It Is MY Wallet!

as an unmarried liberal I'd like more money in MY wallet, too

so I think it is time to start taxing churches and religions so I can keep more of my own money.

and I'm tired of socialist conservatives with wives and children getting tax breaks! Why should I pay MORE in taxes (as a single man) than conservatives with families?

THAT smacks of socialism!

I don't care how many wives or children he has. I should NOT have money taken from me to subsidize HIS family!

Should we also tax the SPCA and PETA? How about Greenpeace? World Wildlife Fund?

By the way, how does not taxing anyone of those groups take money out of your pocket? Can you show me the cause and effect link between not taxing charities and your wallet?
 
Do you really think anyone is proposing fixing that debt solely through tax increases? Are you really that stupid?

Do you think any liberal is proposing fixing the debt thru cutting spending?



Yes actually the deems are. What was proposed was a 9/1 cut and raise new reveneu

Actually, that was the Republican proposal, and the Democrats wanted more taxes.
 
"Hey, we have this guy over here who dropped out of high school and we need your money to pay for his health insurance."
Flat out lie.

It was a Republican who put our SOCIALIST health care "system" in place that forces the insured to pay for the care of the uninsured, including illegals. Why should I have to pay YOUR health care? Why won't rw's pay for their own health care? Why do rw's want to CONTINUE to force us to pay for health care for illegals?

Its pubpots who want to raise our taxes in order to give more to the super rich.

"Hey, we have this woman over here who keeps getting pregnant and we need your money to pay for her birth control/abortion/child's food-clothing-shelter-insurance."
You rw's keep saying this but so far, I have not read where "you" gave us an example of it. All I've ever seen is the same LIE, repeated over and over again, that Sandra Fluke said she wanted free birth control.

As for children, yes, its true that pubpots care a hell of a lot more about fetuses than they do about children. Before they're born, you rw's just love them. After they're born, not so much. Indeed, Id bet you would let American children starve to death in the streets.

I get it, when Obama says women should have free birth control he is spreading a Republican lie.

Keep telling yourself that.
 
"Hey, we have this guy over here who dropped out of high school and we need your money to pay for his health insurance."
Flat out lie.

It was a Republican who put our SOCIALIST health care "system" in place that forces the insured to pay for the care of the uninsured, including illegals. Why should I have to pay YOUR health care? Why won't rw's pay for their own health care? Why do rw's want to CONTINUE to force us to pay for health care for illegals?

Its pubpots who want to raise our taxes in order to give more to the super rich.

"Hey, we have this woman over here who keeps getting pregnant and we need your money to pay for her birth control/abortion/child's food-clothing-shelter-insurance."
You rw's keep saying this but so far, I have not read where "you" gave us an example of it. All I've ever seen is the same LIE, repeated over and over again, that Sandra Fluke said she wanted free birth control.

As for children, yes, its true that pubpots care a hell of a lot more about fetuses than they do about children. Before they're born, you rw's just love them. After they're born, not so much. Indeed, Id bet you would let American children starve to death in the streets.

I get it, when Obama says women should have free birth control he is spreading a Republican lie.

Keep telling yourself that.

and you keep telling yourself you're "small government" when all you want is government to tell women what to do and advance your religious agenda.
 
Do you think any liberal is proposing fixing the debt thru cutting spending?



Yes actually the deems are. What was proposed was a 9/1 cut and raise new reveneu

Actually, that was the Republican proposal, and the Democrats wanted more taxes.
Romney is quoted as saying he would reject a 10/1 proposal.The Simpson-Bowles proposal fell apart because of both dems and pubs. Both sides have been equally unwilling to compromise.
 
I am sick and tired of other peoples' hands in my pocket.

The Democrats seem to think they have carte blanche permission to dip their hands into my wallet whenever they wish. "Hey, we have this guy over here who dropped out of high school and we need your money to pay for his health insurance."

"Hey, we have this woman over here who keeps getting pregnant and we need your money to pay for her birth control/abortion/child's food-clothing-shelter-insurance."


The liberal mindset is truly bizarre. If I don't give them my money, I am the one who is costing the government money! This is so ingrained in their thinking that when you fight for your money, they begin to grin like a Biden-monkey and drool and show their teeth.

It isn't the irresponsible people costing us money. No. It is the "hard-hearted assholes" who won't subsidize irresponsibility who are costing us money.

What a weird, fucked up philosophy the Left has.

See my sig.


.

gee... i wonder what cost more... paying for bush's wars of choice....

or big bird?

tell you what? you don't have to pay for health coverage...

and i won't pay for wars.

p.s. part of living in a civilized society is we all pay for things.

why do you hate this country?

That is the dumbest argument against cutting spending I have ever read. It shows how pathetic the argument against cutting spending is that it is being repeated by so many people.
 
Yes actually the deems are. What was proposed was a 9/1 cut and raise new reveneu

Actually, that was the Republican proposal, and the Democrats wanted more taxes.

er... no. that was the proposal TO the republicans. you should probably get your facts straight.

No, that was the proposal by the Republicans that Obama agreed to, and then ran from, when the Democrats wanted more taxes.

If you don't believe me, look it up.
 
Flat out lie.

It was a Republican who put our SOCIALIST health care "system" in place that forces the insured to pay for the care of the uninsured, including illegals. Why should I have to pay YOUR health care? Why won't rw's pay for their own health care? Why do rw's want to CONTINUE to force us to pay for health care for illegals?

Its pubpots who want to raise our taxes in order to give more to the super rich.

You rw's keep saying this but so far, I have not read where "you" gave us an example of it. All I've ever seen is the same LIE, repeated over and over again, that Sandra Fluke said she wanted free birth control.

As for children, yes, its true that pubpots care a hell of a lot more about fetuses than they do about children. Before they're born, you rw's just love them. After they're born, not so much. Indeed, Id bet you would let American children starve to death in the streets.

I get it, when Obama says women should have free birth control he is spreading a Republican lie.

Keep telling yourself that.

and you keep telling yourself you're "small government" when all you want is government to tell women what to do and advance your religious agenda.

You keep saying that, and I keep asking you to show me where I said anything that supports your claim. Have you found it yet?
 
I am sick and tired of other peoples' hands in my pocket.

The Democrats seem to think they have carte blanche permission to dip their hands into my wallet whenever they wish. "Hey, we have this guy over here who dropped out of high school and we need your money to pay for his health insurance."

"Hey, we have this woman over here who keeps getting pregnant and we need your money to pay for her birth control/abortion/child's food-clothing-shelter-insurance."


The liberal mindset is truly bizarre. If I don't give them my money, I am the one who is costing the government money! This is so ingrained in their thinking that when you fight for your money, they begin to grin like a Biden-monkey and drool and show their teeth.

It isn't the irresponsible people costing us money. No. It is the "hard-hearted assholes" who won't subsidize irresponsibility who are costing us money.

What a weird, fucked up philosophy the Left has.

See my sig.


.

Two things you might want to keep in mind.

I'm sure you've heard the old axiom that 'a stitch in time prevents nine'. Well, birth control pills are certainly a less expensive option than pregnancy. And that's not even counting the cost of caring for a dependent child, assuming that the state might just have to step in to offer subsistence of one kind or another. Then there's also the cost of social workers and possibly the cost of the legal system getting involved if that disadvantaged child grows up to be an angry delinquent. What do you suppose all THAT costs?

In keeping with the idea of minimizing financial costs as well as societal costs, preventive medicine is considerably cheaper than emergency room care where uninsured people often end up if they don't have coverage. And who do you think ultimately picks up the tab for all those ER visits if and when those people don't have insurance?

The second thing you might want to keep in mind is that Republicans have been (and continue to be) perfectly willing to spend YOUR tax dollars on THEIR priorities.
 
Dems have always favored higher taxes on the rich. What I find shocking is this new republican meme that some people don't pay enough taxes.

Well both sides argue that people don't pay enough taxes. It's just a difference of who they each claim isn't paying enough. Dems argue that it's the rich, repubs argue that it's the poor and middle class.

So your solution is to raise everyone's taxes?

That is so beautifully liberal!
 
So you're a millionaire?

Do you think $16 trillion of debt will be paid just by millionaires? Are you really that stupid?

.

Do you really think anyone is proposing fixing that debt solely through tax increases? Are you really that stupid?

Yes, that is what libturds like you have proposed over and over again. Your spending cuts over 10 years are totally fictional.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top