Israeli army levels Araqib village for eighth time

[Marc39]

No such thing as Israel army. No such thing as Israel.

Yes there is. It is a foreign occupation of Palestine pretending to be a legitimate state.

allah knows better Allah is a Zionist

Quran 5:20-21...

Remember Moses said to his people: 'O my people! Recall in remembrance the favor of Allah unto you, when He produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave you what He had not given to any other among the peoples. O my people! Enter the holy land which Allah hath assigned unto you, and turn not back ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin.

 

[Trajan]

NEGEV, (PIC)-- The Israeli army with the help of a fleet of bulldozers has been leveling the Araqib village between the cities of Raht and Bir Sabe' since early Thursday morning in the eighth demolition of the village, Palestinians in the occupied city of Negev said.

The Israelis cornered the villagers forcing them out of the homes they erected anew after they were knocked down about a month back. They were blocked from salvaging their personal possessions inside. Part of their necessities were transported by trucks while the homes and their contents were being demolished.

“This is the true face of the Israeli government and Israeli democracy,” said Dr. Awad Abu Furaih, spokesman for the Araqib defense committee.

Israeli army levels Araqib village for eighth time

it appears to me that they are or have tried their level best to come to an agreement over the legality of jewish- Bedouin claims...



snip-


The Bedouin brought as an expert witness Prof. Oren Yiftachel, a political geographer and town planner from Ben-Gurion University in Be’er Sheva. The state is putting forward two contradictory arguments: on the one hand that the land was mawat land [n.b. - uncultivated wasteland], and on the other that it has been expropriated. Logic says that if it was mawat it did not have to be expropriated, and if it was expropriated, perhaps it was not mawat. The main witness for the defense is Prof. Ruth Kark, an expert in historical geography and the Middle East from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The summations are scheduled for September 30. In the meantime, the Bedouin claimants have submitted a special request to call another witness on their behalf, Dr. Yitzhak (Clinton ) Bailey, an expert in Bedouin law and ways of life and the author of “Bedouin Law from Sinai and the Negev” (Yale University Press, 2009 ). In the meantime, Kark and Yiftachel, two learned scholars, have looked at the same maps, read the same 19th-century books by scholars and travelers to Palestine, but each offers a completely different interpretation of the material. Kark maintains that the Bedouin have no attachment to the land and that it is impossible to prove they ever did; Yiftachel says it is as clear as day that the Bedouin have owned the land for untold generations.

snip-

Prof. Kark does not support a change in the situation. In other countries, too, she says, the Bedouin get no special treatment. ‘For the past five-six years I have been researching the subject of Bedouin land in the Middle East, examining how other countries address the question of their lands … According to this research there are two groups of countries. Those whose leaders are of Bedouin origin, such as Saudi Arabia, which treat the Bedouin slightly more tolerantly; and countries like Syria, which show no great tolerance for them. There is much talk today in the international community about indigenous peoples and their rights. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are mentioned in this regard.


UN-Truth Al-Arakib: some background via Haaretz

 

[Marc39]

Quote: Originally Posted by P F Tinmore
According to the 1949 armistice agreements, Israel occupies Palestine.

You still trying to peddle that rotting fish?

The '49 armistice agreements were temporary and non-binding.

No wonder you have 0 reputational points.

The binding Palestine Mandate issued unanimously by the full international body of the League of Nations, establishing Palestine as the Jewish National Home, is the only legally enforceable document pertaining to the matter.

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate

 

[P F Tinmore]

Quote: Originally Posted by P F Tinmore
According to the 1949 armistice agreements, Israel occupies Palestine.

You still trying to peddle that rotting fish?

The '49 armistice agreements were temporary and non-binding.

No wonder you have 0 reputational points.

The binding Palestine Mandate issued unanimously by the full international body of the League of Nations, establishing Palestine as the Jewish National Home, is the only legally enforceable document pertaining to the matter.

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate

It is irrelevant if the agreements were binding or not. They created no borders. They merely stated that the existing borders between Lebanon and Palestine, Syria and Palestine, Jordan and Palestine, and Egypt and Palestine remained unchanged. Since, as of 1949, Israel had not legally acquired any land there were no borders stated for Israel.

The agreement did establish armistice lines that were specifically not borders but defined areas of occupation.

 

[Marc39]

Quote: Originally Posted by P F Tinmore
According to the 1949 armistice agreements, Israel occupies Palestine.

You still trying to peddle that rotting fish?

The '49 armistice agreements were temporary and non-binding.

No wonder you have 0 reputational points.

The binding Palestine Mandate issued unanimously by the full international body of the League of Nations, establishing Palestine as the Jewish National Home, is the only legally enforceable document pertaining to the matter.

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate

It is irrelevant if the agreements were binding or not. They created no borders. They merely stated that the existing borders between Lebanon and Palestine, Syria and Palestine, Jordan and Palestine, and Egypt and Palestine remained unchanged. Since, as of 1949, Israel had not legally acquired any land there were no borders stated for Israel.

The agreement did establish armistice lines that were specifically not borders but defined areas of occupation.

Er, the League of Nations established Israel's borders in 1922.

Ever open a book?

"North. – From Ras en Naqura on the Mediterranean eastwards to a point west of Qadas, thence in a northerly direction to Metulla, thence east to a point west of Banias.

East. – From Banias in a southerly direction east of Lake Hula to Jisr Banat Ya’pub, thence along a line east of the Jordan and the Lake of Tiberias and on to El Hamme station on the Samakh-Deraa railway line, thence along the centre of the river Yarmuq to its confluence with the Jordan, thence along the centres of the Jordan, the Dead Sea and the Wadi Araba to a point on the Gulf of Aqaba two miles west of the town of Aqaba, thence along the shore of the Gulf of Aqaba to Ras Jaba.

South. – From Ras Jaba in a generally north-westerly direction to the junction of the Neki-Aqaba and Gaza-Aqaba Roads, thence to a point west-north-west of Ain Maghara and thence to a point on the Mediterranean coast north-west of Rafa.

West. – The Mediterranean Sea."
[ame]http://www.amazon.com/Israel-History-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0688123635/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1293290680&sr=8-1[/ame]


Now, you know.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You still trying to peddle that rotting fish?

The '49 armistice agreements were temporary and non-binding.

No wonder you have 0 reputational points.

The binding Palestine Mandate issued unanimously by the full international body of the League of Nations, establishing Palestine as the Jewish National Home, is the only legally enforceable document pertaining to the matter.

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate

It is irrelevant if the agreements were binding or not. They created no borders. They merely stated that the existing borders between Lebanon and Palestine, Syria and Palestine, Jordan and Palestine, and Egypt and Palestine remained unchanged. Since, as of 1949, Israel had not legally acquired any land there were no borders stated for Israel.

The agreement did establish armistice lines that were specifically not borders but defined areas of occupation.

Er, the League of Nations established Israel's borders in 1922.

Ever open a book?

"North. – From Ras en Naqura on the Mediterranean eastwards to a point west of Qadas, thence in a northerly direction to Metulla, thence east to a point west of Banias.

East. – From Banias in a southerly direction east of Lake Hula to Jisr Banat Ya’pub, thence along a line east of the Jordan and the Lake of Tiberias and on to El Hamme station on the Samakh-Deraa railway line, thence along the centre of the river Yarmuq to its confluence with the Jordan, thence along the centres of the Jordan, the Dead Sea and the Wadi Araba to a point on the Gulf of Aqaba two miles west of the town of Aqaba, thence along the shore of the Gulf of Aqaba to Ras Jaba.

South. – From Ras Jaba in a generally north-westerly direction to the junction of the Neki-Aqaba and Gaza-Aqaba Roads, thence to a point west-north-west of Ain Maghara and thence to a point on the Mediterranean coast north-west of Rafa.

West. – The Mediterranean Sea."
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Israel-History-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0688123635/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1293290680&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Israel: A History (9780688123635): Martin Gilbert: Books[/ame]


Now, you know.

The League of Nations stated that those were Palestinian borders.

Show me a League of Nations document that mentions Israel, or Jewish state for that matter.

 

[Marc39]

It is irrelevant if the agreements were binding or not. They created no borders. They merely stated that the existing borders between Lebanon and Palestine, Syria and Palestine, Jordan and Palestine, and Egypt and Palestine remained unchanged. Since, as of 1949, Israel had not legally acquired any land there were no borders stated for Israel.

The agreement did establish armistice lines that were specifically not borders but defined areas of occupation.

Er, the League of Nations established Israel's borders in 1922.

Ever open a book?

"North. – From Ras en Naqura on the Mediterranean eastwards to a point west of Qadas, thence in a northerly direction to Metulla, thence east to a point west of Banias.

East. – From Banias in a southerly direction east of Lake Hula to Jisr Banat Ya’pub, thence along a line east of the Jordan and the Lake of Tiberias and on to El Hamme station on the Samakh-Deraa railway line, thence along the centre of the river Yarmuq to its confluence with the Jordan, thence along the centres of the Jordan, the Dead Sea and the Wadi Araba to a point on the Gulf of Aqaba two miles west of the town of Aqaba, thence along the shore of the Gulf of Aqaba to Ras Jaba.

South. – From Ras Jaba in a generally north-westerly direction to the junction of the Neki-Aqaba and Gaza-Aqaba Roads, thence to a point west-north-west of Ain Maghara and thence to a point on the Mediterranean coast north-west of Rafa.

West. – The Mediterranean Sea."
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Israel-History-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0688123635/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1293290680&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Israel: A History (9780688123635): Martin Gilbert: Books[/ame]


Now, you know.

The League of Nations stated that those were Palestinian borders.

Show me a League of Nations document that mentions Israel, or Jewish state for that matter.

The League of Nations established "Palestine" as the Jewish National Home in 1922, which was intended to eventuate into Israel in 1948.

Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country

Winston Churchill, British Colonial Secretary of Palestine who implemented the Palestine Mandate...

The conception a Jewish homeland in Palestine was undoubtedly that if the absorptive capacity over a number of years and the breeding over a number of years, all guided by the British government, gave an increasing Jewish population, that population should not in any way be restricted from reaching a majority position. Certainly, we committed ourselves to the idea that some day, there might well be a great Jewish State there, numbered by millions.

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Jews-Friendship-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0805088644/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1293291841&sr=8-1]Amazon.com: Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship (9780805088649): Martin Gilbert: Books[/ame]

 

[P F Tinmore]

You still have not posted any documents mentioning Israel or Jewish state.

 

[Marc39]

You still have not posted any documents mentioning Israel or Jewish state.

The League of Nations' use of Jewish National Home signifies a Jewish State.

ART. 2.
The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.

The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate


President Woodrow Wilson, who was responsible for the creation of the League of Nations, stated unequivocally that the Jewish National home was to eventuate in a Jewish State...

I am persuaded that the Allied nations, with the fullest concurrence of our own government and people, are agreed that in Palestine shall be laid the foundation of a Jewish Commonwealth

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Israel-History-Martin-Gilbert/dp/0688123635/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1293296210&sr=1-1]Amazon.com: Israel: A History (9780688123635): Martin Gilbert: Books[/ame]

 

[P F Tinmore]

NEGEV, (PIC)-- The Israeli army with the help of a fleet of bulldozers has been leveling the Araqib village between the cities of Raht and Bir Sabe' since early Thursday morning in the eighth demolition of the village, Palestinians in the occupied city of Negev said.

The Israelis cornered the villagers forcing them out of the homes they erected anew after they were knocked down about a month back. They were blocked from salvaging their personal possessions inside. Part of their necessities were transported by trucks while the homes and their contents were being demolished.

“This is the true face of the Israeli government and Israeli democracy,” said Dr. Awad Abu Furaih, spokesman for the Araqib defense committee.

Israeli army levels Araqib village for eighth time

it appears to me that they are or have tried their level best to come to an agreement over the legality of jewish- Bedouin claims...



snip-


The Bedouin brought as an expert witness Prof. Oren Yiftachel, a political geographer and town planner from Ben-Gurion University in Be’er Sheva. The state is putting forward two contradictory arguments: on the one hand that the land was mawat land [n.b. - uncultivated wasteland], and on the other that it has been expropriated. Logic says that if it was mawat it did not have to be expropriated, and if it was expropriated, perhaps it was not mawat. The main witness for the defense is Prof. Ruth Kark, an expert in historical geography and the Middle East from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The summations are scheduled for September 30. In the meantime, the Bedouin claimants have submitted a special request to call another witness on their behalf, Dr. Yitzhak (Clinton ) Bailey, an expert in Bedouin law and ways of life and the author of “Bedouin Law from Sinai and the Negev” (Yale University Press, 2009 ). In the meantime, Kark and Yiftachel, two learned scholars, have looked at the same maps, read the same 19th-century books by scholars and travelers to Palestine, but each offers a completely different interpretation of the material. Kark maintains that the Bedouin have no attachment to the land and that it is impossible to prove they ever did; Yiftachel says it is as clear as day that the Bedouin have owned the land for untold generations.

snip-

Prof. Kark does not support a change in the situation. In other countries, too, she says, the Bedouin get no special treatment. ‘For the past five-six years I have been researching the subject of Bedouin land in the Middle East, examining how other countries address the question of their lands … According to this research there are two groups of countries. Those whose leaders are of Bedouin origin, such as Saudi Arabia, which treat the Bedouin slightly more tolerantly; and countries like Syria, which show no great tolerance for them. There is much talk today in the international community about indigenous peoples and their rights. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are mentioned in this regard.


UN-Truth Al-Arakib: some background via Haaretz

The Ottoman Empire had a property "rights" system. These right were leased from the government. These rights could be bought, sold, leased and inherited. The rights to land remained in families for generations.

Treaties that emerged after the war gave the assets and land of the Ottoman Empire to Palestine as the successor state in that defined area.

 

[Marc39]

NEGEV, (PIC)-- The Israeli army with the help of a fleet of bulldozers has been leveling the Araqib village between the cities of Raht and Bir Sabe' since early Thursday morning in the eighth demolition of the village, Palestinians in the occupied city of Negev said.

The Israelis cornered the villagers forcing them out of the homes they erected anew after they were knocked down about a month back. They were blocked from salvaging their personal possessions inside. Part of their necessities were transported by trucks while the homes and their contents were being demolished.

“This is the true face of the Israeli government and Israeli democracy,” said Dr. Awad Abu Furaih, spokesman for the Araqib defense committee.

Israeli army levels Araqib village for eighth time

it appears to me that they are or have tried their level best to come to an agreement over the legality of jewish- Bedouin claims...



snip-


The Bedouin brought as an expert witness Prof. Oren Yiftachel, a political geographer and town planner from Ben-Gurion University in Be’er Sheva. The state is putting forward two contradictory arguments: on the one hand that the land was mawat land [n.b. - uncultivated wasteland], and on the other that it has been expropriated. Logic says that if it was mawat it did not have to be expropriated, and if it was expropriated, perhaps it was not mawat. The main witness for the defense is Prof. Ruth Kark, an expert in historical geography and the Middle East from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The summations are scheduled for September 30. In the meantime, the Bedouin claimants have submitted a special request to call another witness on their behalf, Dr. Yitzhak (Clinton ) Bailey, an expert in Bedouin law and ways of life and the author of “Bedouin Law from Sinai and the Negev” (Yale University Press, 2009 ). In the meantime, Kark and Yiftachel, two learned scholars, have looked at the same maps, read the same 19th-century books by scholars and travelers to Palestine, but each offers a completely different interpretation of the material. Kark maintains that the Bedouin have no attachment to the land and that it is impossible to prove they ever did; Yiftachel says it is as clear as day that the Bedouin have owned the land for untold generations.

snip-

Prof. Kark does not support a change in the situation. In other countries, too, she says, the Bedouin get no special treatment. ‘For the past five-six years I have been researching the subject of Bedouin land in the Middle East, examining how other countries address the question of their lands … According to this research there are two groups of countries. Those whose leaders are of Bedouin origin, such as Saudi Arabia, which treat the Bedouin slightly more tolerantly; and countries like Syria, which show no great tolerance for them. There is much talk today in the international community about indigenous peoples and their rights. Australia, New Zealand and Canada are mentioned in this regard.


UN-Truth Al-Arakib: some background via Haaretz

The Ottoman Empire had a property "rights" system. These right were leased from the government. These rights could be bought, sold, leased and inherited. The rights to land remained in families for generations.

Treaties that emerged after the war gave the assets and land of the Ottoman Empire to Palestine as the successor state in that defined area.

Under Ottoman rule, 99% of the Ottoman Empire was State-owned land controlled by the Turkish Sultanate. Arabs leased that land, known as "Miri" land that, ultimately, reverted back to the Sultanate.

A miniscule amount of land was privately held, known as "Mulk".

Tanzimat Land Reform in the mid-19th century served to raise property taxes resulting in most of the small privately held land to be transferred to wealthy Arab landowners who lived elsewhere, such as in Syria and Lebanon.

Essentially, Arabs under Ottoman rule were sharecroppers and tenant farmers with no property rights.

Your history lesson for the day

 

[docmauser1]

Treaties that emerged after the war gave the assets and land of the Ottoman Empire to Palestine as the successor state in that defined area.

So, who was the prime-minister of that "Palestine"?

 

[Marc39]

Treaties that emerged after the war gave the assets and land of the Ottoman Empire to Palestine as the successor state in that defined area.

Er, no.

The one Treaty of Sevres transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" from the Ottomans to the World War I allies, Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan.

The one San Remo Resolution adopted by the WW I allies transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" to the Jews.

The one Palestine Mandate ratified by the League of Nations established "Palestine" as the Jewish homeland.

Your lesson for the day

 

[P F Tinmore]

Treaties that emerged after the war gave the assets and land of the Ottoman Empire to Palestine as the successor state in that defined area.

Er, no.

The one Treaty of Sevres transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" from the Ottomans to the World War I allies, Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan.

The one San Remo Resolution adopted by the WW I allies transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" to the Jews.

The one Palestine Mandate ratified by the League of Nations established "Palestine" as the Jewish homeland.

Your lesson for the day

Israel is a completely separate entity from anything in the post war treaties. It runs counter to anything in the treaties.

Neither the League of Nations, nor the Palestine Mandate, nor the UN had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

 

[Marc39]

Treaties that emerged after the war gave the assets and land of the Ottoman Empire to Palestine as the successor state in that defined area.

Er, no.

The one Treaty of Sevres transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" from the Ottomans to the World War I allies, Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan.

The one San Remo Resolution adopted by the WW I allies transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" to the Jews.

The one Palestine Mandate ratified by the League of Nations established "Palestine" as the Jewish homeland.

Your lesson for the day

Israel is a completely separate entity from anything in the post war treaties. It runs counter to anything in the treaties.

Neither the League of Nations, nor the Palestine Mandate, nor the UN had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

Israel is the only country in the Middle East, today, that existed as a sovereign state in ancient history. Not once, twice.

The Arab Muzzie shitholes were all invented after World War I from the ashes of the Turkish [not Arab] Ottoman Empire.

And, Israel is the only country endorsed by the world community when the entire League of Nations called for the reestablishment of the Jewish homeland.

The Arab Muzzie cesspools are all Western colonialist proxies.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Er, no.

The one Treaty of Sevres transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" from the Ottomans to the World War I allies, Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan.

The one San Remo Resolution adopted by the WW I allies transferred sovereignty over "Palestine" to the Jews.

The one Palestine Mandate ratified by the League of Nations established "Palestine" as the Jewish homeland.

Your lesson for the day

Israel is a completely separate entity from anything in the post war treaties. It runs counter to anything in the treaties.

Neither the League of Nations, nor the Palestine Mandate, nor the UN had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

Israel is the only country in the Middle East, today, that existed as a sovereign state in ancient history. Not once, twice.

The Arab Muzzie shitholes were all invented after World War I from the ashes of the Turkish [not Arab] Ottoman Empire.

And, Israel is the only country endorsed by the world community when the entire League of Nations called for the reestablishment of the Jewish homeland.

The Arab Muzzie cesspools are all Western colonialist proxies.

Sorry, you are wrong. You need to read up.

 

[Marc39]

Israel is a completely separate entity from anything in the post war treaties. It runs counter to anything in the treaties.

Neither the League of Nations, nor the Palestine Mandate, nor the UN had anything to do with the creation of Israel.

Israel is the only country in the Middle East, today, that existed as a sovereign state in ancient history. Not once, twice.

The Arab Muzzie shitholes were all invented after World War I from the ashes of the Turkish [not Arab] Ottoman Empire.

And, Israel is the only country endorsed by the world community when the entire League of Nations called for the reestablishment of the Jewish homeland.

The Arab Muzzie cesspools are all Western colonialist proxies.

Sorry, you are wrong. You need to read up.

History is on my side, uneducated one. No wonder you have 0 reputational points.

Israel existed in at least 1300 BCE, verified by the archaeological record.

Israel existed twice in antiquity as the First and Second Temples [1000 BCE, 516 BCE]

Not one Arab country today existed as an independent, sovereign state prior to World War I.

And, Pallies never ruled in "Palestine" Jews ruled in "Palestine" for 500 years.

Yoiur history lesson for the day.

 

[Sunni Man]

The Zionists like to make their claims for the rouge state of Israel based on the Bible.

Although there was no place called Israel for almost two thousand years.

Modern Israel is just a Zionist invention.


Yet the same Bible lists Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, and others.

Nations that have always been there; and are still here today for everyone to see and visit.

 

[Marc39]

The Zionists like to make their claims for the rouge state of Israel based on the Bible.

Although there was no place called Israel for almost two thousand years.

Modern Israel is just a Zionist invention.


Yet the same Bible lists Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, and others.

Nations that have always been there; and are still here today for everyone to see and visit.

Allah is a Zionist, Sunni dog...

Quran 5:20-21...

Remember Moses said to his people: 'O my people! Recall in remembrance the favor of Allah unto you, when He produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave you what He had not given to any other among the peoples. O my people! Enter the holy land which Allah hath assigned unto you, and turn not back ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin.

Israel is the ONLY country in the Middle East allah can be proud of. The Arab Muzzie cesspools are all backward, failed shitholes.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel is the only country in the Middle East, today, that existed as a sovereign state in ancient history. Not once, twice.

The Arab Muzzie shitholes were all invented after World War I from the ashes of the Turkish [not Arab] Ottoman Empire.

And, Israel is the only country endorsed by the world community when the entire League of Nations called for the reestablishment of the Jewish homeland.

The Arab Muzzie cesspools are all Western colonialist proxies.

Sorry, you are wrong. You need to read up.

History is on my side, uneducated one. No wonder you have 0 reputational points.

So?

Israel existed in at least 1300 BCE, verified by the archaeological record.

So?

Israel existed twice in antiquity as the First and Second Temples [1000 BCE, 516 BCE]

So?

Not one Arab country today existed as an independent, sovereign state prior to World War I.

So?

And, Pallies never ruled in "Palestine" Jews ruled in "Palestine" for 500 years.

So?

Yoiur history lesson for the day.

The League of Nations did not create Israel. The British Palestine Mandate did not create Israel. The UN did not create Israel. Israel has no land or borders. Where is it?