Islam's European Conquest: Is America Next?

[actsnoblemartin]

this is an excellent post, im not surprised most had their heads up their ass a.k.a. ignored it

Conclusion

The nightmare must end. Sharia oppresses the citizens of Islamic countries. Islam must reform, but the legal hierarchy in Islamic nations will not do this because the judges and legal scholars understand the cost: many passages in the Quran and the hadith must be rejected, and this they cannot do. After all, the Quran came down directly from Allah through Gabriel, so says traditional theology. So how can Islam reform? But reform it must. It can start by rewriting classical fiqh (interpretations of law). Again, though, that would mean leaving behind the Quran and Muhammad's example. How can the legal hierarchy in Islamic nations do this?

In contrast, the West has undergone the Enlightenment or the Age of Reason (c. 1600—1800+), so western law has been injected with a heavy dose of reason. Also, the New Testament tempers excessive punishments. At least when Christianity reformed (c. 1400—1600), the reformers went back to the New Testament, which preaches peace and love. So religion and reason in the West permit justice to be found more readily—the Medieval Church is not foundational to Christianity; only Jesus and the New Testament are.

Can Islamic countries benefit from an Enlightenment that may deny the Quran and the hadith? This seems impossible. Islamic law threatens Muslims with death if they criticize Muhammad and the Quran, not to mention denying them.

Since Islamic law cannot be reformed without doing serious damage to original and authentic Islam—the one taught by Muhammad—then a second plan must be played out. Sharia must never spread around the world. At least that much is clear and achievable. The hard evidence in this article demonstrates beyond doubt that sharia does not benefit any society, for it contains too many harsh rules and punishments.

One of the most tragic and under—reported occurrences in the West in recent years is the existence of a sharia court in Canada. Muslims are pushing for a sharia divorce courting Australia as well. Having a court of arbitration if it is based on western law and legal theory is legitimate, but sharia does not hold to this standard. Whether sharia is imposed gradually or rapidly, Canada should promptly shut down any sharia court, and Australia should never allow one. Such a court should never be permitted in the US, the rest of the West, or anywhere else in the world that is battling Islam.

It is true that the Enlightenment teaches tolerance, but it also teaches critical thinking and reasoning. Sharia cannot stand up under scrutiny. It is intolerant and excessive, and Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics teaches the West that excess is never just.

Thankfully, the province of Quebec, Canada, has forbidden sharia. This is the right initiative.

Sharia ultimately degrades society and diminishes freedom.


Supplemental material:

In private emails to me or on websites, Muslim apologists (defenders) claim that the Islamic way of dealing with vices is superior to the western way, even in Islam's punishments like flogging and stoning. It is true that the West is filled with decadence, but are Islamic countries pure and pristine through and through, as these Muslim apologists imply? To anyone whose mind has not been clouded by a lifetime of devotion to Islam, the answer to this rhetorical question is obvious. Alcohol and other intoxicants and gambling serve as test cases.

This article says that Bahrain, an island and independent sate that is connected to Saudi Arabia by a causeway, provides a 'breathing lung' for Saudis because this Islamic island allows the free flow of alcohol and a night life. The words 'breathing lung' in Bahrain mean that Saudi Arabia suffocates people. On the weekends an average of 40,000 cars line up to cross the bridge.

This article discusses the smuggling of alcohol in Saudi Arabia and says:

"Western analysts note that alcohol smuggling of the magnitude underway in Saudi Arabia —— perhaps tens of millions of dollars' worth of illegal merchandise annually —— would likely involve the complicity of Saudi customs agents and perhaps a higher—level patron."

This article reveals how Iranians get around the official ban on alcohol, like beer and vodka and other intoxicants, like opium. A black market has sprung up—just like the one in America during Prohibition.

This article says that even though the Taliban, the tyrants who formerly ruled Afghanistan, outlawed the growth of poppies, which are the source of opium, the leaders of the Taliban may have profited from the drug trade. The new and democratic government has a hard time keeping this drug under control.

This article says that authorities in Turkey threaten to imprison online gamblers, and this page links to a report (scroll to the second one) that discusses how Turkey must deal with the problem of monetary interest, alcohol, and gambling. It is revealing to see how Muslim religious leaders try to squirm out of Quranic laws against interest, in order to help Islamic financial institutions make money.

The purpose of these links is not to condemn Islamic countries or to assert that the West is better than they are. Facts say that the West has many problems. Rather, the purpose is to demonstrate that Islamic countries have their share of problems as well. This means that Islamic countries are also decadent. This means that Islamic punishments do not work entirely (except by scare tactics), but they can drive the sin or crime underground.

on "Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies"


American Thinker: Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies

 

[Sunni Man]

The west will someday be ruled by Sharia Law.

Maybe not in my life time, but it will happen.

 

[Intense]

The west will someday be ruled by Sharia Law.

Maybe not in my life time, but it will happen.

There are the 666 Prophesies. That's not anything to be proud of though, and the cost is condemnation. Get out while you still can.

 

[Sunni Man]

The west will someday be ruled by Sharia Law.

Maybe not in my life time, but it will happen.

There are the 666 Prophesies. That's not anything to be proud of though, and the cost is condemnation. Get out while you still can.

 

[Intense]

The west will someday be ruled by Sharia Law.

Maybe not in my life time, but it will happen.

There are the 666 Prophesies. That's not anything to be proud of though, and the cost is condemnation. Get out while you still can.

Eternal Reward is not about which club You belong to. It's about putting God First in All Things, God, not the Club. You need to study Revelation better, if it pleases you.

 

[Sunni Man]

There are the 666 Prophesies. That's not anything to be proud of though, and the cost is condemnation. Get out while you still can.

Eternal Reward is not about which club You belong to. It's about putting God First in All Things, God, not the Club. You need to study Revelation better, if it pleases you.

Thanks, I studied th Book of Revelations for years.

 

[Intense]

Eternal Reward is not about which club You belong to. It's about putting God First in All Things, God, not the Club. You need to study Revelation better, if it pleases you.

Thanks, I studied th Book of Revelations for years.

Can you clarify the response?

 

[stonewall]

The west will someday be ruled by Sharia Law.

Maybe not in my life time, but it will happen.

This is why Islam must be destroyed.

It's followers cannot change. The religion cannot be reformed.

I am not saying that America must kill Muslims. I don't think that is necessary. But, what is necessary is that we lift the veil. We tell the truth about Islam. What it is.

What Islam is... is a political system. First and foremost that is what it is.

It is not a religion in the sense that Americans accept that term.

It is a way of life. A system of government. A system of laws.

A Muslim is a slave to "Allah".

And, it is not up to Non-Muslims to decide who a moderate is or a so-called radical Muslim. It's impossible for us to do this. And, an unnecessary exercise.

If someone calls themselves a Muslim than we can assume they follow Muhammad and wish to destroy our way of life. They are enemies of America.

If that is not true for a specific Muslim, then it's time to leave your slavery behind.

But, don't blame Non-Muslims for failing to differentiate between you and your co-religionists. Radical-moderate... who cares?

 

[mdn2000]

for all the money the arabs have they are the most under-educated people.

do a search on teachers in saudi arabia, many are from the west and they state that the pupils refuse to do any sort of work in order to learn.

thats why foreigners do most the work,

 

[JW Frogen]

I lived in Saudi Arabia for a time and Wahabi Islam inflicts so many prohibitions on reason and free thought that there are few subjects in the humanities that can actually be openly taught. Forget any real attempt at global history or philosophy, comparative religion or even world literature.

Most Saudis have no hope in hell of understanding the world they live in unless they are the elite class who have access to some education in the West.

Saudi Arabia is the extreme, granted (sort of like the Mississippi of the Islamic world) but other Islamic nations have varying hindrances on reason and free thought.

Egypt recently wiped out the famous pigs of Cairo (who perform a vital garbage destruction role) because of Swine flu, there justification for this judgment, Islamic traditions on the vile nature of the pig.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Not a Saudi but: Sayyid Qutb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[mdn2000]

Not a Saudi but: Sayyid Qutb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crazy. Nasser was a nut, wasn't he the one who attacked Yemen, a very bloody war.