It better be a landslide!

[mamooth]

Someone is quoting Monckton? Why? Couldn't they find a crybaby retard in the USA? That's not very patriotic, going overseas to find some crank. A true American patriot only parrots genuine American cranks.

Let's check the "excuses as to why Romney lost" list:

1. Democratic vote fraud!
2. Suppressing the military vote!
3. Liberal media!
4. Rigged polls!
5. Too many welfare cases!
6. October/November surprise!
7. Black panther/union thugs!

Flanders hit #1, #3, and #7. Thus, he could have shortened his rant by simply shouting "Numbers 1, 3, and 7!".

 

[Dick Tuck]

Why do right wing morons feel so strongly against international monitoring of elections? We assist in monitoring other peoples' elections to make them a bit more fair. Funny that the right wing would prefer to not have those with no dog in this fight not see how they try to suppress minority voters.

 

[blastoff]

Romney loses if it is not a landslide victory. For months the MSM has devoted itself to stopping a Romney landslide. First Martha Raddatz, then Candy Cowley, became footnotes in the media’s “No landslide” strategy. Up to this morning, I thought the strategy was limited to an attempt to save congressional seats as well as water down Romney’s mandate. Something Christopher Monckton said in today’s column made me realize Democrats fear a sound thrashing because they have every intention of pulling a JFK:

Communists hate democracy. Obama is with them on that. What has he done to eradicate the widespread voting fraud – nearly all of it perpetrated by “Democrats” – that is now endemic?

Democrats filch Senate and House seats as a matter of course, while JFK was the first Democrat to steal the presidency.

The 1960 election was also the first time the media closed its eyes to flagrant theft on the presidential level. Media Socialists hated Richard Nixon to be sure, but they would have ignored the theft irrespective of JFK’s opponent. Note that Democrats were setting the table for a JFK-Nixon-type contest by drumming up hatred against Romney personally —— rich white guy, blah, blah, blah. Happily, Romney could not be turned into the ogre the media invented to portray Nixon.

NOTE: My objection to Romney is that he is a Northeast liberal from Massachusetts who will do pretty much everything Hussein did; raise the debt ceiling, bailout banks and Wall Street firms, stimulus packages, etc. Hussein & Company cannot use any of that against him without cutting their own throats. Romney’s one saving grace is repealing the Affordable Care Act. Hussein has none.

Parenthetically, disregarding the urging of President Eisenhower and others, Mr. Nixon refused to contest the election results. He said he would not make America look like a banana republic. In today’s world every Democrat is hellbent on turning America into a banana republic for any reason. Hussein most of all. And Nixon was supposed to be a bad guy!

JFK in 2000

Al Gore’s shenanigans in 2000 is the stuff Democrats admire. Gore got caught with his hand in the till because he made the mistake of asking the SCOTUS to settle the issue. The fact that his attempted burglary was so obvious does not prevent Democrats to this day from screaming “We was robbed.”

Understand Gore if you want to understand where Democrats are trying to go with election fraud. Gore is a leading proponent of replacing the Electoral College with the popular vote. Remember that he tried to steal the election by claiming he won the popular vote in three Florida counties. Recounts proved otherwise. Had he stayed in Florida’s courts he might very well have pulled it off. No Democrat will make that same mistake. And why should they?

So long as Democrats cherry-pick their Supreme Court cases they can continue to loot with impunity. Gore’s goof taught Democrats they must never go to the SCOTUS for a ruling on a crooked presidential election RESULT. A little larceny prior to the election is another matter. ACORN, illegal immigrants voting, the cemetery vote, illegal campaign contributions, and every other trick Democrats have been getting away with for decades remain safe. Proof: Nothing has ever been done to stop those practices in the past. In addition, voter ID requirements is being blocked in the COURTS by Democrats.

NOTE: I don’t know the details governing early voting but I know Democrats. Voting early affirms the Democrat party’s First Commandment: Vote early and often.

Put it all together and it’s fair to say Hussein intends to steal this election à la JFK —— but only if the media can make the finish close enough to activate plausible deniability. In order for the theft to succeed it is imperative that Romney NOT win by a landslide. Basically, there are too many witnesses to the crime should Romney win by a huge margin.

Here’s the link to Monckton’s article:

Barack Obama the communist
Exclusive: Christopher Monckton of Brenchley on how BHO fits definition to a TPublished: 9 hours ago
by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

Barack Obama the communist

Care to explain your 1960 election "flagrant theft on the presidential level" comment?

 

[auditor0007]

I can only guess how many thousands of illegal ballots will be counted because of early voting laws. Early voting and overturning voter ID laws is the best hope Hussein has of stealing this election. The two compliment one another. If it is so easy to catch the crooks, and they do it so openly, I have to wonder why anybody working for the DNC would be honest. They obviously do not fear jail time:

Project Veritas is known for its hidden-camera probe of the controversial national community organizing group tied to Obama, ACORN.

Nothing came out of the ACORN child prostitution sting videos; so it isn’t likely anything will come from these two:

@ProjectVeritas_ : Jim Moran's (D-Va.) Field Director Conspires to Commit Voter Fraud, Forge Docs - YouTube

@ProjectVeritas_ EXCLUSIVE: DNC Staffer Assists Double Voting In Support of Obama - YouTube

Incidentally, Pat Moran’s father is the one and only:

Jim Moran, 67, is a controversial figure in Congress who has been criticized for his collaboration with Islamic leaders with ties to terrorism.

AG has voter fraud on radar in wake of video sting
Federal, state probes possible after Democrat campaign boss caught
Published: 8 hours ago
by ART MOORE

AG has voter fraud on radar in wake of video sting

Looks like the nutjobs are coming unglued. I voted early in Ohio. We needed either picture ID or the last four digits of our SS number. Not sure if there is any way to vote without one of those.

 

[Flanders]

1. Democratic vote fraud!
2. Suppressing the military vote!
3. Liberal media!
4. Rigged polls!
5. Too many welfare cases!
6. October/November surprise!
7. Black panther/union thugs!

To mamooth: Number 8. Early voting abuses.

Romney will win; nevertheless, Democrats are guilty of all eight. Hence, my title and my premise.

Dick Tuck;6228096

Why do right wing morons feel so strongly against international monitoring of elections?

To Dick Tuck: Intelligent Americans want no part of the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) at home or abroad. Morons on the Left are so blinded by their own touchy-feely worldview they cannot see what the UNIC is working towards with the help of American quislings. Namely —— REPLACE THE VERY CONCEPT OF SOVEREIGN NATIONS WITH A GLOBAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTERED BY THE UNITED NATIONS.

Dick Tuck;6228096

We assist in monitoring other peoples' elections to make them a bit more fair.

To Dick Tuck: “WE” don’t assist. Liberal busybodies like Jimmy Carter flit about the world sticking their noses into everybody else’s internal affairs leaving the impression a majority of Americans are doing it.

Dick Tuck;6228096

Funny that the right wing would prefer to not have those with no dog in this fight not see how they try to suppress minority voters.

To Dick Tuck: There is not one case of an ELIGIBLE voter being denied. As hard as Democrats and their liberal organizations try they cannot show where the suppression of ELIGIBLE voters exists —— let alone exists to the extent of voter fraud.

Care to explain your 1960 election "flagrant theft on the presidential level" comment?

To blastoff: No.

There is so much available about the grand theft you can do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

Looks like the nutjobs are coming unglued. I voted early in Ohio. We needed either picture ID or the last four digits of our SS number. Not sure if there is any way to vote without one of those.

To auditor0007: Democrats will get around both. As I said in the OP:

NOTE: I don’t know the details governing early voting but I know Democrats. Voting early affirms the Democrat party’s First Commandment: Vote early and often.

 

[Flanders]

I do not believe poll numbers and headlines telling me the race is close, nor do I believe those color-coded Electoral College maps talking heads point to. I get the impression they got the idea from weather maps.

In any event my premise holds true. Romney must win by a landslide not only to avoid court cases, but to avoid the promised violence I’m hearing from Democrats.

Lee DeCovnick over at the American Thinker says “. . . the MSM has utterly failed in informing the public of the closeness of the election,. . .”. I disagree. The MSM has gone out of its way to make it look like a close race when it isn't.

DeCovnick is right about “. . . organized agitation and post-election street violence after a Democratic loss?”

Once again, a landslide victory for Romney would almost certainly make Democrat parasites think twice before they tear the country apart out of spite and anger.

If Obama loses, what would be the result among his most strident backers? Will they just turn off their TV set and go to bed after such a shock? Will Richard Trumka, the ultra-hard-left progressive president of the AFL-CIO, call for a nationwide strike unless the results are recounted and overturned? What will be the response of the millions of urban dependents who rely on "Obama phones" and food stamps? Is it racist or just realistic to predict that the anticipated fear/threat reaction from a surprising Obama loss will be sadly played out in the streets of America?

While the MSM has utterly failed in informing the public of the closeness of the election, and of the downward trend of the President's numbers, Obama's narcissism and Alinsky-esque roots may preclude his going on national television and calmly telling his "folks" to go home. Is there any doubt that Obama would certainly embrace organized agitation and post-election street violence after a Democratic loss? Such banana republic tactics would sends a clear warning to all Americans about being more careful about for whom they vote in future elections.

October 27, 2012
Media Misleading May Prompt Post-Election Chaos
Lee DeCovnick

Blog: Media Misleading May Prompt Post-Election Chaos

 

[Grandma]

In any event my premise holds true. Romney must win by a landslide not only to avoid court cases, but to avoid the promised violence I’m hearing from Democrats.

DeCovnick is right about “. . . organized agitation and post-election street violence after a Democratic loss?”

Once again, a landslide victory for Romney would almost certainly make Democrat parasites think twice before they tear the country apart out of spite and anger.

If Obama loses, what would be the result among his most strident backers? Will they just turn off their TV set and go to bed after such a shock? Will Richard Trumka, the ultra-hard-left progressive president of the AFL-CIO, call for a nationwide strike unless the results are recounted and overturned? What will be the response of the millions of urban dependents who rely on "Obama phones" and food stamps? Is it racist or just realistic to predict that the anticipated fear/threat reaction from a surprising Obama loss will be sadly played out in the streets of America?

... Obama's narcissism and Alinsky-esque roots may preclude his going on national television and calmly telling his "folks" to go home. Is there any doubt that Obama would certainly embrace organized agitation and post-election street violence after a Democratic loss? Such banana republic tactics would sends a clear warning to all Americans about being more careful about for whom they vote in future elections.

October 27, 2012
Media Misleading May Prompt Post-Election Chaos
Lee DeCovnick

Blog: Media Misleading May Prompt Post-Election Chaos

Straight-up disinfo. You should be ashamed. I've already called you out as a shill.

 

[thanatos144]

In any event my premise holds true. Romney must win by a landslide not only to avoid court cases, but to avoid the promised violence I’m hearing from Democrats.

DeCovnick is right about “. . . organized agitation and post-election street violence after a Democratic loss?”

Once again, a landslide victory for Romney would almost certainly make Democrat parasites think twice before they tear the country apart out of spite and anger.

If Obama loses, what would be the result among his most strident backers? Will they just turn off their TV set and go to bed after such a shock? Will Richard Trumka, the ultra-hard-left progressive president of the AFL-CIO, call for a nationwide strike unless the results are recounted and overturned? What will be the response of the millions of urban dependents who rely on "Obama phones" and food stamps? Is it racist or just realistic to predict that the anticipated fear/threat reaction from a surprising Obama loss will be sadly played out in the streets of America?

... Obama's narcissism and Alinsky-esque roots may preclude his going on national television and calmly telling his "folks" to go home. Is there any doubt that Obama would certainly embrace organized agitation and post-election street violence after a Democratic loss? Such banana republic tactics would sends a clear warning to all Americans about being more careful about for whom they vote in future elections.

October 27, 2012
Media Misleading May Prompt Post-Election Chaos
Lee DeCovnick

Blog: Media Misleading May Prompt Post-Election Chaos

Straight-up disinfo. You should be ashamed. I've already called you out as a shill.

Yet use nothing to back up your claim.

 

[Flanders]

Looks like the nutjobs are coming unglued. I voted early in Ohio. We needed either picture ID or the last four digits of our SS number. Not sure if there is any way to vote without one of those.

To auditor0007: I guess you are not Somalian!

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Two volunteer poll workers at an Ohio voting station told Human Events that they observed van loads of Ohio residents born in Somalia — the state is home to the second-largest Somali population in the United States — being driven to the voting station and guided by Democratic interpreters on the voting process. No Republican interpreters were present, according to these volunteers.

XXXXX​

A source, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a volunteer outside the Morse Road polling center. She has witnessed Somalis who cannot speak English come to the polling center. They are brought in groups, by van or bus. The Democrats hand them a slate card and say, “vote Brown all the way down.” Given that Sherrod Brown is the incumbent Democrat Senator in Ohio, one can assume that this is the reference.

XXXXX​

According to the Ohio Secretary of State’s web site, someone wanting to vote early in Ohio must supply one of the following in writing on the absentee ballot form, whether voting early by mail or in person: an Ohio driver’s license number; the last four digits of the social security number; or a copy of a current and valid photo identification, military identification, or a current — within the last 12 months — utility bill, including cell phone bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the person’s name and address in addition to the voter registration acknowledgement.

The voter is not required to show the driver’s license or social security card, but must merely write it on the absentee ballot request form. While the individual would be required to show a utility bill, bank statement or other printed document if he or she chooses that option, this is in lieu of writing the driver’s license or social security number. Therefore, the information cannot be checked against the Bureau of Motor Vehicles or other state databases. Essentially, a person is asked to check a box stating that they are a citizen, and the poll worker is to trust that they are the person who is listed on the item being shown or the information being written. In other words, someone can be an illegal resident of the state of Ohio and the United States, get an apartment, turn on the heat, bring in the Columbia Gas bill, register to vote by the deadline, and vote by showing that same bill. There is then no verification that this individual is a citizen of the United States.

Is voter fraud being committed in Ohio?
By: Sara Marie Brenner
10/26/2012 09:25 PM

Is voter fraud being committed in Ohio? - Conservative News

 

[RosieS]

LOL. What a bunch of whining in advance. If Romney wins the election, everyone will go to work the next day the same as the day before. And down the road, if he repeats the same mistakes of the Bush admin, there will be a GOP Convention he will not be invited to, that will pledge itself to the same mistakes that he and Bush made. Fools never learn.

We're back to the Republicans feeling victimized yet again I see. Only going to get worse, I'm afraid.

There is a name for that. It is called "Conservative Victimization Syndrome":

Jon Stewart's Epic Takedown Of Conservative Self-Victimization | TPM LiveWire

Although I dunno what version of this syndrome has the sufferers going off prematurely.


Regards from Rosie

 

[Flanders]

LOL. What a bunch of whining in advance. If Romney wins the election, everyone will go to work the next day the same as the day before. And down the road, if he repeats the same mistakes of the Bush admin, there will be a GOP Convention he will not be invited to, that will pledge itself to the same mistakes that he and Bush made. Fools never learn.

We're back to the Republicans feeling victimized yet again I see. Only going to get worse, I'm afraid.

There is a name for that. It is called "Conservative Victimization Syndrome":

Jon Stewart's Epic Takedown Of Conservative Self-Victimization | TPM LiveWire

Although I dunno what version of this syndrome has the sufferers going off prematurely.


Regards from Rosie

To RosieS: Unbelievable misdirection! Stewart’s montage is clever, and humorous, but the fact remains: Socialism’s parasite class was built on victimhood. Every welfare state entitlement was designed to compensate a specific group of “victims” at someone else’s expense.

Stewart had fun with opinions and philosophical differences between liberals and conservatives, while he dared not touch the economic destruction done to pay for the welfare state, nor did his humor go near the individual liberties the welfare state continues to abolish.

 

[skookerasbil]

Its gonna be a landslide............for Romney. Been sayng it for months. Simple........incumbent in a general election under 50% and in a crap economy gets jacked every time. All media, including FOX, is brilliantly drawing the sheep in to watch every day and night.

 

[skookerasbil]

By the way.................all you have to do is go over to REALCLEAR Politics and scan the articles from the left the past several days. Just off the charts k00k stuff. Its called desparation.........you dont even have to read the articles, just read the headings of the articles. I was laughing my balls of yesterday.

 

[mememe]

Texas sparks international row with election observers

What?!

US doesn't want to play by rules it forces on everyone else?!

This is an outrage! Democracy is in danger! Where is NATO to bomb US into democracy?!

 

[mememe]

Its gonna be a landslide............for Romney.

What difference does it make to you what talking head is going to occupy the seat at the White House for the next few years?

Your elections are just a show-business!

Your country will have policies devised away from the spot-light regardless of what clown you will vote for!

 

[Flanders]

Texas sparks international row with election observers

What?!

US doesn't want to play by rules it forces on everyone else?!

This is an outrage! Democracy is in danger! Where is NATO to bomb US into democracy?!

TWO DOWN. 48 TO GO.

To mememe: I hope this does not spoil your day:

Iowa has joined Texas in warning international election observers of possible criminal prosecution if they violate state laws and get near polling places on Election Day.

Iowa warns international observers of arrest
By BOBBY CERVANTES | 10/31/12 2:00 PM EDT Updated: 10/31/12 2:46 PM EDT

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/83108.htm

 

[Flanders]

Texas and Iowa will lock up UN observers. Liberal California fires poll worker. There is a video at the link:

Sacramento Veteran Pollster Fired Over Protest Against U.N. Observers
November 2, 2012 5:02 PM

Sacramento Veteran Pollster Fired Over Protest Against U.N. Observers « CBS Sacramento

 

[decker]

Its gonna be a landslide............for Romney. Been sayng it for months. Simple........incumbent in a general election under 50% and in a crap economy gets jacked every time. All media, including FOX, is brilliantly drawing the sheep in to watch every day and night.

well i hope your right. but who know. if romney win pa and mi, then it will be a landslide for him. hope it not the case

 

[thanatos144]

Its gonna be a landslide............for Romney. Been sayng it for months. Simple........incumbent in a general election under 50% and in a crap economy gets jacked every time. All media, including FOX, is brilliantly drawing the sheep in to watch every day and night.

well i hope your right. but who know. if romney win pa and mi, then it will be a landslide for him. hope it not the case

For the country's sake I hope it is.....It will quell most of the ignorant who are waiting to cause riots.