Israel does not exist

[P F Tinmore]

So what?
Can you not deal with what the article says?
Take one point at a time and debunk them.
Make your case.

The whole article is the opinion of a zionist, there is no need to bunk or debunk anything

United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 - Wikipedia
Under Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the 1998 ICC Statute, “[t]he transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts
Customary IHL - Practice Relating to Rule 130. Transfer of Own Civilian Population into Occupied Territory

A War crime!

Indeed, Morton Klein in BREITBART. A double propaganda whammy.

Indeed, always unable to deal with the issues on the article.

I did. I posted a question. When I get an answer, I will move on to the next issue.

What was the question?

Occupation means possessing/exercising actual authority over another country’s sovereign territory.

(Jordan renamed Judea/Samaria “the West Bank” during Jordan’s 19-year (1948-67) illegal occupation of the area, as explained below).

So, what other country's sovereign territory did Jordan occupy?

 

[teddyearp]

(Jordan renamed Judea/Samaria “the West Bank” during Jordan’s 19-year (1948-67) illegal occupation of the area, as explained below).

Finally! An admission that Jordan occupied Judea and Samaria! To the extent that they even gave it a new name.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The whole article is the opinion of a zionist, there is no need to bunk or debunk anything

United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 - Wikipedia
Under Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the 1998 ICC Statute, “[t]he transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts
Customary IHL - Practice Relating to Rule 130. Transfer of Own Civilian Population into Occupied Territory

A War crime!

Indeed, Morton Klein in BREITBART. A double propaganda whammy.

Indeed, always unable to deal with the issues on the article.

I did. I posted a question. When I get an answer, I will move on to the next issue.

What was the question?

Occupation means possessing/exercising actual authority over another country’s sovereign territory.

(Jordan renamed Judea/Samaria “the West Bank” during Jordan’s 19-year (1948-67) illegal occupation of the area, as explained below).

So, what other country's sovereign territory did Jordan occupy?

Judea and Samaria are rightfully a part of Israel, as the most ancient part of the land of the Jewish people. Without the Jordanian invasion and attempt to annex it to the 78% of Jewish land the Hashemites got in 1925, that land would have been annexed to Israel.

In 1967 Israel could have, and should have expelled all the Arabs from those areas, as the Jordanians did with the Jews in 1948.

Because it did not do so, and that area was not part of a sovereign country for all of that time, it became a disputed area to be negotiated during a peace treaty.

By rights, it belongs to the Jewish people. And Israel was more than ready to give up 93% of all of that land for a peace treaty.

Every time, the Muslims reject it. Destroying Israel (your favorite mantra of Israel does not Exist) is what they, and you, are after.

Let us see what the future brings.

Will the Arabs ever sit down with Israel to negotiate any of these issues?

 

[Shusha]

So, what other country's sovereign territory did Jordan occupy?

Israel.

 

[fanger]

So, what other country's sovereign territory did Jordan occupy?

Israel.

so are all the people living there israeli's with equal rights?

 

[Sixties Fan]

So, what other country's sovereign territory did Jordan occupy?

Israel.

so are all the people living there israeli's with equal rights?

The Arabs and all other non Jews say so. And more and more of the Arabs are applying to become citizens of Israel and not of the "State of Palestine"

 

[fanger]

israel tries hard not let the "state of palestine" exist

 

[fanger]

So, what other country's sovereign territory did Jordan occupy?

Israel.

so are all the people living there israeli's with equal rights?

The Arabs and all other non Jews say so. And more and more of the Arabs are applying to become citizens of Israel and not of the "State of Palestine"

Hasbara
"The natural response against anti-Zionism which derives from the hatred of Jewsand the desire to destroy Israel as a sovereign Jewish nation"
did you mean Jew sand?

 

[Sixties Fan]

So, what other country's sovereign territory did Jordan occupy?

Israel.

so are all the people living there israeli's with equal rights?

The Arabs and all other non Jews say so. And more and more of the Arabs are applying to become citizens of Israel and not of the "State of Palestine"

Hasbara
"The natural response against anti-Zionism which derives from the hatred of Jewsand the desire to destroy Israel as a sovereign Jewish nation"
did you mean Jew sand?

You just do not like it that Arab, Muslims and Christians are applying from Israeli citizenship and not demanding an end to Israel or that Abbas hurry up that State of Palestine so that they will rush to become citizens of.

tsk tsk tsk

 

[Hollie]

israel tries hard not let the "state of palestine" exist

Actually, you have that backwards. It seems apparent that the Arabs-Moslems who are masquerading as “Pal’Istanians” have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Statehood would impose responsibilities that they are wholly unable to respond to. The permanent condition of welfare recipient and their status as the poor, aggrieved victim (of their own ineptitude and incompetence), would quickly vanish if they were to be held accountable for the civil affairs of government.

Although, “Pal'istanian” statehood would be an interesting experiment in just how quickly Arabs-Moslems could dismantle their new found “statehood”. The first rocket fired at Israel from the state of Islamic terrorist’istan would be an act of war. Even the talking heads at the UN would have a difficult time making excuses for an act of war. There would be no reason for a subsequent reprisal from Israel to be met with a flurry of pointless UN “condemnations”.

Maybe steal an opinion from Juan Cole?

 

[fanger]

your opinion seems to be a copy/paste from Juan kerr

 

[fanger]

israel tries hard not let the "state of palestine" exist

Actually, you have that backwards. It seems apparent that the Arabs-Moslems who are masquerading as “Pal’Istanians” have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Statehood would impose responsibilities that they are wholly unable to respond to. The permanent condition of welfare recipient and their status as the poor, aggrieved victim (of their own ineptitude and incompetence), would quickly vanish if they were to be held accountable for the civil affairs of government.

Although, “Pal'istanian” statehood would be an interesting experiment in just how quickly Arabs-Moslems could dismantle their new found “statehood”. The first rocket fired at Israel from the state of Islamic terrorist’istan would be an act of war. Even the talking heads at the UN would have a difficult time making excuses for an act of war. There would be no reason for a subsequent reprisal from Israel to be met with a flurry of pointless UN “condemnations”.

Maybe steal an opinion from Juan Cole?

Samson apparently derived his strength by his hair, israel derives it's strength from it's horse USA, that strength will one day be taken away, what would poor israel do then?

 

[Hollie]

your opinion seems to be a copy/paste from Juan kerr

You’re befuddled. I understand that. However, acts of war perpetrated by some future/imagined “State of Gaza’istan” could not be legitimately protected or excused. A response by Israel would be completely in accord with international norms.

What can you cut and paste from Juan Cole in response?

 

[Hollie]

israel tries hard not let the "state of palestine" exist

Actually, you have that backwards. It seems apparent that the Arabs-Moslems who are masquerading as “Pal’Istanians” have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Statehood would impose responsibilities that they are wholly unable to respond to. The permanent condition of welfare recipient and their status as the poor, aggrieved victim (of their own ineptitude and incompetence), would quickly vanish if they were to be held accountable for the civil affairs of government.

Although, “Pal'istanian” statehood would be an interesting experiment in just how quickly Arabs-Moslems could dismantle their new found “statehood”. The first rocket fired at Israel from the state of Islamic terrorist’istan would be an act of war. Even the talking heads at the UN would have a difficult time making excuses for an act of war. There would be no reason for a subsequent reprisal from Israel to be met with a flurry of pointless UN “condemnations”.

Maybe steal an opinion from Juan Cole?

Samson apparently derived his strength by his hair, israel derives it's strength from it's horse USA, that strength will one day be taken away, what would poor israel do then?

Let me help with your befuddlement. What role did the Great Satan™ play in the various wars of aggression waged and lost by Islamics in the past against Israel.

Troll Juan Coles site and steal what you can.

 

[fanger]

little Satan™ also known as "that shitty little country" will bite off more than they can chew pretty soon

 

[Hollie]

little Satan™ also known as "that shitty little country" will bite off more than they can chew pretty soon

So, you agree. Your earlier stuttering and mumbling was pointless and ill-conceived.

 

[fanger]

you started this breath holding, foot stamping
Temper Tantrum

 

[Hollie]

you started this breath holding, foot stamping saga

I corrected your false claims. There’s no need to hold your breath and stomp your feet. Learn from your mistakes.

Can’t find anything to steal from Juan Cole in rebuttal?