Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Furthermore, regulatory agencies are staffed primarily by liberal Democrats. Conservatives don't long to become useless tics on the ass of society.is there ever an occasion or action that requires "personal responsibility"?
In other words is it as I assume the reason liberals OBEY any laws or regulations is because of fear of being caught?
The reason I ask is I heard on the radio this talk host say "well if they make it a law not to text and drive, I'll obey it"!
Is that the attitude of liberals, i.e. if there is NO LAW then I'll do whatever I feel like doing even though it violates the laws of physics or the laws of Karma or the Golden Rule?
In other words do MOST liberals obey laws,rules and regulations out of fear of being caught?
To take this further especially you nerdy liberals...
What minutia of rules,laws regulations did Star Trek characters follow?
I mean did the Federation have OSHA,EPA,EEOC, etc. equivalents?
Were there rules like OSHA has that says 1 water closet for every 15 employees?
Really what kind of regulatory burden did Kirk have to abide with every time he exceeded warp drive?
YOU see what I mean? In 2012 40,000 new state rules,laws,regulations went into affect.
Between 1995 and 2010, the total time spent by the public complying with federal regulations grew by 25%. Such a significant increase over the past decade and a half may well have deterred new business investment even before the 2008 financial crisis.
Over the same period, regulatory agencies budgets grew by 166%, according to an analysis by Susan Dudley and Melinda Warren. The increase in expenditures occurred as agencies created new rules, stepped up enforcement of existing mandates and increased staffing.
The growing regulatory state | The Daily Caller
and all those laws/regulations were passed by democrats?
Republicans control no legislatures or governors offices in any state?
Just consider the two massive regulatory bills passed after Obama was elected. There is Obamacare and that piece of crap that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd sponsored. Republicans didn't have thing to do with it. Furthermore, regulatory agencies are staffed primarily by liberal Democrats. Conservatives don't long to become useless tics on the ass of society.
Dodd Frank put back into effect much of Glass Steagall which was repealed by a GOP congress (although Clinton did sign off on this well)is there ever an occasion or action that requires "personal responsibility"?
In other words is it as I assume the reason liberals OBEY any laws or regulations is because of fear of being caught?
The reason I ask is I heard on the radio this talk host say "well if they make it a law not to text and drive, I'll obey it"!
Is that the attitude of liberals, i.e. if there is NO LAW then I'll do whatever I feel like doing even though it violates the laws of physics or the laws of Karma or the Golden Rule?
In other words do MOST liberals obey laws,rules and regulations out of fear of being caught?
To take this further especially you nerdy liberals...
What minutia of rules,laws regulations did Star Trek characters follow?
I mean did the Federation have OSHA,EPA,EEOC, etc. equivalents?
Were there rules like OSHA has that says 1 water closet for every 15 employees?
Really what kind of regulatory burden did Kirk have to abide with every time he exceeded warp drive?
YOU see what I mean? In 2012 40,000 new state rules,laws,regulations went into affect.
Between 1995 and 2010, the total time spent by the public complying with federal regulations grew by 25%. Such a significant increase over the past decade and a half may well have deterred new business investment even before the 2008 financial crisis.
Over the same period, regulatory agencies budgets grew by 166%, according to an analysis by Susan Dudley and Melinda Warren. The increase in expenditures occurred as agencies created new rules, stepped up enforcement of existing mandates and increased staffing.
The growing regulatory state | The Daily Caller
and all those laws/regulations were passed by democrats?
Republicans control no legislatures or governors offices in any state?
Just consider the two massive regulatory bills passed after Obama was elected. There is Obamacare and that piece of crap that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd sponsored. Republicans didn't have thing to do with it. Furthermore, regulatory agencies are staffed primarily by liberal Democrats. Conservatives don't long to become useless tics on the ass of society.
Dodd Frank put back into effect much of Glass Steagall which was repealed by a GOP congress (although Clinton did sign off on this well)and all those laws/regulations were passed by democrats?
Republicans control no legislatures or governors offices in any state?
Just consider the two massive regulatory bills passed after Obama was elected. There is Obamacare and that piece of crap that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd sponsored. Republicans didn't have thing to do with it. Furthermore, regulatory agencies are staffed primarily by liberal Democrats. Conservatives don't long to become useless tics on the ass of society.
what about Dodd Frank is so terrible?
(notice im leaving the health care law out of this discussion since no conservative can point to a section of the law, and i mean exact section outside the mandate, that they disagree with. so lets not go there right now)
again point to which part of the Dodd Frank law you disagree with. you simply avoided the question.Dodd Frank put back into effect much of Glass Steagall which was repealed by a GOP congress (although Clinton did sign off on this well)Just consider the two massive regulatory bills passed after Obama was elected. There is Obamacare and that piece of crap that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd sponsored. Republicans didn't have thing to do with it. Furthermore, regulatory agencies are staffed primarily by liberal Democrats. Conservatives don't long to become useless tics on the ass of society.
what about Dodd Frank is so terrible?
Glass Steagal was 37 pages. Dodd/Frank was well over 2000 pages. The problem with the later of been exposed in detail by numerous commentators. The claim that all it did is restore Glass-Steagal doesn't pass the laugh test.
(notice im leaving the health care law out of this discussion since no conservative can point to a section of the law, and i mean exact section outside the mandate, that they disagree with. so lets not go there right now)
ROLF! You must be joking. Problem with it have been posted in detail for the last 20 years. I object to every word of it.
We need to return to a Constitutional Federal Republic, as framed. I believe Jefferson and Washington would agree along with all other original framers. The Magna Carta was a good start and the Declaration was better. All Socialist Democracies in history without exception has faded into utter oblivion.
The libs need to consider same......
Robert
is there ever an occasion or action that requires "personal responsibility"?
In other words is it as I assume the reason liberals OBEY any laws or regulations is because of fear of being caught?
The reason I ask is I heard on the radio this talk host say "well if they make it a law not to text and drive, I'll obey it"!
Is that the attitude of liberals, i.e. if there is NO LAW then I'll do whatever I feel like doing even though it violates the laws of physics or the laws of Karma or the Golden Rule?
In other words do MOST liberals obey laws,rules and regulations out of fear of being caught?
To take this further especially you nerdy liberals...
What minutia of rules,laws regulations did Star Trek characters follow?
I mean did the Federation have OSHA,EPA,EEOC, etc. equivalents?
Were there rules like OSHA has that says 1 water closet for every 15 employees?
Really what kind of regulatory burden did Kirk have to abide with every time he exceeded warp drive?
YOU see what I mean? In 2012 40,000 new state rules,laws,regulations went into affect.
Between 1995 and 2010, the total time spent by the public complying with federal regulations grew by 25%. Such a significant increase over the past decade and a half may well have deterred new business investment even before the 2008 financial crisis.
Over the same period, regulatory agencies budgets grew by 166%, according to an analysis by Susan Dudley and Melinda Warren. The increase in expenditures occurred as agencies created new rules, stepped up enforcement of existing mandates and increased staffing.
The growing regulatory state | The Daily Caller
you were warned bout the brown acid, d00d.
again point to which part of the Dodd Frank law you disagree with. you simply avoided the question.
so hence you object to mammograms being included at no cost, insurance companies being able to drop you if you get sick, reimposing lifetime caps, reinstating pre-existing conditions, not being able to sell insurance across state lines, making 80% of all premium dollars pay for actual patient services, offer tax credits to small businesses for providing insurance, not being able to raise rates on individuals to push them out of the market, letting kids stay on their parents insurance until 26. yup those are all terrible things to have in a law......
Which usually comes first: a problem, or a law or rule to correct the problem? Which came first, bad working conditions or labor unions? Which came first governments or people living in groups? Which came first illness or healers?
Which usually comes first: a problem, or a law or rule to correct the problem? Which came first, bad working conditions or labor unions? Which came first governments or people living in groups? Which came first illness or healers?
You're confused if you think laws solve social problems.
is there ever an occasion or action that requires "personal responsibility"?
In other words is it as I assume the reason liberals OBEY any laws or regulations is because of fear of being caught?
The reason I ask is I heard on the radio this talk host say "well if they make it a law not to text and drive, I'll obey it"!
Is that the attitude of liberals, i.e. if there is NO LAW then I'll do whatever I feel like doing even though it violates the laws of physics or the laws of Karma or the Golden Rule?
In other words do MOST liberals obey laws,rules and regulations out of fear of being caught?
To take this further especially you nerdy liberals...
What minutia of rules,laws regulations did Star Trek characters follow?
I mean did the Federation have OSHA,EPA,EEOC, etc. equivalents?
Were there rules like OSHA has that says 1 water closet for every 15 employees?
Really what kind of regulatory burden did Kirk have to abide with every time he exceeded warp drive?
YOU see what I mean? In 2012 40,000 new state rules,laws,regulations went into affect.
Between 1995 and 2010, the total time spent by the public complying with federal regulations grew by 25%. Such a significant increase over the past decade and a half may well have deterred new business investment even before the 2008 financial crisis.
Over the same period, regulatory agencies budgets grew by 166%, according to an analysis by Susan Dudley and Melinda Warren. The increase in expenditures occurred as agencies created new rules, stepped up enforcement of existing mandates and increased staffing.
The growing regulatory state | The Daily Caller
Which usually comes first: a problem, or a law or rule to correct the problem? Which came first, bad working conditions or labor unions? Which came first governments or people living in groups? Which came first illness or healers?
You're confused if you think laws solve social problems.
We need to return to a Constitutional Federal Republic, as framed. I believe Jefferson and Washington would agree along with all other original framers. The Magna Carta was a good start and the Declaration was better. All Socialist Democracies in history without exception has faded into utter oblivion.
The libs need to consider same......
Robert
All of them?
What about every "first world" country in the world today?
Which usually comes first: a problem, or a law or rule to correct the problem? Which came first, bad working conditions or labor unions? Which came first governments or people living in groups? Which came first illness or healers?
You're confused if you think laws solve social problems.
Are laws against child molestation wrong because they're trying to legislate morality?
Really what kind of regulatory burden did Kirk have to abide with every time he exceeded warp drive?
You're confused if you think laws solve social problems.
Are laws against child molestation wrong because they're trying to legislate morality?
Many people missed my point.
It appears MOST liberals are like children and most non-liberals are the adults.
MOST liberals are NOT educated in common sense. In personal responsibility and more fundamentally the laws of physics which supercede the laws of man!
"Texting while driving" law for example.
Most liberals when asking for the law are really saying they haven't any common sense!
Liberals still don't understand that at 20mph you travel 60 feet in one second!
Liberals don't understand at 60mph they travel almost the length of a football field 272 feet by the time they take their eyes off their texting to stopping!
Sometimes, when you read out loud the stuff you write down, you realize how stupid it sounds so you don't post it. Try it sometime. Read your statement out loud then see if you think it still makes enough sense.
We need to return to a Constitutional Federal Republic, as framed. I believe Jefferson and Washington would agree along with all other original framers. The Magna Carta was a good start and the Declaration was better. All Socialist Democracies in history without exception has faded into utter oblivion.
The libs need to consider same......
Robert
