israel reacts like a spoilt child

You refuse to show the invading Arabs post 1920, don't you? Interesting how you try to post only partial information that fits your bullshit agenda. There were 700,000 Arabs living in Israel and and Jordan aka pre 1922 "Palestine mandate" About 300,000 of those lived in Israel. As more Jews arrived Arabs started invading from neighboring lands looking for work and opportunity the Jews brought with them.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, it was the lack of opportunity that caused a lot of friction.

The Constitution of the Jewish Agency: Land Holding and Employment Clauses ...

"(d) Land is to be acquired as Jewish property and ... the same shall be held as the inalienable property of the Jewish people.

"(e) The Agency shall promote agricultural colonization based on Jewish labour ... it shall be deemed to be a matter of principle that Jewish labour shall be employed ..."​

"Keren Kayemet draft lease: Employment of Jewish labour only

"... The lessee undertakes to execute all works connected with the cultivation of the holding only with Jewish labour. Failure to comply with this duty by the employment of non-Jewish labour shall render the lessee liable to the payment of compensation ..."

"The lease also provides that the holding shall never be held by any but a Jew ..."​
Zionists migrated in their own apartheid policies on land ownership and labor.

The British also tried to skew the demographics towards the Arabs by opening the floodgates to neighboring Arab invaders, and limiting Jewish migration. Which was another reason the Jews fought for independence from the British. Incompetent Arabs were just jealous and upset at how the Jews managed to successfully fight off the Brits and regain their ancient t homeland. So they attacked Israel with over whelming force thinking they will surely defeat and drive the Jews into the sea. They failed again and again. All the attacks and aggression against the Jewish state were never to create a Palestinian state.

What's more interesting is these same Arabs who started out with a total of 300,000 in Israel, are now about 4 million in the West Bank and Gaza, yet they complain about "ethnic cleansing", "genocide"", and of course a "Palestinian Holocaust". And we're not inc,I'd g the millions more in "refugees". Ha ha ha. What a bunch of lying shysters!
Arabs were already there. Jews made up only 10% of the population. The hostility started ramping up when Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun began terrorizing arabs and driving them from their homes. They drove out over 700,000 arabs from Palestine. Surrounding arabs states said if the British wouldn't ensure arabs rights in Palestine, then they would step in and do it for them.

All zionists had to do, was respect the rights of the indigenous arab population of Palestine and there would not have been all the violence that had occured between the two populations. But they didn't. Because their arrogant, narcissistic, assholes, who deserve to have someone fuck up their shit!


All the PRO- PALESTINIAN knows how to do is LIE. The HATE, RACISM, ANTI SEMITISM has been for THOUSANDS OF YEARS !!! :clap2:

The Treatment of Jews
in Arab/Islamic Countries
By Mitchell Bard

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arabs sometimes claim that, as "Semites," they cannot possibly be anti-Semitic. This, however, is a semantic distortion that ignores the reality of Arab discrimination and hostility toward Jews. Arabs, like any other people, can indeed be anti-Semitic.
The term "anti-Semite" was coined in Germany in 1879 by Wilhelm Marr to refer to the anti-Jewish manifestations of the period and to give Jew-hatred a more scientific sounding name.(1) "Anti-Semitism" has been accepted and understood to mean hatred of the Jewish people.

While Jewish communities in Arab and Islamic countries fared better overall than those in Christian lands in Europe, Jews were no strangers to persecution and humiliation among the Arabs and Muslim. As Princeton University historian Bernard Lewis has written: "The Golden Age of equal rights was a myth, and belief in it was a result, more than a cause, of Jewish sympathy for Islam."(2)

Muhammad, the founder of Islam, traveled to Medina in 622 A.D. to attract followers to his new faith. When the Jews of Medina refused to convert and rejected Muhammad, two of the major Jewish tribes were expelled; in 627, Muhammad's followers killed between 600 and 900 of the men, and divided the surviving Jewish women and children amongst themselves.(3)

The Muslim attitude toward Jews is reflected in various verses throughout the Koran, the holy book of the Islamic faith. "They [the Children of Israel] were consigned to humiliation and wretchedness. They brought the wrath of God upon themselves, and this because they used to deny God's signs and kill His Prophets unjustly and because they disobeyed and were transgressors" (Sura 2:61). According to the Koran, the Jews try to introduce corruption (5:64), have always been disobedient (5:78), and are enemies of Allah, the Prophet and the angels (2:97*98).

The Dhimmi
Still, as "People of the Book," Jews (and Christians) are protected under Islamic law. The traditional concept of the "dhimma" ("writ of protection") was extended by Muslim conquerors to Christians and Jews in exchange for their subordination to the Muslims. Peoples subjected to Muslim rule usually had a choice between death and conversion, but Jews and Christians, who adhered to the Scriptures, were allowed as dhimmis (protected persons) to practice their faith. This "protection" did little, however, to insure that Jews and Christians were treated well by the Muslims. On the contrary, an integral aspect of the dhimma was that, being an infidel, he had to openly acknowledge the superiority of the true believer--the Muslim.

In the early years of the Islamic conquest, the "tribute" (or jizya), paid as a yearly poll tax, symbolized the subordination of the dhimmi. Later, the inferior status of Jews and Christians was reinforced through a series of regulations that governed the behavior of the dhimmi. Dhimmis, on pain of death, were forbidden to mock or criticize the Koran, Islam or Muhammad, to proselytize among Muslims or to touch a Muslim woman (though a Muslim man could take a non*Muslim as a wife).

Dhimmis were excluded from public office and armed service, and were forbidden to bear arms. They were not allowed to ride horses or camels, to build synagogues or churches taller than mosques, to construct houses higher than those of Muslims or to drink wine in public. They were not allowed to pray or mourn in loud voices-as that might offend the Muslims. The dhimmi had to show public deference toward Muslims-always yielding them the center of the road. The dhimmi was not allowed to give evidence in court against a Muslim, and his oath was unacceptable in an Islamic court. To defend himself, the dhimmi would have to purchase Muslim witnesses at great expense. This left the dhimmi with little legal recourse when harmed by a Muslim.(4)

Dhimmis were also forced to wear distinctive clothing. In the ninth century, for example, Baghdad's Caliph al-Mutawakkil designated a yellow badge for Jews, setting a precedent that would be followed centuries later in Nazi Germany.(5)

Violence Against Jews
At various times, Jews in Muslim lands were able to live in relative peace and thrive culturally and economically. The position of the Jews was never secure, however, and changes in the political or social climate would often lead to persecution, violence and death. Jews were generally viewed with contempt by their Muslim neighbors; peaceful coexistence between the two groups involved the subordination and degradation of the Jews.

When Jews were perceived as having achieved too comfortable a position in Islamic society, anti-Semitism would surface, often with devastating results: On December 30, 1066, Joseph HaNagid, the Jewish vizier of Granada, Spain, was crucified by an Arab mob that proceeded to raze the Jewish quarter of the city and slaughter its 5,000 inhabitants. The riot was incited by Muslim preachers who had angrily objected to what they saw as inordinate Jewish political power.

Similarly, in 1465, Arab mobs in Fez slaughtered thousands of Jews, leaving only 11 alive, after a Jewish deputy vizier treated a Muslim woman in "an offensive manner." The killings touched off a wave of similar massacres throughout Morocco.(6)

Other mass murders of Jews in Arab lands occurred in Morocco in the 8th century, where whole communities were wiped out by Muslim ruler Idris I; North Africa in the 12th century, where the Almohads either forcibly converted or decimated several communities; Libya in 1785, where Ali Burzi Pasha murdered hundreds of Jews; Algiers, where Jews were massacred in 1805, 1815 and 1830 and Marrakesh, Morocco, where more than 300 hundred Jews were murdered between 1864 and 1880.(7)

Decrees ordering the destruction of synagogues were enacted in Egypt and Syria (1014, 1293-4, 1301-2), Iraq (854-859, 1344) and Yemen (1676). Despite the Koran's prohibition, Jews were forced to convert to Islam or face death in Yemen (1165 and 1678), Morocco (1275, 1465 and 1790-92) and Baghdad (1333 and 1344).(8)

As distinguished Orientalist G.E. von Grunebaum has written:


It would not be difficult to put together the names of a very sizeable number of Jewish subjects or citizens of the Islamic area who have attained to high rank, to power, to great financial influence, to significant and recognized intellectual attainment; and the same could be done for Christians. But it would again not be difficult to compile a lengthy list of persecutions, arbitrary confiscations, attempted forced conversions, or pogroms.(9)

The situation of Jews in Arab lands reached a low point in the 19th century. Jews in most of North Africa (including Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Morocco) were forced to live in ghettos. In Morocco, which contained the largest Jewish community in the Islamic Diaspora, Jews were made to walk barefoot or wear shoes of straw when outside the ghetto. Even Muslim children participated in the degradation of Jews, by throwing stones at them or harassing them in other ways. The frequency of anti-Jewish violence increased, and many Jews were executed on charges of apostasy. Ritual murder accusations against the Jews became commonplace in the Ottoman Empire.(10)

By the twentieth century, the status of the dhimmi in Muslim lands had not significantly improved. H.E.W. Young, British Vice Consul in Mosul, wrote in 1909:


The attitude of the Muslims toward the Christians and the Jews is that of a master towards slaves, whom he treats with a certain lordly tolerance so long as they keep their place. Any sign of pretension to equality is promptly repressed.(11)

The danger for Jews became even greater as a showdown approached in the UN over partition in 1947. The Syrian delegate, Faris el-Khouri, warned: "Unless the Palestine problem is settled, we shall have difficulty in protecting and safeguarding the Jews in the Arab world."(12)

More than a thousand Jews were killed in anti-Jewish rioting during the 1940's in Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Syria and Yemen.(13) This helped trigger the mass exodus of Jews from Arab countries.
 
You refuse to show the invading Arabs post 1920, don't you? Interesting how you try to post only partial information that fits your bullshit agenda. There were 700,000 Arabs living in Israel and and Jordan aka pre 1922 "Palestine mandate" About 300,000 of those lived in Israel. As more Jews arrived Arabs started invading from neighboring lands looking for work and opportunity the Jews brought with them.
Wrong, wrong, wrong, it was the lack of opportunity that caused a lot of friction.

Zionists migrated in their own apartheid policies on land ownership and labor.

The British also tried to skew the demographics towards the Arabs by opening the floodgates to neighboring Arab invaders, and limiting Jewish migration. Which was another reason the Jews fought for independence from the British. Incompetent Arabs were just jealous and upset at how the Jews managed to successfully fight off the Brits and regain their ancient t homeland. So they attacked Israel with over whelming force thinking they will surely defeat and drive the Jews into the sea. They failed again and again. All the attacks and aggression against the Jewish state were never to create a Palestinian state.

What's more interesting is these same Arabs who started out with a total of 300,000 in Israel, are now about 4 million in the West Bank and Gaza, yet they complain about "ethnic cleansing", "genocide"", and of course a "Palestinian Holocaust". And we're not inc,I'd g the millions more in "refugees". Ha ha ha. What a bunch of lying shysters!
Arabs were already there. Jews made up only 10% of the population. The hostility started ramping up when Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun began terrorizing arabs and driving them from their homes. They drove out over 700,000 arabs from Palestine. Surrounding arabs states said if the British wouldn't ensure arabs rights in Palestine, then they would step in and do it for them.

All zionists had to do, was respect the rights of the indigenous arab population of Palestine and there would not have been all the violence that had occured between the two populations. But they didn't. Because their arrogant, narcissistic, assholes, who deserve to have someone fuck up their shit!
.. it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.
-- British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936

... So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have*crowded into the country and multiplied till their* population has increased more than even all world Jewry*could lift up the Jewish population. -- Winston Churchill [45]

According to the Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission of the League of Nations,[46] La Syrie had published, on August 12, 1934, an interview with Tewfik Bey El-Hurani, Governor of the Hauran. Governor El-Hurani stated that "In the last few months from 30,000 to 36,000 Hauranese [Syrian] had entered Palestine and settled there."

Churchill's recognition of massive Arab immigration into Palestine was confirmed by many, including the British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936, who wryly observed that

This illegal immigration was not only going on from the Sinai, but also from Transjordan and Syria and it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.[57] Nonetheless, Arab leaders and their British supporters attempted to make exactly that case. In order to appease the small but powerful Arab effendi community, the Mandatory power began imposing stricter limitations upon Jewish immigration.

While counting the newly arrived Arab illicit immigrants as indigenous deeply rooted Palestinians, the British explained that it was the Jews who were flooding the country beyond its "absorptive capacity" and crowding out Arabs. The Hope Simpson Report of 1930 announced its seminal conclusion that Arabs were being "displaced" by Jews, even though in its own pages the report revealed that there was an uncontrolled influx of illegal Arab immigrants from Egypt, Trans-Jordan and Syria.[58]

And if you follow the propaganda, since there were a few Arab immigrants, none of the Palestinians were natives. There were no Palestinians.
 
Wrong, wrong, wrong, it was the lack of opportunity that caused a lot of friction.

Zionists migrated in their own apartheid policies on land ownership and labor.

Arabs were already there. Jews made up only 10% of the population. The hostility started ramping up when Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun began terrorizing arabs and driving them from their homes. They drove out over 700,000 arabs from Palestine. Surrounding arabs states said if the British wouldn't ensure arabs rights in Palestine, then they would step in and do it for them.

All zionists had to do, was respect the rights of the indigenous arab population of Palestine and there would not have been all the violence that had occured between the two populations. But they didn't. Because their arrogant, narcissistic, assholes, who deserve to have someone fuck up their shit!
.. it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.
-- British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936

... So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have*crowded into the country and multiplied till their* population has increased more than even all world Jewry*could lift up the Jewish population. -- Winston Churchill [45]

According to the Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission of the League of Nations,[46] La Syrie had published, on August 12, 1934, an interview with Tewfik Bey El-Hurani, Governor of the Hauran. Governor El-Hurani stated that "In the last few months from 30,000 to 36,000 Hauranese [Syrian] had entered Palestine and settled there."

Churchill's recognition of massive Arab immigration into Palestine was confirmed by many, including the British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936, who wryly observed that

This illegal immigration was not only going on from the Sinai, but also from Transjordan and Syria and it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.[57] Nonetheless, Arab leaders and their British supporters attempted to make exactly that case. In order to appease the small but powerful Arab effendi community, the Mandatory power began imposing stricter limitations upon Jewish immigration.

While counting the newly arrived Arab illicit immigrants as indigenous deeply rooted Palestinians, the British explained that it was the Jews who were flooding the country beyond its "absorptive capacity" and crowding out Arabs. The Hope Simpson Report of 1930 announced its seminal conclusion that Arabs were being "displaced" by Jews, even though in its own pages the report revealed that there was an uncontrolled influx of illegal Arab immigrants from Egypt, Trans-Jordan and Syria.[58]

And if you follow the propaganda, since there were a few Arab immigrants, none of the Palestinians were natives. There were no Palestinians.
Even if you follow the Arabs back a few centuries, they arrived there from neighboring Arab lands by invasions and conquest. So technically, no, they aren't the real natives. Jews can clearly trace their ancestry further back than the Arabs. you need to ask ourself why it was okay for the division of the mandate to go as planned, of which so many Arab Muslim states were formed...Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Oman, UAE, Quattar, Tunisia, etc. but the one Jewish state was not acceptable. The answer is obvious, this conflict has never ever been about "occupation" or "land theft" but rather about Arab Muslim intolerance of others. Period. Had Israel now been another Muslim state or part of Syria, Egypt or Jordan (had any of the Arab aggressions not failed) there would be absolutely no discusssions regarding Palestine or a Palestinian people. When you come to that realization you will understand how fraudulent all the claims of the Arabs are.
 
Bravo Roudy. You stated that very well. - Jeremiah

"Right is right, even if everyone is against it; and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it"

- William Penn
 
.. it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.
-- British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936

... So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have*crowded into the country and multiplied till their* population has increased more than even all world Jewry*could lift up the Jewish population. -- Winston Churchill [45]

According to the Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission of the League of Nations,[46] La Syrie had published, on August 12, 1934, an interview with Tewfik Bey El-Hurani, Governor of the Hauran. Governor El-Hurani stated that "In the last few months from 30,000 to 36,000 Hauranese [Syrian] had entered Palestine and settled there."

Churchill's recognition of massive Arab immigration into Palestine was confirmed by many, including the British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936, who wryly observed that

This illegal immigration was not only going on from the Sinai, but also from Transjordan and Syria and it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.[57] Nonetheless, Arab leaders and their British supporters attempted to make exactly that case. In order to appease the small but powerful Arab effendi community, the Mandatory power began imposing stricter limitations upon Jewish immigration.

While counting the newly arrived Arab illicit immigrants as indigenous deeply rooted Palestinians, the British explained that it was the Jews who were flooding the country beyond its "absorptive capacity" and crowding out Arabs. The Hope Simpson Report of 1930 announced its seminal conclusion that Arabs were being "displaced" by Jews, even though in its own pages the report revealed that there was an uncontrolled influx of illegal Arab immigrants from Egypt, Trans-Jordan and Syria.[58]

And if you follow the propaganda, since there were a few Arab immigrants, none of the Palestinians were natives. There were no Palestinians.
Even if you follow the Arabs back a few centuries, they arrived there from neighboring Arab lands by invasions and conquest. So technically, no, they aren't the real natives. Jews can clearly trace their ancestry further back than the Arabs. you need to ask ourself why it was okay for the division of the mandate to go as planned, of which so many Arab Muslim states were formed...Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Oman, UAE, Quattar, Tunisia, etc. but the one Jewish state was not acceptable. The answer is obvious, this conflict has never ever been about "occupation" or "land theft" but rather about Arab Muslim intolerance of others. Period. Had Israel now been another Muslim state or part of Syria, Egypt or Jordan (had any of the Arab aggressions not failed) there would be absolutely no discusssions regarding Palestine or a Palestinian people. When you come to that realization you will understand how fraudulent all the claims of the Arabs are.

When was it that all of the Palestinians left and were replaced by these Arab immigrants?
 
When was it that all of the Palestinians left and were replaced by these Arab immigrants?


All what "palestinians" ???? The population of the land that came to be called
"palestina" by Rome about 2000 years ago was not only in great flux since that time ---
it was even before that time. Your question is silly. There are many places
in the world in which demographics change drastically in short periods of time.
There is no continual community of people over the past 1000 years
in Manhattan, New York The only continual community in "palestine
over the past 1000 years-----are jews and a few christians ---even Sala'adin
and his crew did not stick around Bedouins simply MOVE AROUND widely
and never did consitute a continuous community in the area.
ALL of jerusalem was in ruins for centuries after the islamic invasion---it
actually never DEVELOPED as a city after that time----it just fell apart more.
The concept of AN ARAB MUSLIM PALESTINIAN SOCIETY is a joke-----
ARAB MUSLIM SOCIETY developed in Iraq, Egypt, Syria and
even in a sick way in Sudan ---but not in
Palestine The only people thru the period of time since the islamic invasion
which STUCK it out as distinct communities were actually jews and ---
and some monastic type christians---christians did PILGRIMAGES
to some of the places important to them-----it was not a place of
pilgrimage for muslims ------muslims exerted power from afar .
and with some local little officials----something like the UK
foreign service ------but you guys are doing a fine job creating
a silly version of history-----keep up the idiot work
and Bedouins roamed in and out and sometimes crowded the gutters
 
And if you follow the propaganda, since there were a few Arab immigrants, none of the Palestinians were natives. There were no Palestinians.
Even if you follow the Arabs back a few centuries, they arrived there from neighboring Arab lands by invasions and conquest. So technically, no, they aren't the real natives. Jews can clearly trace their ancestry further back than the Arabs. you need to ask ourself why it was okay for the division of the mandate to go as planned, of which so many Arab Muslim states were formed...Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Oman, UAE, Quattar, Tunisia, etc. but the one Jewish state was not acceptable. The answer is obvious, this conflict has never ever been about "occupation" or "land theft" but rather about Arab Muslim intolerance of others. Period. Had Israel now been another Muslim state or part of Syria, Egypt or Jordan (had any of the Arab aggressions not failed) there would be absolutely no discusssions regarding Palestine or a Palestinian people. When you come to that realization you will understand how fraudulent all the claims of the Arabs are.

When was it that all of the Palestinians left and were replaced by these Arab immigrants?
Having reading comprehension problems? The total of what is now Israel and Gaza contained about 250,000 Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians. They were the leftovers from the previous invasions and conquests. As more Jews started arriving early 1900's, hundreds of thousands of Arabs from neighboring Arab lands started migrating looking for work and opportunity, with the help of the British of course. Currently one fourth of Israel's population (about two million) are those same Arab Muslims who are Israeli citizens with the same rights as other Israelis. So Israel has done more than its job of absorbing the "locals" of the land, especially considering that Jews were NOT allowed to be part of the other countries that were formed. If any Arabs are "unsatisfied" with the outcome of the mandate, they can migrate to any of the other countries that were formed. Perhaps Jordan, where the "Arab Palestine" was supposed to be anyhow? Oh I forgot, the other Arabs don't want them either, after what the Palestinians did in Jordan, Lebanon, and Kuwait, who blames them?
 
Last edited:
Roudy leave tinnie alone---Saddaam was convinced that he was
descended from MUCHAMMAD NEBUCHADNEZZER and Israel
was part of his EMPIRE. Tinnie has a right to his fantasies too
 
Wrong, wrong, wrong, it was the lack of opportunity that caused a lot of friction.

Zionists migrated in their own apartheid policies on land ownership and labor.

Arabs were already there. Jews made up only 10% of the population. The hostility started ramping up when Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun began terrorizing arabs and driving them from their homes. They drove out over 700,000 arabs from Palestine. Surrounding arabs states said if the British wouldn't ensure arabs rights in Palestine, then they would step in and do it for them.

All zionists had to do, was respect the rights of the indigenous arab population of Palestine and there would not have been all the violence that had occured between the two populations. But they didn't. Because their arrogant, narcissistic, assholes, who deserve to have someone fuck up their shit!
.. it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.
-- British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936

... So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have*crowded into the country and multiplied till their* population has increased more than even all world Jewry*could lift up the Jewish population. -- Winston Churchill [45]

According to the Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission of the League of Nations,[46] La Syrie had published, on August 12, 1934, an interview with Tewfik Bey El-Hurani, Governor of the Hauran. Governor El-Hurani stated that "In the last few months from 30,000 to 36,000 Hauranese [Syrian] had entered Palestine and settled there."

Churchill's recognition of massive Arab immigration into Palestine was confirmed by many, including the British Governor of the Sinai from 1922 to 1936, who wryly observed that

This illegal immigration was not only going on from the Sinai, but also from Transjordan and Syria and it is very difficult to make a case out for the misery of the Arabs if at the same time their compatriots from adjoining states could not be kept from going in to share that misery.[57] Nonetheless, Arab leaders and their British supporters attempted to make exactly that case. In order to appease the small but powerful Arab effendi community, the Mandatory power began imposing stricter limitations upon Jewish immigration.

While counting the newly arrived Arab illicit immigrants as indigenous deeply rooted Palestinians, the British explained that it was the Jews who were flooding the country beyond its "absorptive capacity" and crowding out Arabs. The Hope Simpson Report of 1930 announced its seminal conclusion that Arabs were being "displaced" by Jews, even though in its own pages the report revealed that there was an uncontrolled influx of illegal Arab immigrants from Egypt, Trans-Jordan and Syria.[58]

And if you follow the propaganda, since there were a few Arab immigrants, none of the Palestinians were natives. There were no Palestinians.

Sure there were and they are still there. They just changed their name to "Israeli." :D
 
I am intrigued can you cite your source regarding the stat that 30% of all refugees were "made" by Israel?

Helpful Facts & Figures | Refugees International

Who is a refugee?

A refugee is legally defined as a person who is outside his or her country of nationality and is unable to return due to a well-founded fear of persecution because of his or her race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. By receiving refugee status, individuals are guaranteed protection of their basic human rights, and cannot be forced to return to a country where they fear persecution.

In 2011, there were 15.2 million refugees around the world, including 4.8 million Palestinian refugees, and it is estimated that 80 percent of refugees are women and children.
 
They had no OBLIGATION to employ then or to allow them to squat upon the land

Spoken exactly like a Nazi sacking Jews from their employment and evicting them from their homes, based solely on their faith.

Good thing we hotly condemn racist ideology like yours, eh?
 
Historians are divided on the size of the population on the eve of the British conquest of Palestine. The rate of the Arab-Muslim population was about 250,000.

The Population during the British Mandate Period (1918 – 1948)

The Fourth Wave, Part Two (1917 – 1948)

The second part of the largest wave came during the British Mandate occupation, between 1917 and 1948 when Israel was established. Arabs and Muslims from Arabic and Muslim countries entered illegally the country under the Turks and latter the British mandate from the eastern, northern and southern borders looking for jobs created by the Zionist movement and latter by the British Mandate (1918 – 1948).

The Arab population of the Sharon area (between Tel Aviv and Haifa, the center of Jewish settlements) grew from 10,000 to more than 30,000 from 1922 – 1940s. The Arab population of the south (between Jaffa and the Egyptian border) grew by more than 200% between 1917 – 1940s. About 35,000 Arabs from the Haurain, South Syria came looking for work.

From 1870 to 1948 the Arabic population grew by 270%. Even in Egypt, the Arab country with the highest birth rate, the rate was only 105%, which proves that a significant part of the Arabic population growth came from immigration. By 1921when the British government performed its first census the number of Arabs and Muslims amounted to about 500,000. The 1931 British Census included about 30 different languages spoken by the Muslim population in Palestine. They were illegal immigrant workers from Arabic and Muslim countries. The high rate of children's deaths, law life expectancy and the lack of health services in the country made it impossible to reach 270% as a result of birth rate. In Short, from about 250,000 around the end of the 19th century, many of them bedouins, the Arabic population grew to about 1,250,000 in 1948. The Palestinian claim that they are the ancient population of the so called Palestine has no ground.

Winston ChurchilL, said in May 22, 1939 that the Arab immigration to Palestine during the British Mandate was so large that their numbers grew in such proportion that even if all Jews immigrated to Palestine they could not reach that number. Franklin D.Roosevelt, said in May 17, 1939 that the Arab immigration to Palestine since 1921 was much greater that Jewish immigration.

A significant part of the 1948 Palestinian refugees were first or second generation illegal immigrant workers.
What's up with the "data dump" sans any comments from you? Why do I have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out what your point is? Are you trying to say the jews were there first and it was the arabs that migrated in? That there was no zionist migration into the area? Your link was bullshit!
From 1870 to 1948 the Arabic population grew by 270%.
The entire area, jews and arabs, increased by 250% and that makes it impossible for the arab population to grow at 270%, as your source stated, but doesn't show where that data is derived from.

Here's how the population increased in Palestine from a more credible source...
The transformation of Mandated Palestine

At the culmination of a quarter century of Mandatory rule, Palestine had been radically transformed in demographic terms. The population of Palestine had increased tremendously - from the 750,000 of the 1922 census to almost 1,850,000 at the end of 1946 - an increase of nearly 250 per cent.

Between 1922 and 1946, the jewish population grew by 725%.

During this period the Jewish population had soared from 56,000 after the First World War to 84,000 in 1922 to 608,000 in 1946, an increase of about 725 per cent. From constituting less than a tenth of the population in Palestine after the First World War, the Jewish community in 1947 constituted nearly a third. A good part of this was due to births within Palestine but legal immigration alone accounted for over 376,000, with illegal immigration being estimated at another 65,000 - a total of 440,000. This Jewish population was primarily urban - about 70 per cent to 75 per cent in and around the cities of Jerusalem, Jaffa-Tel Aviv and Haifa.

Land holding patterns had also changed considerably. From the 650,000 dunums held by Jewish organizations in 1920, of the total land area of 26 million dunums, the figure at the end of 1946 had reached 1,625,000 dunums - an increase of about 250 per cent and Jewish settlement had displaced large numbers of Palestinian Arab peasants. Even so, this area represented only 6.2 per cent of the total area of Palestine and 12 per cent of the cultivable land.
To sum up, zionists had only 12% of the farm land, but took 70% of the country with the creation of Israel. And that's the cause of all the hostility between the two groups.
 
It is both sad and comical that the figure 7% land ownership by jews----continues
to be an issue about which so many people LIE The claim regarding the 7%
is about true----Jews, OWNED BY PURCHASE, 7% ----the conclusion that the
rest of the land 93% was owned by arabs or even by non muslims is the biggest NAZI
lie of the century------In fact ---A good MARKER for detection of a FILTHY DISGUSTING
LYING PIECE OF SHIT ---- are those who utilize or endorse this lie Yes---it is a fact
Jews owned, BY PURCHASE, ---actually OWNED 7% ----what the liars leave out
is the fact that MOST OF THE LAND WAS NOT PRIVATELY OWNED AND ARAB MUSLIMS
OWNED VIRTUALLY NONE sherri endorsed the lie--------well ---a kind of lawyerly lie---
the left the lie ON THE TABLE and endorsed the true statement jews owned 7% ---she
simply failed to POINT OUT----that arab muslims owned just about NONE.
Deceitful ----Gobbelian move----but the fact is that it is used by fifth rate lawyers
all the time. Regarding islamo-imperialist throat slitters-----It is more important
to note what they do not say ----than what they do say
 

Forum List

Back
Top