Israeli study: Civilians majority of Gaza war dead

it's a shame no one cares about the innocent Palestinians getting killed.

WHAT BULLSHIT! If you hadn't noticed its Israelis making these claims! The enemies of Hamas!

So take your self-righteousness and shove it!


What you should be saying is it's a shame that the HAMAS terrorists don't care about innocent Palestinians getting killed. Otherwise they won't fire missiles from civilian populations, take the fight to civilian populations, wear uniforms, short weapons in schools and hospitals making them legit targets and backing Israel into a corner where she has no other option, but to launch a major operation!

There are ways to fight terrorists with fewer civilian casualties as has been evidenced by the US and allied forces in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

The old -- "it's the terrorists's fault for forcing us to kill so many civilians" begins to pale in the the face of emerging evidence that Israel did far less than it could have to prevent civilian deaths and, in fact,, may have acted in ways to encourage those deaths.

What it comes down to is that to some Israeli's - Palestinians are little more than vermin, not human beings and unfortunately that Israeli minority has a disproportionate political weight.
 
yea yea... we heard the same shit from Osama Bin Laden after 9/11 zealot.

:cuckoo:

So the use of human shields is acceptable to you?

Israel's human shields draw fire | World news | The Guardian

clearly, less than they are acceptable to you, buddy. Your trite catch phrases mean very little outside of the talking point culture your kind has fostered. Maybe you can butcher an iranian quote next.


:thup:

That's not acceptable either. This is the real world, not some game.
 
So the use of human shields is acceptable to you?

Israel's human shields draw fire | World news | The Guardian

clearly, less than they are acceptable to you, buddy. Your trite catch phrases mean very little outside of the talking point culture your kind has fostered. Maybe you can butcher an iranian quote next.


:thup:

That's not acceptable either. This is the real world, not some game.

and, unfortunately for the non-jewish humanity at play your kind only really has one concern: zion, pali be damned.
 
it's a shame no one cares about the innocent Palestinians getting killed.

WHAT BULLSHIT! If you hadn't noticed its Israelis making these claims! The enemies of Hamas!

So take your self-righteousness and shove it!


What you should be saying is it's a shame that the HAMAS terrorists don't care about innocent Palestinians getting killed. Otherwise they won't fire missiles from civilian populations, take the fight to civilian populations, wear uniforms, short weapons in schools and hospitals making them legit targets and backing Israel into a corner where she has no other option, but to launch a major operation!

There are ways to fight terrorists with fewer civilian casualties as has been evidenced by the US and allied forces in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

The old -- "it's the terrorists's fault for forcing us to kill so many civilians" begins to pale in the the face of emerging evidence that Israel did far less than it could have to prevent civilian deaths and, in fact,, may have acted in ways to encourage those deaths.

What it comes down to is that to some Israeli's - Palestinians are little more than vermin, not human beings and unfortunately that Israeli minority has a disproportionate political weight.

true story. We can see that very same process in the forum input of Jillian and, especially, Ghook's goyim hating ass.
 
Israel's human shields draw fire | World news | The Guardian

clearly, less than they are acceptable to you, buddy. Your trite catch phrases mean very little outside of the talking point culture your kind has fostered. Maybe you can butcher an iranian quote next.


:thup:

That's not acceptable either. This is the real world, not some game.

and, unfortunately for the non-jewish humanity at play your kind only really has one concern: zion, pali be damned.

My kind? What kind would that be, exactly?
 
That's not acceptable either. This is the real world, not some game.

and, unfortunately for the non-jewish humanity at play your kind only really has one concern: zion, pali be damned.

My kind? What kind would that be, exactly?

blank check writing zionists whose sole concern are the chosen regardless of how much goyim humanity must suffer. See Tom Hagee.


:thup:
 
it's a shame no one cares about the innocent Palestinians getting killed.

WHAT BULLSHIT! If you hadn't noticed its Israelis making these claims! The enemies of Hamas!

So take your self-righteousness and shove it!


What you should be saying is it's a shame that the HAMAS terrorists don't care about innocent Palestinians getting killed. Otherwise they won't fire missiles from civilian populations, take the fight to civilian populations, wear uniforms, short weapons in schools and hospitals making them legit targets and backing Israel into a corner where she has no other option, but to launch a major operation!

i agree Hamas are a bunch of cowards for using civilians as human shields. but does it make it right for Israel to kill the civilians?
 
and, unfortunately for the non-jewish humanity at play your kind only really has one concern: zion, pali be damned.

My kind? What kind would that be, exactly?

blank check writing zionists whose sole concern are the chosen regardless of how much goyim humanity must suffer. See Tom Hagee.


:thup:

First, it's John Hagee, not Tom.
Second, you realize that Hagee isn't Jewish, right?
 
My kind? What kind would that be, exactly?

blank check writing zionists whose sole concern are the chosen regardless of how much goyim humanity must suffer. See Tom Hagee.


:thup:

First, it's John Hagee, not Tom.
Second, you realize that Hagee isn't Jewish, right?

first, Your clarification is quite telling.

second, you clearly understand what criteria is necessary, in Hagee's mind, to prompt the second coming of jesus christ and, by extension, his blank check support for zion.

:thup:
 
blank check writing zionists whose sole concern are the chosen regardless of how much goyim humanity must suffer. See Tom Hagee.


:thup:

First, it's John Hagee, not Tom.
Second, you realize that Hagee isn't Jewish, right?

first, Your clarification is quite telling.

second, you clearly understand what criteria is necessary, in Hagee's mind, to prompt the second coming of jesus christ and, by extension, his blank check support for zion.

:thup:

How is knowing a guy's name telling?
 
First, it's John Hagee, not Tom.
Second, you realize that Hagee isn't Jewish, right?

first, Your clarification is quite telling.

second, you clearly understand what criteria is necessary, in Hagee's mind, to prompt the second coming of jesus christ and, by extension, his blank check support for zion.

:thup:

How is knowing a guy's name telling?

pretty much in the same way correcting the name of a mistaken gay porn film company might just give reason to believe you have a vested interest in their product.


But I digress, point 2 stands. Being jewish was never the reason for his blank check support of zionism. Surely you'd have picked that up after pledging 50 bucks for another golden chair at TBN...
 
Except, you know, John Hagee isn't some esoteric figure. He makes enough controversial comments that his name is mentioned on a fairly regular basis in the media.
 
Except, you know, John Hagee isn't some esoteric figure. He makes enough controversial comments that his name is mentioned on a fairly regular basis in the media.

:rofl:


yea dude... I mean.. he ONLY has access to cable broadcast and a supportive audience the likes of which Ted Turner would have envied in the 90s.

:cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top