Issa confident House will vote to place Eric Holder in contempt

[WillowTree]

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) predicted Sunday that Republicans and Democrats would vote to find Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress this week.

“I believe they will, both Republicans and Democrats will vote that,” Issa said on Fox News Sunday. “There are a number of Democrats, 31, who wrote to the administration asking them to be forthcoming. Many of them will stay with us now that the administration has not been.”






Issa confident House will vote to place Eric Holder in contempt - TheHill.com

 

[Truthmatters]

No evidence of White House cover-up in gun case: lawmaker | Reuters

 

[Mac1958]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

 

[Truthmatters]

You dont get to have grand jury testimony about ongoing cases.

Look what you fucks did to Plame and her contacts

 

[Truthmatters]

Like I said long ago.

you righties wont like where this one ends up

 

[CaféAuLait]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

Yet, it would not be a party line vote if the dems vote with him as stated, would it?

 

[Dot Com]

oh neat...

 

[WillowTree]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

The democrats get the chance to give Issa the finger! The Republicans want the truth. We'll see what happens.

 

[Leweman]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

It worked for healthcare. All of Washington is political.

 

[jillian]

is it supposed to be prophetic that he thinks the extremist GOP'ers in the house will vote to find holder in contempt?

d'uh...

not to mention all that is supposed to stop the second there's a claim of executive privilege... but it's not like we can expect issa and the boys to act rationally.

 

[Charles_Main]

No evidence of White House cover-up in gun case: lawmaker | Reuters

Of course there is no evidence, they wont release any of it.

Fool

 

[asaratis]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

They are rightly attacking his credibility. He is a lying,corrupt member of Obama's lying, corrupt administration. As has been said, it may not be a pure party line vote. There are some Dems fed up with this shit, also.

 

[Charles_Main]

is it supposed to be prophetic that he thinks the extremist GOP'ers in the house will vote to find holder in contempt?

d'uh...

not to mention all that is supposed to stop the second there's a claim of executive privilege... but it's not like we can expect issa and the boys to act rationally.

31 Democrats could possibly support it. What you going to call them? lol

 

[Charles_Main]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

There are 31 House Democrats who also believe Holder is not being Honest, and have said so in writing. What are you guys going to say if they support the Contempt Vote?

lol

The question should be, and would be in your minds, if you were not Partisan Hacks, what does the country stand to lose if we allow a Corrupt Lying AG to just get away with it.

 

[Truthmatters]

get their names

 

[WillowTree]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

There are 31 House Democrats who also believe Holder is not being Honest, and have said so in writing. What are you guys going to say if they support the Contempt Vote?

lol

The question should be, and would be in your minds, if you were not Partisan Hacks, what does the country stand to lose if we allow a Corrupt Lying AG to just get away with it.

excellent points.

 

[Dot Com]

ANOTHER F & F thread?

Willow!!!-

 

[OODA_Loop]

I think the votes are there.

Shady law enforcement is not viewed favorably across the political spectrum.

If Congress / we can't get straight answers from the highest law enforcement agency and officer under any administration or political flavor we have no domestic tranquility.

 

[Charles_Main]

get their names

Pay attention and you would already know.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Precisely what do the Republicans have to gain by holding Holder in contempt by a pure party line vote? Are they sure it won't look a wee bit, y'know, blatantly political?

.

There are 31 House Democrats who also believe Holder is not being Honest, and have said so in writing. What are you guys going to say if they support the Contempt Vote?

lol

The question should be, and would be in your minds, if you were not Partisan Hacks, what does the country stand to lose if we allow a Corrupt Lying AG to just get away with it.

I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but not everyone is a left wing "partisan hack" or a right wing "partisan hack". Believe it or not, there are many of us who choose to think for ourselves. Here's something even crazier: I'll bet there's more of me than of you.

It was a legitimate question, one that you chose to go partisan whacko with.

.