It is time for a conversation about the 1st Amendment

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Quantum Windbag, Dec 19, 2012.

  1. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    Said much better than I would.


    It's Time For A Conversation About The First Amendment | Popehat
     
  2. Mac1958
    Offline

    Mac1958 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    30,286
    Thanks Received:
    6,510
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    Independent Ave.
    Ratings:
    +20,527

    First Amendment purist here. And I like it just the way it is. As I've droned on and on about before -- but what the hell, I'll do it again -- I want to know who the crazies are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them. The First Amendment provides all that information for me, daily, loud and clear.

    But to address the piece directly, I've highlighted the key word, above. I think that virtually all of our problems can be traced to a culture that's in decay, and this is an example. The culture of the media, not to mention our society in general, needs to be engaged, changed and improved. That's a massively heavier lift than just making or changing laws -- which is nothing more than a band-aid -- but it would be organic and real.

    How does that happen? Slowly but surely, one at a time, people have to be brave and principled enough to start saying, "no, I'm not going to do that", or "we're no longer going to practice that kind of journalism in this newsroom", and they have to be pointed out and celebrated loudly, nationally. That's how it starts, anyway.

    We need to change the culture, across the board, before it's too late, in many areas. Band-aids will not be enough.

    Long live the First Amendment.

    .
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Sunni Man
    Offline

    Sunni Man Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,001
    Thanks Received:
    5,328
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    Patriotic American Muslim
    Ratings:
    +12,444
    So called "Freedom of Speech" was instituted by our founding fathers to protect the average citizens right to criticise the government, both in public and private, without fear of prosecution or imprisonment.

    But the courts over the years morphed it into all forms of speech; including hate speech and all forms of pornography.

    Until we stop this insanity, and bring free speech back to the original intent of the founding fathers.

    Our nation will continue to spiral downward into the abyss of decadence and unfettered immorality.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. squinch
    Offline

    squinch Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    407
    Thanks Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +79
    You speak of decadence and unfettered immorality as if they're bad things.
     
  5. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,338
    It's time to repeal the whole Bill of Rights. That's what liberals really mean.
     
  6. squinch
    Offline

    squinch Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    407
    Thanks Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Ratings:
    +79
    I favor repealing the Bill of Rights for conservatives and republicans. The forefathers intended that the Bill of Rights apply only to humans.
     
  7. Grampa Murked U
    Offline

    Grampa Murked U Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    47,719
    Thanks Received:
    8,800
    Trophy Points:
    2,055
    Location:
    Kansas City
    Ratings:
    +23,978
    Ummm.....no

    HELL NO
     
  8. BlindBoo
    Offline

    BlindBoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2010
    Messages:
    19,625
    Thanks Received:
    2,195
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +4,399
    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    Frankly, I don't see that restriction on the first amendment.
     
  9. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    Bravo. :clap2:

    Strangely enough, a lot of people that feel that way about the 1st think the 2nd is in need of serious revision.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Avorysuds
    Offline

    Avorysuds Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    13,834
    Thanks Received:
    1,655
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Eugene Oregon
    Ratings:
    +2,141
    lol, free speech means only what you want to allow? Interesting....
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page