Israel destroyed the international American school

[toomuchtime_]

your link goes to Lillian Goldman Law Library not to any Hamas document, I call BS

It is the law library of the Yale Law School.

 

[Marc39]

got a link for that quote, or is it your own?

The Hamas Charter is readily available.

The israeli translation is widely available, thats why I asked if you had a link

You don't even realize that Israeli and Jew are not interchangeable. LOL There are Israeli Arabs and Muslims.

Too funny, but, in the end, too sad.

 

[P F Tinmore]

got a link for that quote, or is it your own?

The Hamas Charter is readily available.

It is used by Israel but not Hamas.

 

[toomuchtime_]

your link goes to Lillian Goldman Law Library not to any Hamas document, I call BS

Senior British diplomat and former British ambassador to the UN Sir Jeremy Greenstock stated in early 2009 that the Hamas charter was "drawn up by a Hamas-linked imam some [twenty] years ago and has never been adopted since Hamas was elected as the Palestinian government in 2006". Greenstock also stated that Hamas is not intent on the destruction of Israel.[57] Finally, according to investigations by Israeli daily newspaper The Jerusalem Post in 2006, representatives of Hamas in Beirut, Damascus and London had intended to rewrite the charter. Azzam Tamimi, Director of the London-based Institute of Islamic Political Thinking, told the newspaper in a telephone interview: "All the madness from the Protocols of Elders of Zion and the conspiracy theory must be eradicated. It should never have been there in the first place"

Hamas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And yet it has not been modified, so one must question Greenstock's and Tamini's spin on the Covenant.

 

[toomuchtime_]

got a link for that quote, or is it your own?

The Hamas Charter is readily available.

It is used by Israel but not Hamas.

But if the Hamas Charter didn't accurately represent Hamas' views, they could disavow it or modify it, but since they haven't it is hard to believe it is not an accurate representation of their views and intentions.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Hamas Charter is readily available.

It is used by Israel but not Hamas.

But if the Hamas Charter didn't accurately represent Hamas' views, they could disavow it or modify it, but since they haven't it is hard to believe it is not an accurate representation of their views and intentions.

Hamas has not adopted this as their charter and cannot amend it. They have spoken about it but I do not recall seeing it in the US media.

 

[Marc39]

It is used by Israel but not Hamas.

But if the Hamas Charter didn't accurately represent Hamas' views, they could disavow it or modify it, but since they haven't it is hard to believe it is not an accurate representation of their views and intentions.

Hamas has not adopted this as their charter and cannot amend it. They have spoken about it but I do not recall seeing it in the US media.

Don't make shit up, again. You know less than nothing.

The Hamas Charter governs Hamas and represents their views of the destruction of Israel and genocide of Jews.

End of story.

 

[Marc39]

got a link for that quote, or is it your own?

The Hamas Charter is readily available.

It is used by Israel but not Hamas.

Don't make shit up, again. The Hamas Charter forms the foundation of Hamas thoughts, words and deeds.

 

[Shogun]

Anyone else hearing the punchline of a zionist translation? How did the last joke go: How do you turn "zionism into the sea" into "jews into the sea"? Hire a zionist translator!

 

[Marc39]

Anyone else hearing the punchline of a zionist translation? How did the last joke go: How do you turn "zionism into the sea" into "jews into the sea"? Hire a zionist translator!

You can't even tell us what Zionism is, stoner. You're brain-dead, which is genetic.

 

[toomuchtime_]

It is used by Israel but not Hamas.

But if the Hamas Charter didn't accurately represent Hamas' views, they could disavow it or modify it, but since they haven't it is hard to believe it is not an accurate representation of their views and intentions.

Hamas has not adopted this as their charter and cannot amend it. They have spoken about it but I do not recall seeing it in the US media.

It was adopted by the founders of Hamas, Yassin, Rantisi and Taha, in August 1988 and has never been amended or disavowed by the Hamas leadership since. It is as much a declaration of the principles and purpose of Hamas as the Declaration of Independence is for the United States. Clearly the leaders of Hamas are not ashamed of what's written in the Charter, so how can you be a supporter of Hamas and yet be ashamed of what it stands for?

 

[Shogun]

Anyone else hearing the punchline of a zionist translation? How did the last joke go: How do you turn "zionism into the sea" into "jews into the sea"? Hire a zionist translator!

You can't even tell us what Zionism is, stoner. You're brain-dead, which is genetic.

oh i'm QUITE SURE you believe in genetic inferiority, jew. QUITE sure.

 

[Marc39]

Anyone else hearing the punchline of a zionist translation? How did the last joke go: How do you turn "zionism into the sea" into "jews into the sea"? Hire a zionist translator!

You can't even tell us what Zionism is, stoner. You're brain-dead, which is genetic.

oh i'm QUITE SURE you believe in genetic inferiority, jew. QUITE sure.

You have such low self-esteem, you aren't even embarrassed not to know what Zionism even is, stoner. Your genetics are pathetic. Go away.

 

[P F Tinmore]

But if the Hamas Charter didn't accurately represent Hamas' views, they could disavow it or modify it, but since they haven't it is hard to believe it is not an accurate representation of their views and intentions.

Hamas has not adopted this as their charter and cannot amend it. They have spoken about it but I do not recall seeing it in the US media.

It was adopted by the founders of Hamas, Yassin, Rantisi and Taha, in August 1988 and has never been amended or disavowed by the Hamas leadership since. It is as much a declaration of the principles and purpose of Hamas as the Declaration of Independence is for the United States. Clearly the leaders of Hamas are not ashamed of what's written in the Charter, so how can you be a supporter of Hamas and yet be ashamed of what it stands for?

Hamas’ leaders are not of a single mind. They include both fiery radicals who dismiss any suggestion of co-existence with Israel and moderates whose views differ little from those of Abbas, a Fatah leader who is considered a moderate. But over the months and years preceding January’s elections, the center of gravity within the group’s thinking had unmistakably shifted. Senior officials repeatedly signaled that Hamas is open to changing its policy in favor of a long-term peaceful accommodation with Israel; that it is willing to take concrete steps toward this goal, provided that Israel reciprocates; and that it would seriously consider moving even further given the right political circumstances.

On more than one occasion, Hamas’ chief representative in Lebanon, Usama Hamdan, has outlined a stance toward the conflict with Israel which, according to an ICG report (Enter Hamas, 1/06), “many who study Hamas consider [to be] its emerging consensus.” In an interim agreement, Hamas and Israel would conclude a comprehensive armistice in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders. After a period of confidence-building, a formal agreement could be concluded. “Hamas is clear in terms of [both] the historical solution and an interim solution,” Hamdan said. “We are ready for both: the borders of 1967, a state, elections and [a peace] agreement after ten to fifteen years of building trust.”

Yet in almost every case, the U.S. media failed to broadcast these signals. For instance, four months before the elections, a moderate Hamas candidate representing Nablus, Mohammed Ghazal, told Reuters (9/21/05) that the group could change its 1988 charter calling for Israel’s destruction and that it was open to negotiating with Israel. “The charter is not the Koran,” Ghazal said. “Historically, we believe all Palestine belongs to Palestinians, but we’re talking now about reality, about political solutions. . . . The realities are different.” If Israel reached a stage where it felt able to talk to Hamas, Ghazal said, “I don’t think there will be a problem of negotiating with the Israelis.” (Less than a week after Ghazal’s comments, Israeli soldiers raided his apartment and arrested him—AP, 9/27/05.)

Nixed Signals

There but not reported.

 

[Shogun]

You can't even tell us what Zionism is, stoner. You're brain-dead, which is genetic.

oh i'm QUITE SURE you believe in genetic inferiority, jew. QUITE sure.

You have such low self-esteem, you aren't even embarrassed not to know what Zionism even is, stoner. Your genetics are pathetic. Go away.

oh so NOW you are a psychiatrist now, eh jew?

nice second sentence, by the way.. having troubles translating without clearing your throat, jew?

go tell another genetic joke while looking past that giant boat of a nose on your face, jew.

 

[Marc39]

oh i'm QUITE SURE you believe in genetic inferiority, jew. QUITE sure.

You have such low self-esteem, you aren't even embarrassed not to know what Zionism even is, stoner. Your genetics are pathetic. Go away.

oh so NOW you are a psychiatrist now, eh jew?

nice second sentence, by the way.. having troubles translating without clearing your throat, jew?

go tell another genetic joke while looking past that giant boat of a nose on your face, jew.

Stoner, your inferior genetics are an embarrassment. Go away and do everyone a favor.

 

[Marc39]

Hamas has not adopted this as their charter and cannot amend it. They have spoken about it but I do not recall seeing it in the US media.

It was adopted by the founders of Hamas, Yassin, Rantisi and Taha, in August 1988 and has never been amended or disavowed by the Hamas leadership since. It is as much a declaration of the principles and purpose of Hamas as the Declaration of Independence is for the United States. Clearly the leaders of Hamas are not ashamed of what's written in the Charter, so how can you be a supporter of Hamas and yet be ashamed of what it stands for?

Hamas’ leaders are not of a single mind. They include both fiery radicals who dismiss any suggestion of co-existence with Israel and moderates whose views differ little from those of Abbas, a Fatah leader who is considered a moderate. But over the months and years preceding January’s elections, the center of gravity within the group’s thinking had unmistakably shifted. Senior officials repeatedly signaled that Hamas is open to changing its policy in favor of a long-term peaceful accommodation with Israel; that it is willing to take concrete steps toward this goal, provided that Israel reciprocates; and that it would seriously consider moving even further given the right political circumstances.

On more than one occasion, Hamas’ chief representative in Lebanon, Usama Hamdan, has outlined a stance toward the conflict with Israel which, according to an ICG report (Enter Hamas, 1/06), “many who study Hamas consider [to be] its emerging consensus.” In an interim agreement, Hamas and Israel would conclude a comprehensive armistice in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders. After a period of confidence-building, a formal agreement could be concluded. “Hamas is clear in terms of [both] the historical solution and an interim solution,” Hamdan said. “We are ready for both: the borders of 1967, a state, elections and [a peace] agreement after ten to fifteen years of building trust.”

Yet in almost every case, the U.S. media failed to broadcast these signals. For instance, four months before the elections, a moderate Hamas candidate representing Nablus, Mohammed Ghazal, told Reuters (9/21/05) that the group could change its 1988 charter calling for Israel’s destruction and that it was open to negotiating with Israel. “The charter is not the Koran,” Ghazal said. “Historically, we believe all Palestine belongs to Palestinians, but we’re talking now about reality, about political solutions. . . . The realities are different.” If Israel reached a stage where it felt able to talk to Hamas, Ghazal said, “I don’t think there will be a problem of negotiating with the Israelis.” (Less than a week after Ghazal’s comments, Israeli soldiers raided his apartment and arrested him—AP, 9/27/05.)

Nixed Signals

There but not reported.

Hamas is Arabic for Islamic Resistance Movement. Who do you think they're resisting, moron? Hint: Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

It was adopted by the founders of Hamas, Yassin, Rantisi and Taha, in August 1988 and has never been amended or disavowed by the Hamas leadership since. It is as much a declaration of the principles and purpose of Hamas as the Declaration of Independence is for the United States. Clearly the leaders of Hamas are not ashamed of what's written in the Charter, so how can you be a supporter of Hamas and yet be ashamed of what it stands for?

Hamas’ leaders are not of a single mind. They include both fiery radicals who dismiss any suggestion of co-existence with Israel and moderates whose views differ little from those of Abbas, a Fatah leader who is considered a moderate. But over the months and years preceding January’s elections, the center of gravity within the group’s thinking had unmistakably shifted. Senior officials repeatedly signaled that Hamas is open to changing its policy in favor of a long-term peaceful accommodation with Israel; that it is willing to take concrete steps toward this goal, provided that Israel reciprocates; and that it would seriously consider moving even further given the right political circumstances.

On more than one occasion, Hamas’ chief representative in Lebanon, Usama Hamdan, has outlined a stance toward the conflict with Israel which, according to an ICG report (Enter Hamas, 1/06), “many who study Hamas consider [to be] its emerging consensus.” In an interim agreement, Hamas and Israel would conclude a comprehensive armistice in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders. After a period of confidence-building, a formal agreement could be concluded. “Hamas is clear in terms of [both] the historical solution and an interim solution,” Hamdan said. “We are ready for both: the borders of 1967, a state, elections and [a peace] agreement after ten to fifteen years of building trust.”

Yet in almost every case, the U.S. media failed to broadcast these signals. For instance, four months before the elections, a moderate Hamas candidate representing Nablus, Mohammed Ghazal, told Reuters (9/21/05) that the group could change its 1988 charter calling for Israel’s destruction and that it was open to negotiating with Israel. “The charter is not the Koran,” Ghazal said. “Historically, we believe all Palestine belongs to Palestinians, but we’re talking now about reality, about political solutions. . . . The realities are different.” If Israel reached a stage where it felt able to talk to Hamas, Ghazal said, “I don’t think there will be a problem of negotiating with the Israelis.” (Less than a week after Ghazal’s comments, Israeli soldiers raided his apartment and arrested him—AP, 9/27/05.)

Nixed Signals

There but not reported.

Hamas is Arabic for Islamic Resistance Movement. Who do you think they're resisting, moron? Hint: Israel.

Congratulations, you got something right!

 

[Marc39]

There but not reported.

Hamas is Arabic for Islamic Resistance Movement. Who do you think they're resisting, moron? Hint: Israel.

Congratulations, you got something right!

And, you pwned yourself, dopey.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas is Arabic for Islamic Resistance Movement. Who do you think they're resisting, moron? Hint: Israel.

Congratulations, you got something right!

And, you pwned yourself, dopey.

Hamas resists Israel's occupation of their land which is something they have the legal right to do.