It costs less than $60 to have a baby in Finland. How?

DUH!!!! your solution is to steal from others

better to have the baby at home or not have it
Obvious anarchist

Every man for himself!
I never said that,,,I just dont think theft is an honest way to live your life
Contributing to society is not theft


Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
 
We only have the best healthcare in the world if you're rich. The average person in a place like Finland has much better healthcare options. That's why public approval of their healthcare system is over 90%.

It costs less than $60 to have a baby in Finland. How?

Finland's healthcare system has helped give it the lowest maternal death rate in the world -- and it's available to everyone for next to nothing.

Dr. Aydin Tekay is the chief physician at a labor ward in Finland where every mother there gets a private room and even the option of a water birth. The cost? Less than $100 euros, and almost 50 percent of which they'll get back as reimbursement. That means it costs less than $60 to have a baby, compared with the U.S. where the average natural birth costs over $12,000 and insurance doesn't cover all of it.
The maternal death rate in the U.S. has nearly doubled over the last three decades; in Finland they've cut it in half.

Question. If you’re born in Finland are you automatically a citizen? Follow up. What are the costs in becoming a doctor in Finland? University and medical school.
Take a look at the medical malpractice laws. You don't get to sue for every little thing and only objective injuries are covered.
 
Obvious anarchist

Every man for himself!
I never said that,,,I just dont think theft is an honest way to live your life
Contributing to society is not theft


Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this
 
I never said that,,,I just dont think theft is an honest way to live your life
Contributing to society is not theft


Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this


You said having a child - not having a catastrophic birth. If we had proper and affordable catastrophic health insurance options instead of the bloated Obabblecare monstrosity which basically funnels money into insurance company bureaucracies, the rare emergency birth that could bankrupt a family would be covered.
 
I never said that,,,I just dont think theft is an honest way to live your life
Contributing to society is not theft


Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this


did you know some illness's or injuries kill you???

thats no reason to steal or submit some to slavery,,,
 
Contributing to society is not theft


Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this


You said having a child - not having a catastrophic birth. If we had proper and affordable catastrophic health insurance options instead of the bloated Obabblecare monstrosity which basically funnels money into insurance company bureaucracies, the rare emergency birth that could bankrupt a family would be covered.
I was always taught that ins. was for catastrophic cases and not for day to day living,,,
 
Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this


You said having a child - not having a catastrophic birth. If we had proper and affordable catastrophic health insurance options instead of the bloated Obabblecare monstrosity which basically funnels money into insurance company bureaucracies, the rare emergency birth that could bankrupt a family would be covered.
I was always taught that ins. was for catastrophic cases and not for day to day living,,,


Yes, that's how it used to be and should be.

What we have now is a combination of prepaid routine health services and catastrophic coverage. This has made routine care incredibly expensive by adding tons-o-overhead to simple transactions. I've come to the conclusion that co-pays are what services would cost without insurance. Before Obamacare, this was somewhat hidden due to low deductibles. The new obscenely high deductibles make the insurance uneconomic for most middle class people. A family deductible of $12K for a family can cause financial insolvency. Obamacare makes things worse.

The real answer is to unbundle insurance from prepaid routine care, deregulate (i.e. allow nationwide competition), reform malpractice laws, and get rid of prescription requirements for maintenance drugs (thyroid, insulin, hayfever remedies).
 
Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this


You said having a child - not having a catastrophic birth. If we had proper and affordable catastrophic health insurance options instead of the bloated Obabblecare monstrosity which basically funnels money into insurance company bureaucracies, the rare emergency birth that could bankrupt a family would be covered.
I was always taught that ins. was for catastrophic cases and not for day to day living,,,

Yes. That's the only rational way to use insurance. The idea of insurance paying for childbirth is ridiculous. It's like expecting insurance to buy you a new car.
 
DUH!!!! your solution is to steal from others

better to have the baby at home or not have it
Obvious anarchist

Every man for himself!
I never said that,,,I just dont think theft is an honest way to live your life
Contributing to society is not theft
depends on what you mean by that,,,
Look up society
Are these public spirited individuals related to the anti abortion loons ?
 
We only have the best healthcare in the world if you're rich. The average person in a place like Finland has much better healthcare options. That's why public approval of their healthcare system is over 90%.

It costs less than $60 to have a baby in Finland. How?

Finland's healthcare system has helped give it the lowest maternal death rate in the world -- and it's available to everyone for next to nothing.

Dr. Aydin Tekay is the chief physician at a labor ward in Finland where every mother there gets a private room and even the option of a water birth. The cost? Less than $100 euros, and almost 50 percent of which they'll get back as reimbursement. That means it costs less than $60 to have a baby, compared with the U.S. where the average natural birth costs over $12,000 and insurance doesn't cover all of it.
The maternal death rate in the U.S. has nearly doubled over the last three decades; in Finland they've cut it in half.
We only have the best healthcare in the world if you're rich. The average person in a place like Finland has much better healthcare options. That's why public approval of their healthcare system is over 90%.

It costs less than $60 to have a baby in Finland. How?

Finland's healthcare system has helped give it the lowest maternal death rate in the world -- and it's available to everyone for next to nothing.

Dr. Aydin Tekay is the chief physician at a labor ward in Finland where every mother there gets a private room and even the option of a water birth. The cost? Less than $100 euros, and almost 50 percent of which they'll get back as reimbursement. That means it costs less than $60 to have a baby, compared with the U.S. where the average natural birth costs over $12,000 and insurance doesn't cover all of it.
The maternal death rate in the U.S. has nearly doubled over the last three decades; in Finland they've cut it in half.
We only have the best healthcare in the world if you're rich. The average person in a place like Finland has much better healthcare options. That's why public approval of their healthcare system is over 90%.

It costs less than $60 to have a baby in Finland. How?

Finland's healthcare system has helped give it the lowest maternal death rate in the world -- and it's available to everyone for next to nothing.

Dr. Aydin Tekay is the chief physician at a labor ward in Finland where every mother there gets a private room and even the option of a water birth. The cost? Less than $100 euros, and almost 50 percent of which they'll get back as reimbursement. That means it costs less than $60 to have a baby, compared with the U.S. where the average natural birth costs over $12,000 and insurance doesn't cover all of it.
The maternal death rate in the U.S. has nearly doubled over the last three decades; in Finland they've cut it in half.

That's because they pay over 52% in taxes.
So in order to have that baby at 60.00, you give over half of your pay check to the government.
 
The US system is poorly rated compared to other industrial countries. How does the quality of the U.S. healthcare system compare to other countries? - Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker We pay double and get so much less. Our system of tying it to work makes if tougher to change jobs and start a new business. Get caught waiting to be covered and your world will get blown up financially with an accident or illness. Over half American bankruptcies are tied to health coverage.

Our care is of the highest quality and small wait time for surgery or treatments.
At least our USA patients are not in long waiting lines like some countries in Europe are.
People are going blind before they get cataract surgery due to rationing.
 
But diapers cost $4000 per year.

Actually, they can. Twinkle Tush Ella costs $490 a piece.

Most Expensive Baby Diapers in the World - Top Ten List
rich people spend their money on the craziest things,,,,

cloth diapers are less than 2 dollars a piece and all you need is at most 50 of them,,,
Plus a washer and a dryer...and a hazardous waste disposal permit

Actually, the contents can be dumped in the toilet and flushed, just as YOUR waste products are. And, if necessary, the diapers can be handwashed in a sink, although it's certainly preferable if you can use a machine.
 
But diapers cost $4000 per year.

Actually, they can. Twinkle Tush Ella costs $490 a piece.

Most Expensive Baby Diapers in the World - Top Ten List
rich people spend their money on the craziest things,,,,

cloth diapers are less than 2 dollars a piece and all you need is at most 50 of them,,,
Plus a washer and a dryer...and a hazardous waste disposal permit
most people already have a washer and dryer,,,and the toilet works as a disposal just fine,,,

Besides, has no one heard of a "laundromat"?
 
But diapers cost $4000 per year.

Actually, they can. Twinkle Tush Ella costs $490 a piece.

Most Expensive Baby Diapers in the World - Top Ten List
rich people spend their money on the craziest things,,,,

cloth diapers are less than 2 dollars a piece and all you need is at most 50 of them,,,
Plus a washer and a dryer...and a hazardous waste disposal permit

Actually, the contents can be dumped in the toilet and flushed, just as YOUR waste products are. And, if necessary, the diapers can be handwashed in a sink, although it's certainly preferable if you can use a machine.


you would think the lefty environmentalist would be against disposable diapers and favor cloth,,,


The Dangers of Disposable Diapers
 
But diapers cost $4000 per year.

Actually, they can. Twinkle Tush Ella costs $490 a piece.

Most Expensive Baby Diapers in the World - Top Ten List
rich people spend their money on the craziest things,,,,

cloth diapers are less than 2 dollars a piece and all you need is at most 50 of them,,,
Can’t believe anyone yearns for the days of cloth diapers
when you factor the cost of both money and environment, cloth for us was the only way to go,,,and was far cheaper,,,

I used disposable diapers, but a wonderful friend gave me a big box of cloth diapers as a baby shower present. Not only were they a godsend if I ran out of diapers, they make amazing all-purpose cloths, for anything from tossing over your shoulder when burping, to washcloths, to whatever. That particular baby is now 29, and I have had two children since, and I still have those cloth diapers from that long-ago baby shower. They are now the best cleaning and dusting cloths in the house.
 
Contributing to society is not theft


Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this


You said having a child - not having a catastrophic birth. If we had proper and affordable catastrophic health insurance options instead of the bloated Obabblecare monstrosity which basically funnels money into insurance company bureaucracies, the rare emergency birth that could bankrupt a family would be covered.
Medicare for all
 
Having a child at the expense of others (who often can't afford to have as many children as they would like to do excessive taxes) is not a contribution to society. Children raised in welfare households are far less likely to grow up into successful, independent, productive adults.
Sad reflection of what a society really is


Yes. It is. And doubling down on the problem by paying unwed mothers to have children isn't going to solve it. We need to reform our public policy to free families to be able to raise their children. As it stands, responsible people are having less children due to financial concerns in order to subsidize irresponsible ones. And people wonder why are culture is on the decline.
It goes beyond births to all medical procedures

Getting sick or injured should not destroy your life. Most modern societies understand this


You said having a child - not having a catastrophic birth. If we had proper and affordable catastrophic health insurance options instead of the bloated Obabblecare monstrosity which basically funnels money into insurance company bureaucracies, the rare emergency birth that could bankrupt a family would be covered.
Medicare for all

Government controlled health care for all. The war machine loves you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top