Israel unhappy with military aid package...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those freeloaders always have their hand out.
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Meh, better a Jewish stable democracy that is an ally to the US and doesn't threaten the world, than yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine", ruled by backwards-ass Medeival Muslim shariah Neanderthals.

A stable democracy for Jews and a disenfranchised non-Jewish population of about the same size as the Jewish population, is not actually a democracy. However wonderful you may believe it is.
 
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.
As opposed to the non-islamists purged from your Islamist paradises?
Perhaps he wants to see the ISIS flag of Islam over all the world capitals, including the Vatican.

If I had my way Muslims would not be permitted to enter Europe or the U.S. without first disavowing most of Islam's tenets.
 
Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.
As opposed to the non-islamists purged from your Islamist paradises?
Perhaps he wants to see the ISIS flag of Islam over all the world capitals, including the Vatican.

If I had my way Muslims would not be permitted to enter Europe or the U.S. without first disavowing most of Islam's tenets.

Ha Ha. First time we are in agreement.
 
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Meh, better a Jewish stable democracy that is an ally to the US and doesn't threaten the world, than yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine", ruled by backwards-ass Medeival Muslim shariah Neanderthals.

A stable democracy for Jews and a disenfranchised non-Jewish population of about the same size as the Jewish population, is not actually a democracy. However wonderful you may believe it is.
Whatever you think it is, or it actually is, is still exponentially better than yet another Islamic terrorist shithole run by Islamic barbarians.
 
Those freeloaders always have their hand out.
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Why's that then?
 
Those freeloaders always have their hand out.
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Why's that then?

Probably the same reason the white South Africans only allowed a small minority of the non-whites to vote.
 
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Why's that then?

Probably the same reason the white South Africans only allowed a small minority of the non-whites to vote.

None of that makes sense.
 
Those freeloaders always have their hand out.
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Why's that then?
Let's see, about a hundred years ago the Palestinians were at home minding their own business. Then all these criminals came down from Europe...
 
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Why's that then?
Let's see, about a hundred years ago the Palestinians were at home minding their own business. Then all these criminals came down from Europe...

You keep saying that. They were legal immigrants, many of them war survivors.
 
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Why's that then?
Let's see, about a hundred years ago the Palestinians were at home minding their own business. Then all these criminals came down from Europe...

Don't dump your revisionism on me, and expect me to take it seriously.
 
Silence third worlder. You're the typical Arab-Moslem whiner. You're just incensed that the US has mutually beneficial relationships with israel as well as many other non-islamist allies. A portion of Israel's military strength derives from that relationship.

What an affront it is to the Arab-Moslem psyche that islamo-fascism is met with a will and a determination to be a part of the relevant first world and to confront islamo-fascism with a bootheel on the back of the islamo-neck.

Yes very benficial to the Zionist paradise, not so much to the U.S. All that aid to keep the native Palestinians brutally oppressed.
Hmmmm let's see, we have a choice of a democratic Zionist paradise of Jews having their own state on their religious and ancestral land, or, yet another Muslim terrorist shithole named "Islamic Caliphate of Palestine"? Decisions decisions....

There is nothing democratic about Israel. A large percentage of the people it rules over are disenfranchised.

Why's that then?
Let's see, about a hundred years ago the Palestinians were at home minding their own business. Then all these criminals came down from Europe...
Let's see. Other than your arbitrary timeline, the geographic area of Palestine was busy being invaded by colonizing / criminal Turks and later by Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese squatters / land grabbers. Not odd at all that your pretentious "outrage" is limited to your false and ignorant claims to Jewish "criminals".

You have been made aware of the legal process that established the Jewish homeland. What legal process established the various muhammedan invasions?
 
Last edited:
You haven't a clue about the history of Palestine since the Romans. For example, there were more non-Muslim invasions than Muslim invasions. 5 Pagan, Christian and Zoroastrian invasions and 4 Muslim invasions.

Here is the condensed history of the invasions for your reference again so you don't continue to make a fool of yourself.

Palestine was conquered by the Romans, but they did not settle their people there. They ruled the native people and imposed a law that required the native people to convert to Christianity from the various religions they had been following when Christianity became the state-religion.

It was conquered by the Persians in 614 and the Persians ruled the native population, they did not settle their people there.

In 628 it was reconquered by the Romans (Byzantines), and again the Romans ruled the native people and did not settle their people there.

In 637 it was conquered by the Arabians/Saracens. They also ruled the native people, but did not settle their people there. Many of the native Christians converted to Islam.

In 1099 Palestine was conquered by the Christian Crusaders who ruled for a little over 100 years. Many of the Muslims re-converted to Christianity.

In 1187 Saladin, the Kurdish ruler of Egypt, conquered most of Palestine, including Jerusalem, the Egyptians also ruled the native people and did not settle their people in Palestine.

In 1250 Saladin's Ayubid in Egypt fell and was replaced by the Mameluks who continued to rule over Palestine's native people but did not settle Mameluks in Palestine. Mameluks being a warrior class made up of Christian converts to Islam from Georgia, the Balkans, Coptic Christians, etc.

In 1515 the Ottomans defeated the Mameluks and Palestine reverted to Ottoman rule. The Ottoman's did not settle their people there, they ruled the native people as previous rulers had.

In 1918 the Ottomans were defeated by the Allied Powers and Palestine reverted to the administration of a Mandatory, Great Britain. Great Britain did not settle its people there but did settle European Jews in the territory.

As you see, your assertion that somehow Syrians, Lebanese or Egyptians (unless you mean Mameluks or Saladin's Kurds) invaded or colonized Palestine, is an historical impossibility. As far as the Turks, there was no evidence of a Turkish presence except for the military garrison and administrators when the British conquered Palestine in 1917 as the 1921 Report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations indicates.
 
You haven't a clue about the history of Palestine since the Romans. For example, there were more non-Muslim invasions than Muslim invasions. 5 Pagan, Christian and Zoroastrian invasions and 4 Muslim invasions.

Here is the condensed history of the invasions for your reference again so you don't continue to make a fool of yourself.

Palestine was conquered by the Romans, but they did not settle their people there. They ruled the native people and imposed a law that required the native people to convert to Christianity from the various religions they had been following when Christianity became the state-religion.

It was conquered by the Persians in 614 and the Persians ruled the native population, they did not settle their people there.

In 628 it was reconquered by the Romans (Byzantines), and again the Romans ruled the native people and did not settle their people there.

In 637 it was conquered by the Arabians/Saracens. They also ruled the native people, but did not settle their people there. Many of the native Christians converted to Islam.

In 1099 Palestine was conquered by the Christian Crusaders who ruled for a little over 100 years. Many of the Muslims re-converted to Christianity.

In 1187 Saladin, the Kurdish ruler of Egypt, conquered most of Palestine, including Jerusalem, the Egyptians also ruled the native people and did not settle their people in Palestine.

In 1250 Saladin's Ayubid in Egypt fell and was replaced by the Mameluks who continued to rule over Palestine's native people but did not settle Mameluks in Palestine. Mameluks being a warrior class made up of Christian converts to Islam from Georgia, the Balkans, Coptic Christians, etc.

In 1515 the Ottomans defeated the Mameluks and Palestine reverted to Ottoman rule. The Ottoman's did not settle their people there, they ruled the native people as previous rulers had.

In 1918 the Ottomans were defeated by the Allied Powers and Palestine reverted to the administration of a Mandatory, Great Britain. Great Britain did not settle its people there but did settle European Jews in the territory.

As you see, your assertion that somehow Syrians, Lebanese or Egyptians (unless you mean Mameluks or Saladin's Kurds) invaded or colonized Palestine, is an historical impossibility. As far as the Turks, there was no evidence of a Turkish presence except for the military garrison and administrators when the British conquered Palestine in 1917 as the 1921 Report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations indicates.
I already addressed the above cut and paste you cut and pasted into other threads.
 
With so many Jew haters denying they are just that, I thought I would help them come to the realization as to what they truly are.

Based on my extensive experience dealing with these people.

You portray yourself as an expert in Talmudic quotes – and consider the same of the Neo Nazi websites from which you get them.

You Might Just Be A Jew Hater If..

Great site except they missed a few. Here's one of the winners that applies to most of the antisemites on this forum:

You claim you cannot be antisemitic because Jews are not the real semites
 
With so many Jew haters denying they are just that, I thought I would help them come to the realization as to what they truly are.

Based on my extensive experience dealing with these people.

You portray yourself as an expert in Talmudic quotes – and consider the same of the Neo Nazi websites from which you get them.

You Might Just Be A Jew Hater If..

Great site except they missed a few. Here's one of the winners that applies to most of the antisemites on this forum:

You claim you cannot be antisemitic because Jews are not the real semites

It's a disease these people have.
 
We keep hearing from various 'sources' here that Israel is such a great, successful country...

If Israel is so successful why does it need a billion dollar, 10 year military aid package?

Why is it that they are showing reluctance at accepting $3 billion a year in military aid and looking for "more generous" aid package?

"American officials have balked as their Israeli counterparts insisted on more generous terms for a new 10-year military aid package that could top $40 billion."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/29/world/middleeast/30prexy.html

Because that was the deal struck all those years ago and it became custom and practise. Israel has tried to come out of the deals/treaties with no success as they benefit the USA more than Israel. It is a form of legal subsidy that allows the USA to keep the costs of defence goods down below current market trends. It also ties Israel to only buying US goods at full price and not the cut prices offered to Islamic nations around Israel. So Israel is demanding more aid hoping that the US refuses and tears up the deals, then the US will be forced into doing the same deals with Israel as it does with Jordan, Egypt, Saudi and Iraq. And Israel will be free to go elsewhere to buy weapons, also Israel will be free to offer its R&D defence work to the highest bidder and not be stuck with only giving it to the USA.

Utter twaddle!

Public hanging used to be custom and practice Phoney!

It's always someone else's fault when it comes to Israel with you Phoney...

If Israel doesn't want the money then don't sign the contract.

Much easier than banging on about wanting even more money and then blaming USA for cutting their aid when they don't get it!

Have you never heard of loan guarantees?

Israel wants the money don't be naïve. they want as much as they can get. They have lived off of other for centuries. Even in the OT, they like to boast and brag, but that is what they do best, oh and cry me a river.
 
We keep hearing from various 'sources' here that Israel is such a great, successful country...

If Israel is so successful why does it need a billion dollar, 10 year military aid package?

Why is it that they are showing reluctance at accepting $3 billion a year in military aid and looking for "more generous" aid package?

"American officials have balked as their Israeli counterparts insisted on more generous terms for a new 10-year military aid package that could top $40 billion."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/29/world/middleeast/30prexy.html

Because that was the deal struck all those years ago and it became custom and practise. Israel has tried to come out of the deals/treaties with no success as they benefit the USA more than Israel. It is a form of legal subsidy that allows the USA to keep the costs of defence goods down below current market trends. It also ties Israel to only buying US goods at full price and not the cut prices offered to Islamic nations around Israel. So Israel is demanding more aid hoping that the US refuses and tears up the deals, then the US will be forced into doing the same deals with Israel as it does with Jordan, Egypt, Saudi and Iraq. And Israel will be free to go elsewhere to buy weapons, also Israel will be free to offer its R&D defence work to the highest bidder and not be stuck with only giving it to the USA.

Utter twaddle!

Public hanging used to be custom and practice Phoney!

It's always someone else's fault when it comes to Israel with you Phoney...

If Israel doesn't want the money then don't sign the contract.

Much easier than banging on about wanting even more money and then blaming USA for cutting their aid when they don't get it!

Have you never heard of loan guarantees?

Israel wants the money don't be naïve. they want as much as they can get. They have lived off of other for centuries. Even in the OT, they like to boast and brag, but that is what they do best, oh and cry me a river.

Get lost.
 
We keep hearing from various 'sources' here that Israel is such a great, successful country...

If Israel is so successful why does it need a billion dollar, 10 year military aid package?

Why is it that they are showing reluctance at accepting $3 billion a year in military aid and looking for "more generous" aid package?

"American officials have balked as their Israeli counterparts insisted on more generous terms for a new 10-year military aid package that could top $40 billion."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/29/world/middleeast/30prexy.html

Because that was the deal struck all those years ago and it became custom and practise. Israel has tried to come out of the deals/treaties with no success as they benefit the USA more than Israel. It is a form of legal subsidy that allows the USA to keep the costs of defence goods down below current market trends. It also ties Israel to only buying US goods at full price and not the cut prices offered to Islamic nations around Israel. So Israel is demanding more aid hoping that the US refuses and tears up the deals, then the US will be forced into doing the same deals with Israel as it does with Jordan, Egypt, Saudi and Iraq. And Israel will be free to go elsewhere to buy weapons, also Israel will be free to offer its R&D defence work to the highest bidder and not be stuck with only giving it to the USA.

Utter twaddle!

Public hanging used to be custom and practice Phoney!

It's always someone else's fault when it comes to Israel with you Phoney...

If Israel doesn't want the money then don't sign the contract.

Much easier than banging on about wanting even more money and then blaming USA for cutting their aid when they don't get it!

Have you never heard of loan guarantees?

Israel wants the money don't be naïve. they want as much as they can get. They have lived off of other for centuries. Even in the OT, they like to boast and brag, but that is what they do best, oh and cry me a river.
So wait, Israel has been around for centuries?

Thanks for clarifying that. Now tell your Arab Muslim invading brethren to get the fook out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top