Israel and the Promised Land.

[dpr112yme]

How can someone say, I love God whom they cannot see when they can't love their own mothers whom they can see?

And for this reason, perhaps, is why God has said that a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife and they two shall become one. God allows room for men and women to not be 'burdened' by their parents throughout their whole lives. Seeking freedom from parents, God has provided a way.

But was Muhammad even married?

I don't know too much about Muhammad, but did his mother pass away into sleep before Muhammad became the prophet Islam is calling him today?

 

[dpr112yme]

Did God call Muhammad out from his people to form a new faith, just as God called out Abram from his people, while Muhammad was still unwed with no wife to go along with him?

Did God ask Muhammad to separate from his mother 'unlawfully' according to God's Own Laws?

Wouldn't God ONLY call those who are separated from their mother and father through legal ways, marriage, to form an independent lineage?

 

[dpr112yme]

The faith that God formed with and through Abram, then later Abraham, was a different faith which Abram's parents were practicing. If Abram had never been married, hence separated from his mother and father, God could never have called Abram out of his parents' home and place.

And also remember that the first man/woman sexual union occurred after the man was driven from the Garden.

Genesis 3:20
20And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

Genesis 3:23-24
23Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. 24So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
Genesis 4:1-2
And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. 2And she again bare his brother Abel.

 

[dpr112yme]

There is no mention of any children before Cain.

So how were there any people in the land towards the east of The Garden where Cain had to himself a wife?

16And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.

The Descendants of Cain

17And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch. 18And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech. 19And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. 20And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle. 21And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ. 22And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.

23And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.

24If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.

 

[dpr112yme]

Whatever the case may be, the point is that Cain and Abel were birthed AFTER the fall of man, not before. And the 'knowing' of Adam to Eve occurred AFTER the fall, not before.

Although the process of procreation is a blessing from God, Cain and Abel were not so blessed in the sense we think of when we have new born babies come into this world.

Abel was murdered by his own biological brother, Cain was driven out of his home territory lest he be killed or kill more. Cain becomes a person who needs to be avenged 7 fold.. etc etc etc..

Today, people bless their children by allowing them to do whatever they feel to do or want to do.

 

[dpr112yme]

And then the Church of God says that this way of child upbringing is more 'loving' than the Truth of The Word of God. Acceptance, they say, will lead the children to learn that their parents love them.

But the Holy Bible talks about what 'hate' is.

Proverbs 13:24

"He that....hateth his son: but he that loveth him......"

Proverbs 13:24 Whoever spares the rod hates their children, but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them.

 

[dpr112yme]

If a male parent to a 'son' is too tenderhearted to discipline his child(ren), the parent is raising children who will also be too tenderhearted to discipline their own children. And when people become too tenderhearted, the non-tenderhearted ones will come in and invade the land and make them all into slaves.

The entire human population is not made up of 'tender hearted' people.

To instill disciplinary attitudes into children will prevent them from being 'taken over' by others who will show physical actions upon them. If a nation becomes tender hearted, where will the soldiers and fighters be; for the nation or even for their neighborhoods and family's welfare?

And only after parents are seen by their children to be able to defend 'righteous' matters, will the children begin learning what is righteous and what is not righteous.

 

[dpr112yme]

If a person can 'reason' with their enemies to be cooperative and loving and understanding, then maybe the 'reasonable' methods of being 'grounded, restricted, timed out, etc...' would work in the real life scenario where wolves desire to devour the sheep.

This world, and all that is in it, is a fight for souls. What happens after falling asleep in the grave is much more long lasting and important that what happens in the short years we live upon the earth.

 

[dpr112yme]

So, if a person does not know about people such as Cain and Abel and the driving out of the man from The Garden, they will be taught by wolves in sheep's clothing to live in a way which, not only hurts themselves, but also the safety of the Nation they are living in.

 

[dpr112yme]

And so basically, if a person is tenderhearted, too tenderhearted, their welfare and safety are in the hands of others.

But as seen by evidence, men who are pushed and tried for too long in an oppressive manner to themselves, will have their male instincts take over to have them fight back against their oppressors. But this occurs only after the man is being overly oppressed in a free society.

Otherwise, if the men are in a contained environment, their natural male instincts will free itself, while in a highly secured place where he will most likely be out numbered.


To defend righteous matters before the person is put into a controlled environment, is much more productive to all and not only to himself. This is seen also in a reversed way. Criminals who are free to exercise their criminal behavior and defenses, become stronger and stronger.

But if you practice righteousness, Righteousness will prevail.

 

[dpr112yme]

No one should say that The Holy Bible is good and yet not accept what The Holy Bible says as far as receiving and doing good in matters.

 

[dpr112yme]

There was once a place where 2 men lived. The place was crowded with people but 2 men lived within it. The first man spoke peace and God and love. The second man didn't speak peace nor God nor love.

Each day the 2 men would be out and about the place they lived in. The first man spoke of peace, of God and love and the second man walked about doing his normal ordinary daily duties.

One day the place was invaded by terrorists. The whole place was in a standstill. Noone could move because of the fear. The 2 men went out to meet the terrorists.

The firs man spoke of peace and of God and love. The second man watched as did the whole place. The terrorists did not appreciate the first man speaking of peace, of God and of love. And so, they jumped into their vehicles and took off.

The place began to be at ease since the terrorists had left. The first man and the second man went about life doing what they normally did. The first man speaking of peace, of God and of love. The second man doing his normal ordinary daily duties.

Some time later, there was a report of another terrorist attack. So the 2 men gathered up again, went to the terrorists and began the dialogue. The first man spoke of peace, of God and of love. The second man watched, this time with not so many people of the place. The terrorists did not appreciate the first man's speaking of peace and of God and love. The second man watched as they jumped into their vehicles and took off.

This happened several times, over and over.

Who, in the end, would be justified as the one who was peaceful, Godly and loving?

 

[dpr112yme]

Here is my opinion:

It is the duty of each man to be responsible for his own. If each man is responsible for his own; including but not limited to: households, lands, property, monetary, etc... then I would assume that he who was more dutiful in his responsibilities would be the one who would be justified as; Peaceful, Godly and Loving.

When people neglect to do their duties, the other people falter.


It is the duty of Law Enforcers to enforce Law with the requirements of the Law in which they are upholding. All else would be vain.


They shouldn't expect to be paid with a pay check if they are not doing their duties, should they?

 

[dpr112yme]

And I do believe that all positions in Government, Federal or State or Local, are job seats rather than Monarchial lineages.

And it is for this reason why the U.S. Constitution has made it clear that the Government is of the People, for the People AND by the People.

Hence, leaving room for the ideas of 'freedom' to be investigated and participated in.

 

[dpr112yme]

DID the majority of the People of the U.S. want certain laws to be in effect in the Land which are in effect in the Land today? Strange concept of how it could NOT be so....

If seen from this light, that the U.S. did uphold the desires of the majority voice of Americans, then it would be those who have not received word nor notice that it truly is the 'desire' of the majority voice in America. To the which, then, the minority voice should respect.


And who or what is going to make these things clear to all of those who are Citizens of America. So that proper respect can be given to the majority voice to let their advancements be met.

Because without proper information, these sorts of things will only lead to factions between the people of the Majority and Minority voices, although both voices are American Citizens.

To keep peace in the land, people cannot be put against one another because of a lack of information being provided to one class. To withhold this sort of public information could be considered, conspiracy.

 

[dpr112yme]

And in a free run Government, being conspired against, is not a free thing anyone should 'have to' receive.


To be very honest : Do YOU know if most of the Americans wanted these in effect laws to be in effect?

Because the solution to every battle against moral and ethical agendas, such as same gendered restrooms and such, could be very easily remedied by sharing, with the minority voices, that the majority of the voices in America desires such. And by doing so, will free up the people in the Minority voices, to seek other places, if they should desire.


People should have the right to be informed on what kind of populace they are going to be living amongst. Sharing this kind of information will allow for people to prepare for their own future welfare instead of being blind sided when and after it hits.

And 'beating around the bush' will not help anyone who desires to know so they can choose if they want to be a part of it or not. No one has to be forced to go to nor be a part of any venue they do not wish to partake in.


If people desire their family's safety OVER the world's sharing of love with one another, they are free to do so.

 

[dpr112yme]

Besides, these 'people' who are feeling as if they are being 'left out'. Who are they and why do THEY not have parents who they can turn to for advice and help? Why is Government trying to be a parent to these 'people'?


It really really surely cannot be those who are ashamed of their sexuality.....

Confident people don't need others to speak for them.

And besides.. why do they feel as if they need the entire nation to accept their private bedroom escapades? And how in God's Earth, are strangers from non family members getting involved with private family matters?

Just because you run a muti-million dollar business or corporation does not mean that you have the right to tell private family members how to live and how to properly conduct their lives in their private homes.

Soon, they may even go as far as saying their cooking stinks and is unfit to be eaten. And so it will become a matter up for the Supreme Court to hear.

You do know that not everybody enjoys being around the things a certain household may. That will leave room for 'not being compliant' with your neighbors to be addressed.

 

[dpr112yme]

So, again, who are these people, whom the majority of the voices in America, is trying to support?

Interesting.. I guess.

I can short sightedly see what could happen. The military, for one, could suffer from the loss of less testosterone men enlisting. But may gain from men with a mixture of 'being' undutiful to their testosterone enlisting. A mixture of women and men in military could lead to understandings on how to be more feminine and more masculine, depending on who is becoming which. Leaders in State would be a representation of Leaders of Nation. Judicial Processes could be less sentencing and more allowing, for the criminals' needs to be and feel accepted and loved. And from this acceptance and love, they will learn that they can get better.. which would be good. And so forth and so on.

And as the Nation prays to God, He will hear from Heaven and keep the Land protected.

Which He might do, as the people in the Nation learn how to do what they want to learn. Leaving the safety of the Nation wholly in The Hands of God. And so with prayers from the Nation, God will keep the safety of the Nation in His Hands. And if people stop praying, God will still have the Nation in His Hands. And God will keep a Nation safe as long and after the Nation is in His Hands. So kind of like a rededication of the Land to God. They did this from the very beginning and now there will be more people to correct into the right ways of God. Which opens the door for evangelism to occur again to go and save the lost sheep of Israel in America. With many more ways and faiths in America than ever had been.

 

[dpr112yme]

Okay, this is fine and dandy. But how to the evangelizers feel about being part of this idea of evangelizing in dangerous territory? Evangelizing in certain Muslim clad towns in America has proven very detrimental. Even so that a certain city in Michigan is now mostly Muslim Clerics.

And so these Evangelizers are going to put themselves in lines of danger? Rocks being thrown at them and bottles and etc.... to go in and rescue those who don't want to walk to safety on their own all the while as the Government defends their right to be in those territories?

What the heck ?? Why the Federal's necessity to accept people's personal sexual desires? I don't want to see them naked and having sex.. Can I have the right to not see them having sex, please?