Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hey........not my fault you wish to remain in your own ignorance Shit Gun.
I gave you a chance to expand your horizons, but, you appear to be happy in your own little world.
Sad, actually.........
every reputable organization that has investigated Isreal's use of WP in Gaza has said their use was legalit might not be unlawful, but WP is a battlefield weapon and should not be used in built up areas, gaza is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, so maybe legal to use it but definately immoral to use it where they did.
it might not be unlawful, but WP is a battlefield weapon and should not be used in built up areas, gaza is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, so maybe legal to use it but definately immoral to use it where they did.
i think you mean a "hellfire" missileevery reputable organization that has investigated Isreal's use of WP in Gaza has said their use was legal
if they had intentionally used it to target civilians, i doubt they would have ruled that way
i don't dispute the legality of WP, what i do question is the use of it in a densely populated area, it is a battlefield weapon used for illumination. the israeli forces say that is what it was used for, yet it has to come down somewhere imo its a get out clause for the israeli forces, we are using it but we are not targeting civilians, the fact civilians are in the area is unfortunate.
but going back to the subject of the thread, the use of flechettes. the idf have been using these for quite some time even before the latest offensive. as i haven't made enough posts yet i can't post links. but a couple of years back israel did a targeted assassination of two palestinian gunmen travelling in a car. the shell took out the car, what israel did then was fire another shell which was a flechette weapon, this missile killed a number of civilians and wounded more than 40. this weapon had a radius of 300 meters in length and 100 meters in width, so spread to surrounding streets. israel at first denied using this missile, saying the second one was the same as the first one fired, which if memory serves was a firefox missile, and it was only when a member of the knesset who had seen the reports said he would go public did the idf come clean. now tell me what was the justification of using this weapon in a populated area after the initial missile had done its job if not to take out non combattants, including women and children.
i think you mean a "hellfire" missileevery reputable organization that has investigated Isreal's use of WP in Gaza has said their use was legal
if they had intentionally used it to target civilians, i doubt they would have ruled that way
i don't dispute the legality of WP, what i do question is the use of it in a densely populated area, it is a battlefield weapon used for illumination. the israeli forces say that is what it was used for, yet it has to come down somewhere imo its a get out clause for the israeli forces, we are using it but we are not targeting civilians, the fact civilians are in the area is unfortunate.
but going back to the subject of the thread, the use of flechettes. the idf have been using these for quite some time even before the latest offensive. as i haven't made enough posts yet i can't post links. but a couple of years back israel did a targeted assassination of two palestinian gunmen travelling in a car. the shell took out the car, what israel did then was fire another shell which was a flechette weapon, this missile killed a number of civilians and wounded more than 40. this weapon had a radius of 300 meters in length and 100 meters in width, so spread to surrounding streets. israel at first denied using this missile, saying the second one was the same as the first one fired, which if memory serves was a firefox missile, and it was only when a member of the knesset who had seen the reports said he would go public did the idf come clean. now tell me what was the justification of using this weapon in a populated area after the initial missile had done its job if not to take out non combattants, including women and children.
in THAT instance, noi think you mean a "hellfire" missileevery reputable organization that has investigated Isreal's use of WP in Gaza has said their use was legal
if they had intentionally used it to target civilians, i doubt they would have ruled that way
i don't dispute the legality of WP, what i do question is the use of it in a densely populated area, it is a battlefield weapon used for illumination. the israeli forces say that is what it was used for, yet it has to come down somewhere imo its a get out clause for the israeli forces, we are using it but we are not targeting civilians, the fact civilians are in the area is unfortunate.
but going back to the subject of the thread, the use of flechettes. the idf have been using these for quite some time even before the latest offensive. as i haven't made enough posts yet i can't post links. but a couple of years back israel did a targeted assassination of two palestinian gunmen travelling in a car. the shell took out the car, what israel did then was fire another shell which was a flechette weapon, this missile killed a number of civilians and wounded more than 40. this weapon had a radius of 300 meters in length and 100 meters in width, so spread to surrounding streets. israel at first denied using this missile, saying the second one was the same as the first one fired, which if memory serves was a firefox missile, and it was only when a member of the knesset who had seen the reports said he would go public did the idf come clean. now tell me what was the justification of using this weapon in a populated area after the initial missile had done its job if not to take out non combattants, including women and children.
you are correct, my mistake. the member of the knesset who threatened to out the idf was yossi sarid. so do you think there was any justification for the use of a shell containing flechettes after the car had been taken out the assasination sucessful, especially when people would have been in a state of panic or rushing to aid anyone who had been wounded. imo in this case it was a deliberate targeting of civilians.
it might not be unlawful, but WP is a battlefield weapon and should not be used in built up areas, gaza is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, so maybe legal to use it but definately immoral to use it where they did.
it might not be unlawful, but WP is a battlefield weapon and should not be used in built up areas, gaza is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, so maybe legal to use it but definately immoral to use it where they did.
Absolutely true-----it is utterly IMMORAL for any people to fight using civilians as combatants and the cribs of their infants as bomb launching pads. If only the Gazans had the DECENCY ----like all civilized people for THOUSANDS OF YEARS----of making it clear WHO ARE THE COMBATANTS----thru clearly visible in signia and if only they had the DECENCY to do their fighting AWAY FROM THE CRIBS OF THE BABIES. The Rules of engagement were not invented yesterday---they DEVELOPED OVER THOUSANDS OF YEARS. ------all civilized people have set off places of battle away from babies for THOUSANDS OF YEARS. ------dogs and rats and hyenas do not-------but Bears do-----and even lions do so.
every reputable organization that has investigated Isreal's use of WP in Gaza has said their use was legal
if they had intentionally used it to target civilians, i doubt they would have ruled that way
i don't dispute the legality of WP, what i do question is the use of it in a densely populated area, it is a battlefield weapon used for illumination. the israeli forces say that is what it was used for, yet it has to come down somewhere imo its a get out clause for the israeli forces, we are using it but we are not targeting civilians, the fact civilians are in the area is unfortunate.
but going back to the subject of the thread, the use of flechettes. the idf have been using these for quite some time even before the latest offensive. as i haven't made enough posts yet i can't post links. but a couple of years back israel did a targeted assassination of two palestinian gunmen travelling in a car. the shell took out the car, what israel did then was fire another shell which was a flechette weapon, this missile killed a number of civilians and wounded more than 40. this weapon had a radius of 300 meters in length and 100 meters in width, so spread to surrounding streets. israel at first denied using this missile, saying the second one was the same as the first one fired, which if memory serves was a firefox missile, and it was only when a member of the knesset who had seen the reports said he would go public did the idf come clean. now tell me what was the justification of using this weapon in a populated area after the initial missile had done its job if not to take out non combattants, including women and children.
He agrees with you, fuckwit. Thank God most of the opposing side in this debate is so damned stupid.it might not be unlawful, but WP is a battlefield weapon and should not be used in built up areas, gaza is one of the most densely populated areas in the world, so maybe legal to use it but definately immoral to use it where they did.
Absolutely true-----it is utterly IMMORAL for any people to fight using civilians as combatants and the cribs of their infants as bomb launching pads. If only the Gazans had the DECENCY ----like all civilized people for THOUSANDS OF YEARS----of making it clear WHO ARE THE COMBATANTS----thru clearly visible in signia and if only they had the DECENCY to do their fighting AWAY FROM THE CRIBS OF THE BABIES. The Rules of engagement were not invented yesterday---they DEVELOPED OVER THOUSANDS OF YEARS. ------all civilized people have set off places of battle away from babies for THOUSANDS OF YEARS. ------dogs and rats and hyenas do not-------but Bears do-----and even lions do so.
Yeah......right idiot.......like the fucking idiot palestinians are any better........firing homemade rockets (without targeting I might add), from apartments and schools.
Sure.......palestinians are SOOOOOO much more "civilized" when it comes to battle.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qryGLZbfDTw]YouTube - Why Palestinians Throw Rocks[/ame]
The only stupid people in this debate are Hamas and those that support them.
I'd like to see the earth open up and swallow Palestine. That way, no more problems.
