallacy. all medical decisions will be left to doctors and patients.
so other than that your more upset with the cost that anything actually in the bill such as...
covering children until age 26
no more pre existing condition exclusions
health care exchanges
making sure 80% of premium dollars goes towards patient care
not being able to raise rates on individuals, you have to raise the rates on the entire group
hmmmm interesting...
1st and foremost the cost to employer's and states.
2nd that a board will be making decisions about who will get what.
And the biggest is the cost in the future ,just like all of the social programs that have been around for over 25 or 30 years or more, it finally gets way to expensive.
there is no board that will be making medical decision, that is a fallacy. all medical decisions will be left to doctors and patients.
so other than that your more upset with the cost that anything actually in the bill such as...
covering children until age 26
no more pre existing condition exclusions
health care exchanges
making sure 80% of premium dollars goes towards patient care
not being able to raise rates on individuals, you have to raise the rates on the entire group
hmmmm interesting...
Health care commissioner's duties
`(C) REJECTION OF BIDS- Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the Secretary to accept any or every bid by an MA organization under this subsection.'.
Like I said who will be accepted and who will be denied
who said anything about big govt vs anarchy.
i simply asked if you oppose the mandate, would you accept having to sign a waiver preventing yourself from receiving medical care if it is not prepaid? if you think medical care is a luxury and commodity, then it should be able to be denied to you if you cant pay for it.
who said anything about big govt vs anarchy.
i simply asked if you oppose the mandate, would you accept having to sign a waiver preventing yourself from receiving medical care if it is not prepaid? if you think medical care is a luxury and commodity, then it should be able to be denied to you if you cant pay for it.
If you want to break the law by refusing care, you mean.
Oh wait, you'd change that law...giving doctors the right to deny care; giving doctors the right to take the lives of infants, elders, the sick and the halt.
And while individual people denying a service is one thing, it's an entirely different matter if the government TELLS you you cannot provide a service/treat a patient.
The state has no business telling doctors they cannot treat. Ever. That's concentration camp medicine.
there is no board that will be making medical decision, that is a fallacy. all medical decisions will be left to doctors and patients.
so other than that your more upset with the cost that anything actually in the bill such as...
covering children until age 26
no more pre existing condition exclusions
health care exchanges
making sure 80% of premium dollars goes towards patient care
not being able to raise rates on individuals, you have to raise the rates on the entire group
hmmmm interesting...
Health care commissioner's duties
`(C) REJECTION OF BIDS- Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the Secretary to accept any or every bid by an MA organization under this subsection.'.
Like I said who will be accepted and who will be denied
post the whole section and the link so its not out of context.
Health care commissioner's duties
`(C) REJECTION OF BIDS- Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the Secretary to accept any or every bid by an MA organization under this subsection.'.
Like I said who will be accepted and who will be denied
post the whole section and the link so its not out of context.
You didn't read the bill did you?
She has the right accept or deni bids
Look it up HR 3962 and it is not out of context this is the whole thing under Sec. C
Dipshit, the argument I made in your siggy isn't for people getting free healthcare. YOU are the one who wants people to get free healthcare.
I can't believe I had to tell you that.
Dipshit, the argument I made in your siggy isn't for people getting free healthcare. YOU are the one who wants people to get free healthcare.
I can't believe I had to tell you that.
no you moron, i think everyone should be required to pay into the system.
once again your lack of reading comprehension is lacking as usual
